US to India: Back the war and share the loot [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2003-03-12 Thread Sandeep Vaidya
HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---
US offering carrots to India on Iraq
AUNOHITA MOJUMDAR
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003 10:55:52 PM ]
Times of India
NEW DELHI: In an attempt to ensure the Vajpayee government holds its counsel 
when Iraq is attacked, the US is holding out to India the carrot of a major 
role in the post-war reconstruction of that country.

In an interview with The Times of India, US ambassador to India Robert 
Blackwill said, We hope you have a major part to play and we have conveyed 
that at very high levels.

At pains to address New Delhi's fears that the planned invasion of Iraq 
would not disadvantage India economically and politically, President Bush 
has phoned Prime Minister Vajpayee, Secretary of State Powell has spoken to 
external affairs minister Yashwant Sinha and US National Security Adviser 
Condolezza Rice has called up her counterpart, Brajesh Mishra. Blackwill has 
also met Deputy Prime Minister L K Advani, Defence Minister George Fernandes 
and also Mishra in recent days.

Blackwill said India with its very well developed successful norms in civil 
society had a role to play in the construction of civil society in Iraq 
and economic reconstruction.   India, he said, had a comparative 
advantage over many countries because of three factors: Its vital civil 
society, its long term ties with Iraq and the fact that India would be 
welcomed in that situation where not every country would be welcomed. So 
for all those reasons, we hope you have a major part to play and we have 
conveyed that at very high levels, he said.

The ambassador, however, added that detailed discussions on this aspect had 
not yet been held with the Indian government because the US did not want to 
give the impression that it was planning in detail for a situation which 
has not yet happenned.



The US now had a very clear perception of India's substantive and serious 
equities in the region unlike during the 1991 Gulf war, Blackwill said, 
claiming that India itself had also been able to influence US policy to some 
degree.

Before September, in the summer, India was urging the Bush administration 
to take the UN route and to try and deal with Saddam Hussein peacefully... 
and it was one of the nations in the world that the United States listened 
most closely to and we took the UN route. I would just note the confluence 
between the president's speech at the UN on the 12th of September when he 
announced we would seek a UNSC resolution and the fact that he met the 
Indian PM on the same day. So India certainly had influence, no doubt, on 
our decision to go to the UNSC.

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bdn7KI.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^


Iraq: We have no intention of attacking anyone [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-10-17 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

October 17, 2002, New York Times
Iraq States Its Case
By MOHAMMED ALDOURI


After so many years of fear from war, the threat of war and
suffering, the people of Iraq and their government in Baghdad are
eager for peace. We have no intention of attacking anyone, now or in
the future, with weapons of any kind. If we are attacked, we will
surely defend ourselves with all means possible. But bear in mind
that we have no nuclear or biological or chemical weapons, and we
have no intention of acquiring them.

We are not asking the people of the United States or of any member
state of the United Nations to trust in our word, but to send the
weapons inspectors to our country to look wherever they wish
unconditionally. This means unconditional access anywhere, including
presidential sites in accordance with a 1998 signed agreement between
Iraq and the United Nations — an agreement that ensures respect for
Iraq's sovereignty and allows for transparency in the work of the
inspectors. We could never make this claim with such openness if we
did not ourselves know there is nothing to be found.

Still, we continue to read statements by officials of the United
States and the United Kingdom that it is not enough that Hans Blix,
head of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection
Commission, and his team of inspectors have unconditional access.
They say this is because the Iraqi government may be hiding weapons
that will not be found, or is moving weapons from place to place, or
is developing new weapons in roving vans or in underground locations.

The United Nations officials with whom our government has worked on
these matters know that these concerns have no foundation. In
December 1998, when the United Nations weapons inspection team left
Iraq on the orders of Richard Butler, the chief United Nations arms
inspector at the time, it had exhausted all possibilities after seven
years of repeatedly examining all possible sites; only small
discrepancies existed.

It is now widely conceded that Iraq possesses no nuclear weapons and
that we could not develop them without building facilities that could
be spotted by satellite. Since 1999, we have allowed the
International Atomic Energy Agency to visit Iraq. If it wishes, it
can inspect any building anywhere. The agency's inspectors will find
nothing untoward.

Scott Ritter, who led many United Nations inspections, has said that
he questions whether Iraq possesses biological weapons. Mr. Ritter
also has been on CNN in recent months explaining that his inspection
team destroyed plants that could produce chemical weapons. If these
plants were reconstructed, Mr. Blix and his team would quickly find
them out. Building such weapons costs billions of dollars and
requires enormous facilities and huge power sources. The idea that
such projects could be moved around in trucks or stashed away in
presidential palaces stretches the bounds of imagination.

It is my belief that the American people are not aware of this
history because, in my opinion and the opinion of my government, no
American political figure has been seriously interested in discussing
these matters with our government. The United Nations was created in
1945 to provide a forum for nations in conflict to come together to
work out their disagreements. It was designed expressly for the
purpose of making the use of force an absolute last resort.

For more than 11 years, the people of Iraq have suffered under United
Nations economic sanctions, which have been kept in place largely by
American influence. According to statistics compiled by the Iraqi
Ministry of Health, these sanctions have caused the death of more
than 1.7 million of our citizens. The embargo has been so severe that
we have been prevented from importing chemicals needed for our
sewage, water and sanitation facilities.

At the same time, the last three American presidents have stated that
these sanctions could not be lifted as long as our president, Saddam
Hussein, remains the nation's leader.

Iraq is not a threat to its neighbors. It certainly is not a threat
to the United States or any of its interests in the Middle East. Once
the United Nations inspection team comes back into my country and
gets up to speed, I am confident that it will certify that Iraq has
no weapons of mass destruction — be they chemical, biological or
nuclear. Such certification, we hope, will remove the shadow of war
and help restore peace between our nations.


Mohammed Aldouri is the Iraqi ambassador to the United Nations.


_
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: 

RE: War on Iraq: Who Needs It? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-10-11 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

I am not a history student, but some of the arguement made in this article can be 
easily proved to be misleading:
 
 in the second case, there was -- arguably -- a humanitarian disaster in the making 
which only the expulsion of Slobodan Milosevic from Kosovo could avert. 
[Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)] 
 
 
 


HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK 

---

War on Iraq: Who Needs It?

By Robert Skidelsky 


 

The United States wants to remove Saddam Hussein from power; its main allies would be 
content with his disarmament. The United States, therefore, wants to keep the United 
Nations weapons inspectors out of Iraq; its allies want to get them back in. 

To reconcile these aims -- at least formally -- is the point of the intense jockeying 
now going on at the UN. The United States wants a new Security Council resolution so 
drawn up as to make legal the early use of force. France and Russia, while not opposed 
to the use of force as a last resort, want to use existing Security Council 
resolutions to give disarmament a last chance. Britain finds itself between a rock and 
a hard place. It is co-sponsor with the United States of a resolution whose 
not-so-hidden aim is to force out Saddam, while being openly committed to nothing more 
than his regime's disarmament. 

In one sense the maneuvers at the United Nations are a side show. 

The United States will go ahead with regime change whatever the UN decides. So the 
unenviable choice for America's allies is either to accede to the U.S. demand for a 
new UN resolution that brings about regime change in Iraq -- probably by war -- or 
to acquiesce in unilateral U.S. action to remove Saddam. No other choice is open, 
because there is no force capable of stopping the United States. This is the reality 
of a world with only one superpower.

The U.S. draft resolution -- at the time of writing -- makes eight demands on Iraq. 
Under extreme pressure Iraq might be expected to accept seven of them, but not the one 
which gives the inspection teams the right to declare for the purposes of this 
resolution ... ground and air-transit corridors which shall be enforced by UN security 
forces, i.e. which allows U.S. forces to enter Iraq where and when they want. 

The technique of demands drawn up to be rejected rather than accepted is not new. On 
July 23, 1914, Austro-Hungary presented a 10-point ultimatum to Serbia following the 
assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo, giving it 48 hours to 
reply. Serbia accepted nine points, but not unexpectedly rejected the 10th, which 
would have allowed Austrian officials to conduct the murder investigation on Serbian 
territory unhindered. The Austrian invasion of Serbia followed a few days later, and 
led to World War I. 

A more recent example, also involving Serbia, was the so-called Rambouillet accord of 
March 20, 1999. In order to enforce peace and self-government in Kosovo, NATO forces 
were to enjoy free and ... unimpeded access throughout the Federal Republic of 
Yugoslavia. U.S. bombing started four days after Serbia's rejection of this 
implementing provision.

Monstrous though Saddam Hussein's regime is, there is much less justification for 
forcing a war on Iraq today than there was for going to war in 1914 or 1999. In the 
first case, the existence of Serbia did pose a threat to the survival of 
Austro-Hungary; in the second case, there was -- arguably -- a humanitarian disaster 
in the making which only the expulsion of Slobodan Milosevic from Kosovo could avert. 

Today, there exists no legal or security case for a pre-emptive U.S. attack on Iraq. 
Saddam is not a threat to the United States, though he may be a menace to some of his 
neighbors. He is not an Islamic fundamentalist, and no evidence has been adduced of 
Iraqi involvement in the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001. In any case, effective 
disarmament of the Saddam regime -- a legitimate peace aim following Iraq's expulsion 
from Kuwait -- can be secured by a toughened inspection regime: Even the much-evaded 
inspectorate system in place between 1991 and 1998 succeeded in liquidating most of 
its external military capacity. 

There is a moral argument for removing any regime which oppresses its own people, 
whatever international law says. But it is rather late in the day to come up with this 
in Saddam's case, and in any event, why stop with Iraq? The newly-proclaimed moral 
argument is simply a pretext for a war desired for other reasons. 

Why then is the United States so keen on a war against Iraq? Put to one side President 
George W. Bush's personal motive for finishing Dad's business and vague talk of oil 
interests. These may play some part in the thinking of the Bush administration but 
they are not of its essence. The fundamental reasons seem to be three. 

The first lies in the area of psychological reassurance. The American people

RE: War on Iraq: Who Needs It? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-10-11 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

The fact is that NATO caused a humanitarian disaster of hugh proportions when it 
bombed Yugoslavia in order to dislodge Milosevic.

Sandeep 

-Original Message-
From: putnik1915 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 16:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: War on Iraq: Who Needs It? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Dear Sandeep,

I certainly hope you are not suggesting that there is even a grain of truth
in the statement:

...in the second case, there was -- arguably -- a humanitarian disaster in
the making which only the expulsion of Slobodan Milosevic from Kosovo could
avert.
[Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)]

A more accurate statement would be:

It is unarguably true that to lessen or minimize the death and destruction
in Kosovo and the rest of Yugoslavia, HATO (lead by the brutish US) must be
EXCLUDED from Kosovo.

Cossack

- Original Message -
From: Sandeep Vaidya (LMI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:19
Subject: RE: War on Iraq: Who Needs It? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


 HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
 ---

 I am not a history student, but some of the arguement made in this article
can be easily proved to be misleading:

  in the second case, there was -- arguably -- a humanitarian disaster in
the making which only the expulsion of Slobodan Milosevic from Kosovo could
avert.
 [Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)]





 HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

 ---

 War on Iraq: Who Needs It?

 By Robert Skidelsky




 The United States wants to remove Saddam Hussein from power; its main
allies would be content with his disarmament. The United States, therefore,
wants to keep the United Nations weapons inspectors out of Iraq; its allies
want to get them back in.

 To reconcile these aims -- at least formally -- is the point of the
intense jockeying now going on at the UN. The United States wants a new
Security Council resolution so drawn up as to make legal the early use of
force. France and Russia, while not opposed to the use of force as a last
resort, want to use existing Security Council resolutions to give
disarmament a last chance. Britain finds itself between a rock and a hard
place. It is co-sponsor with the United States of a resolution whose
not-so-hidden aim is to force out Saddam, while being openly committed to
nothing more than his regime's disarmament.

 In one sense the maneuvers at the United Nations are a side show.

 The United States will go ahead with regime change whatever the UN
decides. So the unenviable choice for America's allies is either to accede
to the U.S. demand for a new UN resolution that brings about regime change
in Iraq -- probably by war -- or to acquiesce in unilateral U.S. action to
remove Saddam. No other choice is open, because there is no force capable of
stopping the United States. This is the reality of a world with only one
superpower.

 The U.S. draft resolution -- at the time of writing -- makes eight demands
on Iraq. Under extreme pressure Iraq might be expected to accept seven of
them, but not the one which gives the inspection teams the right to declare
for the purposes of this resolution ... ground and air-transit corridors
which shall be enforced by UN security forces, i.e. which allows U.S.
forces to enter Iraq where and when they want.

 The technique of demands drawn up to be rejected rather than accepted is
not new. On July 23, 1914, Austro-Hungary presented a 10-point ultimatum to
Serbia following the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand at
Sarajevo, giving it 48 hours to reply. Serbia accepted nine points, but not
unexpectedly rejected the 10th, which would have allowed Austrian officials
to conduct the murder investigation on Serbian territory unhindered. The
Austrian invasion of Serbia followed a few days later, and led to World War
I.

 A more recent example, also involving Serbia, was the so-called
Rambouillet accord of March 20, 1999. In order to enforce peace and
self-government in Kosovo, NATO forces were to enjoy free and ...
unimpeded access throughout the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. U.S.
bombing started four days after Serbia's rejection of this implementing
provision.

 Monstrous though Saddam Hussein's regime is, there is much less
justification for forcing a war on Iraq today than there was for going to
war in 1914 or 1999. In the first case, the existence of Serbia did pose a
threat to the survival of Austro-Hungary; in the second case, there was --
arguably -- a humanitarian disaster in the making which only the expulsion
of Slobodan Milosevic from Kosovo could avert.

 Today, there exists no legal or security case for a pre-emptive U.S.
attack on Iraq. Saddam is not a threat to the United States, though he may
be a menace to some of his neighbors. He is not an Islamic fundamentalist,
and no evidence has been

Rambouillet -- Part II [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-10-03 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

US hardline on Iraq leaves full-scale invasion a 'hair-trigger' away
Julian Borger in Washington, Ewen MacAskill, and Ian Black in Brussels
Thursday October 3, 2002
The Guardian

Washington last night revealed its intention to use UN weapons inspections 
as a possible first step towards a military occupation of Iraq by sending in 
troops, sealing off exclusion zones and creating secure corridors 
throughout the country.

In a leaked proposal for a UN resolution drafted by the US with help from 
British officials, the Bush administration is seeking to transform the 
inspections process into a coercive operation. The resolution would place a 
full-scale invasion of Iraq on a hair trigger, authorising UN member states 
to use all necessary means to restore international peace and security if 
Iraq does so much as make an omission in the weapons inventories it presents 
to the security council.

Weapons inspectors would operate out of bases inside Iraq, where they would 
be under the protection of UN troops. UN forces or the forces of a member 
state would enforce no-fly and no-drive zones around a suspected weapons 
site, preventing anything being removed before inspection.

Diplomats at the UN said there was no doubt that US troops would play a 
leading role in any such enforcement, allowing the Pentagon to deploy forces 
inside Iraq even before hostilities got under way.

The release of the draft helped Washington regain momentum in security 
council talks a day after Iraq took the initiative by agreeing to 
inspections under existing UN guidelines. That agreement was welcomed by 
France and Russia, but dismissed as empty by the US and Britain. Jack Straw, 
the foreign secretary, called the existing guidelines defective.

The resolution will be debated over the next few days among the permanent 
five security council members. President George Bush's negotiating position 
was bolstered yesterday when the House of Representatives agreed to a war 
powers resolution handing him open-ended authority to take military action 
against Iraq.

The Senate, where there was tougher opposition to such a blanket 
authorisation, was reported to be moving towards support of the White House 
line.

Under the US draft, security council member states could send their own 
inspectors into Iraq to operate alongside the official UN teams and these 
extra inspectors would have the same rights and protections accorded other 
members of the team. Member states could also recommend to the UN teams 
which sites to search and how to do it. Iraqi officials could be taken out 
of the country, along with their families, for questioning, in order to 
remove the fear of Iraqi government reprisals.

The Iraqi deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz, said there was no need for a 
new resolution and that the existing resolutions were good enough for 
inspectors to do their job.

John Pike, the head of GlobalSecurity.org, a Washington military thinktank, 
said the resolution was worded in such a way that Iraq was almost certain to 
reject it, even if the alternative was invasion.

I could never imagine Iraq agreeing to this. If you're going to be invaded 
you might as well make the invading force shoot their way in. It's the sort 
of proposal meant to be rejected, Mr Pike said.

British officials said the draft represented more of a discussion paper for 
the five permanent members than a formal document to be circulated within 
the full security council. British experts worked alongside their US 
counterparts at the state department in the early stages of its drafting, 
but it was then handed to the White House and the Pentagon, who added some 
of its tougher elements.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said: We are not going to comment until final 
resolutions are published.

But it was clear that London was uneasy with some items in the draft, 
particularly the use of troops to quarantine suspect sites and to guard the 
inspectors' routes to the sites. One British official pointed out that it 
was put within square brackets and could be jettisoned later.

The intention behind the clause, the official said, was to avoid the 
situation under earlier inspection regimes whereby inspectors were coming 
in the front door and kit was moving out the back.

Further anxiety about the US position came from Chris Patten, the EU's 
commissioner for external relations. In a speech in Chicago today hewill 
say: If the US were to fall prey to the temptation to act alone and outside 
the framework of international order, even for the best of motives, it would 
be setting off down a very dangerous path.

Diplomats in New York and Washington said it was clear there was a split 
between the state department and the Bush administration's hawks over how 
far the US should compromise, particularly over the threat of force.

The French have proposed an alternative resolution, which would make 
inspections tougher, but 

None will be allowed to challenge us: Ric [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-09-27 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

None will be allowed to challenge us: Rice
The Hindu, 27 Sept. 2002


Washington Sept 26. The United States intends to keep its military 
superiority in the world and will not allow another Soviet Union to rise to 
challenge that power, a top U.S. administration official has said.

``The U.S. is a very special country in that when we maintain this position 
of military strength that we have now, we do it in support of a balance of 
power that favours freedom and indeed we don't want to do it alone,'' said 
the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice.

``We welcome and hope that there will be military contributions from other 
likeminded states to maintain that balance of power that favours freedom,'' 
she said.

``But if it comes to allowing another adversary to reach military parity 
with the U.S. in the way that the Soviet Union did, no, the U.S. does not 
intend to allow that to happen, because it happens, there will not be a 
balance of power that favours freedom,'' she added.

PTI


_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




THE WORLD MUST STAND BY IRAQ - SAY NO TO BUSH [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-09-19 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

The Times of India Online
Printed from timesofindia.indiatimes.com  Editorial

Sep 19, 2002
LEADER ARTICLE
Say No To Bush


SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN

TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2002  12:00:44 AM ]

THE WORLD MUST STAND BY IRAQ
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN


Here’s a simple quiz to mark the anniversary of 9/11. (a) Who is threatening 
to use aeroplanes to attack civilians and civilian installations like water 
treatment plants and power stations? (b) Who is refusing to rule out using 
nuclear weapons in his ‘holy war’? (c) Who is using television for a 
messianic propaganda campaign justifying this plan-ned terrorism? (d) Who is 
saying his fatwas count for more than international law? The correct answer 
to all these questions is not Osama bin Laden but George W Bush and the US 
administration.


One year after terrorists killed more than 3,000 innocent people in New York 
and Washington, the world is waiting nervously not for another murderous 
strike by Al-Qaida but for the bombs the US plans to drop on the equally 
innocent people of Iraq.


Regardless of the scripted dissension within, the Bush administration’s 
drive to open the Iraqi front in what is wrongly called the ‘War on 
Terrorism’ has crossed the point of no return. Massive US-UK air attacks 
have already taken place at al-Nukhaib, al-Baghdadi and the ‘H-3’ air 
defences in western Iraq. The war is already on.


And if you don’t believe the nukes threat, consider the August 27 interview 
given by the ranking US official on ‘arms control’, John Bolton, to Fuji-TV. 
Question: Is it possible that nuclear weapons will be used against Iraq? 
Bolton: Since there’s no decision on the use of military force, there’s no 
decision on exactly how it would be carried out.’’ Washington says the 
‘crisis’ has been provoked by Saddam Hussein’s failure to allow UN 
inspectors to certify Iraq has rid itself of all proscribed weapons. ‘News’ 
is leaked to scare the world into believing Iraq has nuclear arms. At the 
same time, Mr Bush openly talks about ‘regime change’ as if it were the 
God-given right of the US to decide how the Iraqi people are to be governed.


Even on the weapons issue, the dishonesty of the US stand is self-evident. 
UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution 687 mandates Iraqi disarmament, and 
for more than six years the UN Special Commission (Unscom) and the 
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) visited suspected weapons sites in 
Iraq to ensure compliance. On April 13, 1998, the IAEA certified that Iraq 
had compiled a ‘‘full, final and complete’’ account of its previous nuclear 
projects and that there was no evidence of any prohibited activity. In 
December 1998, Unscom volun-tarily pulled out of Iraq on the eve of the US 
attack codenamed ‘Operation Desert Fox’. In its last month of inspections, 
according to Unscom head Richard Butler, the commission carried out as many 
as 427 inspections and reported Iraqi non- cooperation in only five of 
these. The truth is the US has never been interested in an objective, UN-run 
disarmament programme for Iraq. Washington deliberately pushed the limits of 
Iraqi tolerance by using Unscom inspections for espionage. Rolf Ekeus, a 
former head of Unscom, told Swedish Radio in July 2002 that at times, 
intrusive inspections were deliberately used by the US to create a crisis 
that could possibly form the basis for military action. Scott Ritter — a US 
marine who was part of Unscom and later admitted the CIA used him to spy 
against Iraq — has written that Iraq no longer has chemical and biological 
weapons programmes. ‘‘In all of their inspections, the (Unscom) monitors 
could find no meaningful evidence of Iraqi circumvention of its commitment 
not to reconstitute its biological weapons program’’, he wrote in Arms 
Control Today in June 2000.


Eleven years after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait, the country is subject to 
the tightest regime of economic sanctions ever imposed on any country. 
Despite the so-called ‘smart sanctions’ introduced by UNSC resolution 1409 
in May this year, Iraq’s capacity to provide clean drinking water, 
electricity and sanitation is hampered by US objections to machinery 
imports. If food imports and the public distribution system are disrupted by 
a full-scale US attack, there will be a massive food shortage in Iraq.


Every UN resolution mandating Iraqi compliance with disarmament also 
explicitly states that Iraq’s sovereignty has to be respected. The US 
flouted these resolutions to establish illegal ‘no-fly zones’ over Iraqi 
airspace and has bombed the country hundreds of times in the past dec-ade. 
In March this year, Iraq submitted a list of 19 questions to UN 
secretary-general Kofi Annan. Among these were (i) Can the UN guarantee the 
elimination of the two no-fly zones? (ii) How do you explain the stance of a 
permanent member of the Security Council which openly calls for the invasion 
of 

Heart of smugness [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-07-23 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Heart of smugness 
Unlike Belgium, Britain is still complacently ignoring the gory cruelties of its 
empire 
Maria Misra 
Tuesday July 23, 2002
The Guardian 
So the Belgians are to return to the Heart of Darkness in an attempt finally to 
exorcise their imperial demons. Stung by another book cataloguing the violence and 
misery inflicted by King Leopold's empire on the Congo in the late 19th and early 20th 
century, the state-funded Royal Museum for Central Africa in Brussels has commissioned 
a group of historians to pass authoritative judgment on accusations of genocide: 
forced labour, systematic rape, torture and murder of the Congolese, around 10 million 
of whom are thought to have died as a consequence. 
This is not the first time that the Belgian empire has been singled out for censure. 
Back in the Edwardian era, British humanitarians spilled much ink over its excesses 
and Conrad's novella was corralled into service to show Leopold's Congo as a sort of 
horrific other to Britain's more uplifting colonialism. 
Complacency about Britain's imperial record lingers on. In the post-September 11 orgy 
of self-congratulation about the west's superiority, Blair's former foreign policy 
guru, Robert Cooper, and a host of journalistic flag-wavers were urging us not to be 
ashamed of empire. Cooper insisted empire was as necessary now as it had been in the 
19th century. The British empire was, we were assured, a generally well-intentioned 
attempt to inculcate notions of good government, civilised behaviour and market 
rationality into less well-favoured societies. 
Is such a rosy view of British imperialism justified? Many argue that it is. After 
all, surely the British have less blood on their hands than the French and the 
Belgians? Wasn't the British addiction to the free market a prophylactic against the 
horrors of forced labour? And didn't those peculiar class obsessions make them less 
racist than the rest - silly snobs, but not vicious yobs? And isn't India not only a 
democracy, but, thanks to the British, one with great railways? Perhaps there is a 
kernel of truth in some of this, but there's also much wilful smugness. While the 
complex consequences of colonial economic policy require extended analysis, it is 
possible to dispel more swiftly the myth that the British Empire, unlike King 
Leopold's, was innocent of atrocities. 
It has become a modern orthodoxy that Europe's 20th century was the bloodiest in 
history and that atrocities must be recorded and remembered by society as a whole. But 
while a Black Book of Communism has been compiled and everybody is aware of the 
horrors of nazism, popular historians have been surprisingly uninterested in the dark 
side of the British Empire. There are exceptions, such as Mike Davis's powerful Late 
Victorian Holocausts, but much else still lies buried in the academic literature. 
Davis and others have estimated that there were between 12 and 33 million avoidable 
deaths by famine in India between 1876 and 1908, produced by a deadly combination of 
official callousness and free-market ideology. But these were far from being a purely 
Victorian phenomenon. As late as 1943 around 4 million died in the Bengal famine, 
largely because of official policy. 
No one has even attempted to quantify the casualties caused by state-backed forced 
labour on British-owned mines and plantations in India, Africa and Malaya. But we do 
know that tens of thousands of often conscripted Africans, Indians and Malays - men, 
women and children - were either killed or maimed constructing Britain's imperial 
railways. Also unquantified are the numbers of civilian deaths caused by British 
aerial bombing and gassing of villages in Sudan, Iraq and Palestine in the 1920 and 
1930s. 
Nor was the supposedly peaceful decolonisation of the British Empire without its gory 
cruelties. The hurried partition of the Indian subcontinent brought about a million 
deaths in the ensuing uncontrolled panic and violence. The brutal suppression of the 
Mau Mau and the detention of thousands of Kenyan peasants in concentration camps are 
still dimly remembered, as are the Aden killings of the 1960s. But the massacre of 
communist insurgents by the Scots Guard in Malaya in the 1950s, the decapitation of 
so-called bandits by the Royal Marine Commandos in Perak and the secret bombing of 
Malayan villages during the Emergency remain uninvestigated. 
One might argue that these were simply the unfortunate consequences of the arrival of 
economic and political modernity. But does change have to come so brutally? There are 
plenty of examples of wanton British cruelty to chill the blood even of a hardened 
Belgian. Who, after all, invented the concentration camp but the British? The 
scandalous conditions in British camps during the Boer war, where thousands of women 
and children died of disease and malnutrition, are relatively well known. Who 

Italy to return obelisk from Queen of Sheba's city [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-07-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Italy to return obelisk from Queen of Sheba's city 
By Anne Penketh
20 July 2002
The Italian government has caved in to Ethiopia's increasingly urgent
demands for the return of a historic obelisk in hopes of ending a dispute
that has poisoned relations for decades.

The Axum obelisk has graced a square in central Rome ever since it was
stolen from Ethiopia in 1937 by Mussolini during Italy's brief occupation
before the Second World War.

But despite signing bilateral agreements promising to return the 3,000-year
old granite monument, the Italian government showed no signs of doing so
until the obelisk was badly damaged by lightning in a thunderstorm in May.
Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's colourful junior culture minister,
Vittorio Sgarbi, caused a storm himself last year by saying that the obelisk
was now an Italian naturalised citizen and should stay where it was.
After the lightning strike, he seemed to change his mind, saying: since it
has already been damaged we might as well give it back.

The incident enraged Ethiopia, which accused Italy of failing to properly
protect the obelisk. The thunderstorm smashed the top of the 82-foot high
structure, causing stone pieces to crash to the ground.

Mr Sgarbi had, as recently as last January, contended that Italy should not
give the obelisk back as it would be returning to a war zone where it
risked destruction. He expressed fears that the Ethiopian government would
not be able to protect and restore the monument. However Ethiopia was having
none of it. It galvanised African opinion behind its position at last week's
founding conference of the successor organisation to the Organisation of
African Unity, the African Union.

Richard Pankhurst, the most prominent expert on Ethiopian archaeology, told
the BBC last week that the Italian position was a disgrace.
One feels that the European Union has a rogue state in its midst, said
Professor Pankhurst, who teaches at Addis Ababa university.

Yesterday, the Italian government sought to put an end to the festering
dispute by announcing after a cabinet meeting that it had started procedures
to return the obelisk - stolen from the ancient holy city of Axum.
Detailed plans for the journey have already been worked out, including the
transfer of the monument in parts on American transport planes.

Axum was once the capital of an empire ruled by the Queen of Sheba. Her
successors left grand monuments over their burial sites, and it was the
grandest of these that Mussolini stole to give his empire some of the feel
of the original Roman Empire.

* Pope John Paul added his voice to the growing outrage yesterday over the
desecration of at least 50 graves at a Jewish cemetery in Rome. Police
admitted they had no clear lead as to who was behind the desecration, which
took place in the early hours of Thursday and led to fears of an increase in
anti-Semitism. 

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Why Indian actors won't joke (anymore) [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-07-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


The Times of India Online
Why Indian actors won't joke (anymore) 
AFP [ MONDAY, JULY 22, 2002 2:49:26 PM ]  ...OLE_Obj... 
CHENNAI: Indian movie stars were told on Monday not to crack jokes, sing aloud or flex 
their muscles while flying to Malaysia and Singapore this week, following an incident 
in which an Indian actress sparked a terror alert at a US airport.
The South Indian Actors Association advised its 200 film stars, among them celluloid 
villains, to refrain from resorting to mimicry on their way to Kuala Lumpur and 
Singapore to give a cultural performance.
The villains ... have also been told not to flex their muscles or jokingly push 
around other members as it can raise the suspicion of airline crew, an official of 
the association said on condition of anonymity.
All the members of the group will have a common dress code also, the official said. 
He said the behaviour code was drawn up because the association did not want to 
attract the attention of foreign security agencies who have been on alert following 
the September 11 attacks.
Last week, south Indian actress Samyuktha Verma and seven members of her entourage 
were questioned by US law enforcement agencies after a passenger on board their 
American Trans Air flight reported that they were indulging in suspicious activity.
The actress and other members of the group, who were on their way to New York from 
Chicago for a cultural function, were seen passing notes, changing seats and mimicking 
some actors -- apparently as a rehearsal their roles in the event.
The aviation authorities in the United States were alerted and the plane was escorted 
to the airport by two military F-16s. Later they were released after being questionied.
Now movie officials are taking no chances. Initially the plan was to take the whole 
group in one flight. But now the association has decided to split up the artistes into 
three or four groups, an official of the association said.
The cultural show is set for Kuala Lumpur on Friday and in Singapore the day after. 
Both cities are home to sizeable Indian populations, especially south Indians.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Banks to shut doors on Saudi royal cash [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-07-17 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Banks to shut doors on Saudi royal cash 
King Fahd is moving large sums through Liechtenstein 
David Pallister and Owen Bowcott in Liechtenstein
Wednesday July 17, 2002
The Guardian 
Western banks may refuse deposits from members of the Saudi royal family under 
guidelines drawn up to identify politically exposed wealthy individuals whose assets 
could in future be confiscated. 
The move comes as details emerge of how King Fahd - head of the dynasty and one of the 
world's richest men - has transferred large sums through anonymous trusts in 
Liechtenstein where secrecy laws allow the Alpine mini-state to function as a bolt 
hole for rich clients. 
The Guardian has found that the banks, notably in Switzerland, are increasingly wary. 
We do not accept business from politicians in controversial countries, said one 
banker. 
Some banks take the view that we will not have anything to do with members of the 
Saudi royal family, said a source close to the Wolfsberg group, an alliance of 11 
major banks - including HSBC, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, and the Dutch 
company ABN Amro - which convened to combat money laundering. 
The anxiety of the banks follows the embarrassing experience of having to trace and 
hand back vast fortunes looted by such notorious former dictators as Ferdinand Marcos 
in the Philippines, Joseph Mobutu in Zaire, and General Sani Abacha in Nigeria. 
All three salted away private funds overseas which were later recovered by successor 
governments. Marcos reportedly plundered between £3bn and £12.5bn before he was 
ousted; Mobutu exploited his impoverished state's natural resources to extract some 
£2.5bn before his death; while Gen Abacha and his associates took up to £2bn from the 
national finances, says the Nigerian government. 
Last year the Basel committee on banking supervision, which is an influential 
international body, defined politically exposed persons (Peps) as those entrusted 
with prominent public functions, including heads of state or of government. 
Accepting and managing funds from corrupt Peps will severely damage the bank's own 
reputation... even if the illegal origin of the assets is difficult to prove, the 
committee warned. It added: The bank may be subject to costly information requests 
and seizure orders from law enforcement. 
If the big banks decide to shun royal Saudi money it would be a huge blow to the House 
of Saud's prestige, reinforcing fears that the regime is less stable after September 
11 and vulnerable to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Although the sums invested 
abroad by King Fahd may not be the product of corruption under current Saudi law, they 
may nevertheless be caught by the banks' new policy. 
Professor Mark Pieth of Basel university, a consultant to the Wolfsberg meeting in 
Zurich which drew up anti-money laundering guidelines, confirms that a sub-group has 
been established to consider such politically exposed clients. 
They're looking at this issue very closely already with the Saudis, he said. 
It would be down to individual banks to decide whether to refuse new Saudi accounts. 
Stanley Morris, an expert on money laundering at Interpol who also attended the 
Wolfsberg meeting, said that guidelines would identify those individuals so 
politically exposed that they constituted an excessive banking risk. 
The 6,000 Saudi royals form a privileged caste whose collective overseas funds are 
thought to amount to £400bn. The ailing King Fahd is believed to have personally 
acquired at least £20bn. 
Critics accuse them of greed and corruption on a grand scale but the royal family 
maintains that its wealth was legally acquired under the laws of the land. 
Dr Saad Al-Fagih, the London-based head of the non-violent dissident group, the 
Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia, said: The way the country is run gives the 
royal family full chance to confiscate as much money as [it wants].
One of the secretive Liechtenstein trusts, the Asturion Foundation, has been used by 
King Fahd for over 25 years to shelter his money abroad. It constitutes a legal entity 
that holds bank accounts of which he is the beneficiary; it also owns his worldwide 
property portfolio. 
It is not known exactly how much money the foundation holds but among the assets 
registered in Britain under the foundation's name is Kenstead Hall, a mock Tudor 
mansion in north London's Billionaire's Row - The Bishop's Avenue in Hampstead. 
Two years ago, the international Financial Action Task Force blacklisted Liechtenstein 
for failing to combat money laundering in general. It was taken off the list in June 
last year after improving its regulatory regime. 
Earlier this year, however, the principality, along with six other countries, was 
placed on another blacklist of uncooperative tax havens by the Organisation for 
Economic Cooperation and Development. 
It now faces penalties from world financial institutions 

Al Jazeera reporter expelled [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-07-08 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

 ...OLE_Obj... 

Date:08/07/2002 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2002/07/08/stories/2002070805360102.htm 

Front Page ../01hdline.htm 

Scribe asked to leave India 
New Delhi July 7. Apparently unhappy with his reporting on Kashmir and Gujarat, India 
has ordered the Al Jazeera correspondent, Nasir M. Shadid, to leave the country within 
a week, sources said today. 
Al Jazeera, which won international popularity for its exclusives on the world's most 
wanted man, Osama bin Laden, in the wake of the September 11 attacks and during the 
Afghan war, will, however, continue to air its Indian news as another correspondent, 
Rifat, will take over. The channel was informed by External Affairs Ministry officials 
that Shadid was not welcome in India. 
- UNI 
© Copyright 2000 - 2002 The Hindu

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Concern for safety of Human Rights Activist [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-06-27 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

 

ASSOCIATION FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS 

18, Madan Boral Lane,Calcutta, 700 012

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 237 6459

Concern for safety of Human Rights Activist

Dear friends,
At about 1 AM on Monday, June 24, a large contingent of armed police and paramilitary 
forces raided the house of Prof. Arup Dasgupta, vice-president of APDR Midnapore 
branch and head of the department of English, Kharagpur College, in Midnapore town.
They could not show any warrant when Dasgupta demanded and forcibly searched his 
house, claiming that his telephone number had been found in the diary of a CPI(ML) 
People's War activist. Dasgupta argued that he was well known as a human rights worker 
and it was not unusual for any political activist to have his phone number. The 
police, however, refused to listen and reprimanded him for keeping a large amount of 
Marxist literature in his residence. All these were classical Marxist books and 
pamphlets and legal publications of various organisations ranging from the CPI(ML) to 
the SUCI.
The police confiscated a few of these and gave a seizure list: 1. A copy of the 
magazine Biplabi Yug, Vol. II, No. 10, October 2001; 2. A copy of the book Shahid 
Smarane -- Glimpses of the Lives of the Martyrs of Naxalbari; 3. Eleven issues of a 
literary magazine, Sanghat, published by Dasgupta; and 4. A copy of the book From Marx 
to Mao Tse-Tung, by George Thomson. A case number ( Goaltore PS Case No. 62/01) was 
written on top of the seizure list.
The officer-in-charge of Goaltore police station, West Midnapore, who was in the team, 
told Dasgupta to come to his police station on Tuesday to face an interrogation by 
the superintendent of police.
Only a few hours earlier, around 4:30 PM on June 23, Dasgupta had visited the Goaltore 
police station as a member of an APDR fact-finding team probing the complaint of a 
fake encounter in the area, in which an alleged member of the CPI(ML) People's War was 
killed. The team also toured other parts of the district from where many complaints of 
human rights abuses were received.
The APDR strongly believes that the police raid was an effort by the state agencies to 
terrorise human rights activists. They wanted to make an example out of Arup Dasgupta. 
Your are aware that a number of APDR activists are already implicated in false cases 
and have even faced violent police attacks in various districts.
Please voice your concern immediately to West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb 
Bhattacharjee (Fax: 91 33 214 5480) and circulate this message among all concerned.
In solidarity,
Tapas Chakraborty
General secretary
APDR

  

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




tech.gif
Description: GIF image


Fwd: [casi] John Sweeney's latest propaganda pieces [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-06-23 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Correspondent, BBC1, 7:15 PM in Ireland, June 23, Sunday



From: Voices uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CASI discussion list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 09:55:33 +0100



Dear folks,

Long time pro-sanctions propagandist - and advocate of military action
against Baghdad falling only just short of nuclear attack - John Sweeney
has made a programme about Iraq which will be screened in the BBC2
Correspondent slot this Sunday evening (probably sometime between 7pm and
8pm - I don't have a TV schedule to hand).

A taster is provided by the following, an edited version of a 5 minute
broadcast on BBC Radio 4's Today programme this morning. The basic line of
the broadcast was that the only Iraqi children who are 'dying because of
sanctions' are in the northern governorates. At the same time the North /
south disparities were wheeled out to prove that sanctions aren't implicated
in the public health crisis. There was also some veiled innuendo suggesting
that UNICEF's '99 surveys were somehow manipulated by the Iraqi Government.

Much of the rest of the content of the broadcast - eg. the material about
GoI human rights abuses - clearly had no bearing on the question 'are
economic sanctions a major factor in the humanitarian crisis in south /
central Iraq?' In any event Sweeney prefers not to answer this question,
preferring to focus on the, questions: 'are Iraqi Government claims that
7000 children are dying every month because of sanctions true?' and 'are the
mass child funerals in Iraq faked?', neither of which has any bearing on the
anti-sanctions case.

There will be a live forum with Mr Sweeney at 1500 BST on Monday 24th June
and you can e-mail your questions using the form at:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/correspondent/newsid_
2053000/2053620.stm

Sweeney writes for the Observer so I would expect a tie-in piece in Sunday's
Observer.

Best wishes,

Gabriel
voices uk

**

Friday, 21 June, 2002, 18:06 GMT 19:06 UK
The mother of all ironies

A few weeks after 11 September Osama Bin Laden justified the attack by
saying that western sanctions had killed one million Iraqi children. Saddam
Hussein's regime says 7,000 children are dying every month. Labour MP George
Galloway says that an Iraqi child has died every six minutes for the last 12
years. John Sweeney has been to the north of Iraq, where he found evidence
that Saddam's sums don't add up.

Ali, was a thick-set Iraqi who used to work for Saddam's psychopathic son,
Uday. Some time after the bungled assassination of Uday, Ali fell under
suspicion.

So he fled Baghdad - going north, to the Kurdish safe haven policed by
western fighter planes,.

I've been to Baghdad. Being in Iraq is like creeping around inside someone
else's migraine. The fear is so omni-present you could almost eat it. No one
talks.

So listening to Ali speak freely was a revelation.

He's not, exactly, a contender to be the next Archbishop of Canterbury. He
had the heft of an enforcer. He told me that he had tortured for the regime.
But I don't think he was lying to us.

Ali talked about the paranoid frenzy that rules Baghdad, the tortures, the
killings, the corruption, the crazy gangster violence of Saddam and his two
sons.

And the faking of the mass baby funerals.

You may have seen them on TV. Small white coffins parading through the
streets of Baghdad on the roofs of taxis, an angry crowd of mourners,
condemning western sanctions for killing the children of Iraq.

Usefully, the ages of the dead babies - three days old, four days old -
are written in English on the coffins. I wonder who did that?

Ali gave us the inside track on the racket. There aren't enough dead babies
around. So the regime stores them for a mass funeral.

He said that he was friends with a taxi driver - he gave his name - whose
son had a position in the regime.

Ali continued: he told me that he had to go to Najaf - a town 100 miles
from Baghdad - in order to bring children's bodies from various freezers
there, and that the smell was unbearable.

They used to collect children's bodies and put them in freezers for two,
three or even six or seven months - God knows - till the smell gets so
unbearable. Then, they arrange the mass funerals.

The logic being, the more dead babies, the better for Saddam. That way, he
can weaken public support in the west for sanctions. That means that parents
who have lost a baby can't bury it until the regime says so.

So how could it be that people would put up with this sickening exploitation
of grief?

Uday took out a wooden cosh and beat the tennis player's brains out.

Ali told another story.

He'd seen Uday kill with his own eyes. This was some years ago, before the
assassination attempt left Saddam's oldest son half-paralysed and impotent.

Uday's lust is famous in Baghdad. He wanted a woman who played tennis at
Baghdad's Sports Club, so he and Ali went to the 

Fwd: Re: [no-sanctions] Fwd: [casi] John Sweeney's latest propaganda pieces [W

2002-06-23 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:47:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [no-sanctions] Fwd: [casi] John Sweeney's latest propaganda
 pieces
From: farbuthnot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sandeep Vaidya [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sandeep - here's a question to Sweeney - if I do it they'll blank me.

Sweeney says 'I have been in Iraq...' Sweeney was there in February 1998
when Karen Robinson and I were there to cover the bombing (which didn't take
place and happened in December instead as we know) he hitched a lift on Kofi
Annan's plane 'forgetting' to apply for an Iraq visa (as one does ...!!) and
the Iraqis threw him out within about 24 hours (they had had a rash of
Mossad operators getting in presenting BBC credentiials etc and were even
more paranoid than usual.)

Question to Sweeney along lines of: hown many times has he been in
south/central Iraq and you understand that he  ... as above and was thus
deported. Is this true?

fxx

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Fwd: [casi] Sweeney piece from today's Observer [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-06-23 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Milan Rai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CASI Discussion Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 09:56:04 +0100
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Subject: [casi] Sweeney piece from today's Observer
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss,
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
List-Id: CASI Discussion List casi-discuss.lists.casi.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss,
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe

Dear folks,

Here's the Sweeney piece from today's Observer. Letters should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (remember to include your address and telephone
number). Letters should be sent to the Observer by Tuesday evening at the
latest.

Four brief comments:

a) Sweeney claims that the regime has faked 'mass baby funerals' in Iraq.
This may well be true but is clearly totally irrelevant to the questions
'has there been a dramatic increase in child mortality in Iraq since the
1991 Gulf War?' and 'if there has been such an increase what are its
causes?' Similar remarks apply to Sweeney's allegations regarding human
rights abuses in Iraq.

b) Again, the Iraqi Government's own figures (as distinct from the UNICEF
survey data - see below) *are* almost certainly incorrect. However again
this is clearly irrelevant to any of the serious questions that arise about
the public health impact of the sanctions. Sweeney's clear intention
throughout the piece is to attempt to identify, in the minds of his readers,
the anti-sanctions position with the Iraqi Government. In doing so he
ignores the views of a wide range of highly credible organisations and
individuals (eg. Save the Children, Human Rights Watch and Hans von Sponeck)
who have spoken out on the issue.

c) Sweeney breezily rubbishes the conclusions of the August '99 joint
UNICEF - GoI child mortality survey, writing that it is 'open to question.
It was based on data from within a regime which tortures children with
impunity. All but one of the researchers used by UNICEF were employees of
the Ministry of Health, according to the Lancet.' In reality it is only
apologists for the sanctions, such as Mr Sweeney, who 'question' the
reliability of these surveys.

Indeed, UNICEF were careful to guard themselves against such allegations.
The following is the relevant extract from their August '99 document
'Questions and Answers for the Iraq child mortality surveys' (available on
the CASI web-site at
http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/casi/info/unicef/000816qa.html )

*
Q: How can UNICEF be sure that the results are accurate/reliable?

A: The large sample sizes - nearly 24,000 households randomly selected from
all fifteen governorates in the south and center and 16,000 from the three
autonomous northern governorates - helps to ensure that the margin of error
for child mortality in both surveys is low. Another important factor was
that in the south and center of Iraq the survey interviewers were all women
and all were medical doctors. In the northern governorates 80% of
interviewers were female - each team had at least one female interviewer -
and all interviewers were trained health workers. UNICEF was also involved
in all aspects of both surveys - from survey design through to data
analysis. Specifically:

UNICEF had direct input to the design of the surveys - which are based on
internationally respected household survey format - the DHS (Demographic and
Health Survey) format;
UNICEF was involved in the training of all survey supervisors;
UNICEF conducted field visits to every governorate (major administrative
unit in Iraq) while the survey was being conducted;
UNICEF oversaw the process of data entry;
UNICEF had full access to the hard copies of the interview records and the
complete data sets for both surveys at all times.

Q: What checks have been made on the data?

A: Each questionnaire was first checked at the local level and then at the
governorate level by staff of the local statistical offices. This check was
primarily to determine whether the randomly sampled households were
correctly identified, visited and interviewed. Final editing and checking
was done at the central level for completeness and consistency. A number of
internal checks normally carried out for Demographic and Health Surveys
(DHS) were also completed for both surveys. The surveys and findings were
also reviewed by a panel of experts in early July. This panel included
senior personnel from DHS, Macro International, WHO and senior UNICEF offici
als from the Regional Office in Amman and New York Headquarters.

Q: Could the Government of Iraq have manipulated the data to give higher
mortality 

Gujarat violence backed by state, says EU report [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-05-01 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Gujarat violence backed by state, says EU report
By Edna Fernandes in New Delhi
Published: April 29 2002 18:15 | Last Updated: April 29 2002 18:37
A European Union investigation into India's worst race riots in a decade has concluded 
that the violence was not spontaneous but a pre-planned policy involving state 
ministers to purge Muslims and destroy their economy, according to an internal 
report by EU embassies in Delhi.
The report provides one of the most damning indictments yet on the Gujarat riots, 
which have killed almost 900 people, mostly Muslims, in a matter of weeks. One EU 
source said the report pointed to ethnic cleansing of Muslims in the state and that 
there was clear evidence of complicity by state ministers.
The report has been submitted to the 15 EU governments who will decide what action to 
take and how to raise their concerns at next week's EU-India summit in Delhi.
Gujarat is one of the items on the summit agenda. I imagine we will express concern 
about everything in our report, including evidence of a purge, said the EU source. If 
that fails to yield a dialogue, further measures will have to be considered, he said.
The disclosure is sure to put further pressure on India's Hindu nationalist BJP-led 
government, which faces an opposition censure motion in parliament today over its 
handling of the riots.
On Monday Ram Vilas Paswan, the minister for coal, resigned in protest, marking the 
first formal split in the fragile coalition over the issue. Mr Paswan's Lok Jan Shakti 
party has four seats in parliament.
Atal Behari Vajpayee, prime minister, hit back at foreign criticism last week, 
accusing the international community of meddling in India's internal affairs. But that 
position was becoming harder to justify this week amid mounting evidence that the 
violence was pre-planned and state-backed. Last week some western diplomats described 
events in Gujarat as genocide for the first time. While the EU report stopped short 
of using that word, it clearly implied there was a policy of ethnic cleansing.
The pattern of violence suggests the purpose was to purge Muslims from Hindu and 
mixed Hindu/Muslim areas, said a copy of the final draft seen by the Financial Times. 
Muslim businesses were systematically targeted and destroyed.
On the role of BJP state officials in Gujarat, it said: Ministers took active part in 
the violence . . . senior police officers were instructed not to intervene in the 
rioting.
Until now, the BJP central government has said the revenge riots were ignited by a 
fatal arson attack on a train carrying Hindu activists at Godhra. That attack, which 
killed 59 people, was blamed on Muslims.
But the EU report, based on investigations by a number of individual member states 
that sent staff to the region, - including Germany, Britain and the Netherlands - said 
Godhra was no more than a pretext for Hindu mob violence, which was planned months 
before. Diplomatic sources said free swords were being distributed by Hindu activists 
days before the riots began.
The true death toll was put at more than 2,000 and 140,000 people are estimated to be 
refugees as a result of the attacks.
On Tuesday, Human Rights Watch published its own verdict on Gujarat which appeared to 
back the EU's findings. What happened in Gujarat was not a spontaneous uprising. It 
was a carefully orchestrated attack against Muslims, said the group, adding that the 
state and police were complicit.
On Monday, a group of Gujarat victims came to Delhi to tell their stories. Dilawer, a 
nine-year-old boy, told how his parents were killed. They spread water. A naked wire 
was there. My mother died of electric shock. They burned my father also. Another 
victim, Feeroz Bhai, told how he watched a Hindu mob use a sword to cut out his unborn 
child from his eight-month pregnant wife, killing them both.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Urgent Request for Help from Gujarat [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-29 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 28 April 2002 18:09
Subject: Urgent Request for Help from Gujarat


Some friends working to provide legal help to victims of violence in Gujarat sent 
following request. Please do let me know if you have any suggestions / information. 
Particularly if you know lawyers who are familiar and able to provide us more info on 
following please do let me know.

Thanks in advance, Jagdish

* How can victims of Gujarat Carnage use UN mechanisams to get justice?

* Contact / Information about possibilities of using U.S. Alien Torts law to bring 
cases against all those were responsible for violence in Gujarat.

* How far it is possible to use  universal jurisdiction of European countries and /or 
using the genocide convention in case of violence in Gujarat.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Fascism's firm footprint [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-28 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


(http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20020506fname=Roy+%28F%29sid=1)
OUTLOOK INDIA, Magazine | May 06, 2002 ESSAY

Democracy
Who's she when she's at home?
ARUNDHATI ROY

Last night a friend from Baroda called. Weeping. It took her fifteen minutes
to tell me what the matter was. It wasn't very complicated. Only that
Sayeeda, a friend of hers, had been caught by a mob. Only that her stomach
had been ripped open and stuffed with burning rags. Only that after she
died, someone carved 'OM' on her forehead.

