[arch-general] Arch doc inclusion policy

2009-08-01 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
Hey everybody,

looking through my /usr/share/doc today I noticed that there were
surprisingly few packages that actually installed their documentation
there. Not even the SDL package installed its docs in there. I don't
mind this too much as I carry all kinds of library documentation in my
home directory with me at all times to have it accessible when I have no
Internet connection available.

This left me wondering, though, what Arch's general policy is on
inclusion/exclusion of library/tool/package documentation for
/usr/share/doc and if this policy should be generally applied to AUR
packages as well.

-- Sven-Hendrik


Re: [arch-general] ext3 driver for windows

2009-08-01 Thread ludovic coues
I'm more concerned about compatibility between mac and ext3. Anyone have
tried before ?


Re: [arch-general] Arch doc inclusion policy

2009-08-01 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haases...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
 Hey everybody,

 looking through my /usr/share/doc today I noticed that there were
 surprisingly few packages that actually installed their documentation
 there. Not even the SDL package installed its docs in there. I don't
 mind this too much as I carry all kinds of library documentation in my
 home directory with me at all times to have it accessible when I have no
 Internet connection available.

 This left me wondering, though, what Arch's general policy is on
 inclusion/exclusion of library/tool/package documentation for
 /usr/share/doc and if this policy should be generally applied to AUR
 packages as well.

 -- Sven-Hendrik


The policy is to include them unless they are very, very big.  In that
case, they can be excluded and, sometimes, provided in a separate
package at the maintainer's discretion (e.g. qt and qt-doc).  In the
past, we were removing the docs systemtically, so packages that have
not been rebuilt since then might be missing their docs.


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] news item draft: /dev layout cleanup

2009-08-01 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Allan McRae (2009-08-01 22:33):
 Hi all,

 Getting around to this again

 [draft]
 /dev layour cleanup

 The /dev layout has been cleaned up to comply to the device names  
 specified in the Linux kernel documentation. We had some legacy left  
 from our devfs days, which has now been removed.

 The most obvious change from a users perspective is the vc/*-tty*  
 transition.  The initscripts-2007.08 update requires adjusting the  
 /etc/inittab file to refer to tty* instead of vc/*.  Due to severe  
 system breakages if this file is not updated, this change will be  
 automatically handled by pacman.  The original /etc/inittab file is  
 saved as /etc/inittab.pacsave.  To be clear:

 package /etc/inittab - inittab.pacnew (if needed)
 system /etc/inittab - inittab.pacsave
 system /etc/inittab --sed-- inittab

 Make sure to check these files after the update and do any merging that  
 is required.
 [/draft]

 Finally, are we going to do a quick update to initscripts and filesystem  
 before this is moved? There have been a few patches push to get for  
 these.  I can do that tomorrow if people agree?

 Allan

As someone has already mentioned, it would be nice to mention the
reasons for this (vc/*-tty*) change to please curious users...
Why is this needed? Are /dev/vc/* going away?

-- 
--  Rogutės Sparnuotos


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] news item draft: /dev layout cleanup

2009-08-01 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Rogutės
Sparnuotosrogu...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Allan McRae (2009-08-01 22:33):
 Hi all,

 Getting around to this again

 [draft]
 /dev layour cleanup

 The /dev layout has been cleaned up to comply to the device names
 specified in the Linux kernel documentation. We had some legacy left
 from our devfs days, which has now been removed.

 The most obvious change from a users perspective is the vc/*-tty*
 transition.  The initscripts-2007.08 update requires adjusting the
 /etc/inittab file to refer to tty* instead of vc/*.  Due to severe
 system breakages if this file is not updated, this change will be
 automatically handled by pacman.  The original /etc/inittab file is
 saved as /etc/inittab.pacsave.  To be clear:

 package /etc/inittab - inittab.pacnew (if needed)
 system /etc/inittab - inittab.pacsave
 system /etc/inittab --sed-- inittab

 Make sure to check these files after the update and do any merging that
 is required.
 [/draft]

 Finally, are we going to do a quick update to initscripts and filesystem
 before this is moved? There have been a few patches push to get for
 these.  I can do that tomorrow if people agree?

 Allan

 As someone has already mentioned, it would be nice to mention the
 reasons for this (vc/*-tty*) change to please curious users...
 Why is this needed? Are /dev/vc/* going away?

It's in the first paragraph


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] news item draft: /dev layout cleanup

2009-08-01 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Allan McRae wrote:
 Hi all,

 Getting around to this again

 [draft]
 /dev layour cleanup

 The /dev layout has been cleaned up to comply to the device names
 specified in the Linux kernel documentation. We had some legacy left
 from our devfs days, which has now been removed.

