[arch-general] makepkg problem

2009-05-03 Thread Juan Diego
hello

I'm trying to create a source pkg for an aur package and I'm geting this error:

$ makepkg  --source
== Making package: mpd-devel 0.15_beta1-1 i686 (Sun May  3 16:02:54 KST 2009)
== Creating source package...
  - Adding PKGBUILD...
  - Adding install script...
  - Adding mpd.init...
  - Adding mpd.install...
ln: creating symbolic link
`/home/xx/mpd/srclinks.SKgroBqtf/mpd-devel/mpd.install': File
existsy

I have this files as my source files:
PKGBUILD
mpd.init
mpd.install

any ideas why is this?
thanks


Re: [arch-general] makepkg problem

2009-05-03 Thread Allan McRae

Juan Diego wrote:

hello

I'm trying to create a source pkg for an aur package and I'm geting this error:

$ makepkg  --source
== Making package: mpd-devel 0.15_beta1-1 i686 (Sun May  3 16:02:54 KST 2009)
== Creating source package...
  - Adding PKGBUILD...
  - Adding install script...
  - Adding mpd.init...
  - Adding mpd.install...
ln: creating symbolic link
`/home/xx/mpd/srclinks.SKgroBqtf/mpd-devel/mpd.install': File
existsy

I have this files as my source files:
PKGBUILD
mpd.init
mpd.install

any ideas why is this?
thanks
  


Your install file should not be in the source array.

Allan






Re: [arch-general] makepkg problem

2009-05-03 Thread Juan Diego
yes, thank you very much, it works well.

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
 Juan Diego wrote:

 hello

 I'm trying to create a source pkg for an aur package and I'm geting this
 error:

 $ makepkg  --source
 == Making package: mpd-devel 0.15_beta1-1 i686 (Sun May  3 16:02:54 KST
 2009)
 == Creating source package...
  - Adding PKGBUILD...
  - Adding install script...
  - Adding mpd.init...
  - Adding mpd.install...
 ln: creating symbolic link
 `/home/xx/mpd/srclinks.SKgroBqtf/mpd-devel/mpd.install': File
 existsy

 I have this files as my source files:
 PKGBUILD
 mpd.init
 mpd.install

 any ideas why is this?
 thanks


 Your install file should not be in the source array.

 Allan







Re: [arch-general] Laptop Install - 2 questions remain, WPA and Compiz with Radeon Driver

2009-05-03 Thread Jan Spakula
Excerpts from David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.'s message of So Mai 03 12:11:04 +0200 
2009:
 (1) My laptop has an Atheros card and is happily using the madwifi driver. 
 The 
 only problem is that I'm starting it manually and need to know where to put 
 the pieces to have it start automatically. Basically, it takes 3 commands to 
 get my wifi going:
 
 ESSID=${1:-skyline}
 IFACE=${2:-wlan0}
 
 iwconfig ${IFACE} essid ${ESSID}
 
 wpa_supplicant -i${IFACE} -Dwext -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -d -B 
  /var/log/wpa_start.log 21
 
 sleep 2   # This doesn't count as a command
 
 dhcpcd wlan0
 
 My question is Where do I put this stuff to make it happen when I start 
 Arch??

Install the netcfg package, create a profile under /etc/network.d (there are
some examples, so you shouldn't have any problem), and edit /etc/rc.conf: add
the name of your profile into NETWORKS=(...) and add 'net-profiles' to your
DAEMONS.

-- Jan


[arch-general] Laptop Install - 2 questions remain, WPA and Compiz with Radeon Driver

2009-05-03 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Listmates,

The laptop install (Toshiba 205D) went great accept where I am stuck 
with 
video drivers for my ati card, and the last little nit of getting wifi to 
start automatically. First the easy one, the wireless:

(1) My laptop has an Atheros card and is happily using the madwifi driver. The 
only problem is that I'm starting it manually and need to know where to put 
the pieces to have it start automatically. Basically, it takes 3 commands to 
get my wifi going:

ESSID=${1:-skyline}
IFACE=${2:-wlan0}

iwconfig ${IFACE} essid ${ESSID}

wpa_supplicant -i${IFACE} -Dwext -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -d -B 
 /var/log/wpa_start.log 21

sleep 2   # This doesn't count as a command

dhcpcd wlan0

My question is Where do I put this stuff to make it happen when I 
start 
Arch??

(2) No Compiz with the radeon driver. I know there must be a trick or two that 
will make this work. Heck, I even got compiz working on the intel card, so I 
know the ATI card (X1200) will do it (it does it with the fglrx driver on 
openSuSE). However, I don't know what the tricks are to getting it working on 
the stock radeon driver. Any other ATI Arch users know any more about this??

Here is my current xorg.conf:

#
Section Files
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/misc:unscaled
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/local
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/Type1
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/URW
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/speedo
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/artwiz-fonts
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/cyrillic
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/truetype
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/TTF
  FontPath /usr/share/fonts/uni:unscaled
  FontPath /usr/local/share/fonts
  FontPath /opt/kde3/share/fonts
  InputDevices /dev/gpmdata
  InputDevices /dev/input/mice
EndSection

Section ServerFlags
  Option   AllowMouseOpenFail on
  Option  IgnoreABI on
EndSection

Section Module
  Load dbe
  Load type1
  Load freetype
  Load extmod
  Load glx
  Load dri
EndSection

Section InputDevice
  Driver   kbd
  Identifier   Keyboard[0]
  Option   Protocol Standard
  Option   XkbLayout us
  Option   XkbModel microsoftpro
  Option   XkbRules xfree86
EndSection

Section InputDevice
  Driver   mouse
  Identifier   Mouse[1]
  Option   Buttons 5
  Option   Device /dev/input/mice
  Option   Name Microsoft Wheel Mouse Optical
  Option   Protocol explorerps/2
  Option   Vendor Sysp
  Option   ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse[3]
Driver  synaptics
Option  Device /dev/input/mice
Option  Emulate3Buttons on
Option  Name Touchpad
Option  SHMConfig on
Option  Vendor Synaptics
Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor[0]
VendorName   TOSHIBA
ModelNameTOSHIBA 17IN TRUEBRIGHT
UseModes Modes[0]
DisplaySize  367230
HorizSync30.0 - 70.0
VertRefresh  43.0 - 60.0
Option   CalcAlgorithm XServerPool
Option   DPMS
Option   PreferredMode 1440x900
EndSection

Section Modes
  Identifier   Modes[0]
EndSection

Section Screen
  DefaultDepth 24
  SubSection Display
Depth  15
Modes  1440x900 1024x768 800x600
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  16
Modes  1440x900 1024x768 800x600
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  24
Modes  1440x900 1024x768 800x600
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  8
Modes  1440x900 1024x768 800x600
  EndSubSection
  Device   Device[0]
  Identifier   Screen[0]
  Monitor  Monitor[0]
EndSection

Section Device
  BoardNameRV350 NP
#  BusID1:5:0
  Driver   radeon
  Identifier   Device[0]
#  Option   GARTSize 32
  VendorName   ATI
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
  Identifier   Layout[all]
  InputDevice  Keyboard[0] CoreKeyboard
  InputDevice  Mouse[1] CorePointer
  InputDevice  Mouse[3] SendCoreEvents
  Option   Clone off
  Option   Xinerama off
  Screen  0  Screen[0] 0 0
EndSection

Section DRI
Group  video
Mode   0660
EndSection

Section Extensions
Option  Composite true
Option  DAMAGE true
EndSection



-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com


[arch-general] The ultimate Home Theater / media center computer

2009-05-03 Thread RedShift

Hi list


Somehow I got it into my head that I want a home theater PC. I'm growing tired of 
having to watch television and movies on my computer's 17 LCD screen. At the 
shop I used to work at, once in a while we'd build a media center computer, but the 
concept never really took off here (Belgium). There are many reasons for that, such 
as:

* Television is major suckage here (thanks to That Big Company and 
Government-Not-Governing). The entire country is split into very small regions 
where broadcast frequencies differ,  there's no unified TV guide system, not 
all regions can receive all channels. Digital television is even worse: That 
Big Company forces you to buy one of their proprietary decoders. The only way 
to receive digital television without restrictions is DVB-T with a very limited 
number of channels (basically nothing).
* At that time, the hardware sucked (noisy, too big, not stylish enough to put 
it along your other hi-fi components, not powerful enough, limited digital 
outputs, etc...). The software wasn't much better (too complicated, took a long 
time to start, etc...).


Anyway, my goal is to build the *ULTIMATE* HTPC. As such, strong demands must 
be met:

The hardware:

* It should be stylish, a timeless look which fits with your other hi-fi 
components.
* It must be entirely silent. Zero moving components. No exceptions.
* Unrestricted fully digital outputs.
* Must be able to play at least 720p MKV's using x264 encoded video.
* Easy remote control. No remote controls with more buttons than there are stars in the 
sky and certainly no dual function buttons (those functions in a different 
color which you need to flick a switch or are context dependent).
* Able to receive DVB-C.

The software:

* There is no room for Digital Rights Management fascism. All content must 
play flawless and in the highest quality possible. In some cases this will mean 
circumventing protections. That'll probably make the device illegal in some countries, 
but I don't care.
* Easy user interface (also see hardware remote control point).
* Can connect to NAS or other storage devices such as USB sticks.

In total:

* Must be a complete replacement for your DVD player and other media devices. 
The goal here is keeping the number of remote controls down. Ideally you should 
only have two: one for controlling your HTPC and one for your hi-fi set.
* It is geared towards modern television, that means stuff like HDTV and no 
legacy connector stuff (like composite).