Precisely which Hindu scripture preaches this?

Our Prime Minister justified this as part of the retaliation by outraged
Hindus against Muslim 'terrorists' who burned alive 58 Hindu passengers on
the Sabarmati Express in Godhra. Each of those who died that hideous death
was someone's brother, someone's mother, someone's child. Of course they were.

.


(click on the link)

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Fwd: speechless [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-28 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410)
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:23:22 +0100
Subject: speechless
From: farbuthnot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi -

On BBC Radio 5 Breakfast this am, the head of Amnesty (whose name I missed)
was interviewed, her delegation had just got into Jenin. Pretty pathetic she
was, but I put it down to not wanting to be thrown out again, byt the IDF,
until she said, the human rights violations they were investigating
included: 'not giving enough notice to those whose homes were to be
demolished. Could have been 'not giving notice to those whose homes were
demolished ... I was so gobsmacked my mental playback deserted me! Scuse
me I am 99% certain I didn't mishear, perhaps someone less
illiterate than I is smart enought to access the BBC and check! best, f.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




DEPLETED URANIUM IN BUNKER BOMBS [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-27 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

DEPLETED URANIUM IN BUNKER BOMBS

America's big dirty secret
 (Le Mode diplomatique, March 2002)

   The United States loudly and proudly 
boasted this
   month of its new bomb currently 
being used against
   al-Qaida hold-outs in Afghanistan; 
it sucks the air
   from underground installations, 
suffocating those
   within. The US has also admitted 
that it has used
   depleted uranium weaponry over the 
last decade
   against bunkers in Iraq, Kosovo, and now
   Afghanistan.
   by ROBERT 
JAMES PARSONS *


   The immediate concern for medical 
professionals and employees of aid
   organisations remains the threat of 
extensive depleted uranium (DU)
   contamination in Afghanistan. This 
is one of the conclusions of a 130-page
   report, Mystery Metal Nightmare in 
Afghanistan? (1), by Dai Williams, an
   independent researcher and 
occupational psychologist. It is the result of more
   than a year of research into DU and 
its effects on those exposed to it.

   Using internet sites of both NGOs 
(2) and arms manufacturers, Williams has
   come up with information that he has 
cross-checked and compared with
   weapons that the Pentagon has 
reported — indeed boasted about — using
   during the war. What emerges is a 
startling and frightening vision of war, both
   in Afghanistan and in the future.

   Since 1997 the United States has 
been modifying and upgrading its missiles and
   guided (smart) bombs. Prototypes of 
these bombs were tested in the Kosovo
   mountains in 1999, but a far greater 
range has been tested in Afghanistan. The
   upgrade involves replacing a 
conventional warhead by a heavy, dense metal one
   (3). Calculating the volume and the 
weight of this mystery metal leads to two
   possible conclusions: it is either 
tungsten or depleted uranium.

   Tungsten poses problems. Its melting 
point (3,422°C) makes it very hard to
   work; it is expensive; it is 
produced mostly by China; and it does not burn. DU
   is pyrophoric, burning on impact or 
if it is ignited, with a melting point of
   1,132°C; it is much easier to 
process; and as nuclear waste, it is available free
   to arms manufacturers. Further, 
using it in a range of weapons significantly
   reduces the US nuclear waste storage 
problem.

   This type of weapon can penetrate 
many metres of reinforced concrete or rock
   in seconds. It is equipped with a 
detonator controlled by a computer that
   measures the density of the material 
passed through and, when the warhead
   reaches the targeted void or a set 
depth, detonates the warhead, which then has
   an explosive and incendiary effect. 
The DU burns fiercely and rapidly,
   carbonising everything in the void, 
while the DU itself is transformed into a fine
   uranium oxide powder. Although only 
30% of the DU of a 30mm penetrator
   round is oxidised, the DU charge of 
a missile oxidises 100%. Most of the dust
   particles produced measure less than 
1.5 microns, small enough to be breathed
   in.

   For a few researchers in this area, 
the controversy over the use of DU
   weapons during the Kosovo war got 
side-tracked. Instead of asking what
   weapons might have been used against 
most of the targets 

Revulsion grows toward Vajpayee's party [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-26 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

ALLEGED BJP TOLERANCE OF BRUTALITY
Revulsion grows toward Vajpayee's party
By B. GAUTAM
Special to The Japan Times
NEW DELHI -- India's secularism is in flames. The western Indian state of Gujarat, 
perhaps the most economically prosperous region in the entire country, has been in the 
midst of communal carnage for many weeks now. The majority Hindu population there has 
been systematically butchering members of the minority Muslim group in what is 
ironically considered the land of peace. 
It is in Gujarat that Mahatma Gandhi was born, the man who won India its independence 
from British rule in 1947 through nonviolence, which he chose to describe as ahimsa, a 
word coined thousands of years ago by Gautama Buddha. Gandhi's ashram pacifist colony 
stands to this day in Ahmedabad, the city that has been witnessing horrific brutality. 
Just one incident is enough to highlight this. Last week, a Muslim woman on her eighth 
month of pregnancy was seized by a Hindu mob, her abdomen ripped open and her fetus 
scooped out and thrown into a fire. 
The United Nations Human Rights Commission condemned the Gujarat atrocities, and said 
that they were as bad as -- if not worse than -- what happened in Nazi Germany, where 
Hitler and his men killed 6 million Jews in carrying out his Final Solution. 
Curiously, in what is seen as an abject exercise to tutor the young and the 
impressionable in the Nazi doctrine of extermination, students of Class 12 in Gujarat 
appearing for their final examination were asked a question on Hitler's ruthless 
methodology. 
As part of an English grammar exercise, the boys and girls were asked to join the 
following sentences into one: There are two solutions. One of them is the Nazi 
solution. If you do not like people, kill them, segregate them. Then strut up and 
down. Proclaim that you are the salt of the Earth. 
In Gujarat where hundreds of innocent Muslim men and women have been murdered, the 
perversion of an educational exercise appears to be part of a provocation process, 
which understandably led to an uproar not just within the nation, but also outside. 
Finland has made a strong protest over the handling of the Gujarat massacres, ignoring 
Indian accusation of interference in internal affairs. 
In Britain, cases have been filed in court calling for the extradition of Narendra 
Modi, Gujarat's chief minister and a leader of the Hindu nationalist party, Bharatiya 
Janata Party. The BJP, which heads the national coalition government in New Delhi, can 
find itself on a sticky wicket, because the U.K. is in a strong position to pursue the 
demand, given the fact that a few British citizens are among those dead in Gujarat. 
The Economist news magazine, in a strong indictment of the Gujarat barbarism, has 
called the BJP shameless. It adds: The BJP has for several years seemed to treat 
its Hindu nationalist ideology as a political liability. Now, when that ideology is 
showing its dangerous and shameful side, the party has suddenly chosen to reaffirm 
it. 
The atrocities began as a revenge for an attack by Muslims on a train carrying Hindu 
pilgrims. About 60 of them were burned to death. In retaliation, hundreds of Muslims 
in Gujarat were slaughtered, and according to independent reports and eyewitness 
accounts, Hindu mobs were incited and the killings were orchestrated by the Modi 
administration itself. 
Yet, the nationalist BJP has been resisting just about every conceivable move to have 
Modi removed from chief ministership. Supporting him in a shocking display of bad 
judgment is India's prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, whose reputation for 
misplaced tolerance has until now endeared the BJP, which he heads, to most coalition 
members. The massacres are condemnable he said, But who lit the fire and how did it 
spread? 
Understandably, this has produced a sense of revulsion among the nation's opposition 
parties, which refused to let Parliament function for days until it was agreed that 
Gujarat would be on the table for a debate and vote on April 30. The Vajpayee 
government is bound to face uncomfortable questions that day. 
With even some of his own coalition partners perturbed and angry over the massacres, 
Vajpayee could soon well be in hot water. 
His party's directive to Modi hold early elections in the troubled state, and the 
national BJP's tryst with the Indian electorate in 2004, when the current term of 
Parliament ends, seem to point to an uncertain future for the Hindu nationalist party. 
The Japan Times: April 26, 2002
(C) All rights reserved 

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register

Muslims trapped by India's apartheid [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-25 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Muslims trapped by India's apartheid
Gujarat's Hindu nationalist chief minister, Narendar Modi, holds the media responsible 
for the cycle of communal bloodletting, but the blame lies largely at his doorstep, 
writes Luke Harding 
The Guardian, London 
Tuesday April 23, 2002 

When will the violence in Gujarat stop? Judging by the horrific events of this 
weekend, not yet. Nearly two months after communal rioting first broke out in India's 
most infamous state, there were more deaths in Gujarat.

Some 17 people were killed and at least 100 injured in fresh Hindu-Muslim clashes. The 
state's main city Ahmedabad continues to burn. A group of Muslims dragged a police 
constable into a lane and stabbed him to death on Sunday.

The police responded by going on a killing spree, shooting dead at least six Muslims 
in the Gomtipur area of the city. They included an 18-year-old girl, Nazimabanu 
Mehmood Hussain, and her 42-year-old father. She and the other victims of what is 
euphemistically known as police firing were shot in the head at point blank range.

The depressing cycle of violence follows a now-familiar pattern in which Gujarat's 
partisan Hindu police force - instead of trying to stop the violence - trains its guns 
on India's minority community.

The response of Gujarat's unrepentant Hindu nationalist chief minister, Narendar Modi, 
has been to blame the media. In full-page adverts in Sunday's Indian newspapers Mr 
Modi accuses his critics of malicious propaganda. They have tarnished Gujarat's 
reputation by spreading untruths, he says.

Few people outside India's ruling Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) - of which Mr Modi is a 
member - share this view. Last week a leaked report compiled by senior diplomats at 
the British high commission in New Delhi squarely pointed the finger of blame for the 
violence at Mr Modi and his administration.

The report also suggested that the official death toll - 800 - was a gross 
underestimate. A truer figure was 2,000, with the vast majority of dead Muslims, the 
report noted. Extremist Hindu organisations began preparing an attack against the 
state's Muslim community well before the Godhra tragedy, in which a Muslim mob burned 
to death 56 Hindus on a train, the report added.

In a declaration to be made public this week, the European Union compares events in 
Gujarat since February 27 with the persecution of the Jews in Nazi Germany. The 
carnage in Gujarat was a kind of apartheid ... and has parallels with Germany of the 
1930s, the declaration says.

While secular Indians have been appalled by the epic scale of the retaliatory 
destruction in Gujarat, Mr Modi has become a hero among hardliners within the BJP and 
its Hindu revivalist allies. It is this, perhaps, which explains why India's BJP prime 
minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, had refused to give in to persistent demands from the 
opposition to sack the defiant Mr Modi.

It seems that many in the BJP and its revanchist sister organisations feel that 
India's Muslims have finally got the beating they deserve. The Muslims have to be 
taught a lesson, once and for all, Pravin Togadiya, the secretary general of the 
extremist Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), opined on Sunday.

Mr Vajpayee clearly finds the violence embarrassing. India's reputation 
internationally has suffered badly. New Delhi's previously plausible argument that the 
problem of extremism was one that only affected its archrival Pakistan now seems 
hollow. But with the BJP in deep electoral trouble, many within the ruling party 
believe that continuing Hindu-Muslim unrest is the best way to consolidate its Hindu 
vote bank and bounce back to victory in a general election scheduled for 2004.

India's ultra-nationalist home minister LK Advani - seen by many as a successor to Mr 
Vajpayee - has defended Mr Modi. The bodies have continued to pile up, but Mr Advani 
has maintained a sphinx-like silence, which appears to hint at approval. Several of 
the prime minister's secular coalition partners, meanwhile, have also demanded Mr 
Modi's dismissal. 

But they have refrained from pulling the plug on the government, realising that loss 
of office, which an early general election would bring, means loss of influence, 
power, and money.

With more deaths every day Mr Modi's declaration in yesterday's Indian newspapers that 
Peace is our collective responsibility seems nothing more than a sick joke.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Long Arm of the Law [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-24 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=7711349
Long Arm of the Law 
 [ TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 2002  2:32:16 AM ] 

Editorial: Times of India

The news that relatives of the three British citizens killed in the 
anti-Muslim violence in Gujarat last month are going to move the 
British courts for justice is at once an indictment of the Indian 
judicial system and a warning to politicians that `national 
sovereignty' cannot shield them from justice if they commit crimes 
against humanity.

It is by no means certain that the British high court will admit 
such a case, although lawyers for the three families say they are 
marshalling compelling evidence.

To the extent that world opinion is growing against the Gujarat 
government and chief minister Narendra Modi - the European Union has 
reportedly condemned the carnage as apartheid, with parallels to 
1930s Germany - a British magistrate could conceivably initiate 
steps embarrassing to both the Vajpayee and Blair governments.

When a Spanish magistrate asked the British courts to extradite the 
visiting former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, the matter went 
all the way up to the Law Lords who finally upheld the legality of 
sending Pinochet to face trial in Spain.

The evidence Judge Baltazar Garzon in Spain had against Pinochet was 
not much more detailed or precise than what human rights groups have 
collected on Mr Modi and his government.

What saved the day for Pinochet was the political decision taken by 
then British home secretary Jack Straw, who vetoed the extradition 
on `health' grounds. In the Gujarat case, Britain is sure to side 
with the Vajpayee government, saving Mr Modi the trouble of checking 
into a hospital with `chest pain'.

Nevertheless, the thought that he could be questioned by 
investigators the next time he travels to Britain or Europe will 
probably weigh heavily on his mind.

Whether countries like it or not, an international legal 
architecture to deal with gross violations has begun to emerge in 
the aftermath of the mass killing of civilians by all sides in the 
Bosnian and Croatian civil wars which tore apart the former 
Yugoslavia. Unfortunately, the framework is rather ad hoc.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) 
established by the UN Security Council has proved to be politically 
biased, indicting former Yugoslav strongman Slobodan Milosevic for 
causing civilian deaths, but not the commanders of NATO for 
deliberately killing civilians as part of their illegal war on 
Yugoslavia in 1999.

The new International Criminal Court (ICC) will come into being in 
July 2002 despite the objection of the US, which fears its soldiers 
and leaders might one day be indicted for war crimes and crimes 
against humanity.

India too is opposed to the ICC for largely the same reason. The 
growing assertiveness of national courts is yet another part of the 
emerging international legal framework for dealing with serious 
crimes.

In India today, for example, a terrorist crime committed against an 
Indian citizen in another country is a prosecutable offence in our 
national courts. If the Vajpayee government finds the idea of a 
foreign court prosecuting Indian citizens - including BJP and VHP 
leaders - for the killings which have taken place in Gujarat 
distasteful, the best way to respond would be to ensure the guilty 
are prosecuted and punished here. The NHRC has asked for the CBI to 
probe certain massacre cases in Gujarat and for fast-track courts. 
At a minimum, the government must act on these demands.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Frantic search for British sons lost in Gujarat riots [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-24 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Frantic search for British sons lost in Gujarat riots 
Fears that 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, have died since unrest began 
Luke Harding in New Delhi
Wednesday April 24, 2002
The Guardian 
The mothers of British Muslim cousins who disappeared when they were caught up in the 
communal riots in Gujarat nearly two months ago said last night that they had no 
intention of leaving India until they knew what had happened to them. 
Shakheel and Sayed Dawood, who were on holiday in India, were dragged from their Jeep 
by a Hindu mob 45 miles from the state's main city, Ahmedabad. 
Their nephew, Imran, escaped but a family friend and the driver were killed. 
Ayesha and Rabia Dawood, from Batley, West Yorkshire, are camping out in their 
ancestral village, Lajpore. 
They have distributed pamphlets and contacted relief camps where those left homeless 
by the riots are sheltering, but have found no trace of the two men. 
Shakheel's father, Abdulhai, who has lived in England since 1959, told the Indian 
Express: My son even showed the rioters his passport, telling them he wasn't an 
Indian national but they wouldn't listen. Their names on the passport damned them. 
Their disappearance is a further embarrassment to the Indian government, already much 
criticised for letting the riots continue. 
A report by the British high commission in New Delhi, leaked last week, blamed the 
continuing violence in the state on its chief minister, Narender Modi, and his 
government, and suggested that the official death toll of 855 was a gross 
underestimate. A truer figure was 2,000, mainly Muslims, it suggested. 
The Dawood families are awaiting the result of DNA tests on human remains found at the 
scene. If the men are confirmed dead, the relatives may sue the Indian government in 
the British courts. 
Gujarat continued to smoulder yesterday. Another 17 people were killed at the weekend, 
and 100 injured. 
The dead included 10 Muslims shot in the head at point-blank range by police officers, 
apparently killed in revenge for one of their colleagues who was dragged into an alley 
and stabbed to death. 
Three more people died in Ahmedabad yesterday. 
The Indian prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, has so far refused to give in to 
persistent opposition demands to sack Mr Modi, who belongs to the same Hindu 
nationalist party, the BJP. 
While secular Indians have been appalled by the destruction, Mr Modi has become a hero 
to hardliners in the BJP and its Hindu revivalist allies. 
The Gujarat state government promised yesterday that the latest police shootings would 
be investigated. The home secretary, K Nityanandam, said the inquiry would begin once 
he had learned more. 
I need to take down full details from the officers of the concerned place, he said. 
But preliminary reports definitely reveal that most of these victims were shot by the 
police on their heads. Few outside the BJP have much confidence in his findings. 
Since the rioting broke out after 59 Hindus were burned to death when a Muslim mob set 
fire to a train, Mr Modi's government has been accused of deliberately failing to stop 
Hindu gangs burning, stabbing and raping their Muslim neighbours. 
About 100,000 Muslims whose homes have been destroyed are living in relief camps and 
have received little or no help. 
Mr Modi has accused his critics of spreading malicious propaganda. 
The row about the violence has paralysed the Indian parliament for more than a week. 
It has also dented India's reputation internationally. 
While Britain has maintained a diplomatic silence on the affair, and expressed only 
concern, other countries have been more damning. The Indian foreign ministry has 
responded by telling them to mind their own business. 
Since the September 11 attacks, New Delhi has argued that extremism is an Islamic 
problem which afflicts only its neighbour and rival, Pakistan: a claim that seems 
increasingly hollow given the rise of Hindu fundamentalism. 
But with the BJP in deep electoral trouble, many of its members believe that 
continuing Hindu-Muslim unrest is the best way to win back wobbling Hindu voters 
before the next general election in 2004. 
The leaked British report said that extremist Hindu groups were already planning to 
attack Gujarat's Muslim community well before the fatal assault on the train at Godhra 
on February 27. 
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002 

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Modi to be sued for genocide in London [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Modi to be sued for genocide in London

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Articleshow.asp?art_id=7486040

RASHMEE Z AHMED

TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2002  8:27:32 PM ]

LONDON: Britain-based Gujaratis are working alongside the British
government to bring three cases in three separate courts across Europe
against Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The cases, which are to be filed separately in the British High Court, the
Belgian courts and, possibly, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in
The Hague, are expected to compliment two other proposed cases against
Modi and his administration in India and the US.

The charges, ranging from complicity with murder to genocide, could,
theoretically, lead to a formal request for Modi's extradition, as seemed
likely when Belgian court officials recently held preliminary hearings in
a genocide case against Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

Belgian law, unique and controversially, allows its courts to hear cases
of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity no matter where they
are carried out or by whom.

Sulaiman Qazi, solicitor and cousin of British national Mohammed Aswat who
was killed near Ahmedabad, says that the British government is cooperating
fully in the preparation of the case, which could be filed in as little as
four or five weeks.

Describing the Gujarat violence as a crime against humanity and not
against one community, Qazi said he felt the British Foreign Office (FCO)
would support them to the hilt.

The FCO has said that high-ranking officials were responsible for the
massacre of innocents and we know that is a statement of support if it
comes to extradition, Qazi told The Sunday Times of India as he worked on
a a database consisting of hundreds of eyewitness accounts, with
verifiable names, addresses and contact numbers.

Sources acknowledged that the FCO's alleged help sits oddly with a
government pronouncement on Gujarat in the House of Lords in early March,
when junior foreign office minister Baronness Amos appreciated the
efforts which have been made by the Indian Government to restore calm and
said the Indian authorities are seen to be doing all that they can.

The minister had been replying to concerned queries about Aswat's two
still-missing companions, Shakil and Saeed Dawood.

Qazi admitted that extradition is only one possibility. More likely, he
said, is a Henry Kissinger-like situation, in which the former American
secretary of state's arrival in the UK will be attended by Spanish
investigators seeking to interview him on Cambodia. In other words, if
Modi or others named were ever to set foot in the UK or European Union,
they will almost certainly be interviewed by investigators.

Qazi's search for admissible and irrefragible evidence against Modi,
which would prove he had a direct hand in the killing of my cousin, will
hinge on the testimony of a fourth British Muslim who was travelling with
Aswat and saw his companions lynched, set on fire and brutally murdered.

The man, who along with the other three, belongs to a West Yorkshire
region made up of 15,000 Indian Gujarati Muslims, returned to the UK on
Thursday after being nursed back to health by the British authorities in
India.

His testimony was also recorded by the British political secretary in
Mumbai.

The British case, to be filed by all four British families will not only
charge the VHP, the RSS and the BJP, but also name specific names.

Qazi confirmed that British data-gathering, which took the form of a
now-controversial and leaked report, has helped human rights organisations
on the ground. London was, apparently, deeply involved in crucial
data-gathering and, according to sources, two or three FCO officials flew
out from here to join the British fact-finding team in India.

Zafar Sareshwala, rich expatriate member of a prominent Ahmedabadi family,
lived near the dead British men, knew them well, and is helping to
organise the legal challenge.

He says the British authorities, particularly the local MP, have been
stung into strong support because the Yorkshire Gujarati and Muslim
population complained that Indian officials were not helping even to reach
the site of Aswat's murder.

There are more non-Muslims in the UK, US and India helping in the search
for justice against Modi, said Sareshwala, who lectured at Harvard last
week and was approached there by a senior professor, Balakrishnan
Rajgopal, to help take Modi to the ICJ at The Hague.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Why UK's report worries Delhi [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=7404110
Why UK's report worries Delhi 

 
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN

TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2002  5:50:01 AM ] 
 
NEW DELHI: The Vajpayee government is worried a scathing report
on the Gujarat riots prepared by the British High Commission
here might form the basis for British courts to indict Chief
Minister Narendra Modi for 'complicity' in the killing of three
British Muslims near Ahmedabad in early March - and possibly
even genocide. 

''We presume the British government will fight any such move,
just as it opposed the idea of extraditing Pinochet,'' said an
official, referring to the year-long legal battle by human rights
activists to have the former Chilean dictator sent to Spain to
face trial. ''But if the victims' family members move the courts
in Britain, there is no telling what might happen''. 

British law allows for jurisdiction when crimes are committed
against citizens overseas. And since a similar provision was
explicitly introduced into Indian statute books via the new Prevention
of Terrorism Act, India would be hard put to invoke national
sovereignty if a British court was to make an extradition request.

The Times of India has learned that at least two human rights
organisations and several Indian lawyers in the UK are ''actively
examining'' the possibility of moving the British courts against
Modi and senior Gujarat officials for their alleged ''role''
in the killing.

''Based on all that has emerged'' said one London-based Indian
lawyer, ''a strong case can be made out on the complicity of
the state's leadership.'' 

She said reports of senior Gujarat ministers taking over police
control rooms and preventing officers from saving lives ''will
help establish the chain of command right to the top''. 

What apparently has the Vajpayee government worried is that the
British High Commission report also seems to support the charge
that the riots were planned and that the police connived with
the killers. 

Any British court, which takes up the case, is likely to subpoena
the report and use it to put pressure on the Blair government.


For the moment, the Blair government is handling the case gingerly.
Its main concern seems to be securing adequate monetary compensation
for its murdered citizens. 

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Dead British Gujarati case gathers pace [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

(Times of India)
Dead British Gujarati case gathers pace 
RASHMEE Z AHMED
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ MONDAY, APRIL 22, 2002 8:08:40 PM ] 
LONDON: The family of the British national, Mohammed Aswat, who was killed in the 
early days of the Gujarat violence, has said it is saddened by the failure of the 
Indian government to even send a letter of condolence to his wife and five children, 
the youngest of whom is five years old.
Aswat, 42, who was dragged out of his car and killed by a mob at Prantij in Gujarat 
while en route from Agra to Ahmedabad, is said to have been known to Indian High 
Commission officials here as a regular helper at their visa surgeries in west 
Yorkshire.
Indian officials confirmed to this paper that they recalled a Mohammed bhai, who used 
to help control the crowds and settle people at the visa surgeries, but said they 
would recognise his face better than his full name because surgeries are informal 
occasions, when each man is called by his home name.
Aswat's family and friends, who are preparing to file a murder case here against the 
Gujarat government, say the body of watertight evidence against the state machinery 
is building up well.
On Monday, a spokeswoman for the British foreign office said: We have not been 
approached by the families of the British nationals and are not involved at the moment 
in any legal matter. That is a matter for the families and their lawyers.
She added that we are in touch with the families at a humanitarian level, 
particularly in relation to the missing men.
Meanwhile, Vipul Thakker, a senior human rights lawyer who prepares cases for the 
international courts, told this paper, the wheels are in motion to present a 
thoroughly-researched document to the British government to take up at the 
International Court of Justice (ICJ) at The Hague.
Pointing out that the indictment of Slobodan Milosovic and his generals did not affect 
state-to-state relations, Thakker claimed his work had official backing. 
Essentially they gave us the green light, but the methodology is that we must prepare 
the document and they must decide to move the ICJ, he said.
On Monday, the British government's reluctance to admit its alleged support for West 
Yorkshire's Gujarati Muslims drew knowing smiles. 
Prominent West Yorkshireman, Habib Akudi, who claimed the British government was 
active and engaged and fully supportive of our search for justice, said he was not 
surprised. They will try and play down their role, but it is upfront and it had to be 
because we complained that when two Christians were killed in India some years ago and 
a hut-like church was burnt, they were very active. Now, they were doing nothing 
despite talking about human rights .
Akudi said the local MP, Mike Wood, had got involved and taken his constituents' 
concerns to senior levels of government and parliament.
He said that the same was true of Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who tried to wash his 
hands off the case early in the Gujarat violence by telling angry Muslims that he was 
not the foreign minister of India.
Later, said Akudi, the pressure of his Indian Muslim-dominant constituency of 
Blackburn, forced Straw to make three strong statements on the Gujarat violence.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Intellectual Genocide. [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-20 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Morning Star 20.04¹02
Intellectual Genocide.
Felicity Arbuthnot

Palestine and Iraq have much in common. The desert slaughter - misnamed a
war - of 1991, left Iraq: Œreduced to a pre-industrial age for a
considerable time to come¹, according to the UN Special Rapporteur, who
visited barely a month after the end of hostilities. Palestine too, lies in
ruins. In both cases, the silence of those who could exert pressure has been
truly deafening.

