Re: config/3649: [PATCH] concatenate Configuration lines ending in \

1999-04-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/3649; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:  Subject: Re: config/3649: [PATCH] concatenate Configuration lines ending 
in \
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:22:54 +0200

 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
 
  I just shudder to think of how badly some seds will screw
  that up.
 
 Yes, I've looked at this sed-stuff and myself wasn't convinced that this
 feature is worth the trouble. I'm -0 for those changes to the sed-stuff.
 
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com


Re: config/3649: [PATCH] concatenate Configuration lines ending in \

1999-04-21 Thread dgaudet
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer.  ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]


Synopsis: [PATCH] concatenate Configuration lines ending in \

Comment-Added-By: dgaudet
Comment-Added-When: Tue Apr 20 21:52:46 PDT 1999
Comment-Added:
I just shudder to think of how badly some seds will screw
that up.

Dean