Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 19:24, Xavi Ivars wrote: > Is there anything pending to release both lttoolbox and apertium now? > Nope. I prepared everything, and then forgot about it because of other work. Will do... -- Tino Didriksen ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
Missatge de Francis Tyers del dia dt., 4 de set. 2018 a les 12:22: > El 2018-09-04 11:07, Tino Didriksen escribió: > > > > What I want a sign-off for is something like: is this feature > > complete? Was this all the weight stuff that was needed for now? Any > > critically missing bits that makes this not releasable just yet? > > It could always use more testing, but I think it's working fine per > the specifications. Is there anything pending to release both lttoolbox and apertium now? -- < Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me > ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dt., 4 de set. 2018 a les 11:08: > > > Merging to master is simply a case of "does it build and pass tests", imo. > > What I want a sign-off for is something like: is this feature complete? > Was this all the weight stuff that was needed for now? Any critically > missing bits that makes this not releasable just yet? > I see what you mean, but if the answer for this sign-off was "it's not ready", it could potentially be blocking releasing other complete features, so I personally wouldn't merge to master then. But we can have this conversation later on :) -- < Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
El 2018-09-04 11:07, Tino Didriksen escribió: On 4 September 2018 at 11:01, Xavi Ivars wrote: Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dt., 4 de set. 2018 a les 10:58: Releasing new versions is most certainly the plan. Basically just need someone (e.g. the relevant mentors) to sign off on the weight code. I thought that sign off was already done, as the code was merged to master. I guess now it's OK, but in the future we should avoid merging code that we think needs something else before a release happens. Merging to master is simply a case of "does it build and pass tests", imo. What I want a sign-off for is something like: is this feature complete? Was this all the weight stuff that was needed for now? Any critically missing bits that makes this not releasable just yet? It could always use more testing, but I think it's working fine per the specifications. Fran -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
On 4 September 2018 at 11:01, Xavi Ivars wrote: > > > Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dt., 4 de > set. 2018 a les 10:58: > >> Releasing new versions is most certainly the plan. Basically just need >> someone (e.g. the relevant mentors) to sign off on the weight code. >> > > I thought that sign off was already done, as the code was merged to > master. > > I guess now it's OK, but in the future we should avoid merging code that > we think needs something else before a release happens. > Merging to master is simply a case of "does it build and pass tests", imo. What I want a sign-off for is something like: is this feature complete? Was this all the weight stuff that was needed for now? Any critically missing bits that makes this not releasable just yet? -- Tino Didriksen -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dt., 4 de set. 2018 a les 10:58: > Releasing new versions is most certainly the plan. Basically just need > someone (e.g. the relevant mentors) to sign off on the weight code. > I thought that sign off was already done, as the code was merged to master. I guess now it's OK, but in the future we should avoid merging code that we think needs something else before a release happens. -- < Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
Releasing new versions is most certainly the plan. Basically just need someone (e.g. the relevant mentors) to sign off on the weight code. I am also not super happy with using var-ints for the versioning information in the new binary format, but I can fix that. -- Tino Didriksen On 4 September 2018 at 09:52, Xavi Ivars wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to suggest that we release new versions of both lttoolbox and > Apertium. > >- lttoolbox includes a couple of interesting new features: > - weights & headers for transducers, > - a new mode that can be used between gen and postgen >- apertium includes support for weights, but also some critical fixes >(C++ version agnostic usage of HMM tagger) > > > After that, we may need to publish a bunch of new languages and pairs that > will sue the new features > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] New versions of Apertium
+1 El 04/09/18 a les 09:52, Xavi Ivars ha escrit: Hi, I wanted to suggest that we release new versions of both lttoolbox and Apertium. * lttoolbox includes a couple of interesting new features: o weights & headers for transducers, o a new mode that can be used between gen and postgen * apertium includes support for weights, but also some critical fixes (C++ version agnostic usage of HMM tagger) After that, we may need to publish a bunch of new languages and pairs that will sue the new features -- < Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me > -- Mikel L. Forcada (http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/) Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat d'Alacant E-03071 Alacant, Spain Phone: +34 96 590 9776 Fax: +34 96 590 9326 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