That Œhistory will slaughter those responsible¹ - to use the words of Denis
Halliday, distinguished UN Diplomat and UN Under Secretary General, who
resigned in disgust as UN Co-ordinator in Iraq, citing the Œdestruction of
an entire nation¹ - will be of little comfort to the dead, maimed,
disposessed, bereaved and dying of both countries. However, as the silent
slaughter continues in Iraq, resulting from the world¹s most draconian UN
embargo and another continues in Palestine at the hands of Israel - whilst
possibly the most pathetic incumbant UN Secretary General ever, bleats
apologetically about Œrestraint¹, in an expensive suit and the quiestest of
voices. Priorities, however,  are not alone food, water, medicines - they
are what Halliday¹s successor, Count Hans von Sponeck, an equally
distinguished diplomat cited as: Œintellectual genocide.¹

Palestine and Iraq have the highest number of Ph¹D¹s in the Middle East,
women and men educated without discrimination. In both countries the
education system has been targetted and dismantled. As the west crows of
restoring education in Afganistan, it is silent on decimating it in a part
of the world where writing, algebra, mathematics, domestic law and record
keeping began.

Iraq, prior to the embargo was awarded, two years running, a unique accolade
from UNESCO. The education system was globally unparallelled in that a child
could be born into abject poverty, of illiterate parents and emerge from
this free, high quality system (including University) as anything he or she
wished to be. Western Post graduate courses were paid for by the Iraqi
government, resulting in rounded east-west expertise.

With the onset of the UN embargo on Hiroshima Day 1990, all educational
materials to Iraq were halted. Blackboards, pencils, pens, course books,
medical journals, computers, even paper. A doctor qualifying today will be
twelve years out of date - he or she will still be using 1989 materials,
apart from the small amount taken in by occasional sanctions breakers.

When the UN Weapons Inspectors (UNSCOM) raided the Science Laboratory at
Baghdad¹s famous, formerly resplendantly
  equipped University (built by the Gulbenkian oil foundation in the 1970¹s
as a result of an oil deal, the Inspectors laughed at it¹s sorry state -
then threw out the few remaining books. (ED - I HAVE THE UN VIDEO)

The language laboratory is silent. Computers and visual aids long dead,
denying a western orientated society the ability to perfect western
languages - in a society where all university students are taught in english
in order to enable them to access overseas post graduate courses.

An abiding memory is visiting the University and talking to the Professor of
Literature, a passionate, elegant educationalist, who had been a
distinguished visiting Professor, to a number of US and UK Universities. He
searched for the words to explain the magnitude of the educational
decimation under the embargo. Education for him - as in all Iraq and
Palestine - was not a profession, it was a burning passion - the learning
young, where ever they were, were a country¹s future.

The tweed jacketed Professor spoke better english than I and personified
passion, pride and dignity. As I thanked him and offered my hand, he
clutched it, in both of his and said: ŒI beg you, please, send us paper,
send us books, send us pens and pencils ... I beg you, I beg you.¹ Four
months later, he was dead. All those who knew him, said he died of a broken
heart - he could no longer give his students the wherewithall to equip them
for whatever they chose in life.

  In Palestine, the blockade of the great Beir Zeit University, has been
little reported. Roads bulldozed, students and academics, forced to scramble
over mountains of rubble and take circuitous routes to reach. Frequently it
was impossible.

Now, along with lives and homes, all educational infrastructure has been
detonated by the Israeli Defence Force. The seven Palestinian Universitites,
painstakingly re-opened, community outreaching, in a community where one
third of the three million population is under fifteen and education  a
cornerstone, are under threat.

The Ministry of Education in Ramallah - a walled compound - was reportedly
attacked by thirty Israeli tanks, despite the employees offers for the
building to be inspected. Soldiers destroyed outer and inner doors, safes,
filing cabinets, computers, hard disks, files, students records Œwere
damaged, or reduced to 

Kondapalli Seetharamaiah dead [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-18 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---



Hindu April 13, 2002

Kondapalli Seetharamaiah dead

By Our Special Correspondent

VIJAYAWADA APRIL 12. Veteran communist leader and founder 
of the People's War Group of Naxalites, Kondapalli Seetharamaiah, 
87, died in his grand-daughter's house here today.

He was suffering from Parkinson's disease and heart problem. He 
had lost his memory power and had been spending a vegetative life 
for the last five years. His condition deteriorated so much in the last 
five months that he found it difficult to recognise even his kith and 
kin. The end came when he was being given a bath at 6.15 p.m. He 
is survived by his wife Koteswaramma and two grand-daughters. 
The cremation will be held tomorrow.

Born in a middle-class farmer's family in Jonnavada village, he was 
attracted to the Communist movement early in life. He became the 
secretary of Krishna district unit of the united Communist Party, 
which played a crucial role in Telangana Armed Struggle. Following 
a split in the Communist Party of India (CPI), he could not join 
either group and moved away from politics.

He went to Warangal to work as a Hindi teacher in Fatima School 
where he came in contact with K.G.Satyamurthi. Both of them were 
attracted to the CPI (ML) and attended the party conclave held at 
Gottikondabillam in Guntur district which was addressed by Charu 
Majumdar. He became a state committee member of the CPI (ML) 
and associated himself with the Srikakulam movement. He founded 
the People's War Group. He was arrested in the Secunderabad 
Conspiracy case. After killing the duty constable he escaped from 
the hospital where he was admitted for treatment in 1982 causing a 
sensation. He led the PWG for several years when it reigned terror 
in Andhra Pradesh and some neighbour states. Following 
differences with the leadership he left the PWG and came away to 
his native village where police picked him up in 1992.

The courts have acquitted him in all the cases filed against him by 
the police.

Hindu April 14, 2002

A few admirers attend Kondapalli's funeral

By Our Staff Reporter

Vijayawada April 13. It was certainly not a funeral befitting the PWG 
founder, Kondapalli Seetharamaiah, one of the country's most 
feared revolutionary leader, who died here yesterday.

Only a few admirers, friends, and members of his family were 
present at Karuna Hospital-cum-residence at Siddhardha Nagar 
here of Gangadhar, the grand son-in-law, where the body was kept 
for people to pay homage. Plainclothes policemen and intelligence 
officials were present near the house. The body of the 87-year-old 
former naxalite leader has been kept at the hospital compound 
since last night in a makeshift coffin -- the rear side of a water 
cooler was converted into a coffin.

Some of Kondapalli's admirers laid wreaths and flowers on his 
body, before it was taken out in procession in a flower-decked 
truck. While no big political or revolutionary leader came to the 
house, some youths raised slogans... `Johar johar Kondapalli 
Seetharamaiah,' `We will make every effort to achieve the ideals for 
which you stood... '. Revolutionary songs were played on the public 
address system at the residence where Kondapalli lived 
underground for about 20 years.

In keeping with the Communist tradition, there was no ceremony 
and the body was cremated at the electric crematorium in the 
evening. The grand sons-in law -- V.S. Krishna and Dr. Gangadhar 
-- were present. Koteswaramma, the estranged wife of Kondapalli, 
has come down from Hyderabad to pay her respects. She 
reportedly broke down after seeing his body. Koteswaramma has 
been staying at an old-age home in Hyderabad. Conspicuous by 
her absence was the former naxalite, Anusuyamma, who has been 
living with Kondapalli in the city.

Kondapalli is survived by his two granddaughters - V. Anuradha 
and Sudha.

   Death condoled

Our Special Correspondent from Hyderabad writes: Left parties and 
civil rights organisations today paid tributes to Kondapalli. The 
CPI(M) State secretary, B.V. Raghavulu, said the veteran leader 
had been with Communist movement till his last. The CPI State 
secretary, S. Sudhakar Reddy, said Kondapalli was a contemporary 
of stalwarts of the undivided Communist movement like Chandra 
Rajeswara Rao and P. Sundarayya, but switched to armed struggle 
after the party split.

M. Omkar, general secretary, MCPI, and B.N. Reddy, former MP, 
and B. Tharakam, president, Republic Party of India, described him 
as a great revolutionary who fought for the oppressed and the 
exploited masses.

K.G. Kannabiran, president, People's Union of Civil Liberties, 
described Kondapalli as a legend and inspiration to the youth of 
Telangana. Mere invocation of his name struck terror among the 
exploiters, he recalled. Mr. 

Flying of flag at half mast was inappropriate [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-09 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---




Sinn Fein Carraig Mhachaire Rois,
32A Main Street,
Carrickmacross,
Co. Monaghan.
Fon/ Faics: 042 966 3579
E-Phoist: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


PREAS RAITEAS/ PRESS STATEMENT
8ú Aibhrean 2002 - For immediate release


Flying of flag at half mast was inappropriate

Sinn Féin councillor Matt Carthy has called on the government has slammed 
Fianna Fáil and the government for issuing a directive stating that the 
Irish flag had to be flown at half mast above government buildings 
tomorrow as a mark of respect to the British Queen Mother.

Councillor Carthy said:

It is incredible that the government called for the Irish flag to be 
flown at half mast as a mark of respect on the death of a member of the 
British royal family.

British people, including those who share this island with us, are 
entitled to mourn the death of a member of the British Royal family whom 
they respected.  But the decision to fly the Irish flag at half-mast was 
inappropriate.  It has caused pain to those who have lost loved ones at 
the hands of British forces, who the British royal family represent daily.

This is also a case of double standards when you consider that the Dublin 
government refused to fly the flag at half mast over state departments on 
the occasion of the death of Kieran Doherty TD who died on hunger strike 
in 1981.

I am calling on the Taoiseach Bertie Ahern and local Fianna Fáil 
representatives to explain how they can still claim to be a republican 
party and yet stoop to such patronising acts to appease a royal family 
that still claims jurisdiction over part of Ireland.  Bertie Ahern and 
President McAleese have both extended their sympathies to the British 
Royal family on their recent bereavement.  That was sufficient.

“ It is ironic that only last week our local Fianna Fáil TD Rory O’Hanlon 
was declaring his republican credentials that we are used to hearing from 
his party in the run up to elections.  Actions speak louder than words and 
the act of placing the Irish tricolour at half mast for the death of a 
british royal speaks volumes to republicans. ENDS

Matt Carthy can be contacted at 087 ­ 625 95 87.

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Is India going the way of 1930s Germany? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-08 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2002/0203indhind.html
Foreign Policy in Focus
[March 27, 2002]

Is India going the way of 1930s Germany?
By Arun R Swamy

The recent rounds of violence between religious groups in India do 
more than reveal the fragility of India's secular state. They 
highlight the inability of Indian democracy to combat what is 
essentially a fascist onslaught.

At first glance what is happening in India appears to be another - if 
extreme - case of religious passion gone awry. A train carrying Hindu 
activists from the disputed religious site of Ayodhya was firebombed 
by a mob, killing 58 of the activists. Several days of revenge 
attacks by Hindus against Muslims followed in the state of Gujarat, 
killing more than 700.

However, India's Hindu nationalists have always resembled 1930s 
European fascists more than they do contemporary fundamentalists. 
Members of the core organization of Hindu nationalism, the Rashtriya 
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), founded in the 1920s, are given paramilitary 
instruction, not religious, and wear khaki uniforms reminiscent of 
Mussolini's brownshirts. While the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), 
founded in the 1960s, is mainly concerned with religion, it still 
does not prescribe how Hindus should worship or behave - an 
impossible task given the diversity of Hindu religious practice.
Instead, like all Hindu nationalists, it is bent on characterizing 
Muslims as alien and hostile while seeking to unify Hindus around a 
romantic nationalism, in which military prowess plays a central role. 
Hindu nationalists' emphasis on international prestige has won them 
the support of the Westernized middle class, typically the target of 
Islamic fundamentalism. Their focus on demonizing Muslims rather than 
promoting Hinduism is illustrated even by the dispute over Ayodhya, 
where extremist Hindu groups destroyed a 16th-century Muslim mosque 
in 1992, sparking nationwide sectarian riots in which more than 2,000 
people died.

Hindu nationalists claim that a temple on the same site honoring the 
birthplace of the Hindu deity, Rama, was torn down to make way for 
the mosque. For Hindu extremist groups, the claim that a temple was 
torn down to build a mosque - for which there is no concrete evidence 
- was at least as important as the claim that Rama was born at the 
site. The destruction of the mosque was commonly spoken of in terms 
of retaking territory that had been lost to invaders.

Hindu nationalists have identified other mosques that they wish to 
destroy, claiming that these, too, were built on temple sites. For 
none do they claim the sanctity associated with the birthplace of 
Rama. Indeed, the purpose of claiming a particular site as Rama's 
birthplace - for which there is no basis in theology or tradition - 
was to justify tearing down the existing mosque.

It is this fascist ideology, and the fact that a party espousing it 
is at the head of the national government, that makes the recent 
anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat so much more disturbing than earlier 
rounds of riots. As horrific as the recent violence was, more died in 
1992. But the political establishment's response this time has been 
ambivalent and feeble. The paralysis in the political system is 
emboldening the Hindu extremist organizations responsible for the 
Gujarat riots to press their agenda more forcefully. There are 
times when India seems to resemble Germany in the 1920s and early 
1930s.

The analogy to the rise of Hitler is not one that should be made 
lightly, but there are many parallels. The Gujarat attacks were not 
spontaneous expressions of mob rage but were highly organized and 
brutally efficient, probably identifying Muslim homes and businesses 
through the use of public records. The state government was almost 
certainly complicit in the wave of violence that affected the entire 
state and saw no effort by the police to control it. The central 
government was slow to dispatch the army, and has attempted to put 
the focus on the train attack, for which they blame Pakistani 
intelligence.

The state government initially sought to limit judicial inquiry to 
investigating the train attack, to use its emergency powers only 
against those accused of the train attack, and to offer higher levels 
of compensation to the (Hindu) victims of the train attack on the 
grounds that they were victims of terrorism. Even many liberal 
intellectuals and politicians, whose protests forced the state 
government to retract some of these measures, have tacitly accepted 
the idea that several days of targeted anti-Muslim violence can be 
equated with the attack on the train, and even resulted from it.
Worse, there has been no effort by those in power to hold those 
responsible for the Gujarat attacks accountable. The national 
government, run by the same party as the state government, the 
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has chosen not to use its 

RE: A Nazi by Any Other Name [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-04-04 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

A pro-Palestanian demo in Mumbai, India

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^


attachment: modisharon2.jpg

a spectacular miscarriage of justice. [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-03-15 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


BBC News Online
Thursday, 14 March, 2002, 17:25 GMT 
UN monitor decries Lockerbie judgement

The proceedings were flawed, says Prof Köchler 
A United Nations observer has described the dismissal of the Lockerbie bomber's appeal 
as a spectacular miscarriage of justice. 
Professor Hans Köchler was speaking after five Scottish judges rejected Abdelbaset ali 
Mohmed al-Megrahi's attempt to overturn his conviction for murdering 270 people in the 
1988 atrocity. 
Libya condemned the outcome as a political decision under pressure from Washington 
and London but it was welcomed by the US Government. 
Al-Megrahi is now preparing to be flown by helicopter from the special Scottish Court 
in the Netherlands to Scotland's largest prison in Glasgow to serve his life sentence 
of at least 20 years. 
Professor Köchler, 53, who teaches philosophy at the University of Innsbruck in 
Austria, was one of five UN observers who followed the Lockerbie case. 
They were appointed as part of the deal between the UN and Libya which allowed the 
extradition of al-Megrahi and a co-accused, who was found not guilty at the trial last 
year, to face the charges. 
The observers are not bound to report back formally to the UN but Professor Köchler 
said that under the circumstances, he felt compelled to do so. 
He told BBC Radio Scotland's Newsdrive programme: I am sorry to admit that my 
impression is that justice was not done and that we are dealing here with a rather 
spectacular case of a miscarriage of justice. 
Credence issue 
I am at a loss to explain how this decision of the appeal court can have been passed 
unanimously in light of some of the questions asked and analysis presented by one or 
the other of the appeal court judges during the appeal. 
I see a kind of gap between how the sessions of the appeal court went and the 
unanaimity of this decision... which did not give any credence at all to any of the 
grounds of appeal which were presented. 
I base my observation only on logic and reason. 
Frankly speaking I am not convinced, I was not convinced when I read the opinion of 
the court after the trial last year and I was not convinced when I went through the 
text presented today. 
I am not convinced at all that the sequence of events that led to this explosion of 
the plane over Scotland was as described by the court. Everything that is presented is 
only circumstantial evidence. 
Asked if he spoke for the entire UN observation team, he said: Based on the informal 
conversations we had today - you can imagine that we have spoken to each other after 
the verdict - I have the impression that this concern is shared by the large majority 
of the observers. 
Clare Connelly, a member of the Lockerbie Trial Briefing Unit at Glasgow University, 
said Professor Köchler's comments displayed a profound misunderstanding of 
Scotland's adversarial legal system. 
Judge's comments 
Al-Megrahi showed no emotion as Scotland's senior judge, Lord Justice General Lord 
Cullen, announced the decision at a three-minute hearing in the Scottish Court. 
He said: For the reasons given in the judgement, in which we all concur, we have 
concluded that none of the grounds of appeal is well founded. 
The appeal will accordingly be refused. 
Professor Köchler spoke to al-Megrahi after the hearing and revealed: He is rather 
composed but of course frustrated and he feels himself to be a victim of international 
politics. 
He is in an angry mood but composed. 
Scotland's most senior law officer, Lord Advocate Colin Boyd QC, said: I believe that 
these proceedings have demonstrated what the judicial process can achieve when the 
international community acts together. 
I hope that this can be the enduring legacy of the Lockerbie trial. It is one that 
cannot and must not be forgotten. 
Legal history 
Al-Megrahi's defence team lodged grounds for his appeal a week after the guilty 
verdict at the end of his trial in January 2001 at the custom-built court in Camp 
Zeist. 
The 14-day appeal hearing made Scottish legal history by being broadcast live on 
television and the internet. 
For the Libyan, Bill Taylor QC argued that new evidence presented to the appeal 
pointed to a miscarriage of justice. 
He said it raised the possibility that the bomb had been placed on board the aircraft 
at Heathrow and not in Malta, as the trial judges had concluded. 
However, Alan Turnbull QC, for the prosecution, said the new evidence was weak and 
flawed, and did not affect the original case. 
Commenting on the decision, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said: The completion 
of the appeal does not end U.S. sanctions against Libya, but should spur Libya to take 
quick action to fully comply with the requirements of the UN Security Council. 
UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw called on Libya to honour its obligations in respect 
of Lockerbie and to co-operate fully with UN Security Council resolutions. 
The UK Government 

Reflections on the Gujarat massacre [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-03-15 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


CRY, THE BELOVED COUNTRY
Reflections on the Gujarat massacre
 By
 Harsh Mander

Numbed with disgust and horror, I return from Gujarat
ten days after the terror and massacre that convulsed
the state.  My heart is sickened, my soul wearied, my
shoulders aching with the burdens of guilt and shame.

As you walk through the camps of riot survivors in
Ahmadabad, in which an estimated 53,000 women, men,
and children are huddled in 29 temporary settlements,
displays of overt grief are unusual. People clutch
small bundles of relief materials, all that they now
own in the world, with dry and glassy eyes. Some talk
in low voices, others busy themselves with the tasks
of everyday living in these most  basic
of shelters, looking for food and milk for children,
tending the wounds of the injured.

But once you sit anywhere in these camps, people begin
to speak and their words are like masses of pus
released by slitting large festering wounds.  The
horrors that they speak of are so macabre, that my pen
falters in the writing.  The pitiless brutality
against
women and small children by organised bands of armed
young men is more savage than anything witnessed in
the riots that have shamed this nation from time to
time during the past century.

I force myself to write a small fraction of all that I
heard and  saw because it is important that we all
know.  Or maybe also because I need to share my own
burdens.

What can you say about a woman eight months pregnant
who begged to  be spared.  Her assailants instead slit
open her  stomach, pulled out her foetus and
slaughtered it before her eyes.  What can you say
about a family of nineteen being killed by flooding
their house with water and then electrocuting them
with high-tension electricity.
What can you say?
A small boy of six in Juhapara camp described how his
mother and six brothers and sisters were battered to
death before his eyes.  He survived only because he
fell unconscious, and was taken for dead.  
A family escaping from Naroda-Patiya, one of the
worst-hit settlements  in Ahmedabad, spoke of losing a
young woman and her three month old son, because a
police constable directed her to `safety' and she
found herself instead surrounded by a mob which doused
her with kerosene and set her and her baby on fire.

I have never known a riot which has used the sexual
subjugation of women so widely as an instrument of
violence in the recent mass barbarity in Gujarat. 
There are reports every where of gang-rape, 
of young girls and women, often in the presence of
members of their families, followed by their murder by
burning alive, or by bludgeoning with a hammer and in
one case with a screw driver.  
Women in the Aman Chowk shelter told appalling stories
about how armed men disrobed themselves in front of a
group of terrified women to cower them down further.
In Ahmedabad, most people I met - social workers,
journalists, survivors - agree that what Gujarat
witnessed was not a riot, but a terrorist attack
followed by a systematic, planned massacre, a  
pogrom.  Everyone spoke of the pillage and plunder,
being organised like a military operation against an
external armed enemy.  An initial truck would arrive
broadcasting inflammatory slogans, soon followed by
more trucks which disgorged young men, mostly in khaki
shorts and saffron sashes.  They were armed with
sophisticated explosive materials, country weapons,
daggers and trishuls.  They also carried water
bottles, to sustain them in their exertions.  The
leaders were seen communicating on mobile telephones
from the riot venues, receiving instructions from and
reporting back to a co-ordinating centre.  Some were
seen with documents and computer sheets
listing Muslim families and their properties.  They
had detailed precise knowledge about buildings and
businesses held by members of the minority community,
such as who were partners say in a  restaurant
business, or which Muslim homes had Hindu spouses were
married who should be spared in the violence.  This
was not a spontaneous  upsurge of mass anger.  It was
a carefully planned pogrom.

The trucks carried quantities of gas cylinders.  Rich
Muslim homes and business establishments were first
systematically looted, stripped down of all their
valuables, then cooking gas was released
from cylinders into the buildings for several minutes.
 A trained member of the group then lit the flame
which efficiently engulfed the
building.  In some cases, acetylene gas which is used
for welding steel, was employed to explode large
concrete buildings.  Mosques  and dargahs were razed,
and were replaced by statues of Hanuman and
saffron flags.  Some dargahs in Ahmedabad city
crossings have overnight been demolished and their
sites covered with road building material, and
bulldozed so efficiently that these spots are
indistinguishable from the rest of the road.  Traffic
now plies over 

fascist leaflet [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-03-13 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---



From: Hari Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: VHP leaflet from Gujarat
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:58:32 -0800

Dear friends:

The following is a communication a SANSAD friend has received from
Mallika Sarabhai, the renowned dancer from Ahmedabad.

This is for your information, and to convey the extent to which the
battle lines are being drawn.

hari sharma
***

This is a leaflet being distributed in the lakhs around the State. We
need you to pass this on to warn people of the ggravity of the
situation.Please help to pass it on to the press and to people who
will help us fight it fearlessly
mallika


The creeping fascism in Gujarat:

A TRANSLATION OF THE CIRCULAR LETTER IN GUJARATI

DISTRIBUTED IN THE STREETS OF AHMEDABAD by the VHP

*

VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD (Raanip)

SATYAM SHIVAM SUNDARAM

JAI SHRIRAM

WAKE UP! ARISE! THINK! ENFORCE! SAVE THE COUNTRY! SAVE THE RELGIION!

Economic boycott is the only solution! The anti-national elements use
the money earned from the Hindus to destroy us! They buy arms! They
molest our sisters and daughters! The way to break the back-bone of
these elements is: An economic non-cooperation movement.

Let us resolve -

From now on I will not buy anything from a Muslim shopkeeper!

I will not sell anything from my shop to such elements!

3. Neither shall I use the hotels of these anti-nationals, nor their 
garages!

4. I shall give my vehicles only to Hindu garages! From a needle to
gold, I shall not buy anything made by Muslims, neither shall we sell
them things made by us!

5. Boycott whole-heartedly films in which Muslim hero-heroines act!
Throw out films produced by these anti-nationals!

6. Never work in offices of Muslims! Do not hire them!

7. Do not let them buy offices in our business premises, nor sell or
hire out houses to them in our housing societies, colonies or
communities.

8. I shall certainly vote, but only for him who will protect the Hindu 
nation.

9. I shall be alert to ensure that our sisters-daughters do not fall
into the 'love-trap' of Muslim boys at school-college-workplace.

10. I shall not receive any education or training from a Muslim teacher.

Such a strict economic boycott will throttle these elements! It will
break their back-bone! Then it will be difficult for them to live in
any corner of this country. Friends, begin this economic boycott from
today! Then no Muslim will raise his head before us! Did you read
this leaflet? Then make ten photocopies of it, and distribute it to
our brothers. The curse of Hanumanji be on him who does not implement
this, and distribute it to others! The curse of Ramchandraji also be
on him! Jai Shriram!

