Re: [arch-general] Name change on crypto modules for kernel26-2.6.24?

2008-01-31 Thread Neil Darlow

Hi,

To clarify.

Neil Darlow wrote:
Too me, it looks like these modules have undergone a name change in 
2.6.24. I think the required modules are actually being loaded but 
cryptsetup complains about missing modules.


It appears the following name changes have occurred:

* padlock_aes.ko -- padlock-aes.ko
* padlock_sha.ko -- padlock-sha.ko

Regards,
Neil Darlow



[arch-general] man pages and utf8

2008-01-31 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Regarding the discussion going on in arch-dev-public about changes in
man and utf8 compliance.
As far as i remember Roman's feature request [1] wasnt even mentioned. 
At least not recently. Are there any thoughts of replacing man with 
man-db? Or the recent chamges in man and groff make this FR invalid?

[1]http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9130



Re: [arch-general] man pages and utf8

2008-01-31 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 31, 2008 2:25 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Regarding the discussion going on in arch-dev-public about changes in
 man and utf8 compliance.
 As far as i remember Roman's feature request [1] wasnt even mentioned.
 At least not recently. Are there any thoughts of replacing man with
 man-db? Or the recent chamges in man and groff make this FR invalid?

 [1]http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9130

Of course there are thoughts on it. I was the one that asked him to
open the feature request in the first place.

The utf8 fix was painfully simple, so it was put in place. Replacing
man with man-db is not as simple, so wasn't the first choice here. As
always, this was a scratch an itch thing - man pages in _my_ locale
acted goofy, so I fixed it.

Apparently, using man-db fixes about 5 other bug reports we have
regarding cyrillic characters, so this will most likely get done, but
in all honesty, it's not my top priority and I'm not even the 'man'
maintainer. I simply fixed some breakage.



Re: [arch-general] Name change on crypto modules for kernel26-2.6.24?

2008-01-31 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:46 +, Neil Darlow wrote:
 Hi,
 
 To clarify.
 
 Neil Darlow wrote:
  Too me, it looks like these modules have undergone a name change in 
  2.6.24. I think the required modules are actually being loaded but 
  cryptsetup complains about missing modules.
 
 It appears the following name changes have occurred:
 
 * padlock_aes.ko -- padlock-aes.ko
 * padlock_sha.ko -- padlock-sha.ko
 
 Regards,
 Neil Darlow
 
Same issue here. If possible, can one of the developers please take a
look at this?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [arch-general] man pages and utf8

2008-01-31 Thread Attila
On Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 21:25 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:

 Regarding the discussion going on in arch-dev-public about changes in
 man and utf8 compliance.

I support every step to get utf8 and man work together. At the moment with
LANG=de_DE.utf8 i give NROFF the '-Tascii' option. But this is only okay
because the most man pages be in english and so the possibility that i can
search for a '-' character is more important than seeing an umlaut.

Good luck and thanks for your impulse.

See you, Attila




Re: [arch-general] man pages and utf8

2008-01-31 Thread Attila
On Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 23:05 Aaron Griffin wrote:

 The '-' character searching is fixed with the groff package in
 testing. It will move to core soon.

Fantastic. I take the files from testing and now man works well with utf8.

Thanks a lot.

See you, Attila





[arch-general] Domain: archlinux.eu

2008-01-31 Thread Volker Glatz
Hi there,

I'm the owner of the domain www.archlinux.eu.

I registered this domain in the sunrise period of dot-eu to avoid commercial 
usage or something else.

Actually there is a redirection to archlinux.org.

If the archlinux project is interested in this domain I'd like to spend it to 
the project.

But if you think it is a good contribution to give my part back to the project 
I'm also willing to hold the domain anymore on my costs.

If there is absolutely no interest in it, I'll give it free.

Volker