Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Patrick Burroughs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:38:20AM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > > Hi > > > small bump of madwifi drivers > > > please signoff both arches > > > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev > > > > Could give a user signoff for i686 > > > > > greetings > > > tpowa > > > > -Gerhard > > -- > > MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificated Installer > > > > Signoff for i686 here. > ~celti > > No signoff from me, it breaks wifi on my macbook pro. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9802 Varun
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:38:20AM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > Hi > > small bump of madwifi drivers > > please signoff both arches > > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev > > Could give a user signoff for i686 > > > greetings > > tpowa > > -Gerhard > -- > MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificated Installer > Signoff for i686 here. ~celti
[arch-general] [OT] i'm giving away textbooks
Hi, I'm aware of this being off-topic but since no profit is going to be made, I dare to post the [1]offer here. The books are in excellent condition and shape. You only have to accept the shipping [2]costs. Thanks, Petar [1] http://smokva.net/lib/ [2] The books are in Switzerland, Europe.
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:38:20AM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > small bump of madwifi drivers > please signoff both arches > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev Could give a user signoff for i686 > greetings > tpowa -Gerhard -- MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificated Installer
Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-i810 obsolete?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Deop i Argemà wrote: Well, I don't use the xf86-video-intel because it's buggier to me than i810 is. Anyway, the most important reason to keep using i810 is that I can get my laptop to suspend to RAM which i can't with the intel one. Please, do not remove the package. Just my two cents Same thing here. Plus, the i810 driver is a lot faster in my 855GM. Yeah me too... Please leave it. Have you guys considered posting bugreports @ whoever is writing that xf86-video-intel driver? Glenn