A true Hindu patriot.

N.B. The kites we use at Uttrayan (Kite flying day) are also made by
them. The fire-works are also made by them. We should boycott those
too. Jai Shri Ram (Ranip)

*

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




It had to be done, VHP leader says of riots [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-03-13 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

It had to be done, VHP leader says of riots
Sheela Bhatt in Ahmedabad , rediff.com
In a startling revelation, Professor Keshavram Kashiram Shastri, 96-year-old chairman 
of the Gujarat unit of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, told rediff.com that the list of 
shops owned by Muslims in Ahmedabad was prepared on the morning of February 28 itself. 
Shastri was replying to an allegation that shops in Ahmedabad were looted on the basis 
of a list prepared by the VHP in advance and that the violence was not a spontaneous 
outburst against the carnage in Godhra ../feb/27train2.htm. 
A scholar of the Mahabharat and a highly respected literary figure of Gujarat, Shastri 
said in a tape-recorded interview, In the morning we sat down and prepared the list. 
We were not prepared in advance. 
Asked why they did it, he responded, Karvun j pade, karvun j pade (it had to be done, 
it had to be done). We don't like it, but we were terribly angry. Lust and anger are 
blind. He said the rioters were kelvayela Hindu chokra (well-bred Hindu boys). 
He said there were two reasons for the inactivity of the Ahmedabad police during the 
rioting. They feared death, he said simply. And some of them were Hindus who 
thought, let the mob do whatever it wants. 
He agreed that the atmosphere in the city now is so charged that if he were to go to 
the Muslim-dominated Kalupur area of Ahmedabad, he would not come back alive. 
He admitted that people had been burnt, mosques razed, and shops looted, but argued 
that all that had been done in a frenzy. 
Shastri agreed that violence was not the answer to violence, but remarked, These 
things [non-violence] look good in the shastras. Our boys were charged because in 
Godhra women and children were burnt alive. The crowd was spontaneous. All of them 
were not VHP people. The Waghri community (a scheduled caste) didn't even know the 
victims of Godhra, but they have done an amazing job! They are not our members. In 
villages all these people who were angry are not our people. They are angry because 
Hindutva was attacked. This is an outburst, a tremendous outburst that will be 
difficult to roll back. 
He said the situation could get aggravated and bigger riots were possible. There will 
be a war, he said. So much poison has spread that it's difficult o contain it now. 
Asked how he, a scholar and a litterateur, could condone innocents being burnt alive, 
he remarked, The youngsters have done even those things which we don't like. We don't 
support it. But we can't condemn it because they are our boys. If my daughter does 
something, will I condemn it? 
We don't believe that the boys have done something wrong, because this was the result 
of an outburst. But we do feel that they should not have gone so far. But that's an 
afterthought. We needed to do something. It's said that snakes that are not poisonous 
should keep the enemy away by hissing once in a while. 
He agreed that in Hindu philosophy, such actions are sinful, but it's done! Now we 
should work for peace. Because India can't afford such disturbances. 
The Ahmedabad police have so far arrested 977 persons on charges of rioting, looting, 
burning and killing people in response to first information reports filed by the 
victims and relatives of the dead. 
According to the police, the search for looted goods has been quite successful. In 
many colonies and slums, looted stuff has been found abandoned on the roads by rioters 
fearful of being caught. 
According to a police source, a legislator in Ahmedabad has sought police protection 
because the relatives of those arrested have been nagging him day and night to get 
them out. 
A senior police officer told rediff.com that the arrested boys are now blaming local 
leaders and saffron activists. Our boys did it because the mobs and leaders supported 
it. Now how can you arrest them? say the relatives of the rioters. 
According to Shastri , The VHP has formed a panel of 50 lawyers to help release the 
arrested people accused of rioting and looting. None of the lawyers will charge any 
fees because they believe in the RSS ideology. 

---
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Slaughter in the Name of God [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-03-11 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Slaughter in the Name of God 
By Salman Rushdie
Washington Post
Friday, March 8, 2002; Page A33 
The defining image of the week, for me, is of a small child's burned and blackened 
arm, its tiny fingers curled into a fist, protruding from the remains of a human 
bonfire in Ahmadabad, Gujarat, in India. The murder of children is something of an 
Indian specialty. The routine daily killings of unwanted girl babies . . . the 
massacre of innocents in Nellie, Assam, in the 1980s when village turned against 
neighboring village . . . the massacre of Sikh children in Delhi during the horrifying 
reprisal murders that followed Indira Gandhi's assassination: They bear witness to our 
particular gift, always most dazzlingly in evidence at times of religious unrest, for 
dousing our children in kerosene and setting them alight, or cutting their throats, or 
smothering them or just clubbing them to death with a good strong length of wood.
I say our because I write as an Indian man, born and bred, who loves India deeply 
and knows that what one of us does today, any of us is potentially capable of doing 
tomorrow. If I take pride in India's strengths, then India's sins must be mine as 
well. Do I sound angry? Good. Ashamed and disgusted? I certainly hope so. Because, as 
India undergoes its worst bout of Hindu-Muslim bloodletting in more than a decade, 
many people have not been sounding anything like angry, ashamed or disgusted enough. 
Police chiefs have been excusing their men's unwillingness to defend the citizens of 
India, without regard to religion, by saying that these men have feelings too and are 
subject to the same sentiments as the nation in general.
Meanwhile, India's political masters have been tut-tutting and offering the usual 
soothing lies about the situation being brought under control. (It has escaped 
nobody's notice that the ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), or Indian 
People's Party, and the Hindu extremists of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), or World 
Hindu Council, are sister organizations and offshoots of the same parent body.) Even 
some international commentators, such as Britain's Independent newspaper, urge us to 
beware excess pessimism.
The horrible truth about communal slaughter in India is that we're used to it. It 
happens every so often; then it dies down. That's how life is, folks. Most of the time 
India is the world's largest secular democracy; and if, once in a while, it lets off a 
little crazy religious steam, we mustn't let that distort the picture. 
Of course, there are political explanations. Ever since December 1992, when a VHP mob 
demolished a 400-year-old Muslim mosque in Ayodhya, which they claim was built on the 
sacred birthplace of the god Ram, Hindu fanatics have been looking for this fight. The 
pity of it is that some Muslims were ready to give it to them. Their murderous attack 
on the train-load of VHP activists at Godhra (with its awful, atavistic echoes of the 
killings of Hindus and Muslims by the train-load during the partition riots of 1947) 
played right into the Hindu extremists' hands. 
The VHP has evidently tired of what it sees as the equivocations and insufficient 
radicalism of India's BJP government. Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee is more 
moderate than his party; he also heads a coalition government and has been obliged to 
abandon much of the BJP's more extreme Hindu nationalist rhetoric to hold the 
coalition together. But it isn't working anymore. In state elections across the 
country, the BJP is being trounced. This may have been the last straw for the VHP 
firebrands. Why put up with the government's betrayal of their fascistic agenda when 
that betrayal doesn't even result in electoral success?
The electoral failure of the BJP is thus, in all probability, the spark that lit the 
fire. The VHP is determined to build a Hindu temple on the site of the demolished 
Ayodhya mosque -- that's where the Godhra dead were coming from -- and there are, 
reprehensibly, idiotically, tragically, Muslims in India equally determined to resist 
them. Vajpayee has insisted that the slow Indian courts must decide the rights and 
wrongs of the Ayodhya issue. The VHP is no longer prepared to wait.
The distinguished Indian writer Mahasveta Devi, in a letter to India's president, K. 
R. Narayanan, blames the Gujarat government (led by a BJP hard-liner) as well as the 
central government for doing too little too late. She pins the blame firmly on the 
motivated, well-planned out and provocative actions of the Hindu nationalists. But 
another writer, the Nobel laureate V. S. Naipaul, speaking in India just a week before 
the violence erupted, denounced India's Muslims en masse and praised the nationalist 
movement. 
The murderers of Godhra must indeed be denounced, and Mahasveta Devi in her letter 
demands stern legal action against them. But the VHP is determined to destroy that 

Another body bag has arrived [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-01-06 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

There are many similarities between the attack on the New York WTC and the 
Indian parliament. One of the is the unwillingness to understand the 
underlying factors that lead to violence.  - sandeep


(Kashmir Times, Jan 4, 20020

Another Kashmiri 'killed in custody' in Delhi
  KT NEWS SERVICE
  SRINAGAR, Jan 4: Another body bag has arrived. One more Kashmiri has 
allegedly been
  killed. As a 'sequel' to December 13 attack on Parliament, Zaffar 
Iqbal, a young Kashmiri
  student, was allegedly 'killed in custody' by Delhi police.

  Iqbal, 22, went missing on December 31 and his body was today handed 
over to his
  parents. Delhi Police claimed that Iqbal died in a road accident, but 
his parents maintain
  that his body bore no accident mark and was killed in custody.

  There were only torture marks on Iqbal's body. His nails were pulled 
out. His face was
  full of torture marks. His hands were twisted. If anyone dies in a 
road accident, he will
  have wounds on his body, but it there were none. Above all police 
played truant with us,
  said Ghulam Hussain Gazi, uncle of Iqbal.

  After completing graduation, Iqbal went to New Delhi where he got 
himself admitted in a
  computer college at Info Park for studying e-commerce. He was 
recently appointed as
  sales executive by a pharmaceutical company in New Delhi.

  On December 31, his parents say, Iqbal after performing his duties 
returned to his
  residence at Jangpora Bogal and dropped his carry-bag there.

  He immediately left for computer college. In the evening his friend 
Deepak, who saw him
  last, dropped him in a bus at Defence colony. But police said his 
body was found near
  the stop where he boarded the bus. How is it possible that the body 
was found at the
  point where he boarded the bus? And if a bus met with an accident why 
only Iqbal got
  wounded?, asked Mir Mustafa, another uncle of Iqbal.

  Delhi police informed his parents here over telephone two days back 
about his death.
  When we reached the police station, we were told that the body has 
been kept at
  hospital mortuary. Accompanied by a cop, when we reached the 
hospital, the authorities
  said that there were several dead bodies in the mortuary for 
identification. None of the
  bodies we saw, was of Iqbal. But later we were told that the body No 
44 lying in the
  morgue is of Iqbal. Probably police brought the body from somewhere 
and kept it in the
  morgue, alleges Mir Mustafa.

  Delhi Police, the parents said, told them that Iqbal was found on 
foot path in an
  unconscious state. He was taken to hospital where he was admitted and 
then breathed
  his last. We tried to contact doctor who treated him, but he went 
missing. We tried to
  locate the prescription copy, but it was not given to us. Police did 
not disclose the exact
  details. If Iqbal died in an accident, then police should have no 
problem to reveal facts, but
  they are concealing the details, said Ghulam Hussain Gazi.

  A pall of gloom descended at Drugjan, Dalgate soon after his body 
arrived from New Delhi
  today. The shopkeepers of the area immediately downed their shutters 
and observed
  bandh against Iqbal's killing. The entire Dalgate area went into 
state of mourning

  At his house, the scene was appalling. Womenfolk recited a wanwun 
(Kashmiri folk lore
  recited during marriages for a bride or groom) in desperation. 
Beating chests and crying
  loudly, the womenfolk showered confetti over Iqbal's coffin as if 
they are bidding adieu to a
  groom.

  Hundreds of people today offered Nimaz-e-Jinaza of Iqbal. He was 
taken in a procession
  to the graveyard where he was laid to rest. 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Another 100...... [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2002-01-01 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

US accused of killing over 100 villagers in air strike

Rory Carroll in Kabul
Tuesday January 1, 2002
The Guardian

Fresh controversy over American bombing flared last night after Afghans 
claimed more than 100 people died in an air strike.
US officials hotly denied that any civilians died during the attack against 
what it said was an al-Qaida compound from which
surface-to-air missiles had been fired.

Reports from the village of Qalaye Niazi, in Paktia province, which borders 
Pakistan, yesterday said human remains were
scattered among craters. Two days earlier, the Afghan defence minister - a 
leading Northern Alliance commander who
wants minimal foreign military involvement in the country - called for an 
end to the air strikes.

The question of ongoing bombing by American forces pursuing clusters of 
al-Qaida and Taliban fighters who have eluded
them, is one of many issues confronting the man named yesterday as 
Washington's special envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay
Khalilzad.

Mr Khalilzad, the national security council's specialist on south-west 
Asia, the near east and north Africa, is to be
President Bush's representative to the Afghan people as they seek to 
consolidate a new order [and] reconstruct their
country, the US announcement of the appointment said.

Trying to hold the government together will be a key task, and the US air 
raids are among many issues threatening to split
the interim administration.

Paktia, just south-west of the Tora Bora cave complex, is a focus of 
current bombing because it is a suspected hideout of
any fighters, including Osama bin Laden, who may have escaped last month's 
US pounding.

A Qalaye Niazi villager, Janat Gul, told Reuters he was the sole person 
from his 24-member family to survive Sunday's
pre-dawn attack by helicopters and jets. There are no al-Qaida or Taliban 
people here, he insisted. Haji Saifullah, head of
the tribal council, invited US forces to inspect the village, claiming 107 
civilians died, including women and children.

An ammunition store destroyed in the bombing had been seized from Taliban 
fighters who retreated from the area nearly six
weeks ago, said Mr Saifullah.

The US central command at Tampa, Florida, dismissed the reports, saying the 
attack was early on Saturday, not Sunday,
and that two B-1B bombers and a B-52 - not helicopters - hit a known 
terrorist target.

You don't have a village launching surface-to-air missiles at aircraft. 
You have a known al Qaida-Taliban leadership
compound, said a spokesman.

The strikes set off secondary explosions consistent with stockpiled arms 
and ammunition but caused no civilian casualties,
he said.

Mr Saifullah accused rival ethnic groups of passing wrong information to 
the US in a successful attempt to provoke an
attack.

Several four-wheel-drive vehicles with US and Northern Alliance soldiers 
were spotted yesterday at the Tira Pass heading in
the direction of the village. The Pakistani-based Afghan Islamic Press news 
agency said at least 92 died in the attack.

Qalaye Niazi is two miles north of the city of Gardez, capital of Paktia. 
US planes have made several raids in the area in
the past fortnight based on intelligence that Taliban and al-Qaida remnants 
are hiding in the mountains.

Two of the earlier raids on eastern Afghanistan were reported to have 
killed more than 100 people. There are no independent
accounts of these incidents, but many Afghans are convined that the dead 
were civilian victims of intelligence blunders.

While the interim government's defence minister, General Mohammed Fahim, 
wants the bombing to stop, the foreign
minister, Abdullah Abdullah, has said that Bin Laden could still be in 
Afghanistan and the air campaign could continue for
as long as it takes to finish the terrorists.

The prime minister, Hamid Karzai, owes his position at the head of a 
stitched-together government of rival factions largely
to US sponsorship and is not eager to alienate the backer on which he will 
almost surely continue to rely.

On his inauguration day, December 22, the US bombed what it said was a 
convoy of enemy fighters, but people from the
area later said the group consisted of tribal elders on their way to Kabul 
for the ceremony.

Survivors claimed a rival group had falsely identified them as terrorists - 
the same claim as in Qalaye Niazi.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers 
Limited 2002 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




India bans peace group from visiting Pakistan [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-31 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

India bans peace group from visiting Pakistan

Dawn, Karachi, Pakistan

   ISLAMABAD, Dec 29: The Indian government on Saturday 
banned a planned visit to
   Pakistan by a peace group. The group was due to meet 
President Pervez Musharraf, rights
   activists said.

   The four-member mission, led by retired Indian Navy 
admiral Ram Das, was scheduled to
   arrive in Lahore on Saturday.

   They failed to arrive as the Indian authorities 
prohibited their visit to Pakistan, a spokesman
   for the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) said.

   The private pressure group, named Soldiers for Peace, 
was due to see the president on
   Sunday.

   The HRCP spokesman said the trip was aimed at promoting 
peace and easing the current
   dangerous tensions.

   HRCP director I.A. Rehman said he was disappointed the 
group was barred from travelling to
   Pakistan.

   I am disappointed that people are not allowed to meet. 
They have stopped all
   communications. It is dividing people in the two 
countries, he said. -AFP

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




We will win nuclear war, says India !!! [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-31 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

MONDAY DECEMBER 31 2001

We will win nuclear war, says India
BY RICHARD BEESTON, DIPLOMATIC EDITOR AND ZAHID 
HUSSAIN IN ISLAMABAD

The Times, London.

INDIA boasted yesterday that it would survive a 
first strike by a
Pakistani atomic weapon, but that its neighbour 
would be wiped
out in a swift nuclear counter-attack.

As troop reinforcements continued to pour into the 
frontier zone,
and tens of thousands of people fled border 
villages, the spectre of
all-out war between two nuclear powers prompted 
America and
Britain to intervene directly.

President Bush spoke by telephone to India's Prime 
Minister, Atal
Behari Vajpayee, and to President Musharraf of 
Pakistan, urging
them to show restraint. He also discussed the 
crisis with Tony
Blair. The Prime Minister, who issued his own 
appeal yesterday
for both countries to back down, has agreed to launch a
diplomatic peace mission when he visits the region 
early in the new
year.

A serious intervention from the outside world could 
not come too
soon. India is determined to avenge the attack by 
Islamic militants
on the Delhi parliament that killed 14 people, 
including five
assailants, on December 13. Unless Pakistan arrests 
and hands
over those responsible, India seems determined to 
act unilaterally.

Pakistan says that it has held at least 50 
militants and frozen assets
and last night Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, the head of 
the group
blamed for the attack was arrested for making 
inflammatory
speeches to incite people to violate law and 
order. But India says
that is not enough and wants the suspects handed over.

Both countries insisted that they wanted to avoid 
war. But on the
ground they both ordered the biggest military 
build-up for 15 years
in what looked like a prelude to the fourth 
Indo-Pakistani war
since independence in 1947.

Mr Vajpayee won the backing of opposition parties 
yesterday to
take whatever action was needed. On the other side 
of the border
Adbul Sattar, Pakistan's Foreign Minister, said 
that his anxieties
were mounting, not only by the day but by the hour.

Part of Pakistan's concern is the increasingly 
bellicose message
from Delhi, whose conventional and nuclear forces 
are roughly
double those of Pakistan. In an interview published 
yesterday
George Fernandes, the Indian Defence Minister, said 
that his
military, from the top down, was eager to fight and 
that thousands
of Indian reinforcements would be in place by the 
middle of this
week.

Speaking after a visit to frontline positions in 
Kashmir, he told the
Hindustan Times: Everyone is raring to go. In 
fact, something
that actually bothers them is that things might now 
reach a point
where one says there is no war.

Of greater concern were his remarks about the 
possible use of
nuclear weapons. He warned Pakistan not to consider 
the use of a
first strike, which he said would be tantamout to 
national suicide.
We could take a strike, survive and then hit 
back, he said.
Pakistan would be finished. I do not really fear 
that the nuclear
issue would figure in a conflict.

However, military experts point out that in the 
event of a
conventional war, Indian forces would heavily 
outnumber the
Pakistanis and could score swift victories. In that 
case Pakistan's
weapon of last resort would be its atomic bomb.

Certainly General Musharraf suggested yesterday, 
after meeting
most of the country's political leaders, that he 
would not walk
away from a fight with his bigger neighbour.

I stand here addressing the 

Pak bleeds, India not in the best of health either [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-28 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---



  Pak bleeds, India not in the best of health either

  Pak’s stock markets have fallen 9% over last week but 
India’s
  growth targets have dipped as well

  SUNIL JAIN, Indian Express Dec 28, 2001

  NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 27: LOOK at the macro-fundamentals —
  the ones Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha says are 
okay for India —
  and the answer’s obvious, namely that Pakistan’s 
Afghan adventure
  has cost it dearly, and any war with India can only 
hurt it a lot more.
  But look at India’s fundamentals, and while they’re 
very strong
  compared to Pakistan, just today the NCAER has 
lowered its growth
  forecast for India by around 15 percent — in August 
it was looking at
  a 5.6 percent growth, and now this is down to 4.8 for 
the current
  year.

  Pakistan’s stock markets have fallen a whopping seven 
percent over
  the month — 9 percent over just the last week thanks 
to war fears
  — and it’s currency has been on a free fall right 
since the year’s
  beginning, stabilising only last month after the US 
gave it an outright
  $600 mn for ditching the Taliban and helped 
renegotiate its other
  loans.

  Worse, thanks to the near-collapse of its economy, 
growth forcasts
  for the year have been lowered dramatically, from 4 
percent earlier
  to around 3 percent according to the Asian 
Development Bank. The
  reason for this is equally clear. Thanks to the huge 
war fears,
  Pakistan’s exports which account for 30 percent of 
its GDP have
  been badly hit — major international carriers have 
reduced
  operations to/from Karachi, and India blocking 
commercial cargo from
  Pakistan will force re-routing which will add to 
costs. Nadeem
  Maqbool, chairman of the Pakistan textile mills 
association told
  Reuters that the textile and garments industry in 
Pakistan had orders
  till December, but nothing after that as buyers from 
Europe and the
  US had not come in after September 11.

  Import duty collections till last month were also 
lower this year —
  they were 135.6 billion Pakistani rupees as compared 
to 141.6 billion
  earlier. And according to a Reuters news report, 
estimates suggest
  that overall tax collections for the year 2001-02 
will be well below
  targets. A senior finance ministry official told the 
agency that
  against the target of Rs 457 billion (Pakistani), the 
target for the
  year had been revised to 430.

  The numbers for India, unfortunately, don’t look that 
great either —
  they’re much better than those for Pakistan, but that 
hardly means
  anything. The Business Confidence Index of the 
National Council for
  Applied Economic Research (NCAER) shows a further 
fall of 11
  percent over the last quarter — the index has been 
falling steadily
  since January 2000. Total tax collections so far this 
year have been
  6 percent lower than those last year, and it’s 
unclear how the
  government will reach the target of raising 
collections by around 15
  percent for the full year.

  NCAER, in fact, expects the fiscal deficit to touch a 
whopping 6.5
  percent of GDP for the year against the target of 4.7 
percent. And
  with exports falling in comparison to last year, no 
growth is expected
  here this year either.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Bullets, destruction force villagers to desert homes [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-26 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


 Fear grips Baingalad as bullets, mortars rain
 Bullets, destruction force villagers to desert homes
 By Firdous Tak
 The Kashmir times, Dec 26, 2001
 BAIN GALAD (SAMBA), Dec 25: People around the world might be busy in 
the Christmas celebrations' and
 preparation for the new year, but for the people living at Bain Galad, 
about 18 Kms from Samba, it is war time as
 the troops on both sides of the border exchanged heavy fire and mortar 
shells for the last two days.

 Leaving behind every thing they have collected throughout their life, 
about 5000 people including women and
 children have left their homes in most of the border villages in Samba 
sector for safer places as Pakistan Rangers
 have now resorted to mortar shelling and heavy machine gun fire 
targetting the civilian areas.

 This correspondent, who was in the village today, had a close shave 
when Pakistan Rangers fired number of
 bullets towards the village at about 12:30 PM.

 Hardly few yards away from the International Border (IB) the village 
was mostly calm, except the frequent
 exchange of small arms fire between the BSF and Pakistan Rangers, till 
December 13 attack on Indian
 Parliament. The villagers here said that soon after the Parliament 
attack the intensity of firing suddenly increased.

 Deserted houses, damaged structures, bullet marks on almost all the 
houses, people leaving the village on
 tractors and carts and elderly people discussing the ongoing conflict 
under the shadows of brick walls was all
 visible, when we visited the village this morning.

 Soon after our vehicle stopped at the bus stop of the village, we were 
told by some youth of the area who were on
 their way to Samba that Pakistan army can open fire at any time and 
thus we should take all the precautions
 while moving in the area. Earlier to this I had seen a young boy in a 
pool of blood in Samba hospital, who was hit
 by a mortar shell in an adjoining village.

 Making our way behind the bushes to a nearby field and taking shelter 
behind the pacca houses we reached the
 site where four houses were destroyed due to the mortar shelling, late 
last night. It was destruction all over,
 speaking about the worst man can do.

 I had hardly spent few minutes at the site, when number of bullets 
were fired from across the border towards the
 village. I was lucky enough to escape as I was immediately driven by 
the local residents, accompanying me,
 behind a brick wall. Fear of death and destruction quite visible on 
their faces, the villagers here told us that this
 was first time that they have seen such a situation in the area.

 On December 23, three Border Security Force (BSF) jawans were killed 
when a routine patrol party was
 ambushed by the Pakistan army. The villagers said that since then the 
situation on the border worsened leading
 to the use of heavy mortar shells from across the border. Most of the 
shells exploded in the civilian areas
 causing severe damage to the civilian population, an old villager said.

 Although, the central government claimed that the situation on the 
border is not so tense and the army has been
 deployed as a precautionary measure, for the people living in this 
village the situation is worse than a war. For
 us the war has started. We can not imagine more tension and 
destruction than this, said Ramesh Kumar
 Sharma, a villager who has migrated alongwith his family to Samba.

 Another aggrieved villager, Kewal Krishan said that when the Pakistan 
troops started targetting the civilian areas
 all the inmates of the village including women and children fled 
leaving behind their belongings and cattle at
 home. They kept firing mortar shells towards the village throughout 
the intervening night of December 23 and 24
 and finding themselves trapped between the armies of both sides the 
villagers started fleeing the village on foot
 early yesterday morning, he said.

 Even yesterday afternoon about four shells exploded in the middle of 
the village razing four residential structures
 of Balwant Singh, Lal Chand, Parsu Ram and Bodh Raj to ground. The 
inmates of the houses had already left for
 Samba, when the incident took place.

 I came two days back on leave to spend few days with my family but 
all of a sudden the village was gripped by
 the threat of war and we were forced to leave our house, said Lance 
Naik Janak Singh, whose house was also
 destroyed in the shelling. He said that he had gone to Samba with his 
family members and when he returned he
 saw his house in flames. Our cattle were caught in the fire and were 
rescued by some youth of the village, he
 added.

