Re: general/4063: POST times out
On 15 Mar 99, at 22:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: lars State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 15 14:11:03 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: I don't see a problem with any of the given URLs. If you have turned on Hostnamelookups try to turn them off. Severity-Changed-From-To: critical-non-critical Severity-Changed-By: lars Severity-Changed-When: Mon Mar 15 14:11:03 PST 1999 I do have Hoastnamelookups set to Off. I find no indication in the logs that you actually tried to POST anything using either of the URLs listed, only that you looked at the page. Try subscribing to the test mailing list or adding a calendar item. Both will fail with a timeout and both worked correctly under Apache 1.2.6. -- Richard B. Pyne, KB7RMU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pyne.kinfolk.org/rbp2
Re: general/4063: POST times out
The following reply was made to PR general/4063; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard B. Pyne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], apache-bugdb@apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: general/4063: POST times out Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 17:02:55 -0700 On 15 Mar 99, at 22:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: lars State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 15 14:11:03 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: I don't see a problem with any of the given URLs. If you have turned on Hostnamelookups try to turn them off. Severity-Changed-From-To: critical-non-critical Severity-Changed-By: lars Severity-Changed-When: Mon Mar 15 14:11:03 PST 1999 I do have Hoastnamelookups set to Off. I find no indication in the logs that you actually tried to POST anything using either of the URLs listed, only that you looked at the page. Try subscribing to the test mailing list or adding a calendar item. Both will fail with a timeout and both worked correctly under Apache 1.2.6. -- Richard B. Pyne, KB7RMU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pyne.kinfolk.org/rbp2
os-bsdi/4065: BSDI by default installs a stripped binary, perl can't use dynaload - solution follows
Number: 4065 Category: os-bsdi Synopsis: BSDI by default installs a stripped binary, perl can't use dynaload - solution follows Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Mon Mar 15 18:10:00 PST 1999 Last-Modified: Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: apache Release:1.3.4 Environment: BSD/OS 3.1 BSDI BSD/OS 3.1 Kernel #1: Thu Sep 24 16:43:14 PDT 1998 :/usr/src/sys/compile/ i386 Description: BSDI by default wants to install a stripped executable, but if this happens, then Apache will choke when it tries to dynaload a module. I found this in DejaNews: After make, install with: # STRIPPROG=touch make install and get a nice dynamically linked httpd, *not stripped*. Stripping it prevents dynamic loading under BSDI 3 -- read dlopen(3). How-To-Repeat: Fix: After make, install with: # STRIPPROG=touch make install ** Please put in the BSD Install notes if you can't do it automatically :) Thanks! Audit-Trail: Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
general/4066: configuration with --enable-shared=max causes module to not load
Number: 4066 Category: general Synopsis: configuration with --enable-shared=max causes module to not load Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Tue Mar 16 00:50:00 PST 1999 Last-Modified: Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: apache Release:1.3.4 Environment: uname -a SunOS cayman 5.7 Generic sun4c sparc SUNW,Sun_4_50 showrev -p Patch: 106793-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWhea Patch: 107022-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtdmn Patch: 106725-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWoldst Patch: 107038-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdoc Patch: 106960-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWman gcc 2.8.1 Description: If I use the option --enable-shared=max during configuration, my extra frontpage module fails to load. Without using --enable-shared=max, everything is fine. How-To-Repeat: Fix: Audit-Trail: Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
general/4067: Client connection to server hangs momentarily after retrieving CGI generated document.
Number: 4067 Category: general Synopsis: Client connection to server hangs momentarily after retrieving CGI generated document. Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Tue Mar 16 01:40:00 PST 1999 Last-Modified: Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: apache Release:1.3.3 Environment: Enterprise Ultra 450 (dual processor) running Solaris 2.5.1, fully patched SunOS 5.5.1 Generic_103640-21 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4 Compiled under any of SUN C 4.0, gcc-2.7.2.1, gcc-2.7.2.3, egcs-1.0.3, egcs-1.1, egcs-1.1.1 Description: Problem can only be described by subjective experience - client connection to server appears to remain open for up to a second after a CGI generated document has been retrieved. Not dependant on CGI - can be seen even on a simple shell example CGI. Overall effect is of a much slower transfer rate from site than would otherwise be expected. Snoop of TCP packets between client and server shows nothing out of the ordinary, as does running truss on the server. This only effects dual processor machines, uniprocessors are uneffected. Removing a processor from the machine seems to give much faster download rates!! How-To-Repeat: Enable CGI and request from dual-processor E450 platform, observe difference in transfer after removing a single processor. Fix: Race condition present in server? Audit-Trail: Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
Re: os-aix/3748: Compiling error with DSO support
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Compiling error with DSO support State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 06:30:18 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: The problem is the SHARED_CORE rule you are enabling. AIX does not require this directive for DSO support. We have modified the Configure script to ignore this option on AIX in future releases.
