[AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Bugs-476328 ] ns_hostbyaddr

2001-10-30 Thread Ms. Source Forge

Bugs item #476328, was opened at 2001-10-30 03:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=103152aid=476328group_id=3152

Category: API: Tcl
Group: aolserver3_4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: patrick o'leary (pjaol)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: ns_hostbyaddr

Initial Comment:
An system which has no DNS registered with it, will
cause the following error
[03/Sep/2001:14:44:17][29917.15][-conn5-] Error: could
not lookup XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
could not lookup XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
   while executing
ns_hostbyaddr [ns_conn peeraddr $conn

Under excessive load will cause daemon to fall over.

--

You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=103152aid=476328group_id=3152



Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Barry Books

Did you turn on clustering? I think tasks only run on the master in a
cluster.

Barry Books

-Original Message-
From: Allan Regenbaum DP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS


We are running a production AOLServer 3.3.1 + ad13 on solaris
We have 2 machines, duplicates of each other.

Machine A suddenly, without error messages stops running scheduled procs !!
Machine B continues to perform flawlessly
The machine is running acs classic 4.2 tcl, 90% webmail which has been
running perfectly well under stress and load for months...


Urgent help/suggestions are appreciated ..

Allan Regenbaum
Digital People



Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Allan Regenbaum DP

Hi Barry .. the machines are decoupled they are in no way dependent upon
each other .. I just mentioned that to show that teh setup works perfectly
on one machine and is failing on another identical config ... seems that as
the production is loade dup something is causing one of our sheculed procs
to not return control of the thread, thereby hanging all the other scheduled
procs. ?

-Original Message-
From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Barry Books
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS


Did you turn on clustering? I think tasks only run on the master in a
cluster.

Barry Books

-Original Message-
From: Allan Regenbaum DP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS


We are running a production AOLServer 3.3.1 + ad13 on solaris
We have 2 machines, duplicates of each other.

Machine A suddenly, without error messages stops running scheduled procs !!
Machine B continues to perform flawlessly
The machine is running acs classic 4.2 tcl, 90% webmail which has been
running perfectly well under stress and load for months...


Urgent help/suggestions are appreciated ..

Allan Regenbaum
Digital People



Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Michael Roberts

I have *always* had a problem with scheduled procs, to the point where I now
simply use a cron job and curl to tell AOLserver to do something

Michael

Allan Regenbaum DP wrote:

 We are running a production AOLServer 3.3.1 + ad13 on solaris
 We have 2 machines, duplicates of each other.

 Machine A suddenly, without error messages stops running scheduled procs !!
 Machine B continues to perform flawlessly
 The machine is running acs classic 4.2 tcl, 90% webmail which has been
 running perfectly well under stress and load for months...

 Urgent help/suggestions are appreciated ..

 Allan Regenbaum
 Digital People



Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Jim Wilcoxson

Are you exec'ing anything in the scheduled proc?  I've seen some
weirdness in the past with execs getting hung, although not much
recently.  I think it was more of an OS (Linux) issue.

We've used scheduled procs for years w/o any problems on all of our
servers, though we only have a handful (of scheduled procs), like 10.
whereas I've read that ACS has lots of them.

A suggestion would be to run more complex stuff in detached threads
that you launch from the scheduled proc rather than in the scheduled
proc itself.  Then if it screws up, you won't tie up the scheduler
thread.

Jim


 I have *always* had a problem with scheduled procs, to the point where I now
 simply use a cron job and curl to tell AOLserver to do something

 Michael

 Allan Regenbaum DP wrote:

  We are running a production AOLServer 3.3.1 + ad13 on solaris
  We have 2 machines, duplicates of each other.
 
  Machine A suddenly, without error messages stops running scheduled procs !!
  Machine B continues to perform flawlessly
  The machine is running acs classic 4.2 tcl, 90% webmail which has been
  running perfectly well under stress and load for months...
 
  Urgent help/suggestions are appreciated ..
 
  Allan Regenbaum
  Digital People




Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Jim Wilcoxson

Is this true of detached threads too - no cleanup?  We're probably fine,
but nice to know when to be extra careful.-Jim


 Make sure that you explicitly release database handles and ns_sets in
 scheduled procs.  A connection thread has a bunch of cleanup that it does,
 and none of it gets done from a scheduled proc thread.

 Pete.




Re: [AOLSERVER] URGENT AOLSERVER + ACS + SOLARIS

2001-10-30 Thread Peter M. Jansson

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:

 Is this true of detached threads too - no cleanup?  We're probably fine,
 but nice to know when to be extra careful.-Jim

I believe so, but it could just be my paranoia.



Re: [AOLSERVER] nsopenssl page size limit?

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Hoegeman

Scott Goodwin wrote:
 This problem was already identified and fixed. I sent Keith an alpha copy
 of the nsopenssl 2.1 release and he confirmed that it does fix his problem.

 thanks, Keith!

scott,

think i could get a copy if it's not too much trouble ?
(or point me at one) i think i'm going to exercise this bug soon..

-mike