 For 80 year old Kamal Das the situation is comparatively more tense 
than the situation 

Fwd: FW: PAKISTAN MILITARY WARNS OF NUCLEAR CONFLICT WITH INDIA [WWW.STOPNATO.OR

2001-12-26 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410)
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:37:14 +
Subject: FW: PAKISTAN MILITARY WARNS OF NUCLEAR CONFLICT WITH INDIA
From: farbuthnot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sandeep, this alarming piece fits with your Kashmir Times one. warmest, 
felicity.
Subj:   Pakistan warns of nuclear conflict with India!
Date:   12/25/2001 7:08:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from the Internet (Details)





   ___      __
   /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
/ /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\http://www.MiddleEast.Org

   News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
  and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
   ===
   To receive MER regularly with our compliments:
http://www.MiddleEast.Org/subscribe
===







a small little incident can result in a chain
 reaction which nobody will be able to control...
 [and] become really horrific for the entire world.
   Brigadier General Mohammad Yaqub

MID-EAST REALITIES - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 12/25/2001:   As in 
Palestine, the Kashmir conflict originally resulted from Western policies 
in the last century.  Now both conflicts threaten to explode into wars of 
mass destruction in this century.
 It is now only a few years since both India and Pakistan first tested 
 their nuclear weapons and long-range missiles.  Israel and India have a 
 long-time still mostly secret military connection and unsuccessfully 
 attempted in the 1980s and early 1990s to undermine and destroy the 
 Pakistani nuclear program -- the Muslim bomb project.  The Israelis -- 
 themselves with a military capability said to be many times greater than 
 that of all the Arab countries combined -- have made no secret of their 
 desire to destroy the advanced weapons programs in Iran, Iraq, Libya and 
 Pakistan; the Syrians are said to be arming with chemical and biological 
 weapons to deter the Israelis; and the Egyptian military is also 
 preparing.  Meanwhile Israel has also secretly outfitted three 
 submarines, acquired in recent years from Germany after firm assurances 
 they would not be used in this way, with nuclear weapons in a kind of 
 doomsday nuclear deterrent scenario.
  Within this vortex of world events, the Americans, continually 
 prodded by the infamous Israeli/Jewish lobby, are themselves now turning 
 the events of 911 and the pursuit of Bin Laden/Al Queida into a worldwide 
 war against all opposition to their imperial new world order.  Using 
 the simplistic slogan of a war against terrorism, one who origins and 
 concepts are clearly with the Israelis, covert and military U.S. actions 
 can be expected against many countries in the year ahead.  Palestinian 
 opposition to Israeli occupation, along with Pakistani opposition to 
 terribly brutal Indian policies in Kashmir, have all been lumped together 
 by the Americans with no sense or concern it appears for the very nature 
 of these complex conflicts.   In the new world of you are either with us 
 or against us a few purposefully or mistaken sparks could in fact ignite 
 an entire region, even the entire world.







  PAKISTAN MILITARY WARNS OF NUCLEAR CONFLICT WITH INDIA
 By Raja Asghar

CHAKOTHI, Pakistan (Reuters - 25 December ) - A senior Pakistani army 
officer said on Monday continued border clashes with India could spark an 
uncontrollable flareup involving nuclear weapons.

The two neighbours have reinforced positions on either side of their 
disputed border in Kashmir since a December 13 suicide attack on the 
Indian parliament which killed 14 people. New Delhi blamed two militant 
groups based in Muslim Pakistan.

Local sources said on Monday that Pakistan's army had deployed 
anti-aircraft guns and moved most troops from the eastern garrison town of 
Sialkot to the border with India.

Pakistani and Indian troops only watched each other with distrust from 
bunkers on either side of a broken bridge at Chakothi in the west of 
disputed Kashmir when a group of journalists visited the Pakistani side of 
the front line.

But both sides reported exchanges of fresh mortar and heavy machinegun 
fire elsewhere in Kashmir and New Delhi expelled a Pakistani diplomat, 
raising tensions between the nuclear-armed adversaries ever higher.

Pakistani Brigadier Mohammad Yaqub said the situation was highly 
explosive.   Because in that situation, 

Pakistan art show shut down in India [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-21 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

The Telegraph-India
21 December 2001

SENA SHUTS DOWN PAK ART SHOW

FROM CHANDRIMA BHATTACHARYA

Mumbai, Dec. 20:
An exhibition of paintings by Pakistani artists was taken off from an 
art gallery on Sunday following protests by the Shiv Sena.

The show titled Manoeuvring Miniatures opened at Sakshi Gallery on 
December 8, three days before the attack on Parliament. The 
exhibition was of paintings - ironic depictions of current themes - 
by contemporary artists from Pakistan using miniature techniques.

The few visitors who managed to see the paintings spoke of their 
charm, originality and boldness, but the Sena was not impressed.

Sena leaders claimed that there was a painting in the show that 
depicted Krishna wearing jeans and holding a gun, which led to the 
protests. This, the Sena felt, could hurt religious sentiments in a 
tense political climate.

We found out about the painting after Saamna carried a report on the 
painting. After the attack on Parliament, when the atmosphere between 
the two countries is already tense, it's wrong to put up such a 
painting, said Sena's Sunil Shinde.

Last Sunday, we went to the gallery to stage our protests. But the 
paintings were already taken off by then because of the Saamna 
article, Shinde said.

Those associated with putting up the exhibition were tight-lipped. 
The show was taken off because we felt it was necessary, a senior 
employee of the gallery said. The organisers took it off because of 
certain unavoidable reasons. She confirmed the Sena protests.

There was a painting of Krishna. But it would not be right to 
comment on the matter, another person associated with the show said.

The Manoeuvring Miniatures show came to Mumbai after being put up at 
Delhi. Artists are shocked at the withdrawal of the paintings. The 
paintings were charming, with lots of humour. There was even a 
painting poking fun at Musharraf. The paintings were very skilfully 
done, weaving in Western art with Mughal miniature techniques. For 
example, there was a miniaturised Manet set in a traditional Mughal 
miniature background, said painter Jehangir Sabavala. There was 
Krishna painting. I don't remember the details.

Many artists in the city were disappointed that they could not visit 
the show. It is unfortunate that it was pulled off, said painter 
Atul Dodiya.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




The innocent dead in a coward's war [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-20 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

The innocent dead in a coward's war 
Estimates suggest US bombs have killed at least 3,767 civilians 
Seumas Milne
Thursday December 20, 2001
The Guardian 
The price in blood that has already been paid for America's war against terror is only 
now starting to become clear. Not by Britain or the US, nor even so far by the 
al-Qaida and Taliban leaders held responsible for the September 11 attacks on New York 
and Washington. It has instead been paid by ordinary Afghans, who had nothing whatever 
to do with the atrocities, didn't elect the Taliban theocrats who ruled over them and 
had no say in the decision to give house room to Bin Laden and his friends. 
The Pentagon has been characteristically coy about how many people it believes have 
died under the missiles it has showered on Afghanistan. Acutely sensitive to the 
impact on international support for the war, spokespeople have usually batted away 
reports of civilian casualties with a casual these cannot be independently 
confirmed, or sometimes simply denied the deaths occurred at all. The US media have 
been particularly helpful. Seven weeks into the bombing campaign, the Los Angeles 
Times only felt able to hazard the guess that at least dozens of civilians had been 
killed. 
Now, for the first time, a systematic independent study has been carried out into 
civilian casualties in Afghanistan by Marc Herold, a US economics professor at the 
University of New Hampshire. Based on corroborated reports from aid agencies, the UN, 
eyewitnesses, TV stations, newspapers and news agencies around the world, Herold 
estimates that at least 3,767 civilians were killed by US bombs between October 7 and 
December 10. That is an average of 62 innocent deaths a day - and an even higher 
figure than the 3,234 now thought to have been killed in New York and Washington on 
September 11. 
Of course, Herold's total is only an estimate. But what is impressive about his work 
is not only the meticulous cross-checking, but the conservative assumptions he applies 
to each reported incident. The figure does not include those who died later of bomb 
injuries; nor those killed in the past 10 days; nor those who have died from cold and 
hunger because of the interruption of aid supplies or because they were forced to 
become refugees by the bombardment. It does not include military deaths (estimated by 
some analysts, partly on the basis of previous experience of the effects of 
carpet-bombing, to be upwards of 10,000), or those prisoners who were slaughtered in 
Mazar-i-Sharif, Qala-i-Janghi, Kandahar airport and elsewhere. 
Champions of the war insist that such casualties are an unfortunate, but necessary, 
byproduct of a just campaign to root out global terror networks. They are a world 
apart, they argue, from the civilian victims of the attacks on the World Trade Centre 
because, in the case of the Afghan civilians, the US did not intend to kill them. 
In fact, the moral distinction is far fuzzier, to put it at its most generous. As 
Herold argues, the high Afghan civilian death rate flows directly from US (and 
British) tactics and targeting. The decision to rely heavily on high-altitude air 
power, target urban infrastructure and repeatedly attack heavily populated towns and 
villages has reflected a deliberate trade-off of the lives of American pilots and 
soldiers, not with those of their declared Taliban enemies, but with Afghan civilians. 
Thousands of innocents have died over the past two months, not mainly as an accidental 
byproduct of the decision to overthrow the Taliban regime, but because of the low 
value put on Afghan civilian lives by US military planners. 
Raids on targets such as the Kajakai dam power station, Kabul's telephone exchange, 
the al-Jazeera TV station office, lorries and buses filled with refugees and civilian 
fuel trucks were not mistakes. Nor were the deaths that they caused. The same goes for 
the use of anti-personnel cluster bombs in urban areas. But western public opinion has 
become increasingly desensitised to what has been done in its name. After US AC-130 
gunships strafed the farming village of Chowkar-Karez in October, killing at least 93 
civilians, a Pentagon official felt able to remark: the people there are dead because 
we wanted them dead, while US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld commented: I cannot 
deal with that particular village. 
Yesterday, Rumsfeld inadvertently conceded what little impact the Afghan campaign (yet 
to achieve its primary aim of bringing Bin Laden and the al-Qaida leadership to 
justice) has had on the terrorist threat, by speculating about ever more cataclysmic 
attacks, including on London. There will be no official two-minute silence for the 
Afghan dead, no newspaper obituaries or memorial services attended by the prime 
minister, as there were for the victims of the twin towers. But what has been cruelly 
demonstrated is that the US and 

Just what the world's poorest nations need [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-18 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Just what they need - a £28m air defence system 
Cabinet rift over support for BAe sale to one of world's poorest countries 
David Hencke and Larry Elliott
Tuesday December 18, 2001
The Guardian 
Tony Blair was at the centre of a Cabinet row last night after it emerged Downing 
Street was backing plans for the sale of a British-made military air traffic control 
system to Tanzania, one of the world's poorest countries, despite ferocious opposition 
from the chancellor, Gordon Brown, and the international development secretary Clare 
Short. 
Sources at the Treasury and the Department for International Development said Mr Brown 
and Ms Short would strongly oppose granting an export licence to the defence firm BAe 
Systems for the £28m project. The contract has been condemned as a waste of money by 
the World Bank for a country that has just eight military aircraft and a per capita 
income of £170 a year. 
Half of Tanzania's population lacks access to clean water and a quarter of children 
die before their fifth birthday. 
The deputy prime minister, John Prescott, has now been asked to intervene in the 
dispute over whether safeguarding 250 BAe jobs on the Isle of Wight should take 
precedence over Labour's commitment to development goals and an ethical foreign 
policy. 
Amid reports that No 10 has been using strong-arm tactics to win over the Foreign 
Office and the Department of Trade and Industry, Mr Prescott will chair a Cabinet 
committee meeting on the issue today. 
The whole thing stinks, said one government source last night, adding that a World 
Bank-commissioned report had concluded Tanzania could buy a new civil air traffic 
control system for a quarter of the price of the BAe deal. 
Ms Short and Mr Brown believe Tanzania should use the benefits of a £1.4bn debt relief 
package announced by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund last month to 
boost spending on health, education and basic infrastructure rather than on what one 
source called unproductive expenditure. 
The prime minister has proudly talked about his Africa initiative, a government 
adviser said last night. If he really cares about Africa this is a test case for 
him. 
The Cabinet row has been festering since August, but has come to a head since the 
September 11 attacks, which have led to BAe Systems citing imminent job losses and 
production cutbacks in an intensification of its lobbying of No 10 for an export 
licence. 
Although the previous foreign secretary, Robin Cook, opposed the licence, the present 
incumbent, Jack Straw is backing the prime minister and the defence secretary Geoff 
Hoon in their support for the company. Patricia Hewitt, the trade secretary is in 
neither camp but is said to be anxious not to pick a fight with Tony Blair. 
The World Bank study is highly critical of the technology of the system, let alone the 
debt problems it will cause Tanzania. The report says the BAe system is too expensive 
and not adequate for civil aviation. It said the system's transmitter has already 
been superseded and will need an expensive maintenance agreement unless this is 
underwritten by BAe. It adds that to protect the system during wartime will require 
extremely expensive design specifications. 
BAe said yesterday it had not seen the report and did not want to comment on it. The 
company said the order would sustain British jobs and added that Tanzania had passed 
tests on whether it could afford it. 
The scheme was condemned yesterday by Oxfam, whose policy director, Justin Forsyth 
said: The news that the government is thinking about agreeing this deal is deeply 
disturbing. It exposes a huge flaw in the UK arms export bill, which at the moment 
puts profits before people. The World Bank have said they won't touch this deal with a 
bargepole - the government should think very carefully about the impact it could have 
on the people of Tanzania.
The order will cause a parliamentary row today when the Commons new scrutiny committee 
- composed of the chairs of the defence, foreign affairs, trade and industry and 
international development committees - meets for the first time. The committee has 
been banned by Ms Hewitt from seeing details of the contract on the grounds that MPs 
were recently blocked from prior scrutiny  under the government's export control 
bill for fears of leaks. Her move will anger MPs already furious about government 
backtracking on the openness promised when it was elected. 
The ex-minister Tony Worthington, who tried to amend the bill to allow scrutiny, said 
yesterday: On one hand we are forgiving debt, while on the other we are adding to 
Tanzania's debt with this order. 
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL 

anti-untouchability campaign makes situation worse [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-18 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

GOVT DRIVE FAILS TO LURE DALITS 
The Telegraph-India, Dec 18, 2001
FROM G.S. RADHAKRISHNA 
Deverakonda (Nalgonda), Dec. 17: 
Want to be treated like an equal? Then pay up more. 
The Andhra Pradesh government's anti-untouchability campaign has only exacerbated the 
plight of the seven crore Dalits who make up about 15 per cent of the state's 
population.
Upper-caste shop owners now charge them more, while in some villages, angry landlords 
, upset with the government diktat, refused to hire Dalit labourers, cutting off a 
major source of their income.
The untouchability campaign began from November 1. It ensured that the Dalits were 
allowed to enter village temples or tea-stalls and draw drinking water from the main 
source. But the deliverance soon became a scourge. Tea is now served to Dalits in tea 
stalls for almost double the amount charged earlier.
Served in disposable cups, a Dalit ends up paying Rs 1.50 per cup against the 50 or 75 
paise he paid for the same quantity when served in earthen pots. This freedom is 
costing us more and more, says Mangadhaiah, a Dalit of Manikonda village in 
Mahboobnagar district.
The upper castes have a ready reply. We cannot serve him in the same glasses used by 
other villagers. He has to pay a higher price if he wants to be treated like an upper 
caste, says Muthayalu, a tea-stall owner in Manikonda.
Parameswaraiah, the village sarpanch in Shankarapalli, Rangareddy district, sums up 
what this freedom means on the ground.
As it is a government order, I see to it that no Dalit is turned away from the 
village temple or tea shops. But he cannot come along with the others. He has to come 
after all the others have gone and sit far away from the shop, the sarpanch said. 
Despite the government campaign, in most villages of Warangal and Nalgonda, Dalits are 
given food wrapped in newspapers - they cannot be served in plates.
In some villages in Mahboobnagar, Dalits are also not allowed to buy fine rice, even 
if they can afford it.
We are sold only coarse rice by the local shops, says Venkataiah, a Harijan farmer 
in Rudraram, in Rangareddy.
State home minister T. Devender Gowd denies such discrimination. By law we have made 
such offences punishable with either six months rigorous imprisonment or a Rs 5,000 
fine for the first offence and two years rigorous imprisonment and Rs 20,000 fine for 
subsequent offences. 
But Left parties, which conducted a survey in around 2,000 gram panchayats out of a 
total of 21,000 in the state, contend that the campaign had merely been an official 
programme.
Within days after giving the Dalits entry into village temples in the constituency of 
state health minister N. Janardhan Reddy, they were barred. In spite of revisits by 
Telugu Desam Party leaders and the minister to that village, the Dalits continue to be 
kept away, says CPM state secretary B.V. Raghavulu.
Most Dalits in Nalgonda district say the untouchability campaign has brought them more 
suffering as landlords hired labourers from Guntur district in the last crop-cutting 
season. The result was nearly 2,000 Dalits went without work.
We would be better off remaining as untouchables rather than starve. We don't know 
whether the village elders will allow our children to go to school next year because 
of the government action against some of them this year, said Bikshapatamma, of 
Chandanpur in Rangareddy.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Delhi cops crackdown on Kashmiris [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-18 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

 Delhi cops crackdown on Kashmiris
'Leave town, go back to Valley'


The Kashmir Times, Dec 18, 2001

New Delhi, Dec 15 (NNN) : A major, silent, secret crackdown is currently underway in 
the Union Capital, especially in the heavily-populated area of the Walled City against 
the people of Kashmiri origin in the wake of Thursday's daring attack on Parliament.

During the drive, the helpless Kashmiris, who mostly come to the city during winter to 
earn their livelihood, have been asked to leave the town. They have been getting 
mid-night knocks at their rented, dingy houses in the congested houses in the dead of 
the night a number of times by the area cops to hear the same parody -  Leave the 
town as soon as possible -

Reportedly in this a major crackdown, thousands of Kashmiris in the Walled City area 
have been asked by the Delhi Police to leave the capital and go back to the Valley in 
the wake of attack on Parliament House. A few Kashmiris left within less than 24 hours 
of the incident, scared of getting into trouble with the police, who launched the 
crackdown on all Kashmiris in the city after orders from above.

However, a bulk of them are refusing to return. Where will we go? they ask. We are 
also Indians, they plead, having spent most of their time for the last two days 
pleading with police officials, shuttling between one police officer's room and 
another.

In fact a large number of them have bluntly told the cops that they will not leave. 
You can kill us, but we're not going anywhere, many of them have told the local 
police, pleading that their woollen supplies like shawls and other items are lying in 
transport godowns or are on their way from Kashmir and Punjab and they'd lose all 
their money if they leave abruptly like this, and especially when Eid-ul-fitr is just 
a couple of days is away.

By a rough estimate, there are over 3,000 Kashmiris staying in parts of Darya Ganj, 
Jama Masjid, Chooriwalan, Chandni Mahal, Ganj Mir Khan, Sheesh Mahal, Sui Walan, 
Chhata Lal Mian, Turkman Gate and some other places in the Walled City. And a large 
number of them had actually got themselves 'registered' at the local police station 
the moment they arrived in Delhi to avoid any harassment during their stay here. The 
'registration' means they have supplied their full personal details to the police.

While this is not the first time the police has cracked down on Kashmiris staying 
here, it is probably the first time it has ordered them to get out of the city and go 
back from where they have come. And the cops are not giving them any reasons 
whatsoever. We have orders from the top, is all that they are prepared to tell the 
harassed Kashmiris. The current raids began around mid-night on Thursday and have 
continued almost without a break since then. The crackdown is total and blanket, and 
has intensified since the government pointed the finger at the Kashmiri militant 
outfit, the Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad.

But most of these Kashmiris say they come here every year during this season to earn 
some money. And going back without making a few bucks would be suicidal since the 
money they earn in these two or three months of winter through sale of shawls, jackets 
and other woollen items is all their income for the whole of the year, on which 
depends the lives of their families.

Ashfaq (name changed) is one of those who has been coming here regularly from Kashmir 
every winter for the last seven to eight years. Along with a dozen other Kashmiris, he 
stays in one small room rented in one of those innumerable lanes that form the Walled 
City of Delhi. Struggling to make both ends meet, he goes around the city selling 
shawls and jackets. And the money he makes from this is his only income for the rest 
of the year, till the next winter.

I have no work back in Kashmir. If I go back now what will I do for the rest of the 
year? Do they want me to take up the guns too? he asks angrily, a sentiment echoed by 
his Kashmiri colleagues smoking 'hoqaah' in their rented room.

  
 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Harassment of Kashmiris [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-17 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Harassment of Kashmiris (Editorial)
Kashmir Times, Dec 17, 2001
Whatever the investigations on the attack in Parliament house on Thursday and whatever 
the evidence against two Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed militant organisations, 
for the people of Jammu and Kashmir Thursday's attack only means an excuse with the 
government for increasing and accelerating its repressive measures against them. There 
are still conflicting versions about the involvement of two Kashmiri youth in the 
suicide attack. But Kashmiris have begun to be targeted by the government, security 
forces and its investigating agencies in and outside the state already as if every 
Kashmiri happens to have a personal involvement with what happened inside the 
parliament house premises on Thursday. Several arrests have already been made 
including the arrest of a Delhi University professor, and several others are being 
harassed. In the recent years, the way people of Jammu and Kashmir are harassed 
outside the state, particularly the Muslims of the state on trivial pretexts !
defies any democratic norms of a free state. It is known fact how security forces have 
been picking on Kashmiri youth on the Delhi-Jammu highway and extorting money from 
them. 
Though complaints are galore about the same, no action has been taken probably because 
those at the helm also see the Kashmiris with a suspicion. Now there are reports of 
Kashmiris, specially Muslims being asked to 'go back to the Valley', as if they have 
no right to visit Delhi, stay their for their studies or business purposes or settle 
there. The government is encouraging such a practice irrespective of the fact that 
this would not only communally create divisive atmosphere in Delhi and elsewhere but 
would also further accentuate the alienation of the already isolated Kashmiris. Just 
because a handful of Kashmiri militants are suspected to be involved in Thursday's 
incident, why should the entire lot of people be branded alike and looked down upon 
with suspicion, hatred and mistrust. 
This is no different from the attack on the Asian community particularly the Sikhs in 
America in the wake of the World Trade Centre attack on September 11, for the pure 
reason that for the ignorant Americans, the Sikhs and Osama bin Laden looked alike in 
their turbans. If the government chose to condemn the attacks on the Asian community 
in America that time, why should it now choose to defend harassment on similar lines 
of the innocent people, for the only reason that they happen to belong to a militancy 
infested state or because they happen to be Muslims. Why should the government deny 
innocent people their democratic rights to reside and live peacefully in any part of 
the country. If Kashmiris staying in Delhi or visiting the capital city are being 
harassed, those staying back in their homes are no less harassed either. 
If the guilt of being a person from the same community and the same land as the 
suspected terrorist, is enough to make one a suspect in the eyes of the powers that be 
in a democratic country, why shouldn't everyone start suspecting all Delhi-ites to 
have some sort of a nexus with the criminals, with the city's growing crime graph, and 
start believing that all Mumbai-ites have connections with the underworld because 
Chotta Rajan and Shakeel etc come from there.  ...OLE_Obj... 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Pakistan - India Relations May Worsen as increasing war-talk in India [WWW.STO

2001-12-14 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


December 14, 2001, NYT
Pakistan - India Relations May Worsen
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 5:21 a.m. ET
NEW DELHI, India (AP) -- Relations between India and Pakistan were already dismal 
before the terrorist attack on India's Parliament building. Now they may be in a 
downward spiral.
Though few have publicly blamed Pakistan for the suicide attack that claimed 12 lives 
Thursday, there is concern it will increase tension between the nuclear rivals.
``It can't get worse, short of war,'' said K.P.S. Gill, one of India's leading 
anti-terrorism experts.
Predictions were just as grim across the border.
``Relations between the two countries will nose-dive further,'' said Riffat Hussain, 
chairman of defense and strategic studies at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad. 
``If they don't accuse Pakistan, they have no one else to blame but themselves.''
Gunmen with explosives stormed the red sandstone complex and began firing in what has 
been called the worst breach of state security since the assassination of Prime 
Minister Indira Gandhi in 1984.
Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee vowed revenge.
``Now the fight against terrorism has reached its last phase. We will fight a decisive 
battle to the end,'' Vajpayee told the nation.
Vajpayee and India's senior leaders on Thursday were careful not to even whisper blame 
against Pakistan, with whom India has fought three wars since independence from 
Britain in 1947.
But by Friday, many other Indians were pointing straight at Pakistan and Afghanistan, 
and to the al-Qaida terrorism network blamed for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks 
against the United States.
``For long, we have waited for Pakistan to stop aiding terrorism in this country,'' 
said Vijay Kumar Malhotra, a senior leader of Vajpayee's party and member of 
Parliament. ``India should attack and destroy the terrorist camps in 
Pakistan-controlled Kashmir.''
India has long accused Pakistan, today a key U.S. ally in its global war on terrorism, 
of fomenting terrorism by training and supporting the Islamic militants who have waged 
a 12-year insurgency in the disputed Himalayan province of Kashmir.
The Islamic separatists are fighting for an independent Kashmir or a merger with 
Muslim Pakistan. Islamabad insists it offers the ``freedom fighters'' only moral and 
diplomatic support.
India blamed Pakistan for the suicide attack that killed 40 people at the Kashmir 
state legislature on Oct. 1. A Pakistan-based militant group claimed credit, then 
later denied involvement.
Pakistan's military leader, President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, was quick to condemn the 
attacks on Thursday.
``I was shocked to learn about the attack earlier today by armed intruders,'' 
Musharraf said. ``I have been saddened by the loss of life and the injuries suffered 
by Indian security personnel in the attack.''
But two words in Musharraf's statement -- calling the attackers ``armed intruders'' 
instead of ``terrorists'' -- raised eyebrows and suspicion in New Delhi on Friday.
Pramod Mahajan, India's parliamentary affairs minister, was asked if the attackers 
were from Pakistan.
``General Musharraf called them `armed intruders.' He was not even ready to use the 
word terrorists,'' Mahajan told Star News TV. ``That should be enough to answer your 
question.''
Kanti Bajpai, a professor of disarmament at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, 
said Musharraf made a grave error.
``Musharraf should call them terrorists,'' he said. ``His statement, that's asking for 
trouble.''
Bajpai noted that India blames Pakistan for having supported the Taliban, which 
harbored the al-Qaida terrorism network blamed for the Sept. 11 attacks on the United 
States. He expects India to retaliate against Pakistan.
``They may take their time over it, to show the world that they did it with due 
process, but I think the chances are pretty high,'' he said.
J.N. Dixit, a former foreign secretary and high commissioner to Pakistan, said 
Thursday's strike should be a warning to the United States that its global war on 
terrorism had failed in India.
Washington had called on both India and Pakistan to use restraint when cross-border 
shelling increased after the Oct. 1 suicide attack on the Kashmir state legislature.
``Despite the U.S.-led anti-terrorism campaign, terrorists still remain strong and 
they have devastating reach,'' Dixit said. ``This spectacular incident ... will result 
in India having to reconsider the American demand to practice restraint.''
Vajpayee told President Bush in a letter that Pakistanis were to blame for the Oct. 1 
suicide attack. ``There is a limit to the patience of the people of India,'' he said 
then.
Bush telephoned Vajpayee Thursday night to offer condolences and FBI and State 
Department counterterrorism teams to help in an investigation.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY 