Re: os-linux/3531: Bad file number: flock; Exiting
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Bad file number: flock; Exiting State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:17:23 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: OK I switched the default back to fcntl() on linux... folks can override it with -DUSE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT in their EXTRA_CFLAGS. Dean
Re: os-linux/3911: Under high load, server hangs in flock or fnctl.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Under high load, server hangs in flock or fnctl. State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:22:22 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: Uh I certainly hope there's no more than one process in accept(), otherwise the locking is completely broken. This is almost certainly a kernel bug. Perhaps try a 2.0.36 kernel instead. Dean
Re: os-linux/3911: Under high load, server hangs in flock or fnctl.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Under high load, server hangs in flock or fnctl. State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-feedback State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:23:18 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: er, stick this in feedback... I'm hoping you can test 2.0.36 and report back, thanks
Re: os-linux/2723: HTTPD dies complaining error getting accept lock
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: HTTPD dies complaining error getting accept lock State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:25:38 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: I've switched the default back to fcntl locking on linux. Dean
Re: os-linux/2774: Heavily loaded webserver stops accepting all connections after some time.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Heavily loaded webserver stops accepting all connections after some time. State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:29:02 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: Are there any messages logged to the error_log? If it shows an flock error, try editting include/ap_config.h searching for LINUX, then find USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT and change it to USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT... this change will be the default in 1.3.5. Dean
Re: os-linux/2986: after log rotation restart, all children die in hours. Parent is catatonic.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: after log rotation restart, all children die in hours. Parent is catatonic. State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:31:05 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: My wild guess is that there's something missing in your cron environment which is present in your interactive environment. If this is still happenning, can you use strace to find out what the parent is doing: strace -p pid_of_parent Send us the trace, thanks. Dean
Re: os-linux/3343: Server dies after 1-20 hours of usage.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Server dies after 1-20 hours of usage. Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:34:26 PST 1999 Comment-Added: When the problem happens, do a netstat -nt -- that should show to where the ESTABLISHED port 80 connections are ... I suspect something is just holding connections open. If that doesn't help, use strace on a few of the children to see what they're doing: strace -p pid_of_child Dean
Re: os-linux/3353: Server processes die, only one remains (root)
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Server processes die, only one remains (root) Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:35:24 PST 1999 Comment-Added: In addition to what Marc asked -- can you strace the parent when the problem occurs? Do this: strace -p pid_of_parent and mail us the output. Thanks Dean
Re: os-linux/3387: Regularly the httpd children will all die with no errors given, the root process will still be running, must stop and restart httpd.
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Regularly the httpd children will all die with no errors given, the root process will still be running, must stop and restart httpd. State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:37:25 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: Yeah an strace of the parent when this problem occurs would be most useful. Thanks Dean
Re: os-linux/3643: Broken PUT method on Linux
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Broken PUT method on Linux State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:39:03 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: See PR#3808 -- user indicates that the third party module mod_bandwidth was causing the trouble.
Re: os-linux/3808: fix for broken PUT method on linux
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: fix for broken PUT method on linux State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:39:32 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: Thanks for the info, I've closed out the other report. Dean
Re: os-linux/3312: Children die. Parent stops serving requests
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Children die. Parent stops serving requests Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:50:39 PST 1999 Comment-Added: Is this problem still happenning with more recent redhat/glibc? If so, can you strace the parent when the problem occurs? strace -p pid_of_parent Dean Category-Changed-From-To: general-os-linux Category-Changed-By: dgaudet Category-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 08:50:39 PST 1999
Re: os-linux/3897: 1.3.4 server starts, seemingly normally... dies, no children, no errors not the case with 1.2.0
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: 1.3.4 server starts, seemingly normally... dies, no children, no errors not the case with 1.2.0 Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:54:14 PST 1999 Comment-Added: Yeah it could totally be a library problem. If you installed glibc over top a libc5 system I'd suspect the installation. If it's a fresh glibc system... dunno. I've never been happy with any attempts to make libc5 and glibc dev environments co-exist -- it's just not worth the headaches. Dean
Re: os-linux/3312: Children die. Parent stops serving requests
On 16 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synopsis: Children die. Parent stops serving requests Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:50:39 PST 1999 Comment-Added: Is this problem still happenning with more recent redhat/glibc? I solved the problem by restarting apache every now and then. If so, can you strace the parent when the problem occurs? strace -p pid_of_parent I made this Oct 30th, so the strace is pretty old: http://ole.tange.dk/children-dies.tgz /Ole
Re: os-linux/3312: Children die. Parent stops serving requests
The following reply was made to PR os-linux/3312; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: apache-bugdb@apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: os-linux/3312: Children die. Parent stops serving requests Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:58:22 +0100 (CET) On 16 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synopsis: Children die. Parent stops serving requests Comment-Added-By: dgaudet Comment-Added-When: Tue Mar 16 08:50:39 PST 1999 Comment-Added: Is this problem still happenning with more recent redhat/glibc? I solved the problem by restarting apache every now and then. If so, can you strace the parent when the problem occurs? strace -p pid_of_parent I made this Oct 30th, so the strace is pretty old: http://ole.tange.dk/children-dies.tgz /Ole
os-aix/4068: Failure To Compile 'Main'
Number: 4068 Category: os-aix Synopsis: Failure To Compile 'Main' Confidential: no Severity: serious Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Tue Mar 16 11:10:01 PST 1999 Last-Modified: Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: apache Release:1.3.4 Environment: AIX 4.2.1.0 IBM xlC.C 3.1.4.0 COMMITTED C for AIX Compiler Description: When compiling the '/src/main' directory, I get an error message complaining of a library file not found libc.a[shr.o]. My path includes the '/usr/lib' directory, where libc.a is found. I am compiling for DSO support, but did not enable the SHARED_CORE rule per earlier pr's. Since I am compiling for DSO is the program looking for 'shr.o'? If so, would you know what AIX fileset that could be found in, because I cannot find that file on any of my systems. I am using apaci install method and call configure with these options: configure --prefix=/usr/local/etc/httpd --enable-module=so (as indicated in JServ install guide, to enable DSO support for JServ module) Here is the output received: Target all is up to date. === src/ap === src/main cc -c -I../os/unix -I../include -DAIX=42 -U__STR__ -DAIX_BIND_PROCESS OR -qnogenpcomp -qnousepcomp -DUSE_HSREGEX `../apaci` gen_test_char.c cc -DAIX=42 -U__STR__ -DAIX_BIND_PROCESSOR -qnogenpcomp -qnousepcomp -D USE_HSREGEX `../apaci` -lm -o gen_test_char gen_test_char.o -lld ./gen_test_char test_char.h exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program ./gen_test_char because of the following er rors: 0509-022 Cannot load library libc.a[shr.o]. 0509-026 System error: A file or directory in the path name does not exi st. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 255. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 2. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 2. Stop. Any assistance you can offer would be greatly appreciated- How-To-Repeat: Fix: Audit-Trail: Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
Re: mod_jserv/4043: Can't run servlets when laptop is not connected to a network
The following reply was made to PR mod_jserv/4043; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pierpaolo Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_jserv/4043: Can't run servlets when laptop is not connected to a network Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 22:26:26 +0100 Can you tell me what Operating System are you using? I'd bet you're trying JServ on a WINDOWS (95/98/NT) machine...
Re: os-aix/4068: Failure To Compile 'Main'
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: Failure To Compile 'Main' State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 16 15:48:32 PST 1999 State-Changed-Why: I just compiled Apache on a 4.2.1 box with no errors. So you have a broken AIX machine. e-mail me directly to determine which AIX filesets you are missing. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
