Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/lib/apr Makefile.in

1999-12-22 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:52:05PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
 Ryan Bloom wrote:
  
  On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
ben 99/12/22 03:46:36
   
  Modified:src/lib/apr Makefile.in
  Log:
  We now link on FreeBSD 2.2.x.
  
   But somewhere recently we've started to require GNU make.
  
  When did that happen?  Is it APR or Apache that is requiring GNU make?
 
 Diagnosed: its the include stuff. You can't say:
 
 -include $(DEP_FILES)
 
 in BSD make. You have to include them individually with .include and
 quotemarks...
 
 Does that work with GNU make?
 

include filename

is the portable version. Works with GNU, BSD, SysV make.

-- 

  Regards,

Sascha Schumann
 Consultant


Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/lib/apr Makefile.in

1999-12-22 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 06:27:18PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
 Sascha Schumann wrote:
  
  On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:52:05PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
   Ryan Bloom wrote:
   
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  ben 99/12/22 03:46:36
 
Modified:src/lib/apr Makefile.in
Log:
We now link on FreeBSD 2.2.x.

 But somewhere recently we've started to require GNU make.
   
When did that happen?  Is it APR or Apache that is requiring GNU make?
  
   Diagnosed: its the include stuff. You can't say:
  
   -include $(DEP_FILES)
  
   in BSD make. You have to include them individually with .include and
   quotemarks...
  
   Does that work with GNU make?
  
  
  include filename
  
  is the portable version. Works with GNU, BSD, SysV make.
 
 Marvellous. In that case it is automake that is broken. I'm running
 v1.4.

make clean? Yes, that's broken :(

-- 

  Regards,

Sascha Schumann
 Consultant