Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:05:49 +0300 Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > those are packages containing hyphens and symbols > eg. tcp should be tcp_wrappers As I said, this has been fixed some time ago: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=archweb_dev.git;a=commit;h=801c4d723e72726851af72b1303cfb343469539e But the db will not change until the package is updated, or probably dropped. > bcm43xx-fwcutter is the same but theres no link to it. bcm43xx-fwcutter has been dropped from the repos. > > Also searching containing symbols doesnt work You mean like http://www.archlinux.org/packages/search/kdebase-runtime/
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:56:21PM -0500, Jeffrey Parke wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Jeffrey Parke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: > Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 > schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? >> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ >> >> >> > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ > ... > > This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some > bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. > > > The Arch website is totally borked http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those "virtual" packages. Greg >>> both of those (wxgtk and archboot) are working links >>> >>> >> >> wxgtk was fixed in the meantime. >> as for archboot take a look at the "virtual" dependencies. >> >> Greg >> > i don't know what those are, but the deps i see there all work. afaik those are packages containing hyphens and symbols eg. tcp should be tcp_wrappers bcm43xx-fwcutter is the same but theres no link to it. Also searching containing symbols doesnt work Greg
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 23:54:07 +0300 "Grigorios Bouzakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as for archboot take a look at the "virtual" dependencies. As I see it the depends detection is fixed in reporead.py, except maybe a missing + . However, the fixed dependencies won't show up, until archboot is updated. Which is highly unlikely, as it is not used anymore afaik.
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Jeffrey Parke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ ... This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. The Arch website is totally borked http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those "virtual" packages. Greg both of those (wxgtk and archboot) are working links wxgtk was fixed in the meantime. as for archboot take a look at the "virtual" dependencies. Greg i don't know what those are, but the deps i see there all work. afaik
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
Jeffrey Parke wrote: Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ ... This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. The Arch website is totally borked http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those "virtual" packages. Greg both of those (wxgtk and archboot) are working links ... because the problem appears to be fixed now. DR
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Jeffrey Parke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: >> >>> >>> Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 >>> schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ >>> >>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ >>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ >>> ... >>> >>> This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some >>> bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. >>> >>> >> >> The Arch website is totally borked >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those >> "virtual" packages. >> >> Greg >> > > both of those (wxgtk and archboot) are working links > wxgtk was fixed in the meantime. as for archboot take a look at the "virtual" dependencies. Greg
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ ... This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. The Arch website is totally borked http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those "virtual" packages. Greg both of those (wxgtk and archboot) are working links
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:52:20PM +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Arch website is totally borked > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those > > "virtual" packages. > > > > Greg > > > > Also, > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/search/kdebase > correctly searches for kdebase and gives the results > > but whenever the search term has a hyphen: > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/search/kdebase-runtime > a 404 is returned. Hyphens are not the only problem See for example http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10881 Greg
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Arch website is totally borked > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those > "virtual" packages. > > Greg > Also, http://www.archlinux.org/packages/search/kdebase correctly searches for kdebase and gives the results but whenever the search term has a hyphen: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/search/kdebase-runtime a 404 is returned. -- Abhishek
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Henning Garus wrote: > Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 > schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? > > > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ > > > > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ > ... > > This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some > bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing. > The Arch website is totally borked http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/wxgtk-2.6/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/archboot/ (see all those "virtual" packages. Greg
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
David Rosenstrauch wrote: Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ TIA, DR yep confirmed
Re: [arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
Am Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:50 -0400 schrieb David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libxml++/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsigc++2.0/ ... This is pure speculation from my end, but I would guess there is some bug with an unescaped + and Django url parsing.
[arch-general] Bad package page(s) on Arch site
Anyone know why these pages are coming up in error? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/memtest86+/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/memtest86+/ TIA, DR
Re: [arch-general] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.10
Works here now. Anyway, try to run: $MAILMAN_PREFIX/bin/check_perms And what /var/log/mailman/error says? -- Hugo