 The most obvious change from a users perspective is the vc/*-tty*
 transition.  The initscripts-2007.08 update requires adjusting the
 /etc/inittab file to refer to tty* instead of vc/*.  Due to severe
 system breakages if this file is not updated, this change will be
 automatically handled by pacman.  The original /etc/inittab file is
 saved as /etc/inittab.pacsave.  To be clear:

 package /etc/inittab - inittab.pacnew (if needed)
 system /etc/inittab - inittab.pacsave
 system /etc/inittab --sed-- inittab

 Make sure to check these files after the update and do any merging
 that is required.
 [/draft]

* If and only if, user touched /etc/securetty (from 'filesystem'), also
must be edit manually it again to match /etc/securetty.pacnew, so I
think that is more safe to add to the announce mail.
* Also note the importance of update all packages 'initscripts'
'filesystem' 'udev' 'syslog-ng' at the same time.



-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



[arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Luís Moreira
Hello.

The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.

I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].

The updated packages were

kernel26
nvidia
xorg-server
(and some others, less important)

If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.

Anyone experienced the same thing?

Best regards,
Luís Moreira.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Johannes Held
Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
 Anyone experienced the same thing?
No, work's without any problems here. I have the same setting as you: x86_64
without testing.

-- 
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
Mast und Schotbruch mit dem http://segelsport-blog.de.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Johannes Held m...@hehejo.de wrote:

 Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
  Anyone experienced the same thing?
 No, work's without any problems here. I have the same setting as you:
 x86_64
 without testing.

 --
 Gruß, Johannes
 Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
 Mast und Schotbruch mit dem http://segelsport-blog.de.


Just as a note, there's a forum thread marked with this same issue. Thought
I'd link it so that any definitive solution might be shouted over there as
well. I think the OP has 32 bit. I have i686 and did not have a problem with
the upgrade, but I am running testing.

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=77119


[arch-general] postgresql 8.4

2009-08-01 Thread Caleb Cushing
what's the status of getting this into extra's? all it seems to
require is a typical version bump (outside of the xml bug). It appears
to work ok on x86_64 on my system. although I haven't done super
thorough testing.

-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/8/1, Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
 Hello.

  The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
  there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.

  I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].

  The updated packages were

  kernel26
  nvidia
  xorg-server
  (and some others, less important)

  If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.

  Anyone experienced the same thing?

It works fine here.
I'm using x86_64, nvidia, without testing.


-- 
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Edgar Kalkowski
Hi,

I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being broken for 
notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was just an issue with the 
beta drivers but especially as you mention that it worked again after changing 
to vesa drivers I thought this might be the case here.

I’m using nvidia drivers for my notebook as well but have not yet updated them 
because I read that it might cause problems. Are you, too, running a notebook? 
If so I’d be interested to hear if the latest nvidia drivers work ok for you.

Edgar



Am oder ungefähr am Samstag, 01. August 2009, um 23:58:58 schrieb Luís Moreira:
 Hello.
 
 The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
 there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.
 
 I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].
 
 The updated packages were
 
 kernel26
 nvidia
 xorg-server
 (and some others, less important)
 
 If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.
 
 Anyone experienced the same thing?
 
 Best regards,
 Luís Moreira.
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
If notebook includes HP Pavilion dv8000 laptop with GEFORCE GO 7600 NVIDIA
graphics card (why do they capitalize *everything*?), and you're asking
referring to i686, then yes, it seems to be fine, for me. :-)

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Edgar Kalkowski em...@edgar-kalkowski.dewrote:

 Hi,

 I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being broken for
 notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was just an issue with
 the beta drivers but especially as you mention that it worked again after
 changing to vesa drivers I thought this might be the case here.

 I’m using nvidia drivers for my notebook as well but have not yet updated
 them because I read that it might cause problems. Are you, too, running a
 notebook? If so I’d be interested to hear if the latest nvidia drivers work
 ok for you.

 Edgar



 Am oder ungefähr am Samstag, 01. August 2009, um 23:58:58 schrieb Luís
 Moreira:
  Hello.
 
  The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
  there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.
 
  I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].
 
  The updated packages were
 
  kernel26
  nvidia
  xorg-server
  (and some others, less important)
 
  If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.
 
  Anyone experienced the same thing?
 
  Best regards,
  Luís Moreira.
 



Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/8/1, Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
  nvidia

Are you using nvidia-185.18.31-1?


-- 
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it


Re: [arch-general] postgresql 8.4

2009-08-01 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Sábado 01 Agosto 2009, às 19:12:27, Caleb Cushing escreveu:
 what's the status of getting this into extra's? all it seems to
 require is a typical version bump (outside of the xml bug). It appears
 to work ok on x86_64 on my system. although I haven't done super
 thorough testing.

Hi,

Im working on it.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
Yes. I believe that is the latest one, since pacman -Syu shows nothing needs
updates. Correct?

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Giovanni Scafora giova...@archlinux.orgwrote:

 2009/8/1, Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
   nvidia

 Are you using nvidia-185.18.31-1?


