Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1
Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario: Hi! In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto: Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use. Ok. I've tried the safe progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:) ciao! Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com Waiting for x86_64 signoff now. I did not realize how long this has been in [testing]. Given no-one found an issue in over a month, I will give a signoff for both... Allan
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1
You may want to post that you're looking for a signoff in the [testing] repo section of the forums. They seem to have much higher user traffic than the mailing lists as far as i can see. 2009/10/11 Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario: Hi! In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto: Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use. Ok. I've tried the safe progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:) ciao! Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com Waiting for x86_64 signoff now. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1
I use xfs on / and /home and my external drive, absolutely no problems so far. Signoff for i686 * Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de [10.10.2009 20:11]: Am Samstag 12 September 2009 schrieb Dan McGee: On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Montag 07 September 2009 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi bump to latest version, please signoff both arches. greetings tpowa bump anyone? I think we need XFS users in order to signoff; might want to ask the general public for signoffs. -Dan anyone uses xfs? thanks Please signoff. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
Re: [arch-general] nut package - no docs or cgi interface??
On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:40:06 am Tom K wrote: David C. Rankin wrote: On Friday 09 October 2009 11:05:09 pm Allan McRae wrote: File a bug report/feature request. Allan Done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16554 Should be under the Community Packages project I think, not the main Arch Linux one. T. [smacks self] OK, how do I move it? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update
On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: The strange part is that if that is the problem, something changed with the 10/8 update. For many months, this box with the intel card just worked... I'll report back after reading through the wiki and either claim success, or, beg for more help :p UUGH!!, I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the following in modprobe.conf (which is deprecated): options i915 modeset=1 Now what?? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009: On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the following in modprobe.conf (which is deprecated): options i915 modeset=1 Now what?? Put it in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf (that's where I have it).
Re: [arch-general] nut package - no docs or cgi interface??
David C. Rankin wrote: On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:40:06 am Tom K wrote: David C. Rankin wrote: On Friday 09 October 2009 11:05:09 pm Allan McRae wrote: File a bug report/feature request. Allan Done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16554 Should be under the Community Packages project I think, not the main Arch Linux one. T. [smacks self] OK, how do I move it? You can not. But it already has been. Allan
Re: [arch-general] perl 5.10.1-3 broken ?
Ashish SHUKLA a écrit : In 4acdada2.7030...@gmx.net, Firmicus wrote: Ashish SHUKLA a écrit : Hi everyone, I've noticed that the recent perl update (5.10.1-3) has not installed any PODs which are required by 'perldoc' for displaying documentation. Are PODs moved to some different package ? #v+ % pacman -Ql perl |fgrep .pod % pacman -Q perl perl 5.10.1-3 #v- Thanks in advance Ashish SHUKLA See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16488 But please, broken is too strong! Perl is not broken. It's just that because of the purge options in makepkg.conf, all pods have been deleted. But ALL the documentation is still there in the form of manpages. Apologies if this offended you. Anyways looking forward to an update with PODs included. Thanks Ashish, Don't worry, I am not easily offended! ;) The issue is fixed with the version currently in testing (pkgrel = 5). Note that to look up the documentation of the modules bundled with perl, you need to use man instead of perldoc. Arch's policy is to exclude the pod files with CPAN-based packages, since they are already duplicated as man pages. Best regards, F
Re: [arch-general] dd and bash_completion
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:57 PM, clemens fischer ino-n...@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org wrote: On Thu-2009/09/24-22:24 Aaron Griffin wrote: And this appears to be fixed in git http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-completion/commit/?id=f733e71e1f8d63c072a402346d8162f9c6b63ae2 http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-completion/commit/?id=f871fe4101ed89cb98e201aed8c975fd3061905b How come the ABS package says http://bash-completion.alioth.debian.org/, and you clone from phraktured.net? The alioth.debian.org repo mentioned on the url website has a different IP, but the same commit. Which abs package ? The one in extra is the stable release 1.0 : http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/bash-completion/ And this is the package aaron maintains. He also hosts a git clone of the official git repo, but it's a clone so yes it should contains the same commit ids :)
