[arch-general] digikam beta4 and gcc 4.3.0

2008-05-13 Thread waldek
Hi,
first of all I'm out of my depth here so be gentle, I was trying to compile
digicam beta4 and the compilation process hangs. I found this thread that
describes it:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user/7917

the answer in digikam forum was:

I have reported this problem to CImg author (David Tschumperlé). After
investiguations, he said than all come from an uncompatibilty with gcc
4.3.0 and CImg code. Note than using Gcc 4.2.3 digiKam compile fine.

so I asked on CImg forums:

http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2036591forum_id=423277

and the reply was:

Anyway, this is not a bug related to CImg or GREYCstoration, since it
compiles fine if you don't set the optimizations with g++ 4.3.0. 
 Also it compiles fine with older versions of g++ (4.2.3 for instance). 
  
 I suspect some bugs in the compiler optimization procedure which causes the
process to hang. I admit this is very annoying, but I can't do anything to
solve it, since it is clearly a problem related to the compiler.

could somebody take a look at it? What do you think?

Cheers

waldek




Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

2008-05-13 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Uh huh... well the end users can just ask the package maintainer to see
  what they can do. Just one email. No bug reports and the attendant extra
  work those usually involve. i.e. Simple and usually exceptionally
  effective for  an easy fix that takes but a few minutes to do. - What do
  I mean ?; Well it takes me about 5 minutes to add a working .desktop file
  to a package. It would take me at least twice that time to log in and
  clear a bug report. That's wasteful.

Minor off topic gripe here. English has existed for way to long
without the need for arrows in the language. I see *way* too many
people talking - like this recently



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

2008-05-13 Thread Xavier
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:49 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  blah blah blah

I have one simple policy for you :
send your freaking desktop file upstream



[arch-general] Mirror: please remove locke.suu.edu

2008-05-13 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Hello,

mirror is down since March 30.
Could someone assign the ticket #9678 to Dale or Eliott to kick this
mirror?

Regards
Gerhard

-- 
Don't drink and root!



Re: [arch-general] Mirror: please remove locke.suu.edu

2008-05-13 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Could someone assign the ticket #9678 to Dale or Eliott to kick this
  mirror?

Uh?

Assigned To
Dale Blount (dale)
Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
eliott (cactus)

Why not just, you know, comment on the bug? It sends all of us email
when you do.



Re: [arch-general] Mirror: please remove locke.suu.edu

2008-05-13 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
 Hello,
 
 mirror is down since March 30.
 Could someone assign the ticket #9678 to Dale or Eliott to kick this
 mirror?
 
 Regards
   Gerhard
 
 -- 
 Don't drink and root!
 

Dale edited the bug yesterday so he is aware

Greg



[arch-general] keyboard indicator lights not working

2008-05-13 Thread Scott Weisman
Hello,

At some point, the keyboard indicator lights stopped working. I know
they aren't broken (and I've even used three separate keyboards). They
used to work, but stopped at some point, but I don't remember when.

Does anyone have any suggestion for this?

Thanks,

Scott



Re: [arch-general] keyboard indicator lights not working

2008-05-13 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 20:19 +0300, Scott Weisman wrote:
 Hello,
 
 At some point, the keyboard indicator lights stopped working. I know
 they aren't broken (and I've even used three separate keyboards). They
 used to work, but stopped at some point, but I don't remember when.
 
 Does anyone have any suggestion for this?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Scott
 

I remember this was a bug in xorg-server. It works in 1.4.0.90-10 in
testing.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

2008-05-13 Thread w9ya

 On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:49 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  blah blah blah

I am thrilled you liked it so much !!


 I have one simple policy for you :
 send your freaking desktop file upstream

As you already know; I have previously said I do just that.

And thank you for simplifying your policy recommendation.

Very best regards;

Bob Finch





Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] policy on desktop files?

2008-05-13 Thread w9ya

 On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Uh huh... well the end users can just ask the package maintainer to
 see what they can do. Just one email. No bug reports and the
 attendant extra work those usually involve. i.e. Simple and usually
 exceptionally effective for  an easy fix that takes but a few minutes
 to do. - What do I mean ?; Well it takes me about 5 minutes to add a
 working .desktop file to a package. It would take me at least twice
 that time to log in and clear a bug report. That's wasteful.

 Minor off topic gripe here. English has existed for way to long
 without the need for arrows in the language. I see *way* too many
 people talking - like this recently

English has ALWAYS been an evolving language. - And this is a good thing
too, otherwise we would all sound like Chaucer !

Very best regards;

-Bob Finch

Liviu Librescu - În veci pomenirea lui.
(May his memory be eternal.)





[arch-general] filelists for packages

2008-05-13 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta
Thanks to Pierre, we have filelists for all packages at
http://dev.archlinux.org/~pierre/test-repo/ [1]

I made a small script which downloads the *gz from his repo
and allows one to find out which package has a particular file:

#!/bin/bash

store=$HOME/.local/share/pac-file # default location
repos=(core extra community)
a=$(uname -m)
url=http://dev.archlinux.org/~pierre/test-repo;

if [ -f $HOME/.config/pac-file.conf ];then
. $HOME/.config/pac-file.conf
fi


case $1 in
  sync)
echo synchronising file cache
cd $store
for i in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do
rm files.db.tar.gz
rm -rf $i; mkdir $i
wget $url/$i/os/$a/files.db.tar.gz
tar zxf files.db.tar.gz -C ./$i
done
echo sync complete.
;;
  search)
cd $store
grep -R $2 . | sed s/\.\/\(.*\)\/files:/\1 /g
;;
  *)
echo usage: $0 {sync|search}
esac
exit 0

Thanks Pierre!

[1]: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-May/006124.html
--
Abhishek Dasgupta



Re: [arch-general] filelists for packages

2008-05-13 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta
To be on the safe side, put || exit 1 after the cd, rm, wget and tar lines.

--
Abhishek Dasgupta