Re: [arch-general] kde4.3-0.1 - Many plasma-addon package conflicts

2009-08-05 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 12:41:32 am David C. Rankin wrote:
 Listmates,
 
   Installing the new kde 4.3 release results and many plasma-addon 
 package conflicts. Is this normal? I'm just going to remove the conflicting 
 addons and then try the reinstall. Detailed list of conflicts attached...
 
 
 

Huh?

The upgrade on the first box failed even though I told it to replace 
the plasma-dataengine:

00:35 archangel:~ pms -u   

:: Synchronizing package databases...   

 kdemod-legacy is up to date

 testing is up to date  

 core is up to date 

 extra is up to date

 community is up to date

 archlinuxfr is up to date  

:: Starting full system upgrade...  

:: Replace kdeplasma-addons-dataengines with extra/kdeplasma-addons-libs? [Y/n] 

resolving dependencies...   

looking for inter-conflicts...  


Remove (1): kdeplasma-addons-dataengines-4.2.98-2  

Total Removed Size:   1.01 MB

Targets (256): ghostscript-8.70-1  gutenprint-5.2.4-1  hal-0.5.13-2  
kdelibs-4.3.0-2  kdelibs-experimental-4.3.0-1  oxygen-icons-4.3.0-1  
snip

Then conflicts occurred. I just tried the same upgrade of 4.3 on 
another box and I got no conflicts? Strange. Maybe I had a real early version 
from testing on the first machine? I don't know, but I had no problems on the 
second box I moved to 4.3.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com


Re: [arch-general] The vsftpd only starts at the second attempt

2009-08-05 Thread Lucas Salies Brum
can you start vsftpd manually?
Yes!
(r...@abraham lucas):$ vsftpd
(r...@abraham lucas):$ ps -A | grep vsftpd
 7934 ?00:00:00 vsftpd

Can you try strace the process?
How?


2009/8/3, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be:
 Lucas Salies Brum wrote:
 (r...@abraham ~):# ps -A | grep vsftpd
 (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd start
 :: Starting vsftpd FTP Daemon
  [FAIL]
 (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd stop
 :: Stopping vsftpd FTP Daemon
  [DONE]
 (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd start
 :: Starting vsftpd FTP Daemon
  [DONE]
 (r...@abraham ~):# ps -A | grep vsftpd
  6453 pts/300:00:00 vsftpd


 This has happened to someone?

 /etc/vsftpd.conf - http://paste.archlinux-br.org/1241
 /etc/rc.conf - http://paste.archlinux-br.org/1242

 Arch Linux i686.

 Thanks.
 ---
 Lucas Saliés Brum
 http://sistematico.org
 lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org



 Not having this problem with the default vsftpd.conf. Instead of starting it
 via the initscripts, can you start vsftpd manually? Does it fail as well?
 Can you try strace the process?


 Glenn



-- 
---
Lucas Saliés Brum
http://sistematico.org
lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org


Re: [arch-general] The vsftpd only starts at the second attempt

2009-08-05 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:45:55 Lucas Salies Brum wrote:
 can you start vsftpd manually?

 Yes!
 (r...@abraham lucas):$ vsftpd
 (r...@abraham lucas):$ ps -A | grep vsftpd
  7934 ?00:00:00 vsftpd

 Can you try strace the process?

 How?

in the example above, strace -p 7934

-- 
 Shridhar


Re: [arch-general] What up with the mirrors? Errors using the .pacnew mirrorlist

2009-08-05 Thread Jon Kristian Nilsen
http://www.archlinux.org/news/456/

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:34 PM, David C.
 Rankindrankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
  Err, OK,
 
 So I just need to comment out the kde-unstable entries in
 pacman.conf, right?

 Or just delete them. As far as I know, that repo is gone. Not sure if
 Pierre will reuse it in the future.

 I think he sent a mail to the arch-dev-public list regarding this.
 Might be worth checking the archives




-- 
http://divineintervention.no


[arch-general] autofs orphaned

2009-08-05 Thread JM
Hello,

I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some
time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced
forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea
Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the
package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be
interested in maintaining the package.

Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned
to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so,
what compatible alternatives are there?

Kind regards,
JM

[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1


Re: [arch-general] autofs orphaned

2009-08-05 Thread Allan McRae

JM wrote:

Hello,

I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some
time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced
forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea
Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the
package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be
interested in maintaining the package.

Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned
to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so,
what compatible alternatives are there?

Kind regards,
JM

[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1
  


Not answering your question, but I notice that none of those bugs have 
attached a fixed PKGBUILD.  It is always helpful if users who use the 
package regularly try and fix the issues and post updated build files.


Allan






[arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates

2009-08-05 Thread kira . laucas
i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other
is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and
snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put
snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to force 
the soundblaster card to be
soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not
work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i
can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will
serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load
modules according to /etc/rc.conf ?


[arch-general] no lzma man

2009-08-05 Thread Caleb Cushing
man lzma doesn't come up with anything although other lz* tools refer
to an lzma man page

-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com


Re: [arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates

2009-08-05 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:51, kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
 i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other
 is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and
 snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put
 snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to 
 force the soundblaster card to be
 soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not
 work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i
 can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
 or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will
 serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load
 modules according to /etc/rc.conf ?

It was a change in rc.sysinit.
See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12706

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


Re: [arch-general] autofs orphaned

2009-08-05 Thread JM
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
 JM wrote:

 Hello,

 I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some
 time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced
 forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea
 Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the
 package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be
 interested in maintaining the package.

 Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned
 to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so,
 what compatible alternatives are there?

 Kind regards,
 JM

 [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1


 Not answering your question, but I notice that none of those bugs have
 attached a fixed PKGBUILD.  It is always helpful if users who use the
 package regularly try and fix the issues and post updated build files.

 Allan




After some struggle I managed to get it working for my case without
actually changing the PKGBUILD or scripts included. FS#12768 may no
longer be relevant, perhaps someone could confirm that. As for other
bugs - I use neither CIFS nor LDAP.

Regards,
JM


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] How the use of provides can damage the dependency tree

2009-08-05 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
 Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 22:16:06 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:
   
 Allan McRae wrote:
 
 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
   
 Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 11:26:51 schrieb Roman Kyrylych:
 
 Okay, then how we currently check that subversion needs
 to be rebuilt on db or heimdal soname bump?
   
 That's where the link database would help a lot.
 
 Or the rebuild script I have posted which scans all the packages in
 the repos in a few minutes.
   
 Or visit this url to check the deps of the desired pkg
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core/heimdal-1.2.1-5
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/x86_64/core/openssl-0.9.8k-4
 etc, etc.

 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/

 That I update it regulary, 1-3 times per week, depending of amount of
 pkgs that are updated in repos.
 

 Do you think your script could use archives created by this one: 
 http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/tmp/createLinkLists.txt

 It creates a simple raw format to work with and is incremental and quite 
 fast. 
 One could apply your changes to the getlinks() function and maybe one could 
 run the links file through sort -u. The goal would be to have such archives 
 on 
 the mirror and analyse its data by tools like yours.

   
Hi Pierre,

Yes, but the problem is that with my scripts I do more tasks with the
extracted info from ELFs. for now, the dt_needed, dt_soname and dt_rpath
are only used.
The deps are first located with sonames and not based diretly on
filenames. So I can know what libs don't have sonames for example, or if
new lib have soname but not the old (example of this libs from boost).


PS: Sorry for the delay, I started working back in school again after
the holidays :)

-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



Re: [arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates

2009-08-05 Thread Partha Chowdhury
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:15:27PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:51, kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
  i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other
  is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and
  snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put
  snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to 
  force the soundblaster card to be
  soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not
  work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i
  can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
  or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will
  serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load
  modules according to /etc/rc.conf ?
 
 It was a change in rc.sysinit.
 See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12706
 


Thank you very much for the information. I spent several hours
desperately to find the cause /solution .