With those goals set, I started looking for hardware. Here's what I've come up 
with:

* Case: Silverstone LC19
http://www.silverstonetek.com/products/p_spec.php?pno=lc19area=usa

+ Fanless PSU.
+ Casefans can be removed
+ Comes with PCI-e and PCI risercards
+ Integrated cardreader and slimline optical slot
+ Available in black and silver
+ Accommodates standard ATX I/O shield
+ Room for a 3.5 storage device (SSD?)
+ Vents right above the CPU
+ Slim

- Fits only small motherboard sizes
- Only 120 watt PSU
- No infrared receiver, no remote control


* Motherboard: Asus P5N7A-VM
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=8YiUFvK51IergAqYtemplete=2

+ Powerful on-board graphics (nVidia 9300)
+ Supports 16 GB of RAM
+ eSATA port
+ Optical audio output
+ HDMI, DVI and VGA video output
+ Gigabit ethernet
+ Solid caps

- nVidia on-board graphics (requiring proprietary driver)
- On-board graphics use system memory
- Crappy realtek audio codec


* DVB-C receiver: ?

I have zero experience with DVB-C receivers for computers. I've come across the 
DVBWorldDTV Cable (http://www.worlddvb.com/product/htm/pcic.htm) which seems 
to provide what I'm looking for. Anyone know how good this hardware actually is and how 
well it's supported by linux?

I have an old hauppauge PVR-350 card which works well, unfortunately hauppauge 
doesn't seem to have DVB-C products.


* Remote control: ?

I want to have something simple here. Maybe a small USB infrared receiver and a 
simple remote control with buttons up, down, left, right, enter? Anyone know if 
such hardware exists?


* Processor: Intel Celeron?

No idea how much processing power would be required for a decent HTPC. 
Preferably as low powered as possible, as the CPU will have to be passively 
cooled.


* Processor cooling: ?

I was thinking of a big block with small fins which you see a lot in 1U 
rackservers. Copper would be the logical choice but from what I've read, 
aluminum allows for better heat transfer to the environment. So a copper base 
with alu fins would be ideal.


* Storage: ?

For storing the operating system I was thinking of those IDE compact flash cards. 
Downside is that they are very slow. An SSD can be considered but I want to leave 
the option open to use the 3.5 bay for a hard drive for people that don't have 
the luxury of a NAS or don't want to leave a NAS running all times.


Moving along. The most annoying aspect: software. Obviously we want all our 
software to be open source. A shortlist 

[arch-general] kde3 Error: Could Not Determine Resource Status - Kmail??

2009-05-03 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Listmates,

Every minute or two I have this large and annoying dialog appear on the 
screen complainting about something related to kmail. The difficult part 
about it is it does *not* tell you what it is complaining about. The only 
thing close to a description it gives is Could not stat resource. Huh? I 
have a screenshot of it here:

( 50K )

http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/kde/kontact-err.jpg

The text of the error states:

quote

Error while getting folder information.
Could Not Determine Resource Status

An attempt to determine information about the status of the resource Mail, 
such as the resource name, type, size, etc., was unsuccessful.

Technical reason: Could Not Stat Resource

Details of the request:

URL: (unknown)

Date and time: Sunday 03 May 2009 04:30 pm

Additional information: Mail

Possible causes:

The specified resource may not have existed or may not be accessible.
A protocol error or incompatibility may have occurred.
Although unlikely, a hardware error may have occurred.

Possible solutions:

Retry the request and ensure your authentication details are entered 
correctly.
Contact your appropriate computer support system, whether the system 
administrator, or technical support group for further assistance.

Anybody see this before and more importantly, How do I fix it?

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] libraw1394 rebuilds

2009-05-03 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Jan de Groot wrote:
 I'm pusing libraw1394 to testing. This release has a sobump and requires
 rebuild of some packages. I've done most packages, but vlc and kdebase
 are also on this list. Both packages are in testing at this moment,
 without versioned dependencies, so I don't plan to rebuild these myself.
 Please rebuild vlc and kdebase when libraw1394 is in testing.

   
Hi Jan,

The pkgs vlc-0.9.9a-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz and vlc-0.9.9a-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
don't needed libraw1394, is listead as depends in PKGBUILD but at least
isn't needed at dynamic library level

This is the list of packages that depends on soname libraw1394.so.8

extra/dvgrab-3.3-1
extra/gstreamer0.10-good-plugins-0.10.14-1
extra/kdebase-4.2.2-1
extra/kino-1.3.3-1
extra/libavc1394-0.5.3-2
extra/libdc1394-2.0.3-1
extra/libiec61883-1.1.0-1
extra/ptlib-2.6.1-1
community/cinelerra-cv-20090421-1



-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



Re: [arch-general] kde3 Error: Could Not Determine Resource Status - Kmail??

2009-05-03 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Monday 04 May 2009 03:11:04 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
   Anybody see this before and more importantly, How do I fix it?

Is this imap? Google has lots of results of that message.

Otherwise you can just strace the kmail process to determine what it is doing.

-- 
 Shridhar