Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p5-1
On Thursday 13 January 2011 15:20:43 Allan McRae wrote: > Upstream bug fix/security release. > > Signoff both, > Allan I'm still able to use sudo here. Signoff x86_64 -- Andrea
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p5-1
Le 13 janvier 2011 00:20:43, Allan McRae a écrit : > Upstream bug fix/security release. > > Signoff both, > Allan > > > Major changes between sudo 1.7.4p4 and 1.7.4p5: > > * A bug has been fixed that would allow a command to be run without the > user entering a password when sudo's -g flag is used without the -u > flag. > > * If user has no supplementary groups, sudo will now fall back on > checking the group file explicitly, which restores historic sudo behavior. > > * A crash has been fixed when sudo's -g flag is used without the -u flag > and the sudoers file contains an entry with no runas user or group > listed. > > * A bug has been fixed in the I/O logging support that could cause > visual artifacts in full-screen programs such as text editors,. > > * A crash has been fixed when the Solaris project support is enabled > and sudo's -g flag is used without the -u flag. > > * Sudo no longer exits with an error when support for auditing is > compiled in but auditing is not enabled. > > * Fixed a bug introduced in sudo 1.7.3 where the ticket file was not > being honored when the "targetpw" sudoers Defaults option was enabled. > > * The LOG_INPUT and LOG_OUTPUT tags in sudoers are now parsed correctly. > > * A crash has been fixed in "sudo -l" when sudo is built with auditing > support and the user is not allowed to run any commands on the host. Signoff i686 (in a vm) Stéphane
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p5-1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Upstream bug fix/security release. > > Signoff both, > Allan Signoff both.
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] acl 2.2.49-2
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > * Rebuild of old package > * Tidy up PKGBUILD > * Simplify build logic > * Fix permissions on /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0 > > Please signoff both. > Thanks > > Stéphane > Signoff both.
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gmp 5.0.1-1
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > * Rebuild of old package > * Tidy up PKGBUILD > > Please signoff both. > Thanks > > Stéphane > Signoff both.
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] perl 5.12.2-1 WAS Re: perl-5.12.2 rebuild list?
2011/1/13 Ángel Velásquez : > 2011/1/12 Allan McRae : >> >> There is no signoff thread so I will signoff both here. >> >> Allan >> > > Singoff both arches > Btw I can't move perl to [core] (no access to [core]), somebody with access to [core] should do it first, then move the rest of packages to extra / community. If you give me access I will do this. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
[arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild
So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager These I didn't check: - kismet - net-snmp - knemo - libvirt - simh Can the respective maintainers find out whether there are patches for libnl 2.0 support? I'd like to do the rebuild on the weekend. If we can't fix all packages, we could put a libnl1 package to [extra]. (If there are no patches, it seems that porting to libnl 2.0 is not that difficult, so we could do it ourselves and submit it) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild
On 01/13/2011 08:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager nm doesn't support libnl 2.0 even in master. These I didn't check: - kismet - net-snmp - knemo - libvirt - simh Can the respective maintainers find out whether there are patches for libnl 2.0 support? I'd like to do the rebuild on the weekend. If we can't fix all packages, we could put a libnl1 package to [extra]. +1 -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild
Am 13.01.2011 19:46, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: > nm doesn't support libnl 2.0 even in master. I think I'll port it and submit them a patch. From what I could see in iw and crda, this is rather easy. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-dev-public] [signoff] dash 0.5.6.1-2
* Rebuild of old package * Tidy up PKGBUILD Please signoff both. Thanks Stéphane
[arch-dev-public] [sigoff] libmpc 0.8.2-3
* Rebuild of old package * Tidy up PKGBUILD Please signoff both. Thanks Stéphane
Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in meld/trunk (PKGBUILD)
Any reason why you bump to this release? from the release mail: Meld 1.5.0 has been released. This is the first in a new unstable series of Meld releases, and there's plenty of shiny new bugs, features and dependencies to check out. note the _unstable_ ! -Andy
