Re: [arch-general] 2 Killer kde4 dark themes - DR you listening??
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: And most importantly, how the /heck/ do you handle the *bright* *white* pages of the web... I'd tried creating a custom CSS for me, but it broke too many pages... I use the BYM[0] extension for firefox. It removes image backgrounds, changes the background color to black and text to grey and is easily toggled with a icon on the statusbar. [0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7166
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:12:31PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Probably because (in my experience at least) top-posting occurs much more frequently than me too posts at least, probably more frequently than improper quoting as well. And yet when I see the top-posted mails, most of the time I don't need to read the rest of the previously quoted message - especially if I'm on a roll and am familiar with the current thread. I guess if one is reading for a historical perspective then it makes more sense to put the reply at the bottom but then I found myself having to read the history over and over again. If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent post to keep thing conscise. Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge long threads in a single message to have a Mee to or +1 at the bottom That's why I found that style to be so inefficient and wasting of my time. Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAktW7HcACgkQWSjv55S0LfGvsQCfUgPSh/tMLIshq9+5RzqIpDfV h88AnRv5oMWRLIlCOaZ/CfSXtqyy9sXa =iFcp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com wrote: Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. Separate blog posts are typically unrelated, so there is no reason they should be chronologically ordered. How about blog comments? In nearly all blog publishers, they are in chronological order. Regards, Marti
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com: If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent post to keep thing conscise. Sure! That's the right(tm) way to do it. ;-) Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge long threads in a single message to have a Mee to or +1 at the bottom Yes, that's true. It's annoying to scroll down, search for the reply and then read a simple +1. I wish, that those emails would be cropped and simply a +1 (perhaps with a small description) is sent. Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. Meh, I see comments on a blog more a as thought of the writer instead of discussions like here on ML. - -- Gruß, Johannes http://hehejo.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktW8rwACgkQhIafEwbLdWBC5gCfciW2XBb3LG7FhrZZaD/gLiWR b8MAniIp/WzlZkDr13uN+wnRaAlBYfm3 =9/ke -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
2010/1/20 Johannes Held m...@hehejo.de: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com: If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent post to keep thing conscise. Sure! That's the right(tm) way to do it. ;-) Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge long threads in a single message to have a Mee to or +1 at the bottom Yes, that's true. It's annoying to scroll down, search for the reply and then read a simple +1. I wish, that those emails would be cropped and simply a +1 (perhaps with a small description) is sent. Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. Meh, I see comments on a blog more a as thought of the writer instead of discussions like here on ML. A forum thread (which displays in chronological order) is a pretty close thing to a mailing list?
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com wrote: Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. Separate blog posts are typically unrelated, so there is no reason they should be chronologically ordered. How about blog comments? In nearly all blog publishers, they are in chronological order. I agree, one blog post + comments is more analog to one mail thread. So I like to have the same order as in blogs : threads / blog post in reverse order (most recent on top) , but inside each of them, bottom-posting / chronological order. Actually when you use a thread view, you usually get a chronological order for all mails inside a thread. If you combine that with top-posting, its a bit weird.
Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails
Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of Wed Jan 20 13:08:19 +0100 2010: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 04:43 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:12:31PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Probably because (in my experience at least) top-posting occurs much more frequently than me too posts at least, probably more frequently than improper quoting as well. And yet when I see the top-posted mails, most of the time I don't need to read the rest of the previously quoted message - especially if I'm on a roll and am familiar with the current thread. I guess if one is reading for a historical perspective then it makes more sense to put the reply at the bottom but then I found myself having to read the history over and over again. If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent post to keep thing conscise. Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge long threads in a single message to have a Mee to or +1 at the bottom That's why I found that style to be so inefficient and wasting of my time. Honestly, I just scroll straight to the bottom, Evolution marks all the quoted stuff for me anyway so that the real replies stand out. With bottom-posting the wasted time is the amount of time taken to scroll to the bottom. With top posting the wasted time is having to scroll down for perspective. I'd wager a quick scroll is faster than having to scroll up and down to read and get perspective. However, in the end its more of a consensus thing. MLs generally agree on bottom-posting, and so top-posting in that context, whatever its merits, isn't good manners. Similarly bottom-posting my replies to my relatives hi how are you emails is very bad manners. To each their own. Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and nobody seems to complain about that concept. This is slightly off-tangent, but personally I feel blogs are less dependent on context, with each post standing on its own, whereas email threads are very context dependent as each new mail is a REPLY to the one before. Honestly, my ultimate solution would look very much like gmail's 'threaded view'. Unfortunately no desktop app that I've seen manages to get a similar handling =(. Have you heard of sup? I've never used gmail but I read sup was inspired by gmail. Well, I'm very happy with sup, bottom posting is no issue since quotes take up one line until expanded. Often you can read the original messages instead of the quotes due to the thread view. You need external apps for sending and receiving, like alpine, but setup in general seems to be much simpler. Imho it bottom posting is the way to go, with replies to paragraphs of a mail where it makes sense. For me personally it doesn't matter much, thanks to sup. The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp
[arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacherhollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter Thunderbird 3 is also good. Thunderbird by default bottom posts (it can be changed though). -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Adminstrator www.itech7.com
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:01:09 +0530 Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote: On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacherhollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter Thunderbird 3 is also good. Thunderbird by default bottom posts (it can be changed though). thunderbird doesn't offer any of the things I'm looking for (see above), is bloat and makes a mess in its user's $HOME. Dieter
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64 with nvidia. I'll load it on my laptop and report back as well after testing the radeon setup. That should be the real test. Is the recommendation no early config for the radeon module?? Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:51 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64 with nvidia. I'll load it on my laptop and report back as well after testing the radeon setup. That should be the real test. Is the recommendation no early config for the radeon module?? Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. I'm using kernel26-2.6.32-ice currently (its up to 2.6.32-4) and Virtualbox PUEL worked fine just moments ago. Its 1 am here, tomorrow I'll try with the stock kernel and see whether it doesn't work.
Re: [arch-general] 2 Killer kde4 dark themes - DR you listening??
On 01/20/2010 03:49 AM, Mikael Eriksson wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: And most importantly, how the /heck/ do you handle the *bright* *white* pages of the web... I'd tried creating a custom CSS for me, but it broke too many pages... I use the BYM[0] extension for firefox. It removes image backgrounds, changes the background color to black and text to grey and is easily toggled with a icon on the statusbar. [0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7166 Now that is cool Works great too! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 11:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel Just a suggestion: I usually drop down to single user (sudo telinit s) before I install major packages like a kernel. DR
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox even with 2.6.32.3, I had to recomile virtualbox module. I tried to start a VM and system froze solid and had to do hard reset. With a recompile, its working though. -- Shridhar
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. I can't comment on the WindowMaker issue but the VirtualBox, at least the OSE version(virtualbox-ose 3.1.2-3) released today is fixed.
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 07:42 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa Everything working perfectly as usual. 32bit kernel with nvidia kernel module. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1
Processes are still being randomly killed by oom-killer here even tho there's lots of free swap available, most of the time ksmserver which kills the kde session. It's been happening since updating to 2.6.32 series. The issue is discussed here (with patch): http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=126169821317492w=4 Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, bump to latest bugfix version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox even with 2.6.32.3, I had to recomile virtualbox module. I tried to start a VM and system froze solid and had to do hard reset. With a recompile, its working though. Are you talking about recompile of the vbox module, that I just did, or are you talking about a kernel recompile? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote: On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. I can't comment on the WindowMaker issue but the VirtualBox, at least the OSE version(virtualbox-ose 3.1.2-3) released today is fixed. I'll check and report back. Thanks! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 09:21 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote: On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. I can't comment on the WindowMaker issue but the VirtualBox, at least the OSE version(virtualbox-ose 3.1.2-3) released today is fixed. I'll check and report back. Thanks! windowmaker still wasn't rebuilt. eventually it will, maybe i'll do it later. -- Ionut
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. Add to the list of broken desktop/window managers: (3) Enlightenment (E17) broken with latest kernel The problem seems to be libpng and libjpg. The xsession-errors from windowmaker were: [13:26 alchemy:~] # cat /home/david/.xsession-errors wmaker: error while loading shared libraries: libpng12.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I created the link to libpng like: ln -s /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14.0.0 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 then on next wm start [13:32 alchemy:~] # cat /home/david/.xsession-errors wmaker: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I didn't catch the E17 .xsession-errors, but I suspect it is related. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On 01/20/2010 09:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on reboot, WindowMaker attempted to start and then crashed back to the login screen. After the upgrade I successfully rebuilt the kernel module for vb with vbox_build_module, then started vbox and it hung with a small dialog spawning session. Let me know what information you want to see and I'll be happy to provide it or file a bug report. Thanks. Add to the list of broken desktop/window managers: (3) Enlightenment (E17) broken with latest kernel The problem seems to be libpng and libjpg. The xsession-errors from windowmaker were: [13:26 alchemy:~] # cat /home/david/.xsession-errors wmaker: error while loading shared libraries: libpng12.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I created the link to libpng like: ln -s /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14.0.0 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 then on next wm start [13:32 alchemy:~] # cat /home/david/.xsession-errors wmaker: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I didn't catch the E17 .xsession-errors, but I suspect it is related. packages for e17 wasn't rebuild. have patience or downgrade to extra/community and don't flood the email with useless problems. The rebuilding process is NOT FINISHED. -- Ionut
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4 -1 [ Possible Problems... ]
On Thursday 21 January 2010 00:50:22 David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox even with 2.6.32.3, I had to recomile virtualbox module. I tried to start a VM and system froze solid and had to do hard reset. With a recompile, its working though. Are you talking about recompile of the vbox module, that I just did, or are you talking about a kernel recompile? vbox module recompile. It fixed the issue on 2.6.32-3 but from your post it seems, it is not sufficient for 2.6.32-4. -- Shridhar
Re: [arch-general] dark themes (was 2 Killer kde4 dark themes - DR you listening??) [Part Solved]
Am oder ungefähr am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, schrieb David C. Rankin:
On 01/19/2010 01:37 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
I stumbled into a part solution to the problem for firefox and other mozilla
apps. Basically there is a new type of skin you can use called user space
skins that use the 'stylish' addon that allows for the easy changing of the
titlebar (and all other aspects) of the browser window.
I also use a dark style sometimes, especially if I work at night. ;)
I found that using QtCurve it is quite easy to make all Qt and Gtk applications
look nice and dark. For firefox I baked my own little darkening style which may
be used with the Stylish addon (see below). It is not very fancy but makes most
sites look quite similar to the original white look. My first problem is with
sites like google.com who use an image with a hardcoded white background. I
cannot get that away.
The second problem is with Java applications as they do not respect the colour
settings of the window manager by default. However you can
$ echo 'swing.defaultlaf=com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel'
/opt/java/jre/lib/swing.properties
which should make all Java applications use Gtk as their default look and feel
(and thus respect the Gtk colour settings).
Best greetings!
Edgar
snip
html {
background-image: none !important;
}
body {
background-image: none !important;
background-color: #302f2f !important;
border-color: #7fc8ff !important;
color: #7fc8ff !important;
}
body * {
background-color: #302f2f !important;
border-color: #7fc8ff !important;
color: #7fc8ff !important;
}
code {
color: grey !important;
}
em {
color: #00ad00 !important;
font-weight: normal !important;
}
a:link {
color: #3f7f5f !important;
text-decoration: underline !important;
}
a:active {
color: #3f7f5f !important;
text-decoration: none !important;
}
a:visited {
color: grey !important;
text-decoration: underline !important;
}
a:hover {
color: #00ad00 !important;
text-decoration: underline !important;
}
/snip
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[arch-general] Can you rebuild an nv dmraid array in linux - or is it just gparted and copy partitions?
Listmates I had a failing drive in my arch server so I installed a new one. The bios raid 'nvidia dmraid' provides the feature to 'Rebuild' the array and allows for adding the new disk to the array. After that configuration you are prompted to Boot to an OS that supports rebuilding.. (or something very close to that). I image that there is some windows utility that does the rebuild on boot. Something probably on one of the cd's that came with the motherboard. The motherboard is an MSI K9N2 SLI Platinum (MS-7374) and has the nvidia dmraid 0/1/5/ chipset. In the past I have always just used gparted to copy partitions from good drive - new drive and created a new array. Based on the output of creating the array in the bios, I'm curious if I can just rebuild does it work in linux? how? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
