Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Op wo 22 apr. 2020 19:29 schreef Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@archlinux.org>: > Em abril 22, 2020 6:38 Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public escreveu: > > Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional > > dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, > it > > doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and > there's > > already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). > > > > Any objections to move it to [extra]? > > > > I don't mind it being moved to [extra], but I use it still, so I'm willing > to help > maintain it. Is Ronald still active? > > Regards, > Giancarlo Razzolini Feel free to take it of my hands or co-maintain it. Ronald
Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Em abril 22, 2020 6:38 Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public escreveu: Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). Any objections to move it to [extra]? I don't mind it being moved to [extra], but I use it still, so I'm willing to help maintain it. Is Ronald still active? Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini pgp3Zf_WHPezL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
On 2020-04-22 11:38:33 (+0200), Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public wrote: > Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional > dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it > doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's > already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). > > Any objections to move it to [extra]? Not from my side! :) -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). Any objections to move it to [extra]?
Re: [arch-dev-public] Spring cleaning (moving orphaned packages from [community] to AUR)
El jueves, 27 de febrero de 2020 10:11:24 (CET), Alexander F Rødseth via arch-dev-public escribió: Hello, It's time for the semi-yearly package cleanup of [community] packages, as is tradition. I have gathered a list of "unneeded orphans" in [community] (packages that currently has no maintainer, and no other package depends on them) from the excellent list on our web page. Hi Alexander, What's the status of this? It's been almost two months. If you don't have time currently, I can go ahead and drop the remaining packages to AUR.