 --
 Arch Linux Developer
 http://www.archlinux.org
 http://www.archlinux.it



Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/8/1, Muhammad Qadri muhammad.a.qa...@gmail.com:
 Yes. I believe that is the latest one, since pacman -Syu shows nothing needs
  updates. Correct?

Yeah, nvidia-185.18.31-1 is the latest one.
I am also using x86_64 (without testing) and kernel 2.6.30.4-1


-- 
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Luís Moreira
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 00:28:42 +0200
Edgar Kalkowski em...@edgar-kalkowski.de wrote:

 Hi,

 I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being
 broken for notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was
 just an issue with the beta drivers but especially as you mention
 that it worked again after changing to vesa drivers I thought this
 might be the case here.

 I’m using nvidia drivers for my notebook as well but have not yet
 updated them because I read that it might cause problems. Are you,
 too, running a notebook? If so I’d be interested to hear if the
 latest nvidia drivers work ok for you.

 Edgar



 Am oder ungefähr am Samstag, 01. August 2009, um 23:58:58 schrieb
 Luís Moreira:
  Hello.
 
  The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
  there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.
 
  I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].
 
  The updated packages were
 
  kernel26
  nvidia
  xorg-server
  (and some others, less important)
 
  If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works
  again.
 
  Anyone experienced the same thing?
 
  Best regards,
  Luís Moreira.
 

Correct, I'm using a laptop with a NVIDIA GEFORCE GO 7300 graphics card.

On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:33:33 -0700
Giovanni Scafora giova...@archlinux.org wrote:

 2009/8/1, Luís Moreira lmm1...@gmail.com:
   nvidia

 Are you using nvidia-185.18.31-1?



Yes, I updated to that version, the latest ones.

Best regards,
Luís Moreira.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Dan Vratil
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:28:42 Edgar Kalkowski wrote:
 Hi,

 I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being broken for
 notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was just an issue with
 the beta drivers but especially as you mention that it worked again after
 changing to vesa drivers I thought this might be the case here.
This bug was related only to nvidia-beta, release 190.16 and it was fixed in 
version 190.18. It has never touched the stable drivers.

(Btw I was trying to track down some informations now abput 190.16, but it 
seems guys from nVidia removed the announcement thread from nvnews.net and 
nvidia.com drivers pages are out of order (E404) :-) )

 I’m using nvidia drivers for my notebook as well but have not yet updated
 them because I read that it might cause problems. Are you, too, running a
 notebook? If so I’d be interested to hear if the latest nvidia drivers work
 ok for you.

 Edgar

 Am oder ungefähr am Samstag, 01. August 2009, um 23:58:58 schrieb Luís 
Moreira:
  Hello.
 
  The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
  there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.
 
  I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].
 
  The updated packages were
 
  kernel26
  nvidia
  xorg-server
  (and some others, less important)
 
  If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.
 
  Anyone experienced the same thing?
 
  Best regards,
  Luís Moreira.

-- 
-
Dan Vrátil
vra...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
http://www.progdan.homelinux.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Edgar Kalkowski
Am oder ungefähr am Sonntag, 02. August 2009, um 02:02:21 schrieb Dan Vratil:
  I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being broken for
  notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was just an issue with
  the beta drivers but especially as you mention that it worked again after
  changing to vesa drivers I thought this might be the case here.
 This bug was related only to nvidia-beta, release 190.16 and it was fixed in 
 version 190.18. It has never touched the stable drivers.

That is good to hear. In this case I’ll upgrade my drivers right away. :)

Edgar


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Tim Gelter
I can confirm this issue for my notebook. Downgrading to the previous
version of nvidia and nvidia-utils (version 185.18.14-1) fixed the issue.
Graphics Processor: Quadro NVS 140M
-Tim

Edgar Kalkowski wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I somewhere read something about the latest nvidia driver being broken for 
 notebook chips. I’m not sure if this is correct or was just an issue with the 
 beta drivers but especially as you mention that it worked again after 
 changing to vesa drivers I thought this might be the case here.
 
 I’m using nvidia drivers for my notebook as well but have not yet updated 
 them because I read that it might cause problems. Are you, too, running a 
 notebook? If so I’d be interested to hear if the latest nvidia drivers work 
 ok for you.
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 Am oder ungefähr am Samstag, 01. August 2009, um 23:58:58 schrieb Luís 
 Moreira:
 Hello.

 The last update broke my Xorg, the screen just goesn black and hangs
 there, CTRL+ALT+F1 (etc) doesn't do anything.

 I'm using X86_64, *without* [testing].

 The updated packages were

 kernel26
 nvidia
 xorg-server
 (and some others, less important)

 If I change the driver in xorg.conf from nvidia to vesa X works again.

 Anyone experienced the same thing?

 Best regards,
 Luís Moreira.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature