[Aptitude-devel] Bug#979186: Bug#979186: aptitude: in the TUI, "+" changes the version of some packages in an inconsistent way
On 2021-01-04 08:42:53 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Can you do an aptitude-create-state-bundle either before (preferred)
> or after that situation and upload it somewhere?
It's available here for a short period:
https://www.vinc17.net/aptitude.bundle
(I created it at about the same time as my bug report; the bug is
also reproducible when running aptitude as a normal user, so that
I could test in a non-destructive way).
> Oh, and what is your setting of aptitude::Auto-Install (aka
> "Automatically resolve dependencies of a package when it is selected")
> and maybe other settings which might play a role here?
My only settings concerning aptitude:
Aptitude::UI::Package-Display-Format "%c%a%M %p %Z %24v %24V";
Aptitude::UI::Styles {
// Add bold to avoid a readability issue.
SolutionActionApproved { fg white; bg green; set bold; };
};
Aptitude::ProblemResolver::SolutionCost "safety, removals";
> Do you have any special /etc/apt/preferences* settings which might
> play a role here, too?
Only:
Explanation: For security, make sure that the Flash plugin is never installed.
Package: flashplugin-nonfree:any
Pin: version *
Pin-Priority: -1
--
Vincent Lefèvre - Web:
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#979186: Bug#979186: Bug#979186: aptitude: in the TUI, "+" changes the version of some packages in an inconsistent way
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-01-04 08:42:53 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Can you do an aptitude-create-state-bundle either before (preferred)
> > or after that situation and upload it somewhere?
>
> It's available here for a short period:
Thanks! Fetched it.
> > Oh, and what is your setting of aptitude::Auto-Install (aka
> > "Automatically resolve dependencies of a package when it is selected")
> > and maybe other settings which might play a role here?
>
> My only settings concerning aptitude:
>
> Aptitude::UI::Package-Display-Format "%c%a%M %p %Z %24v %24V";
>
> Aptitude::UI::Styles {
> // Add bold to avoid a readability issue.
> SolutionActionApproved { fg white; bg green; set bold; };
> };
These shouldn't be relevant.
> Aptitude::ProblemResolver::SolutionCost "safety, removals";
That might play in here, thanks!
> > Do you have any special /etc/apt/preferences* settings which might
> > play a role here, too?
>
> Only:
[…]
> Package: flashplugin-nonfree:any
Probably not relevant either.
Will have a closer look later, earliest this evening.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
___
Aptitude-devel mailing list
Aptitude-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#979186: Bug#979186: aptitude: in the TUI, "+" changes the version of some packages in an inconsistent way
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #979186 [aptitude] aptitude: in the TUI, "+" changes the version of some packages in an inconsistent way Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 979186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
