Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages
[2016-08-06 16:10:04 +0300] Jerome Leclanche: > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-firebug/ > > We shouldn't really be packaging Firefox extensions... It really makes no difference whether it's a browser extension or an ordinary piece of software: we simply shouldn't keep packages in our repos that we aren't able to update in a timely manner. -- Gaetan
Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages
Hi all I am guilty of leaving some packages out-of-date and some tickets sitting idle for a while now, and for being "intermittently inactive" since like forever. It's all caused by an initial breakage of my Linux system due to a hardware issue a year ago and of course RL (so I have not yet managed the time to reconfigure my system to my liking, while continue to using Windows to my disliking). Although I can't put a date I still have to get back full-time on my Arch machine because my daily productivity has gone down and I need to boost back up. Nevertheless, I still use these packages whenever I boot into Arch, and have received some user input towards updating them which I have promised to incorporate. I'll disown any if I can't do them justice by the end of next week. On 6 August 2016 at 19:10, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-firebug/ > > We shouldn't really be packaging Firefox extensions... > J. Leclanche > > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Antonio Rojas wrote: >> Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: >>> Can everyone please either update their packages or explain here why >>> each package is not being updated? If it's due to lack of interest, >>> please consider orphaning it and post the names of the packages here so >>> they can be adopted. >>> >>> If a package is flagged incorrectly, please unflag it. >>> >> >> +1, would also be good if devs/TUs who have been inactive for some months >> could give us an update on their status -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: [arch-dev-public] New TeXLive 2016 packages in [testing]
Rémy Oudompheng via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Done. > > I have also removed verbosity in the hooks. They is still an install > script for texlive-bin and texlive-core because rebuilding the formats > file has a dependency on the hooks being run. > > I need more work to move the format files to a framework like the > "maps" files, so that they are also managed by hooks (it will also > remove potential warnings and instabilities during install/upgrades). > > Rémy. Thanks for the update. So is it safe to remove the install files from tex packages now? AFAICS the following packages are affected: extra/asymptote extra/gnuplot extra/latex2html extra/r community/auctex community/hevea community/sagetex
Re: [arch-dev-public] New TeXLive 2016 packages in [testing]
2016-08-06 20:00 GMT+02:00 Rémy Oudompheng : > 2016-08-05 8:38 GMT+02:00 Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public > : >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:45 AM Rémy Oudompheng < >> arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote: >> >>> I have published new TeXLive packages for the 2016 release in [testing]. >>> The structure of the packages has been left unchanged (e.g. no introduction >>> of pacman hooks). >>> >> >> I noticed that there's an mktexlsr hook now, but texlive-bin still runs it >> post_install and post_upgrade. >> >> Perhaps you should add "Target = usr/bin/mktexlsr" to the hook? Then it >> will run after texlive-bin install and upgrade, too. >> >> Also, please keep the output of the hooks clear—only errors should be >> reported. For the mktexlsr script, remove the echo and the -v flag from rm >> in the mktexlsr script. Perhaps the commands it calls also need to be >> quieted (via arguments or redirects), but don't do so if it suppresses all >> errors, too. The font map hook needs a similar treatment. >> >> Thanks for your work on TeXLive! > > It seems that texlive-bin was mistakenly pushed to [extra] following > the poppler rebuild. > > I need to push all the other packages to [extra] because quite a > number of users are broken now. > > Rémy. Done. I have also removed verbosity in the hooks. They is still an install script for texlive-bin and texlive-core because rebuilding the formats file has a dependency on the hooks being run. I need more work to move the format files to a framework like the "maps" files, so that they are also managed by hooks (it will also remove potential warnings and instabilities during install/upgrades). Rémy.
Re: [arch-dev-public] New TeXLive 2016 packages in [testing]
2016-08-05 8:38 GMT+02:00 Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public : > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:45 AM Rémy Oudompheng < > arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> I have published new TeXLive packages for the 2016 release in [testing]. >> The structure of the packages has been left unchanged (e.g. no introduction >> of pacman hooks). >> > > I noticed that there's an mktexlsr hook now, but texlive-bin still runs it > post_install and post_upgrade. > > Perhaps you should add "Target = usr/bin/mktexlsr" to the hook? Then it > will run after texlive-bin install and upgrade, too. > > Also, please keep the output of the hooks clear—only errors should be > reported. For the mktexlsr script, remove the echo and the -v flag from rm > in the mktexlsr script. Perhaps the commands it calls also need to be > quieted (via arguments or redirects), but don't do so if it suppresses all > errors, too. The font map hook needs a similar treatment. > > Thanks for your work on TeXLive! It seems that texlive-bin was mistakenly pushed to [extra] following the poppler rebuild. I need to push all the other packages to [extra] because quite a number of users are broken now. Rémy.
Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-firebug/ We shouldn't really be packaging Firefox extensions... J. Leclanche On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Antonio Rojas wrote: > Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: >> Can everyone please either update their packages or explain here why >> each package is not being updated? If it's due to lack of interest, >> please consider orphaning it and post the names of the packages here so >> they can be adopted. >> >> If a package is flagged incorrectly, please unflag it. >> > > +1, would also be good if devs/TUs who have been inactive for some months > could give us an update on their status
Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages
Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > Can everyone please either update their packages or explain here why > each package is not being updated? If it's due to lack of interest, > please consider orphaning it and post the names of the packages here so > they can be adopted. > > If a package is flagged incorrectly, please unflag it. > +1, would also be good if devs/TUs who have been inactive for some months could give us an update on their status
[arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages
Hi, We have quite a few packages that are marked out of date for more than a month[1]. Some of them even for a year or two. You can also view a list of your own packages via the link on the developer dashboard under the heading "Developer Reports". Can everyone please either update their packages or explain here why each package is not being updated? If it's due to lack of interest, please consider orphaning it and post the names of the packages here so they can be adopted. If a package is flagged incorrectly, please unflag it. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/devel/reports/long-out-of-date/ Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 19 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 8 fully signed off packages * 64 packages missing signoffs * 7 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (19 total) == * expat-2.2.0-2 (i686) * fakeroot-1.21-2 (i686) * inetutils-1.9.4-4 (i686) * links-2.13-1 (i686) * expat-2.2.0-2 (x86_64) * fakeroot-1.21-2 (x86_64) * inetutils-1.9.4-4 (x86_64) * links-2.13-1 (x86_64) * mutagen-1.34-1 (any) * gst-plugins-bad-1.8.2-4 (i686) * ibus-1.5.14-1 (i686) * lcms2-2.8-1 (i686) * libpng-1.6.24-1 (i686) * libupnp-1.6.20-1 (i686) * gst-plugins-bad-1.8.2-4 (x86_64) * ibus-1.5.14-1 (x86_64) * lcms2-2.8-1 (x86_64) * libpng-1.6.24-1 (x86_64) * libupnp-1.6.20-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (14 total) == * btrfs-progs-4.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * curl-7.50.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dhcpcd-6.11.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * efivar-0.24-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * expat-2.2.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * inetutils-1.9.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnl-3.2.28-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * links-2.13-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * btrfs-progs-4.7-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * dash-0.5.9-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * expat-2.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * inetutils-1.9.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libnl-3.2.28-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * links-2.13-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (50 total) == * mutagen-1.34-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-bibtexextra-2016.41470-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-core-2016.41471-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * texlive-fontsextra-2016.41439-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-formatsextra-2016.41438-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-games-2016.39318-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-genericextra-2016.41413-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-htmlxml-2016.41440-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-humanities-2016.41380-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langchinese-2016.41405-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langcyrillic-2016.41231-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langextra-2016.41397-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langgreek-2016.40850-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langjapanese-2016.41443-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langkorean-2016.40373-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-latexextra-2016.41473-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-music-2016.41389-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-pictures-2016.41299-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-plainextra-2016.41437-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-pstricks-2016.41321-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-publishers-2016.41474-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-science-2016.41327-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * alsa-lib-1.1.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * alsa-utils-1.1.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gst-plugins-bad-1.8.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-1.5.14-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lcms2-2.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libbluray-0.9.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libcap-ng-0.7.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpng-1.6.24-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libupnp-1.6.20-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libzip-1.1.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pyqt5-5.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * talloc-2.1.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xfce4-notifyd-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xfce4-power-manager-1.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * alsa-lib-1.1.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * alsa-utils-1.1.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * gst-plugins-bad-1.8.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-1.5.14-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lcms2-2.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libbluray-0.9.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libcap-ng-0.7.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpng-1.6.24-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libupnp-1.6.20-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libzip-1.1.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pyqt5-5.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * talloc-2.1.8-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xfce4-notifyd-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xfce4-power-manager-1.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (8 total) == * dash-0.5.9-1 (i686) * fakeroot-1.21-2 (i686) * linux-4.6.5-1 (i686) * curl-7.50.1-1 (x86_64) * dhcpcd-6.11.2-1 (x86_64) * efivar-0.24-1 (x86_64) * fakeroot-1.21-2 (x86_64) * linux-4.6.5-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (7 total) == * libbluray-0.9.2-3 (i686), since 2016-05-08 * libbluray-0.9.2-3 (x86_64), since 2016-05-08 * texlive-core-2016.41471-1 (any), since 2016-06-19 * dash-0.5.9-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * dash-0.5.9-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * efivar-0.24-1 (i686), since 2016-07-16 * efivar-0.24-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pid1 - 3 signoffs 2. jasonwryan - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs 4. anthraxx - 2 signoffs
