[APFN] Fw: The most pro-abortion president ever strikes again...
- Original Message - From: Liberty Counsel Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:15 PM Subject: The most pro-abortion president ever strikes again... Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman Liberty Counsel As you doubtless know, Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell has been accused of murder for the killing of babies outside the womb. His trial ended Monday. On the heels of Gosnell’s trial, new undercover videos released by the pro-life group Live Action show other abortionists describing how they kill babies outside the womb. Meanwhile, President Obama told Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, “You’ve also got a president who’s going to be right there with you fighting every step of the way” at their gala fundraising banquet last Friday. Of course, the President’s address didn’t mention a word about Gosnell or his trial! The President’s outspoken and ardent support of abortion, even to the point of giving a keynote address at a Planned Parenthood convention, is hard to stomach. Please see my update below – Mat Dot, In the aftermath of the murder trial of late-term abortionist Kermit Gosnell, Barack Obama became the first sitting President to address the Planned Parenthood National Conference. And while the abortion giant performed a record 333,964 abortions last year, the President spoke to Planned Parenthood (PP) for twelve minutes and never uttered the word “abortion.” Rather, he echoed the party line, touting cancer screenings, counseling, contraception, education, and other minor aspects of the organization’s so-called “service offerings.” President Obama’s deafening silence about Gosnell’s born-alive infant killings shows that he is more willing to defend Planned Parenthood than the women and children who suffer in their murderous “clinics.” Here’s a fact: Abortion clinics around the country are allowed to function in squalid conditions because politicians are more interested in financial contributions than women’s health. Barack Obama is no exception. In fact, he overtly politicized his address to Planned Parenthood by asking for help selling his ObamaCare abortion services to a generally disapproving nation. ++Pro-life Americans like you and me will soon be paying for even more abortion “services” unless our right of conscience is protected! In state after state, investigators have found abortion clinics failing to ensure sterile, sanitary surgical equipment, killing aborted babies who are born alive, performing abortions past the point of viability without documentation of a maternal health reason, arranging abortions for victims of sex-trafficking, misleading women about the risks and dangers associated with abortions, aborting children for sex selection, violating biohazard waste disposal regulations, violating informed consent laws, and many, many other atrocities while government officials turn a blind eye. While the President says he wants abortion to be safe and rare, every year it ends the lives of hundreds of thousands of children in our nation. And we all know that the President is working to increase that number by requiring even pro-life taxpayers to fund abortions through ObamaCare! Make no mistake: The President’s “signature achievement,” ObamaCare, will usher in the biggest advance of abortion services since Roe v Wade. And he has arranged to make pro-life Americans pay for it against their consciences! It is time for Americans to say enough is enough! We must put an end to the real “attack on women’s rights.” ++Tell Congress to protect our constitutional rights! Three Representatives have proposed a vitally important bill that would partially right this wrong and restore the constitutional guarantee of our Rights of Conscience. Congresswoman Diane Black (R-TN), Congressman John Fleming, M.D. (R-LA), and Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), have cosponsored the Health Care Conscience Rights Act (HCCRA) bill in the House. All Americans who stand for life and the protection of our unalienable rights should rally behind this bill. This bill is stalled in committee and must be brought to a vote. Please click here now to sign the letter/petition to congress that demands that this bill come out of committee to a full vote in the House of Representatives. http://www.libertyaction.org/383/petition.asp In Liberty Counsel’s Citizen Petition to congress, we demand respect for the First Amendment, ensuring Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience, and Freedom of Religion – and, unified, we stand in staunch support of H.R. 940 – the Health Care Conscience Rights Act. We are calling for the bill’s passage in the House Subcommittee on Health – and for a full vote by our elected congressmen in the House of Repr
[APFN] Fw: Sign Petition to Change US RF Safety Policy
- Original Message - From: Webmaster To: Webmaster Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 1:34 PM Subject: Sign Petition to Change US RF Safety Policy Please sign the petition below and pass it on via email, facebook, and twitter. If we make this petition a success, we can make one change at the top and stop having to do it state by state and city by city. It affects all rf related issues from smart meters to the sundry wireless technologies that are injuring people. Please help make this go viral. Thanks, Catherine If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online. Share This: For Distribution: On Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/EMR-Policy-Institute/188070864579167?fref=ts On Twitter at: https://twitter.com/@emrpolicy Hello! The EMRadiation Policy Institute has started a petition on www.change.org: "Chairman Rockefeller Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation: Hold hearings to fire FCC and hire EPA to set RF radiation safety limits." We need your help to get it off the ground. Your signature will be sent directly to the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation - that has jurisdiction over the wireless industry. Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link: http://www.change.org/petitions/chairman-rockefeller-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-transportation-hold-hearings-to-fire-fcc-and-hire-epa-to-set-rf-radiation-safety-limits-4 Here's why this petition is important: Sign the petition for Congress to hold hearings as a necessary first step to have an unbiased agency (EPA) protect your health by establishing meaningful safety limits for RF radiation from wireless devices. Please ask your friends and relatives to sign as well. The FCC has shown again, even as it opens a docket to determine whether it should take another look at its RF radiation limits, that it cannot do so in an unbiased manner. The document at: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0422/FCC-13-39A1.pdf contains multiple statements showing bias. Current scientific evidence - BioInitiative 2012 Report www.bioinitiative.org - actually demonstrates biological effects at levels well below the FCC’s inadequate safety limits adopted in 1996. These limits are based on the scientific knowledge as of 1986. The FCC is ignoring the federal government’s own record that the FCC safety limits are flawed and obsolete: http://www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/docs/epa_to_fcc_3nov_93.pdf http://www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/docs/exhibit_a.pdf http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12036 The FCC also freely admits to its lack of expertise: the FCC “is not a health and safety agency, we defer to other organizations and agencies with respect to interpreting the biological research necessary to determine what levels are safe.” The FCC also makes it clear throughout its current docket that it is extremely concerned with protecting and promoting the industry, since it it has the statutory obligation to do so. Recent discussion of Thomas Wheeler as a potential candidate for Chairman of the FCC is of paramount concern. This proposal further highlights the need for the responsibilities for protecting the public health and safety to be moved to an agency with that expertise and focus, one that has no inherent conflict of interest. Mr. Wheeler has worked for industry his entire career and was a major player in the industry fight against RF radiation safety limits that would have provided meaningful protection in the drafting of the TCA of 1996.. The FCC's primary function is to promote telecommunications technologies by licensing providers of these technologies. By its own statements, its expertise is not public health. Public health is too important to let the fox continue to guard the henhouse. With the almost-ubiquitous exposure of the entire US population to RF radiation, it is past time that US policy for non-ionizing radiation protection follow the model in place for the ionizing radiation protection. A recent report released by The EMRadiation Policy Institute at: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/-1770139.htm shows not only that the FCC has not modernized its RF radiation safety limits to reflect current science, but that it does not even enforce its own outdated thermally-based RF radiation safety regulations. Hundreds of comments to recent FCC dockets at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/input?z=iw0f and search proceedings 03-137 and 12-357 support the need for biologically-based RF radiation safety limits NOW! Until the late 1980s the EPA carried out it own non-ionizing radiation research program. Unfortunately, the EPA's mandate for developing non-ionizing radiation safety regulations was never fully funded. Its non-ionizing radiation regulatory authority has been eroded by industry lobbying, most significantly in the
