Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main util.c

2000-02-23 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 12:44:57PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Log:
   Are we ready ??

+1
martin
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fujitsu Siemens
Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-41143 | 81730  Munich,  Germany


Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main util.c

1999-06-18 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 coar99/06/17 15:58:17
 
   Modified:src/main util.c
   Log:
 Cosmetic; style fix and a nit: I object to the implicit assumption
 that NULL == 0, regardless of its validity.

That wasn't the assumption, implicit or otherwise. The assumption was
that !NULL is true.

BTW, I quote KR ed. 2: the constant zero may be assigned to a pointer,
and a pointer may be compared with the constant zero. The symbolic
constant NULL is often used in place of zero. So, you appear to be
objecting to the wisdom of God.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there.
 - Indira Gandhi


Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main util.c

1998-03-14 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 dgaudet 98/03/14 13:27:11
 
   Modified:src/main util.c
   Log:
   Ben does this give you warnings?  It generates better code -- otherwise
   the compiler is stuck doing a bunch of byte - int extensions.  This way
   only one extension occurs.

Nope, this gives no warnings. Might be an idea to comment it so some
smartass doesn't notice that it should be unsigned char...

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie|Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|  Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL authorhttp://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England.  |Apache: TDG http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache