Re: [Apertium-stuff] gsoc2023 proposal

2023-03-18 Thread Eiji Miyamoto
Thank you for your feedback! I will make my proposal more detailed and
change some week's goals too.

On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 at 10:05, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
wrote:

> > Hello, I have finished my first draft and I would love to get any
> feedback
> > from potential mentors.
> > https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:Eiji
>
> Hi,
>
> This looks promising :) Some thoughts:
>
> You've already made kind of an overview of the possibilities in your
> proposal; I would tone down the "investigate possibilities" parts and
> instead try to focus on how you're going to implement one of the
> methods, using apertium-jpn as a testbed.
>
> Try to make clear deliverables per week or at least every other week,
> you should have something like a proof-of-concept by week 2 – especially
> if your ambition is to also work on improving the Japanese language
> data. You currently have week 6 for testing – but you should be testing
> from the start alongside the coding. I would probably plan for 2 weeks
> for converting the PoC from Python to C++ and making it usable as a part
> of the pipeline.
>
> (Think about how this will be integrated into apertium – we have a
> translation pipeline which expects a certain format
> https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium_stream_format )
>
> best regards,
> Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


Re: [Apertium-stuff] gsoc2023 proposal

2023-03-18 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> Hello, I have finished my first draft and I would love to get any feedback
> from potential mentors.
> https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:Eiji

Hi,

This looks promising :) Some thoughts:

You've already made kind of an overview of the possibilities in your
proposal; I would tone down the "investigate possibilities" parts and
instead try to focus on how you're going to implement one of the
methods, using apertium-jpn as a testbed.

Try to make clear deliverables per week or at least every other week,
you should have something like a proof-of-concept by week 2 – especially
if your ambition is to also work on improving the Japanese language
data. You currently have week 6 for testing – but you should be testing
from the start alongside the coding. I would probably plan for 2 weeks
for converting the PoC from Python to C++ and making it usable as a part
of the pipeline. 

(Think about how this will be integrated into apertium – we have a
translation pipeline which expects a certain format
https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium_stream_format )

best regards,
Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 





___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff


[Apertium-stuff] gsoc2023 proposal

2023-03-12 Thread Eiji Miyamoto
Hello, I have finished my first draft and I would love to get any feedback
from potential mentors.
https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:Eiji

Thank you,
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff