Re: [Apertium-stuff] gsoc proposal

2023-03-26 Thread Hèctor Alòs i Font
Thank you for your proposal. You seem to have rushed to submit it even
though there are still several days to go. The result is that there are
many formatting errors that make it difficult to read. It doesn't make a
good impression for someone who is supposed to be meticulous in creating
code so as not to leave errors. Among other things "Coding Challenge"
appears as a part of "Why Google should sponsor it?" and contains things
that are not part of the challenge; the section "What is your plan for
completing the project on time?" contains almost nothing because the
putative subsection "UI improvements" is at the same level; there is a
"week 1" (beware of the repeated typo), but no other weeks at the same
level, etc.
Please note that I am only talking about purely formal issues. I don't know
if there will be other problems as well. I am afraid that it might be easy
to find them in view of the haste in writing the proposal. So, take the
time to review the code (in this case, the proposal) before submitting it
again.
Best wishes,
Hèctor

‪Missatge de ‫حازم شهاوى‬‎  del dia dl., 27 de març
2023 a les 1:33:‬

>
> I created a good proposal that has many   UI and backend improvements, I
> hope it appeals you !
> https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium:HazemShehawy
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


[Apertium-stuff] gsoc proposal

2023-03-26 Thread حازم شهاوى
I created a good proposal that has many   UI and backend improvements, I
hope it appeals you !
https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium:HazemShehawy
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


Re: [Apertium-stuff] Formally deprecate lttoolbox-java?

2023-03-26 Thread Mikel L. Forcada

Thanks a million, Tino

Mikel

El 26/3/23 a les 21:32, Tino Didriksen ha escrit:
The replacement is https://github.com/apertium/apertium-omegat-native 
- which admittedly also needs updating, but it's far easier to get 
functional again.


-- Tino Didriksen


On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 21:06, Felipe Sánchez Martínez 
 wrote:


Hi all,

I guess that the Apertium plugin for OmegaT is running internally
lttoolbox-java. I do no have information on the amount of people
using this plugin, but I guess there are some (me for example).
How much time would it cost to port the latter developments to Java?

Regards

Felipe

El 26/3/23 a las 19:12, Tino Didriksen escribió:

[CC apertium-stuff & PMC]

Cf. https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/34

Given that lttoolbox-java and its downstream dependents have been
falling further and further behind the native tools, I say we
formally deprecate the Java port, mark all related wiki pages
with a warning, and archive the relevant repos.

-- Tino Didriksen



___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
-- 
Universitat d'Alacant / Universidad de Alicante




Dept. de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics

Felipe Sánchez Martínez

Associate Professor - Profesor Titular de Universidad

Tel.: (+34) 965 90 34 00 ext. 2966

Email: fsanc...@ua.es, fsanc...@dlsi.ua.es

Web: https://www.dlsi.ua.es/~fsanchez/


--
Mikel L. Forcada
Dept. de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics
Edifici Politècnica IV,
Universitat d'Alacant
E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig (Spain)

Phone: +34 96 590 9776
m...@dlsi.ua.es
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


Re: [Apertium-stuff] Formally deprecate lttoolbox-java?

2023-03-26 Thread Tino Didriksen
The replacement is https://github.com/apertium/apertium-omegat-native -
which admittedly also needs updating, but it's far easier to get functional
again.

-- Tino Didriksen


On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 21:06, Felipe Sánchez Martínez 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I guess that the Apertium plugin for OmegaT is running internally
> lttoolbox-java. I do no have information on the amount of people using this
> plugin, but I guess there are some (me for example). How much time would it
> cost to port the latter developments to Java?
>
> Regards
>
> Felipe
> El 26/3/23 a las 19:12, Tino Didriksen escribió:
>
> [CC apertium-stuff & PMC]
>
> Cf. https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/34
>
> Given that lttoolbox-java and its downstream dependents have been falling
> further and further behind the native tools, I say we formally deprecate
> the Java port, mark all related wiki pages with a warning, and archive the
> relevant repos.
>
> -- Tino Didriksen
>
>
>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing 
> listApertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
> --
> [image: Universitat d'Alacant / Universidad de Alicante]
>
> Dept. de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics
>
> Felipe Sánchez Martínez
>
> Associate Professor - Profesor Titular de Universidad
>
> Tel.: (+34) 965 90 34 00 ext. 2966
>
> Email: fsanc...@ua.es, fsanc...@dlsi.ua.es
>
> Web: https://www.dlsi.ua.es/~fsanchez/
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


Re: [Apertium-stuff] Formally deprecate lttoolbox-java?

2023-03-26 Thread Felipe Sánchez Martínez

Hi all,

I guess that the Apertium plugin for OmegaT is running internally lttoolbox-java. I do no 
have information on the amount of people using this plugin, but I guess there are some (me 
for example). How much time would it cost to port the latter developments to Java?


Regards

Felipe

El 26/3/23 a las 19:12, Tino Didriksen escribió:

[CC apertium-stuff & PMC]

Cf. https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/34

Given that lttoolbox-java and its downstream dependents have been falling further and 
further behind the native tools, I say we formally deprecate the Java port, mark all 
related wiki pages with a warning, and archive the relevant repos.


-- Tino Didriksen



___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

--
Universitat d'Alacant / Universidad de Alicante



Dept. de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics

Felipe Sánchez Martínez

Associate Professor - Profesor Titular de Universidad

Tel.: (+34) 965 90 34 00 ext. 2966

Email: fsanc...@ua.es, fsanc...@dlsi.ua.es

Web: https://www.dlsi.ua.es/~fsanchez/
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


[Apertium-stuff] Formally deprecate lttoolbox-java?

2023-03-26 Thread Tino Didriksen
[CC apertium-stuff & PMC]

Cf. https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/34

Given that lttoolbox-java and its downstream dependents have been falling
further and further behind the native tools, I say we formally deprecate
the Java port, mark all related wiki pages with a warning, and archive the
relevant repos.

-- Tino Didriksen
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff