Re: freebsd upgrade problem
On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Thats um... bad. Did you upgrade GCC and put the upgraded one in your path before the system one. on 6.1 you want gcc 3.4.4 on 6.2- prerelease you want 3.4.6. 7.1-current is preparing to import 4.x. If you use any other combination it should ONLY BE FOR LOCAL TESTING. But hey if it works more power to you. you also want the one in /usr NOT /usr/local. gcc is part of the base system and ports are tested against the one in the base system. The other ports exist only to aid this testing or related testing. well that um.. sucks. but it works now. i'll try rebuilding after i upgrade to 6_1 ( i was on 6_0 ) perhaps there's a better way to handle the issue i discovered. i see now that the GCC line made it use another gcc -- and not use another library dir ( which is what i had wanted to accomplish ) i was really just taking stabs at stuff i read in the man pages. // Jonathan Vanasco | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | FindMeOn.com - The cure for Multiple Web Personality Disorder | Web Identity Management and 3D Social Networking | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | RoadSound.com - Tools For Bands, Stuff For Fans | Collaborative Online Management And Syndication Tools | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re: freebsd upgrade problem
Jonathan Vanasco wrote: cd /usr/ports/www/libapreq2 export GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/local/lib make install Thats um... bad. Did you upgrade GCC and put the upgraded one in your path before the system one. on 6.1 you want gcc 3.4.4 on 6.2-prerelease you want 3.4.6. 7.1-current is preparing to import 4.x. If you use any other combination it should ONLY BE FOR LOCAL TESTING. But hey if it works more power to you. you also want the one in /usr NOT /usr/local. gcc is part of the base system and ports are tested against the one in the base system. The other ports exist only to aid this testing or related testing. -- Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com 1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F I never had a dream come true 'Til the day that I found you. Even though I pretend that I've moved on You'll always be my baby. I never found the words to say You're the one I think about each day And I know no matter where life takes me to A part of me will always be... A part of me will always be with you.
Re: freebsd upgrade problem
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:58 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Seems to be a FreeBSD quark / fluke, I'll try and solve this off-list. Argh.. I finally got it. Thanks a ton to Philip for some offlist pointers. error: cd /usr/ports/www/libapreq2 make install cc -shared .libs/util.o .libs/version.o .libs/cookie.o .libs/ param.o .libs/parser.o .libs/parser_urlencoded.o .libs/ parser_header.o .libs/parser_multipart.o .libs/module.o .libs/ module_custom.o .libs/module_cgi.o .libs/error.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/ usr/local/lib/apache2 -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/apache2 /usr/ local/lib/apache2/libapr-0.so /usr/local/lib/apache2/libaprutil-0.so - ldb-4.2 -lexpat -liconv -lm -lcrypt -L/usr/local -Wl,-soname - Wl,libapreq2.so.8 -o .libs/libapreq2.so.8 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb-4.2 gmake[2]: *** [libapreq2.la] Error 1 fix: cd /usr/ports/www/libapreq2 export GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/local/lib make install I think this might actually be indicative of a ports problem/quirk, so i'm posting it here: the apache20 port installs the various libs in /usr/local/lib/apache2 when libapreq2 builds against that, it sets the base lib to /usr/ local/lib/apache2 (this is the libapreq ports and source) i think the apache22 port and the apache source will automatically install into /usr/local/lib instead -- and not cause this issue to occur if you install the apr lib on its own (not the bundled 0.9 branch in apache20 ) you get a 1.0 branch in /usr/local/lib -- i think there's a way to build that first and have apache20 link against that, but i'm not sure. i could be wrong - and this is all some sort of box specific issue. i'm not all that familiar with gcc and ld. but this is what the problem looks to be from my vantage. in any event, there you go. so the next person to have this nightmare won't have this issue. // Jonathan Vanasco | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | FindMeOn.com - The cure for Multiple Web Personality Disorder | Web Identity Management and 3D Social Networking | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | RoadSound.com - Tools For Bands, Stuff For Fans | Collaborative Online Management And Syndication Tools | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
