Re: [arch-dev-public] Call for Participation - Arch Conf 2020 Online
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 07:20:19PM +0200, Morten Linderud wrote: > # Important Dates > > * Conference date: 10th - 11th of October > > * Submission deadline: 18th of September Heads up that the CFP date is comming up :) Please submit your talks before the deadline! Currently we are somewhere around 12-13 submitted talks :D https://pretalx.com/arch-conf-online-2020/cfp Poke me if you have questions! -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[arch-dev-public] Kanboard Deprecation
Hi people, as part of our ongoing unification of Arch services in order to ease operational overhead, DevOps would like to move the kanboard service to the GitLab instance [0]. GitLab has a comparable feature in the form of issue boards [1]. The current kanboard isn't getting used much and we'd like to focus our efforts. See below for an overview of the usage lately: Board Owner lowest "days in this column" InfrastructureFlorian 513 Bug todos Eli -empty- Reproducible Arch Linux Bartłomiej 629 Archweb Jelle 489 dbscripts Eli 660 Security Team Jelle 445 Conf Jelle 377 Packaging David 393 General Bartłomiej 239 Docker Image Santiago244 We are not interested in flat out deleting everything and realize that there might still be important information there somewhere. Please have a look at the boards and check if there's anything you know needs to be migrated. At a quick glance, many issues are simply out of date and superseded or already done. If necessary, please migrate the board to GitLab or feel free to create a DevOps ticket [2] so that we can handle the migration. We seek to finish the migration by October 31st. Cheers, Frederik [0] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/16 [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/boards [2] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] Orphaning packages/ request for co-maintainership
Hi David, Le 14/09/2020 à 05:17, David Runge a écrit : > libopenshot > libopenshot-audio > openshot I will take those ones. I don’t use OpenShot yet, but I intend to at some point in the future, so I might as well start maintaining it. > quodlibet > radicale Added myself as co-maintainer. Regards, Bruno/Archange
Re: [arch-dev-public] Orphaning packages/ request for co-maintainership
On 2020-09-13 17:20:44 (-0700), Brett Cornwall via arch-dev-public wrote: > I'd be happily to co-maintain the following: > > aeolus > ardour > audacity > csound > csoundqt > fluidsynth > freepats-general-midi > freeverb > pd > qjackctl > supercollider > vim-csound good stuff! Thanks! I guess apart from audacity, (sometimes) ardour, csound and (sometimes) supercollider all of the above are fairly low-maintenance. About audacity: I have not yet found the energy to work on that package again, as it requires switching to cmake (which introduces more bugs) and potentially switching to a custom wxgtk3/wxwidgets version (only for audacity!) that is a fork of the development version (to have an actual "stable" package, as upstream neither supports the stable nor the development version of wxgtk3 - that's pretty painful). I have opened a few issues on their github issue tracker irt all that. About csound: Upstream has moved a few of the opcodes to a separate repository. Maybe worth checking it out to get back Python support, etc. About supercollider: Upstream uses git-flow and sometimes fixes get swallowed up (not cherry-picked onto a release branch) when a fix was committed towards their develop branch. Other than that, it has become much more reliable to build over the years! Anyways, thanks! :) -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature
