Re: [arch-general] kde4.3-0.1 - Many plasma-addon package conflicts
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 12:41:32 am David C. Rankin wrote: Listmates, Installing the new kde 4.3 release results and many plasma-addon package conflicts. Is this normal? I'm just going to remove the conflicting addons and then try the reinstall. Detailed list of conflicts attached... Huh? The upgrade on the first box failed even though I told it to replace the plasma-dataengine: 00:35 archangel:~ pms -u :: Synchronizing package databases... kdemod-legacy is up to date testing is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... :: Replace kdeplasma-addons-dataengines with extra/kdeplasma-addons-libs? [Y/n] resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Remove (1): kdeplasma-addons-dataengines-4.2.98-2 Total Removed Size: 1.01 MB Targets (256): ghostscript-8.70-1 gutenprint-5.2.4-1 hal-0.5.13-2 kdelibs-4.3.0-2 kdelibs-experimental-4.3.0-1 oxygen-icons-4.3.0-1 snip Then conflicts occurred. I just tried the same upgrade of 4.3 on another box and I got no conflicts? Strange. Maybe I had a real early version from testing on the first machine? I don't know, but I had no problems on the second box I moved to 4.3. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] The vsftpd only starts at the second attempt
can you start vsftpd manually? Yes! (r...@abraham lucas):$ vsftpd (r...@abraham lucas):$ ps -A | grep vsftpd 7934 ?00:00:00 vsftpd Can you try strace the process? How? 2009/8/3, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be: Lucas Salies Brum wrote: (r...@abraham ~):# ps -A | grep vsftpd (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd start :: Starting vsftpd FTP Daemon [FAIL] (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd stop :: Stopping vsftpd FTP Daemon [DONE] (r...@abraham ~):# /etc/rc.d/vsftpd start :: Starting vsftpd FTP Daemon [DONE] (r...@abraham ~):# ps -A | grep vsftpd 6453 pts/300:00:00 vsftpd This has happened to someone? /etc/vsftpd.conf - http://paste.archlinux-br.org/1241 /etc/rc.conf - http://paste.archlinux-br.org/1242 Arch Linux i686. Thanks. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org Not having this problem with the default vsftpd.conf. Instead of starting it via the initscripts, can you start vsftpd manually? Does it fail as well? Can you try strace the process? Glenn -- --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
Re: [arch-general] The vsftpd only starts at the second attempt
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:45:55 Lucas Salies Brum wrote: can you start vsftpd manually? Yes! (r...@abraham lucas):$ vsftpd (r...@abraham lucas):$ ps -A | grep vsftpd 7934 ?00:00:00 vsftpd Can you try strace the process? How? in the example above, strace -p 7934 -- Shridhar
Re: [arch-general] What up with the mirrors? Errors using the .pacnew mirrorlist
http://www.archlinux.org/news/456/ On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:34 PM, David C. Rankindrankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote: Err, OK, So I just need to comment out the kde-unstable entries in pacman.conf, right? Or just delete them. As far as I know, that repo is gone. Not sure if Pierre will reuse it in the future. I think he sent a mail to the arch-dev-public list regarding this. Might be worth checking the archives -- http://divineintervention.no
[arch-general] autofs orphaned
Hello, I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be interested in maintaining the package. Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so, what compatible alternatives are there? Kind regards, JM [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1
Re: [arch-general] autofs orphaned
JM wrote: Hello, I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be interested in maintaining the package. Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so, what compatible alternatives are there? Kind regards, JM [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1 Not answering your question, but I notice that none of those bugs have attached a fixed PKGBUILD. It is always helpful if users who use the package regularly try and fix the issues and post updated build files. Allan
[arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates
i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to force the soundblaster card to be soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load modules according to /etc/rc.conf ?
[arch-general] no lzma man
man lzma doesn't come up with anything although other lz* tools refer to an lzma man page -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Re: [arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:51, kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote: i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to force the soundblaster card to be soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load modules according to /etc/rc.conf ? It was a change in rc.sysinit. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12706 -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
Re: [arch-general] autofs orphaned
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: JM wrote: Hello, I have been using autofs with my local and remote filesystems for some time. With an update to version 5.0 numerous bugs were introduced forcing many users, including me, to downgrade. On May 2nd, Andrea Scrapino who was the autofs maintainer at the time, orphaned the package and asked on arch-dev-public if some other dev would be interested in maintaining the package. Three months later autofs is still orphaned and autofs bugs assigned to BaSH haunt the bugtracker [1]. Will autofs be deprecated? If so, what compatible alternatives are there? Kind regards, JM [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=autofsproject=1 Not answering your question, but I notice that none of those bugs have attached a fixed PKGBUILD. It is always helpful if users who use the package regularly try and fix the issues and post updated build files. Allan After some struggle I managed to get it working for my case without actually changing the PKGBUILD or scripts included. FS#12768 may no longer be relevant, perhaps someone could confirm that. As for other bugs - I use neither CIFS nor LDAP. Regards, JM
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] How the use of provides can damage the dependency tree
Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 22:16:06 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: Allan McRae wrote: Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 11:26:51 schrieb Roman Kyrylych: Okay, then how we currently check that subversion needs to be rebuilt on db or heimdal soname bump? That's where the link database would help a lot. Or the rebuild script I have posted which scans all the packages in the repos in a few minutes. Or visit this url to check the deps of the desired pkg http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core/heimdal-1.2.1-5 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/x86_64/core/openssl-0.9.8k-4 etc, etc. http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/ That I update it regulary, 1-3 times per week, depending of amount of pkgs that are updated in repos. Do you think your script could use archives created by this one: http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/tmp/createLinkLists.txt It creates a simple raw format to work with and is incremental and quite fast. One could apply your changes to the getlinks() function and maybe one could run the links file through sort -u. The goal would be to have such archives on the mirror and analyse its data by tools like yours. Hi Pierre, Yes, but the problem is that with my scripts I do more tasks with the extracted info from ELFs. for now, the dt_needed, dt_soname and dt_rpath are only used. The deps are first located with sonames and not based diretly on filenames. So I can know what libs don't have sonames for example, or if new lib have soname but not the old (example of this libs from boost). PS: Sorry for the delay, I started working back in school again after the holidays :) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
Re: [arch-general] soundcard order is not maintained after recent updates
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:15:27PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:51, kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote: i have two soundcards. one is creative soundblaster live and the other is onboard nvidia soundcard. the kernel modules are snd-emu10k1x and snd-hda-intel respectively. Before the recent updates i used to put snd-emu10k1x before snd-hda-intel in /etc/rc.conf in the MODULES array to force the soundblaster card to be soundcard 0. But after the most recent updates this setting does not work. After going through archwiki and googling i found that either i can put options snd_emu10k1x index=0 in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf or i can create a custom asoundrc file in my home directory which will serve my purpose. so my question is that is the new udev does not load modules according to /etc/rc.conf ? It was a change in rc.sysinit. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12706 Thank you very much for the information. I spent several hours desperately to find the cause /solution .