Taliban legacy that broke a proud female judge [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-14 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Taliban legacy that broke
a proud female judge 
The Irish Times, NMov 14, 2001
What was it like for a woman before and during the years of the Taliban? One woman 
told Elaine Lafferty in Kabul about her life, then and now 
It is difficult to imagine that life was really ever very different for the women of 
Afghanistan. After all, the Taliban is gone from Kabul city, and yet one does not see 
a woman on the street without the all-enveloping blue burqa. 
When I was in Quetta, Pakistan, in October, I bought a burqa for $20 in case I might 
need it. When I returned to New York, it was passed around and tried on by friends, 
female and male, who marvelled at the sense of confinement, invisibility and 
claustrophobia it immediately engendered. 
It also became quite a party joke, so it is strange to be in Kabul and see this garb 
as something still taken seriously. This is not a stone-age city intellectually; 
beneath the burqa, one can make out women wearing sophisticated wool salwar kameez 
suits and upscale black leather shoes. Some carry urban-style handbags. 
But to get a more accurate picture of women here, you have to turn back the clock. In 
1977, 15 per cent of all legislators were women. Until the 1990s, women accounted for 
70 per cent of all teachers, 50 per cent of government workers and fully 40 per cent 
of doctors. In 1990, there were 14 women members of Afghanistan's judiciary. Shukria 
was one of them. 
For five years before that I was an assistant to a judge, she says proudly. We are 
sitting in the offices of UNICEF, where Shukria's aunt has helped her to apply for a 
job. 
Then I became a judge in 1990. I dealt with family law, divorces, property law and 
also juvenile justice. 
The Afghanistan juvenile justice system dealt with minors on several levels according 
to their ages. Her department dealt with with young people between the ages of 15 and 
18 years old. Most of the charges against girls were related to sexual matters. The 
boys were accused of stealing or carrying drugs and weapons, she says. 
Shukria loved being a judge, mostly, she says, because she could help turn children's 
lives around. 
A judge can send them for rehabilitation instead of prison. Afghans are not violent, 
no matter what people say. Most of the crimes were because of poverty and lack of 
education. Children would steal because they needed things or needed money. 
In 1996, Shukria's work life came to an end in an abrupt and brutal manner. The 
Taliban forbade women to work. I ask Shukria how it happened, how did she learn she 
was sacked? She is holding a file folder with her CV inside and she suddenly brings 
it up to cover her face. She cannot control the tears. 
Minutes pass before she begins to speak slowly. I was in my office. They burst 
through the door. They were yelling, 'Who do you think you are? Who appointed you?' 
They did very bad behaviour to me. There was an old man, a guard, and they made him 
carry my things out. You couldn't talk to them. You couldn't reason with them. They 
wouldn't listen, she said. 
It is impossible not to speculate about what she means by bad behaviour but it is 
very easy not to ask this woman, with dark haunted eyes and tears on her cheeks, any 
more about it. She was a lawyer, a judge, a proud woman, and today it is clear she is 
trying just to unbreak her heart. 
After that I sat in my father's house for three years, sweeping the room. I worked as 
a volunteer with children, but it was a terrible time. 
We turn to the present. Shukria has prepared a series of lectures about law in 
Afghanistan for some NGOs. 
She met UNICEF director Carol Bellamy last week to offer proposals for the 
establishment of a new judicial system. She is discussing the revival of the 1964 
Constitution of Afghanistan, which granted equal rights to women. If peace will come, 
if we have a government, then we will have good law as we used to. Judges must sit as 
judges, qualified people, not policeman or military. We have good law here, it just 
needs to be implemented. 
After talking with Shukria I go the football stadium in central Kabul. This is where 
justice Taliban-style was meted out once a month on Friday afternoons for five years. 
The accused would be presented to the family of the alleged victim, who could then 
vote to spare the accused's life. 
Few did. The judges would present the case over the loud-speakers to the 30,000 or so 
observers in the stands. Inevitably execution would be called for. Women were stoned 
to death for adultery, men's throats were slit for murder, hands were chopped off for 
theft, right there in front of the cheering crowds. 
Today the stadium is silent, the grass on the field crushed and brown. A lone soldier 
sits at the entrance peering curiously at some Western woman wandering around an empty 
field. The last execution there was in September, I am told. 
A strange graffiti is written on several 

Czech paper casts doubt on suicide bomber's meeting with Iraqi agent [WWW.STOP

2001-12-14 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

IRAQ SANCTIONS MONITOR Number 382
Friday December 14 2001
ISM is produced by the Mariam Appeal www.mariamappeal.com
___


Czech paper casts doubt on suicide bomber's meeting with Iraqi agent.

Prague, 13 December: The theory about a connection between
the terrorists from 11 September in the USA and the Iraqi
embassy in Prague, which has served as the chief evidence
against Iraq, is crumbling, the daily Mlada fronta Dnes writes
today.

Egyptian Mohammed Ata, who blew up a New York skyscraper,
had only been in the Czech Republic twice. His alleged meeting
with an Iraqi diplomat has not been confirmed. All information
about his other stays in the Czech Republic checked by the
Czech intelligence and police have proved unsubstantiated in
the past days...

The Prague trace and especially the meeting with the Iraqi spy
were the only clue for Americans which suggested a connection
of the al-Qa'idah members with Saddam Husayn's regime. I
can confirm that documents only prove two stays, police chief
Jiri Kolar said last night.

Mohammed Ata visited Prague last May, when he landed at the
Ruzyne airport. Since he did not have visa, he was not allowed to
leave the transit room. This was his first stay. He returned to
Germany and a few weeks later he returned to Prague by bus.
This was his second stay.

He spent here a single night in June and the second day he
boarded a plane bound for the USA. Unfortunately, we have not
ascertained where he was during the night, an intelligence
officer told the daily.

According to the original information, Ata had come by plane
twice. However, the police now found that the other Mohammed
Ata was a man from Pakistan and only had his name in
common with the terrorist. His identification number was
different, there was a big difference in their age and even
nationality. Simply everything was different. It was someone
else, an Interior Ministry official told the daily.

Without presenting any evidence, Prime Minister Milos Zeman
told CNN in mid-November that Ata and Iraqi consul al-Ani had
at their meeting planned a terrorist attack on Radio Free Europe,
which is based in Prague's centre. Zeman later said that this
was just one of the hypotheses. The information was later
denied unofficially by the Czech secret service and President
Vaclav Havel did so officially last week.

Source: CTK news agency, Prague, in English 2306 gmt 13 Dec
01.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




WHAT THEY WON'T LET US SEE: THOUSANDS KILLED BY U.S. BOMBERS [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.U

2001-12-13 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

-
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Dec. 20, 2001
issue of Workers World newspaper
-

WHAT THEY WON'T LET US SEE: THOUSANDS KILLED BY
U.S. BOMBERS

By Deirdre Griswold

The planned and deliberate brutality of the Pentagon war in
Afghanistan is a closely guarded secret.

People in the United States are being told practically
nothing about the war's effects on the Afghan people. What
images are we allowed to see on television? Explosions that
produce nothing but clouds of dust. Fuzzy objects in the
crosshairs of bombers that are always identified as
military targets. Grateful refugees receiving generous
handouts from the West. And the smooth-talking boys of the
Pentagon who make it all sound like a heroic game that will
end when the evil enemy has been taken.

But the truth is there have been massive civilian
casualties.

The military no longer produce a body count at the end of
each day as they did during the Vietnam War. However, as of
Dec. 10, more than 3,500 civilians had died in the U.S.
bombing, according to Prof. Marc W. Herold of the University
of New Hampshire.

Herold has been keeping tabs on casualty reports since the
bombs began falling on Oct. 7. He has done a meticulous job
of tabulating, day by day and place by place, all the
reports of civilian casualties to be found in the world
press.

Herold released the results of his study on Dec. 10 in a
discussion with Amy Goodman, producer of Democracy Now! An
Excel spreadsheet containing the information can be found at
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwherold/.

I was concerned that there would be significant civilian
casualties caused by the bombing, and I was able to find
some mention of casualties in the foreign press but almost
nothing in the U.S. press, he said.

These were poor people to begin with, he added. And, on
top of that, they had absolutely nothing to do with the
events of September 11.

Herold lists the date, number of casualties, location, type
of weapon used and sources of information for each incident.
Here is one such listing for Oct. 11: Two U.S. jets bombed
the mountain village of Karam, comprised of 60 mud houses,
during dinner and evening prayer time, killing 100-160
people. Sources: DAWN (English-language Pakistani daily
newspaper), the Guardian of London, the Independent,
International Herald Tribune, the Scotsman, the Observer and
the BBC News.

That was at the beginning of the bombing campaign, when the
Taliban were still believed to be strong. But what happened
after they began to flee south and eventually abandoned
Kabul?

BOMBING OF BIBI MAHRU

The bombing continued unabated. In an article entitled U.S.
Planes Rain Death on the Innocent, Rory McCarthy wrote in
the Guardian of Dec. 1 that the village of Bibi Mahru near
Kabul had been hit several times by U.S. bombers, even
though they destroyed the only military target in the area,
a radar and anti-aircraft position on a hill above the town,
on the first night.

McCarthy saw the damage caused by bombs dropped 10 days
after the radar position had been destroyed. The deep
craters and pieces of shrapnel indicate that America's
weapon of choice in Kabul was the Mark 82 500-lb. bomb,
which is designed to be guided to its target by the pilot, a
nearby observation plane or a spotter on the ground. But
there was nothing accurate about the 500-lb. bomb which fell
on Bibi Mahru. It killed Gul Ahmad, 40, a Hazara carpet
weaver, his second wife Sima, 35, their five daughters and
his son by his first wife. Two children living next door
were also killed. ... 'My husband was thinking before this
incident that the Americans would bring peace in our
country,' said Arafa, who lost eight members of her family.
'Now I am left with my five daughters and two sons and no
one to look after them.'

McCarthy also visited a neighborhood in Kabul of workers'
apartment buildings built by the Soviet Union during the
period of the Afghan Revolution, which was overthrown in a
war financed by the U.S. CIA. On Nov. 12, wrote McCarthy,
the last day the Taliban spent in Kabul, American planes
targeted a military garrison close to the densely populated
Soviet-built Microrayon housing district. Four 50-lb. bombs
hit the area. Only one hit the garrison.

One landed at the corner of apartment block 33, where a
crowd of children were playing. Nazila, six, was crushed to
death by a concrete block. 'She couldn't run away in time,'
said her father, Abdul Basir. 'We believed because this was
a residential block they wouldn't hit it. We thought they
were hitting their targets accurately.' A second landed in
the road, a third landed on two houses, killing five people,
including a 15-year-old girl.

The Pentagon keeps denying civilian casualties in its press
briefings. The corporate media here--the newspaper and
television bosses who control what gets aired--accept
whatever the military says. They kill 

Criticize Clinton and land in jail [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-08 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Abuse Clinton in Marxist
  Bengal and land in jail

  ALOKE BANERJEE

  TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Times of India, Dec 8, 2001

KOLKATA: It is not safe in Marxist West Bengal to
criticise former US president Bill Clinton even 
when the
state government has decided on Thursday not to
  move a bill to enact Prevention of Organised Crimes Act
  (POCA), a cousin of the much reviled central law the
  Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO).

  Two girls in their early 20s, Deepa Sarkar and Kakoli Mandi,
  found this out to their great misfortune. The girls, 
Naxalites
  attached to People's War, were arrested from Salboni in
  Midnapore for carrying a Clinton Go Back placard. Both were
  charged with sedition and have been languishing in jail since
  March.

  The lack of an act on organised crime has not deterred the
  administration from putting nearly 1,000 political prisoners
  behind bars for prolonged periods. All of them have been
  arrested under the existing laws. As many as 686 of them are
  members of the Kamtapur People's Party which is demanding
  a separate state in North Bengal. The rest are activists of
  various Naxalite factions.

  Ironically, the Left Front and the CPM too had raised similar
  slogans during Clinton's first visit to India in March 
2000, then
  as the president of the United States.

  The opponents to the proposed law from within the CPM have
  insisted that there was no need for a law such as the POCA
  and existing laws were enough to deal with organised crime. 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Local Leaders Ask for End to Raids [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-12-04 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

 Copyright © 2001 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com

  Tim Weiner New York Times Service
   Tuesday, December 4, 2001

   Local Leaders Ask for End to Raids   and Tell Foreign Fighters to Leave

(extract)

.
 In a signed declaration addressed to the world, the elders of this 
region said: To those foreigners living in the mountains of Afghanistan, 
we say to you: Leave our country.
 Because of you, our innocent countrymen are suffering. Our demand to 
the United States government and its coalition: Stop the bombing in the 
name of humanity.

 Please stop bombing our innocent people. We say to all civilized 
nations that this bombardment is cruelty.

 One of the elders, Mohammed Hazrat Faqirbad, said: War is disaster. 
War is evil.  Because war is unholy. There is no holy war. It makes our 
women widows and  beggars. No more.

 The villagers of Kama Ado, about 55 kilometers (35 miles) south of 
here, said they had identified and buried 155 of their dead. Eastern Shura 
officials said that at least 58 people had died in three other nearby 
villages. The officials and villagers said that the death toll would climb 
and that the dead were Afghan civilians, not Qaida fighters.

 The Pentagon has not acknowledged that any villages were struck, 
saying it bombed only Qaida military targets between Friday night and early 
Monday morning. The villages lie within 15 kilometers of the cave complexes 
of Tora Bora in southern Nangarhar Province.



Copyright © 2001 The International Herald Tribune 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Homeless in Srinagar as per POTO [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-11-30 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Homeless in Srinagar as per POTO
Father arrested for 'harbouring' militants, family evicted; JK govt approves ordinance
MUFTI ISLAH
(Indian Express, Nov 30 2001)
SRINAGAR, NOVEMBER 29: AT first glance, this scene in downtown Srinagar is nothing 
unusual: two children, one six, the other four, fighting over a chocolate, the mother 
by their side being consoled by neighbours.

On November 26, her husband Ghulam Muhammad Dar was arrested by the police for 
allegedly harbouring militants. But there's one difference this time. The police have 
sealed the door, nailed the windows, the family has been evicted-as per POTO.
Jammu and Kashmir became the first state in the country to approve POTO today but for 
35-year-old Hasina and her children, Abbas and Fayaz, their grandmother Jana Begum, 
the Special Operations Group of the JK police came with the Ordinance on November 26 
itself. 
Since then they have been spending the day on a coir carpet outside the house, the 
night with neighbours who take turns having them over.
On her door is pasted a handwritten notice in Urdu: ''The Government of Jammu and 
Kashmir has seized this house belonging to Ghulam Muhammad Dar under Section 8 and 9 
of Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance POTO. Dar has been harbouring militants and a 
search of the house had yielded a pistol and a wireless set.'' The notice warns that 
entry into the house by is an offence under the law.
Away from TV studios and the seminar circuit, this aspect of POTO-Sections 8  9-has 
been rarely debated, the focus being on the provisions against the press: the power of 
the police to seize a property suspected to constitute ''proceeds of terrorism.'' TADA 
did not have any such provision. And POTO gives virtually unfettered powers on this 
score. 
In fact, residents can be evicted for an indefinite period and the property seized 
even if the person possessing it is not accused of committing any offence.
Residents of the Safa Kadal neighbourhood where the house is cannot understand why the 
police has refused to let the mother and her two children stay. A group of neighbours 
took the two children, the mother and the grandmother to the police and the local 
adminstration for help. But nothing has come out of it.
Today, it was even worse. Mohammad Ahsan Untoo, who heads the local Human Rights 
Front, arrived at the house with a group of supporters who tried to break open the 
lock. 
Police arrived and fired tear gas at the protesters who were chased away. A team of 
police personnel was posted at the house.
Speaking to The Indian Express, K Rajinder, Inspector General of Police, said Dar's 
house served as a ''hideout'' for Al Badr militants.
''They used to hide in one of the rooms which opened through a cupboard. It was a 
scientifically designed hide-out with good ventilation and space for ammunition,'' he 
said.
Police say Dar's address was found in some documents seized on November 23 after an 
Al-Badr deputy commander Hafiz was killed in an encounter at Zakoora in the city's 
outskirts.
Khalid Najeeb Soharwardhy, Minister of State for Home, said that POTO was applicable 
in Jammu and Kashmir like in other parts of the country. ''It started the day when the 
ordinance was passed. If Parliament withdraws or makes amendments in it, it will then 
cease to be applicable or there will be change in it,'' he said. Until then, the 
family may have to remain homeless.
*   The property can be seized even if the person possessing it is not accused of 
committing any offence under POTO or any other law.
*   The police can throw out all the residents and seal the property without 
giving any notice to them.
*   No judicial supervision. The police do not have to take the court's permission 
before seizing the property. Nor do they have to report to the court after the seizure.
*   They can take up the matter only before an executive officer called the 
Designated Authority and they have 48 hours to do so.
*   There is no prescribed limit on how long the Designated Authority can take to 
decide the validity of the seizure. 

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Sealed house reoccupied by police amid protests [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-11-30 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Sealed house reoccupied by police amid protests
Demonstrations lathicharged, teargassed
Kashmir Times, 30 Nov 2001
KT NEWS SERVICE
SRINAGAR, Nov 29: Amid strong protest demonstration at Safa Kadal which was quelled by 
lathi-charge and lobbing tear gas shells, police today occupied the house which was 
earlier sealed under Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance.
A big demonstration led by Mohammad Ahsan Untoo, chairman Human Rights Front, a local 
human rights organisation, today defied POTO by breaking the seal of the particular 
house. They Ghearoed the house, which was followed by breaking its seal, and then 
forced their entry into it.
The family members also entered the house. But, immediately afterwards police swung 
into action and started pushing back the demonstrators. Dozens of teargas shells were 
lobbed and severe lathi-charge resorted to, to disperse the mob. We broke open the 
outer gate of the house and entered its premises. But a large column of police 
surfaced on the spot and drove us out, Untoo, who managed to give police a slip, told 
KTNS.
The protesters pelted stones at the police party and the clash continued for some 
time. They were also chanting slogans against the police action. Police latter 
occupied the house and took positions from within the structure.
Abdul Qayoom, Superintendent of Police, North, when contacted, denied the house has 
been occupied. He said the authorities have put the security for its protection.
Since it is in the interior city double guard comprising 10 cops including a havaldar 
from district police lines have been put on duty for its protection. This was done to 
avoid the structure being put on fire, he said. Asked that a large number of police 
force would be required to man such hide-outs as the number of sealings mount, he 
said, only such houses would be sealed which have been constructed as militant 
hide-outs.
In the first case of its type in country, a house belonging to Gulam Mohammad Dar, it 
is recalled, was sealed on November 25 after evicting the inmates. The area is tense 
since with the people in the locality on protest.
Untoo said his organisation is planning to stage a dharna at Lal Chowk tomorrow to 
protest the implementation of POTO. The family members would also participate in 
Dharna, he said.
The eviction has forced the octogenarian mother of Dar, his wife, sister and two minor 
children to come on roads. Haseena, ailing mother of Dar said, it took them years to 
save money for its construction. But within moments we were rendered homeless, she 
said.
She said following the arrest of Dar, the only bread earner of the house, they have no 
means to run the family. My husband passed away 27 years back, for years I single 
handed managed affairs of the house. Now, it was he who was running the house, she 
said.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Enforcement of POTO sends shock waves in Kashmir Valley [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-11-28 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---

Enforcement of POTO sends shock waves in Valley
Kashmir Times, Nov 28, 2001
KT NEWS SERVICE
SRINAGAR, Nov 27: The implementation of Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance here has 
sent shivers down the spine of the people. It was the most hotly debated issue today 
with people evaluating the colossal sufferings its use and misuse will unleash.
The state became the first place in the country where the ordinance is implemented. 
Police on Sunday, sealed a house of Gulam Mohammad Dar, a resident of Malik Mohalla 
Safa Kadal and evicted the inmates. The house was allegedly used as a hide-out by 
militants. Dar was arrested some days back and he has been booked under several 
sections of POTO.
Given the volatile situation prevalent in state, it is widely believed here that the 
incidents related to the implementation of ordinance will become a routine. Within 
six months half of valley residents would be on roads, lamented Khurshid Ahmad, an 
advocate.
In every nook and corner today, people were seen discussing the ramifications of 
implementing such an ordinance. The news of first incident was received with shock. In 
offices, educational institutions, mosques and residential houses, terrified people 
were rapt in the discussions over the issue.
Every day we hear of dozens of incidents of encounters, arrests, recovery of arms 
from various places. It means all such places would be sealed, although it is a known 
fact that nobody invites militants to their houses, said Gulam Rasool Wani, a fruit 
vendor here.
It is considered more devastating than the destruction of houses during encounters. 
Whenever an encounter takes place from a house, it is razed to ground or in other 
cases houses were blasted. But the effected person can re-construct it afterwards. 
Here the entire family is forced to take refuge in the street. Then there is a very 
thin line between a militant and a civilian, he said.
Its misuse is the most worrying aspect of the entire episode. That means we cannot 
afford to face a cop. For a trivial issue, they can show recovery from our house and 
seal it. Besides, extortion is an order of the day here and this time if one dares to 
refuse it, its implications could well be understood, said Mushtaq Ahmad, an employee.
Common people are also wondering that ruling party here has offered no opposition to 
an ordinance, which has been branded by opposition in centre and by civil libertarians 
as draconian. Even if their opposition had caused least difference, but they should 
have aired their concern, he said.
NC general secretary Shiekh Nazir Ahmad, when contacted, said he is not aware about 
any sealing of house here. What I know is the ordinance has not been implemented 
here. And for rest, I cannot comment off hand, he said.

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




POTO is state terrorism [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-11-28 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---


Pushing the POTO 
By Kuldip Nayar , The Hindu Nov 28
I THOUGHT we had closed the chapter on the right to stay free. The ousting of the 
British had registered our determination and the Constitution had enshrined the 
resolve. The challenge came during the Emergency (1975-77) when one lakh people were 
detained without trial. Yet, we were able to roll back the misrule by ousting all 
those who were part of the oppressive machinery. The Congress Government again revived 
the MISA of Emergency-fame in the shape of the TADA in 1984 in the wake of the 
happenings in Punjab. But the measure did not stay for long because its misuse had 
killed thousands of innocent people and put some 75,000 men and women behind bars, 
only one per cent of whom were convicted. 
After a lapse of several years, the BJP-led Government has promulgated the Prevention 
of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO). The Union Home Minister, Mr. L. K. Advani, has thrown 
down the gauntlet. It is for the people to pick it up. They are the ones who will be 
picked up on mere suspicion. 
The history of preventive detention is littered with examples of state terrorism. The 
measure will be used once again against trade unionists, human rights activists and 
members of minorities rather than against the terrorists. Once again it will be a 
reign of terror. The National Human Rights Commission's repeated advice has had no 
effect on the Government. 
The existing laws are good enough to fight terrorism. Leading jurists have also 
pointed out that there is no need for special legislation and that the administration 
has enough powers to deal with any untoward situation. But the Government's purpose is 
not to challenge the terrorists but to chastise those who oppose saffronisation and 
are committed to civil liberties and human rights. The craze for power has made the 
Government go beyond the proposals of the Law Commission which set the ball rolling. 
The Government did not send the ordinance to the Parliamentary Standing Committee of 
Home Affairs for its opinion. 
Mr. Advani appears to have made the ordinance a matter of prestige. He has gone to the 
extent of saying that those who oppose the ordinance are supporting terrorism. In the 
face of such a statement, what do the safeguards against the misuse of the POTO mean? 
It is going to be the same old game: them against us, the rulers against the critics. 
And the police will see to it that the will of their political masters prevails. 
No one is opposed to the fight against terrorists. People all over the country suffer 
at their hands. But the suffering at the hands of the police is no less. There is no 
rule which is not bent and there is no excess which is not committed when word comes 
from the top to fix someone. What remedy does the common man have against state 
tyranny? Even the power of law courts has been curtailed. If it is power, the 
Government has already too much for the liking of civil society. The National Security 
Act, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, the Disturbed Area Act, the Special Court 
Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act - all of them are special laws. 
Ordinary laws are no less severe. Rajiv Gandhi's killers were sentenced to death under 
the ordinary law, not the TADA. 
On top of it, the security forces indulge in encounters. The disappearance of civil 
liberties activists is common. Till today, the police have not produced human rights 
activist Khalra of Punjab despite the Supreme Court's order. The POTO will be yet 
another instrument of oppression. The Government seldom pursues real terrors for 
political reasons. Those who committed terror and killed thousands in Delhi in 1984 
and Mumbai in 1993 have yet to be brought to book. 
In any case, Mr. Advani is the last person who should be telling us what terrorism is. 
He has been charge-sheeted in the Babri Masjid demolition case. He is the one who 
should answer whether such an act amounted to terrorism or not. It is, however, 
intriguing that the POTO, unlike the TADA, does not say that alienating people or 
affecting the harmony among different sections is a terrorist act. 
Never has independent India been subjected to warrantless electronic surveillance. 
This is the worst kind of attack on an individual's liberty. What differentiates 
democracy from dictatorship is personal freedom; the first guarantees it and the 
second fetters it. I recall that the Congress Government once brought a Bill to 
intercept mail. Parliament passed it. But the then President, Giani Zail Singh, 
refused to sign it because he considered it interference in a citizen's privacy. When 
we have fought terrorism for more than a decade without resorting to what America and 
Great Britain are doing, why should we now introduce such draconian measures which are 
bound to be misused as has been the experience? Even then there is no provision in the 
latest U.S. measure to detain 

RE: How U.S. destroyed progressive secular forces in Afghanistan [WWW.STOPNATO

2001-09-25 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-

thanks for posting this on the antinato list. I wanted to do search of the Worker's 
World web myself for more background information on Afghanistan, but couldn't due to 
problems with a virus!
 
This article by Deirdre Griswold is perhaps one  of the most important contributions 
to the debate on Afghanistan.
 
Sandeep

-Original Message-
From: Jim Yarker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 00:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How U.S. destroyed progressive secular forces in Afghanistan 
[WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.U


Visit our website:  HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK 

-

http://www.workers.org/ww/2001/afghan0927.php 
http://www.workers.org/ww/2001/afghan0927.php 


How U.S. destroyed progressive secular forces in Afghanistan


By Deirdre Griswold

The media are suddenly full of opinions about Afghanistan, now that the Bush 
administration is accusing Osama bin Laden and other Islamic fundamentalists of being 
behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

In the 1980s, the reactionary political elements now ruling Afghanistan were working 
with the CIA to overthrow a progressive Afghani government supported by the Soviet 
Union. After the spending of an ocean of blood and billions of U.S. dollars, the 
reactionaries won. 

Washington was happy and unconcerned as its protégés went on to butcher Afghani 
progressives, restore landlordism and repress women while fighting among themselves. 

The eventual triumph of the Taleban faction represented a catastrophe for the Afghani 
people. Just in the last year thousands of Afghani refugees have died of starvation 
and exposure and Kabul, the capital, is such a wasteland that the U.S., demanding 
vengeance, can't even find anything to bomb. 

On Oct. 10, 1996, Workers World printed the following article about how the U.S. 
strangled a popular revolution led by the Progressive Democratic Party of Afghanistan 
(PDPA) against feudalism and imperialism.

Not that long ago, the bourgeoisie could still feel pride in their revolutionary 
history. They continued to celebrate the 1789 French Revolution and many other great 
victories in the struggle against feudal oppression. 

They even spoke approvingly of the 1917 overthrow of the czarist autocracy in Russia. 
The problem, they said, was that the Bolsheviks had spoiled that struggle for 
democracy by going too far. 

But capitalism in this rotten age of U.S. imperialist conquest of the globe has 
degenerated so far from its revolutionary roots that it is now, to borrow a phrase 
from Henry Kissinger, to the right of the czar. And it is celebrating the return of 
absolute feudal rule in Afghanistan. 

The powerful media engines, their reach multiplied by the most modern technologies, 
are presenting the world with instant photographic images of a lynching--that's all it 
was--of the few progressives left in Kabul. .

To make the deed more palatable, the media use adjectives like butcher to describe 
former President Najibullah and his aides. Dragged out of the United Nations compound 
where they had sought asylum for the last four years, they were beaten to death and 
then left hanging for all to see. 

But among themselves, foreign-policy experts for the U.S. establishment know that the 
Afghani progressives' real crime was that they tried to carry out a social 
transformation in their country in the direction of socialism. 

What authority bears witness to this? None other than the U.S. Department of the Army 
itself. 

The Pentagon puts out what it calls country study books on almost every country in the 
world. They are updated every few years. These books contain basic information for the 
use of U.S. personnel traveling or working abroad. There's nothing classified in them. 
They're available in most libraries. 

Afghanistan--a Country Study for 1986 has of course the anti-communist line expected 
of a Pentagon publication. But it also contains much useful information about the 
changes instituted by the Afghani Revolution of 1978. 

Freeing women and peasants

Before the revolution, 5 percent of Afghanistan's rural landowners owned more than 45 
percent of the arable land. A third of the rural people were landless laborers, 
sharecroppers or tenants. 

Debts to the landlords and to money lenders were a regular feature of rural life, 
says the U.S. Army report. An indebted farmer turned over half his crop each year to 
the money lender. 

When the PDPA took power, it quickly moved to remove both landownership inequalities 
and usury, says the Pentagon report. Decree number six of the revolution canceled 
mortgage debts of agricultural laborers, tenants and small landowners. 

The revolutionary regime set up extensive literacy programs, especially for women. It 
printed textbooks in many languages--Dari, 

RE: Those 4000 Israelis? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-09-21 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-

According to the the Washington Post that about 113 Israelis are reported to be 
missing in the WTC.
 
Sandeep

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 September 2001 04:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Those 4000 Israelis? [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


Visit our website:  HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK 

-
In a message dated 9/20/2001 7:11:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes: 




For it to be true, those 4000 people would have had to 
maintaain absolute secrecy.  



Are you prepared to say that no Israeli's worked in the WTC? 
-

This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

-
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Say no to war! Join us in a vigil! [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-09-21 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-

Say no to war! Join us in a vigil!

When: Thursday, 27th Sept. 2001 at 6:30PM
Where: The Dail, Dublin


All are welcome! Call 672 7803/087 2225742 for more details
Please pass on this email to others.

http://www.endiraqsanctions.net


Statement from the Campaign to End the Iraq Sanctions.

Justice not retribution is the only way forward for humanity.

The Campaign to End Iraq Sanctions extends our deepest sympathies and 
condolences to the families and friends of the innocent civilians who were 
killed in the United Sates on the 11th September in the World Trade Centre, 
the Pentagon and in Pensyliviana. The sudden and arbitrary taking of life 
by an individual, government or group is immoral and wrong whether it be in 
America, Iraq, Sudan or Yugoslavia.

Since Tuesday the 11th September we have seen images of the carnage and the 
faces of human misery and loss from America. We have witnessed the 
magnitude of the waste and destruction. And we have shared their pain, 
confusion and fear. The coverage was however, in stark contrast to the 
media's past coverage of the Gulf War, when, instead of real buildings 
exploding over and over again, we saw only sterile views of concrete 
targets -- there and then gone. We did not see the destruction and carnage 
nor the misery on the faces of people whose loved ones were killed and 
buried under the rubble and whose lives had been changed terribly and 
unrecognisable in a matter of seconds.

Yet, whilst thousands of American families mourned for the dead and injured 
the Bush administration took advantage of the tragic human toll to 
strengthen and intensify the Pentagon's war machine. Not two days after 
this attack, whilst the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre were still 
burning, President Bush, talked of how America was at War. This was before 
any group had taken responsibility or before any concrete facts were 
established  who were America at war with? The Middle East was put centre 
stage backed up by irresponsible media coverage. A whole culture was held 
accountable and guilty. The backlash of anti- Muslim and Islamic feeling 
has had consequences for the innocent throughout the World, sadly from 
America to Ireland. Innocent people are being targeted with hatred and 
violence as a result of the naked racism expressed, condoned and encouraged 
by World leaders such as Tony Blair and President Bush.

Throughout the week what has been glaringly absent and in fact has been 
repressed by the media, has been any attempt to explore, discuss or 
understand possible motives of the terrorists, why would they do it? What 
was their political agenda? At a time when the World is in shock we have 
seen Bush calling for retribution, revenge and war. Afghanistan, where an 
estimated 5.5 million people will be totally dependent on food aid this 
coming winter as a result of a three year drought, and the ravaging of 
their country by the repressive Taliban regime, is the prime target of 
American and NATO's vengeance. Poverty is already so severe that hundreds 
of thousands can not afford to travel to food distribution centres, and 
thus face certain starvation. The majority of the population have not even 
heard about the events in America.

Yet, their fragile existence is the target of the most powerful and 
supposed democratic countries in the world. Pakistan has been handed an 
ultimatum by President Bush that either they assist in the destruction of 
Afghanistan or they will also be viewed as an enemy. The Campaign is 
calling on the Irish government and World leaders to truly live up to the 
values of humanity and halt the impeding human carnage that now faces our 
world. The potential destruction and decimation of a poor, oppressed and 
innocent people will not only result in the escalation of civilian deaths 
both in the Middle East and in the West, but will also result in the death 
of the spirit of humanity. It is a time for true democratic leadership 
based on the values of justice, peace and the equal value of life whether 
it be an American or Afghani life. It is a time for world reflection and 
not blind retribution. It is a time to truly invoke the values of peace and 
justice that reflects the values of humanity as we recognise the 
vulnerability and the fragility of all human life. No amount of body bags 
be they Irish, English, American, Afghan or Pakistani will bring the 
innocent victims of violence back to their grieving families. Justice not 
retribution is the only way forward for humanity.

-
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that 

Fwd: [no-sanctions] Fwd: UN agencies based in Jordan brace for eventual hits o

2001-09-19 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-





 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Voices uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: UN agencies based in Jordan brace for eventual hits on Iraq
 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:20:58 +0100
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 UN agencies based in Jordan brace for eventual hits on Iraq
 
AMMAN, Sept 19 (AFP) - United Nations agencies based in
 Jordan are
reviewing contingency plans in the event of strikes on Iraq
 following the
September 11 terror attacks in the United States, officials said
 Wednesday.
 
We have received 'secret' instructions from our offices in New
 York to
start preparations within our emergency plans in the event of a
 US strike on
Iraq, a UN agency official told AFP on condition of anonymity.
 
Frantic steps to stock up on supplies, namely food, started
 four days
ago, the official said.
 
Meanwhile the representative of the UN High Commissioner for
 Refugees
(UNHCR) in Amman, Dario Carminati, said his agency has
 taken precautionary
measures in any event of the crisis reaching the region.
 
We are reviewing inventory and our contingency plans,
 Carminati said.
 
According to the UN official the UNHCR, which has an office in
 Baghdad, is
stocking up on food and water mainly and taking steps to
 prepare for fallout
from an eventual attack on Iraq, including the displacement of
 civilians.
 
Different scenarios are being envisaged at the (Iraqi
 international)
borders and inside Iraq, Carminati said.
 
Normally in our contingency plan, we expect people to move
 more to Turkey
and Iran, in case of the closing of borders, and less to Jordan,
 he said.
 
Very few Iraqi refugees come to Jordan, he said, adding
 however that
nationals from other countries living in Iraq moved to Jordan in
 the wake of
the 1991 Gulf war.
 
A US government source said Tuesday that the Central
 Intelligence Agency
was checking reports that a hijacker of one of the airliners that
 crashed into
New York's World Trade Center on September 11 had met a
 senior Iraqi
intelligence official prior to the terror attacks.
 
There is an indication that such a meeting occurred earlier this
 year in
Europe, said the source.
 
But the CIA was not certain the meeting had anything to do with
 Tuesday's
events, the source added.
 
US Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday the United States
 had no evidence
about Baghdad's involvement in the plot.
 
Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri denied in an interview
 published
Wednesday that Baghdad had any role near or far in the US
 terror attacks.
 
 
 --
 ---
 This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
 For removal from list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings.


Campaign to End Iraq Sanctions - Ireland
Website: http://www.endiraqsanctions.net;
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

-
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




India 2nd largest arms buyer, US biggest seller [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-08-22 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-

India 2nd largest arms buyer, US biggest seller  ...OLE_Obj... 
(Times of India, Aug 22)
WASHINGTON: The US, Russia and France together cut almost 90 percent of the world's 
conventional arms sales deals last year, with most of the weapons going to developing 
nations, according to a US congressional report.   The UAE ranked first in the value 
of arms transfer agreements among all developing nations weapons purchasers, 
concluding $7.4 billion worth of deals. India ranked second with $4.8 billion and 
South Korea third with $2.3 billion. The top buyers in 1997-2000 were the UAE, India 
and Egypt.   In 2000, the US ranked first in arms transfer agreements with developing 
nations at 12.6 billion or 49.7 percent of these agreements, the report said.   Russia 
was second with 7.4 billion or 29.1 percent of such deals, while France ranked third 
with 2.1 billion, or 8.3 percent of such agreements.   According to the report, a 
close review of Russia's largest value arms agreements in recent years shows they have 
been with two main clients, China and India.   It adds that while some former arms 
clients in the developing world continue to express interest in obtaining additional 
Russian weaponry, they have been restricted in doing so by a lack of funds.   The 
total value of US arms transfer agreements with developing nations in 2000 increased 
by almost four billion dollars last year, from $8.7 billion in 1999 to 12.6 billion in 
2000.   Out of all arms deliveries made worldwide by all suppliers in 2000, the US, 
Britain and Russia collectively delivered nearly $22.8 billion worth, or 77.5 percent, 
with the US taking the lion's share at 48.3 percent -- down slightly from its 49.1 
percent share in 1999.   As for arms deliveries to developing nations in 2000, the US 
ranked first at $8.7 billion, or 44.8 percent of all such deliveries. It was the 
eighth year in a row that the US has led in such deliveries.   Britain ranked second 
at 4.4 billion or 22.7 percent of such deliveries, while Russia ranked third at 2.4 
billion or 12.4 percent, according to the report produced by the Congressional 
Research Service.   According to Tamar Gabelnick, arms expert with the Federation of 
American Scientists, I'm not surprised that the US is still the main supplier since 
the end of the Cold War. This undercuts the arguments from US defense contractors 
like Lockheed-Martin and Boeing that Pentagon regulations hamper their efforts to 
compete, he added.   The report, which covers the period 1993-2000, goes on to say 
that during 1997-2000 developing world nations accounted for 70.2 percent of al 
deliveries, up from 65.8 percent during the 1993-1996 period.   Authored by Richard 
Grimmett, specialist in national defense, the report points out that a number of 
weapons exporters continue to focus their efforts on maintaining and expanding arms 
sales to nations and regions where they have competitive advantages due to prior 
political/ military ties.'   It goes on to say that additional notable arms sales are 
likely in the Near East, Asia and Latin America as individual nations seek to replace 
older military equipment.   The Near East has generally been the largest arms market 
in the developing world, the report adds, accounting for 54.6 percent in 1993-1996 of 
the total value of all developing nations arms transfer agreements. During 1997-2000 
the region accounted for 47.2 percent of all such agreements. ( AFP )
© The Times OF India Online. All rights reserved.  

-
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^






Israel murders Palestinian leaders [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-08-15 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-

U.S.-backed terror hits new level
Israel murders Palestinian leaders 
By Richard Becker
Josef Goebbels had nothing on the present-day propagandists for the U.S. government 
and capitalist media.
Goebbels, Nazi Germany's minister of propaganda, developed the Big Lie technique. His 
credo was make the lie big enough and repeat it often enough and it will be believed.
Goebbels specialized in turning reality upside down, portraying the victim as 
aggressor and vice-versa--all in the service of Hitler's Nazi war machine. Goebbels 
created a fantasy of Polish aggression to justify Germany's 1939 invasion of that 
country, which started World War II in Europe.
Today, top U.S. government officials and their bought media portray the Israeli 
occupiers of Palestine as beleaguered victims and the oppressed Palestinian people as 
fanatical aggressors, thereby justifying the most ferocious repression by the 
U.S.-armed Israeli military.
Take, for example, the intensifying Israeli campaign of assassination against 
Palestinian political and military leaders in the West Bank and Gaza. In the first 
four days of August, at least 10 Palestinians were murdered--most torn to pieces by 
helicopter-fired missiles, courtesy of the Pentagon.
In Nablus, eight people were killed inside a building housing a research center. The 
most prominent among the dead was Jamil Mansour, the head of the center and a 
political leader of the Hamas organization. 
Two young boys were also killed in the missile attack. Other victims lived in the West 
Bank city of Tulkarem and in Gaza.
Marwan Barghouti, the leader of Fatah, the biggest Palestinian party, narrowly escaped 
death in an attack on the military convoy in which he was traveling. Barghouti is a 
symbol of resistance and a widely popular figure across the Palestinian political 
spectrum.
The latest assassinations and attempted killings resulted in a sharp upsurge in armed 
resistance throughout the West Bank and Gaza. Heavy fighting broke out in many areas.
In the most dramatic response, Ali Joulani, a Jerusalem housepainter who reportedly 
was not previously involved politically, attacked the Israeli Defense Ministry in Tel 
Aviv. He wounded 10 Israeli soldiers before being shot and killed.
The Israeli military has reacted by further tightening the blockades of Palestinian 
cities and villages, creating a severe crisis. 
The rights group B'Tselem reported on Aug. 6 that 218 Palestinian towns and villages 
with a population of more than 200,000 lack adequate water supplies in the hottest 
time of the year as a result of the blockades.
U.S. capitalist media 
support assassinations
At least 50 Palestinian organizers have been killed in the assassination campaign 
since the new Intifada, or uprising, began on Sept. 28 last year.
Can anyone imagine the big-business media's panic campaign if the situation were 
reversed? What if the Palestinians were carrying out an assassination campaign against 
Israeli political figures?
But instead of outrage, the U.S. reaction--official and otherwise--has ranged from the 
gentlest criticism to outright support for Israel's state policy of murder.
Secretary of State Colin Powell termed the Israel assassination campaign overly 
aggressive, and called for a return to negotiations.
But in an interview with Fox News on Aug. 2, Vice President Richard Cheney expressed 
his sympathy with the Israeli tactic. He said, I think there is some justification in 
their [the Israelis] trying to protect themselves by pre-empting.
On the Sunday network talk shows Aug. 5, most of the pundits expressed support for the 
assassinations. Several criticized Powell's extremely mild diplomatic reproach.
George Will and Cokie Roberts, hosting ABC's This Week morning show Aug. 5, agreed 
that, after all, it was Israel that is under attack.
Never mind that more than four times as many Palestinians as Israelis have died, and 
15 times as many Palestinians have been seriously wounded in the Intifida. Never mind 
that tens of thousands of Palestinian homes have been destroyed or made uninhabitable.
Never mind that the Palestinian standard of living, in the broken-up 5 percent of 
historic Palestine that they hold today, is less than one-tenth that of the Israelis. 
And, of course, never mind that Israel--thanks to the U.S. government's generous 
support--today has the fourth most powerful military in the world, while the 
Palestinians have no planes, helicopters, tanks or ships.
Never mind all that. Israel is depicted as the victim, while the Palestinians are the 
aggressors. Josef Goebbels would have been proud.
Split in the administration?
The different positions expressed by Powell and Cheney have raised speculation in the 
world media about a division over Middle East policy in the Bush administration.
But, as an unnamed pro-Israel analyst interviewed by the Chicago Tribune put it, any 

OPPRESSORS IN INDIA MURDER A SYMBOL OF RESISTANCE [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-08-07 Thread Sandeep Vaidya

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-


PHOOLAN DEVI: THE BANDIT QUEEN--

OPPRESSORS IN INDIA MURDER A SYMBOL OF RESISTANCE

By Sara Flounders

Phoolan Devi, a militant leader known as the bandit queen
and famous as a symbol of the struggle of lower-caste and
oppressed Indians, was assassinated in New Delhi on July 25.
She was 44 years old.

India was oppressed as a British colony for hundreds of
years. Winning independence in 1948, capitalist India had a
modest amount of independence maneuvering between the
socialist USSR and U.S. imperialism.

The new U.S.-ruled world order of unrestrained capitalism
has increased the already wide gap between rich and poor
within India, where the caste system provides a deeply
ingrained form of prejudice akin to racism.

This caste system, which Devi fought, is used to justify
extreme discrimination and oppression in every area of
social and economic life.

Leaders of the Samajwadi (Socialist) Party, the party Devi
represented in the Indian Parliament, claim that her
assassination is a political conspiracy of the elite. It
comes at a crucial time when the right-wing nationalist BJP
Party faces a close election against the Samajwadi Party in
the biggest state in India, Uttar Pradesh.

Devi's rallies had been drawing many thousands of angry,
oppressed people.

Phoolan Devi rose from an illiterate peasant girl to an
internationally known bandit to a famous political prisoner
freed by a rising mass movement to a representative in the
national parliament. Her assassination sparked rebellions
and mass demonstrations.

As The Times of India wrote on July 28, Phoolan Devi was a
phenomenon like no other in Indian politics.

Devi is known in the West through a 1994 movie about her
life called Bandit Queen. Its graphic portrayal of caste
and sexual violence against women created an uproar in
India.

In India Devi was a legend before the age of 20 as the
leader of a gang of dacoits--robbers who preyed on the rich
upper castes and shared the spoils with the impoverished
lower castes. She made international headlines in 1981 when
she was charged with the biggest murder of upper-caste male
landowners in modern Indian history.

A THREAT TO THE SOCIAL ORDER

As described in the biography India's Bandit Queen by Mala
Sen and in the movie Bandit Queen, Devi's early life
experience was similar to that of millions of Indian women.

As a girl in a large, impoverished family of the oppressed
mallah caste, she was considered only a burden. She was
married off at age 11 to an abusive and brutal man of 33.

She escaped at age 12 and traveled alone, hundreds of miles,
back to her village. But an unattached young woman who had
abandoned her marriage was considered a threat to the whole
social order.

In an isolated village, she was the prey of other powerful
men. Her determination to speak out against the theft of her
father's tiny plot of land and her effort to take the matter
to court earned further attacks.

She wound up in a band of dacoits or bandits, becoming the
gang's leader by the age of 16. Many hundreds of bandit
gangs lived in the treacherous crags and narrow eroded
ravines of rural Uttar Pradesh. Gang life was part of the
upheaval in the decaying feudal social order.

Even the gangs were divided by caste. Some gangs acted as
protectors of the landlord classes and in league with the
police worked for payoffs, like paramilitary gangs in Latin
America. Others gangs of poor and landless rebels offered a
kind of protection for the peasants who were abused by the
corrupt and higher caste police.

Not that the gangs were revolutionary guerrillas. Their
struggle was not aimed at overturning the social order or
even at organizing the masses to demand their rights. But
they represented class hatred and outrage at the injustice
of a rotting, caste-ridden, class society.

A SYMBOL OF RESISTANCE

Phoolan Devi became famous. Newspapers across India wrote
tirelessly of her exploits.

A Phoolan Devi doll with a bandoleer of bullets strapped
across her chest and a red bandana was one of the hottest-
selling toys in India.

In 1980 she was captured. Her lover was killed. She was
turned over to the upper-caste men of the village of Behmai.
There she was held and gang raped for weeks.

She was almost dead when friends smuggled her out of the
village.

After her escape she reorganized a gang and allegedly
returned a year later for revenge. Twenty-two men of the
elite Thakur caste were gunned down.

The act sent shock waves through the elite of India. Many
Indian politicians and business owners belong to this caste.

The state launched the biggest dragnet ever conducted.
Thousands of police were assigned to the case. For three
years Phoolan Devi eluded capture.

Press coverage was intense. There was enormous political
pressure for her capture.

The killings were considered an outrageous act for a woman
and especially a woman of such a low caste.


US wants a 99 yr lease for bases in Serbia [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-07-31 Thread Sandeep Vaidya (LMI)

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
-


The USA will hire military bases in Serbia  
Source: www.blic.co.yu 
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/perl/redirect?u=http%3A%2F%2Fblic.gates96.com%2F
Published: July 30, 2001 Author: Beta news agency
Posted on 07/30/2001 03:14:38 PDT by Lemi According to well-informed 
diplomatic sources of Brussels 
The USA will hire military bases in Serbia 
Brussels (Beta)- American administration wants to hire certain military bases and 
buildings for 99 years, including Bondsteel KFOR base in Kosovo, Yugoslav Army's 
radar base on Kopaonik Mountain, military airport near Sjenica and additional 
buildings on Pester plateau, well-informed diplomatic sources of Brussels told Beta 
agency. 
According to these sources, American administration informed Belgrade that it wanted 
close cooperation of American Army and Yugoslav Army, especially in Kosovo and south 
Serbia. 
Pentagon and American military leaders suggested, and State Department and White House 
accepted, that America and Serbia sign a specific military agreement on 99-year use 
of the American military base Bondsteel in Kosovo. 
Washington also wants to hire the radar base on Kopaonik Mountain, which the Yugoslav 
Army equipped with British technology. 
Yugoslav military airport in Sjenica would be adapted for landing of American and NATO 
heavy transporters. 
Diplomats of Brussels claim that Serb deputy Prime Minister Nebojsa Covic, Yugoslav 
Minister of Foreign Affairs Goran Svilanovic, Yugoslav General Ninoslav Krstic and 
Police General Goran Radosavljevic were informed about the plan on military 
cooperation during their meeting with the commanders of American forces in Germany. 
According to the diplomatic sources of Brussels, Americans think that their army 
should remain in Kosovo and on the Balkans until the situation in the region 
stabilizes and the entire region starts full cooperation with the European Union. 
Brussels connects the American initiative with the plans of leading American and 
European oil companies to build an oil pipeline that would take oil from Caspian Sea, 
through Bulgaria, south Serbia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Albania to west Europe. 
The sources of Brussels say that Americans plan to remove so-called common military 
troops from the region and keep high-quality military staff and equipment on the 
Balkans. These are primarily units performing satellite-intelligence duties and 
logistics for mass air transport. 

-
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^