Re: [arch-general] A good twitter client

2010-03-07 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:08:42 christopher floess wrote:
 On 03/07/2010 03:15 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
  Hi,
  Does anyone know a good twitter client for KDE apart from Firefox's
  echofon, Chromed Bird (I don't use GChrome), and KDE μblog ?
  Twitgin sucks if you have to many tweets from people you're following and
  that's my case.
 
 I'm using mitter. It's gtk though, and I tend to think it's not that
 feature rich, but I'm not sure because I don't use the twitter features.

What happened to kde twitter widget? I cannot find it anymore in the list of 
widgets. Following claims that it is still available with 4.4. It is not 
available online either.

http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6978/1/
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6978/1/
-- 
Regards 
 Shridhar


[arch-general] Messages from fcron

2010-03-07 Thread Magnus Therning
I keep on getting messages from fcron along what can be found below.  Does
anyone know where I should look to fix this?

/M

 Original Message 
Subject: fcron sys...@tatooine /usr/sbin/run-cron /etc/cron.daily
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:58:09 +
From: magnus.thern...@ntlworld.com
To: magnus.thern...@ntlworld.com

error: syslog-ng:1 duplicate log entry for /var/log/crond.log
error: found error in /var/log/messages.log /var/log/auth.log
/var/log/mail.log /var/log/kernel.log /var/log/errors.log /var/log/daemon.log
/var/log/user.log /var/log/iptables.log /var/log/everything.log
/var/log/syslog.log /var/log/acpid.log /var/log/crond.log /var/log/lpr.log
/var/log/uucp.log /var/log/news.log /var/log/ppp.log /var/log/debug.log , 
skipping



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Sonntag, 7. März 2010 12:03:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
 2) svn-git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, .. will
 need to be adapted.

The problem is that our current repo layout and workflow is not mappable to 
git. E.g. we use svn's feature to checkout specific dirs/files etc..

But I guess if someone would come up with a superior solution using git we 
would be quite happy.

-- 

Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre


[arch-general] Changed GNUstep directory in new windowmaker package

2010-03-07 Thread Daniel Isenmann
Hi,

today I have released a new release of the windowmaker package. The
important change is the GNUstep directory. I have changed this
to /usr/lib/GNUstep. It was requested as a bug report
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15301) and it’s now equal to Debian’s
GNUstep directory location.

That means, you have to change the directory for the WPrefs.App which
has now the new location. All other things should be run without
problems. If you have older GNUstep applications, you have to recompile
them with the new location if they way located in the old GNUstep
directory.

 -Daniel


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Ray Rashif
On 07/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 7. März 2010 12:03:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
 2) svn-git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, .. will
 need to be adapted.

 The problem is that our current repo layout and workflow is not mappable to
 git. E.g. we use svn's feature to checkout specific dirs/files etc..

 But I guess if someone would come up with a superior solution using git we
 would be quite happy.

Sparseness is a complicated matter in git:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-read-tree.html#_sparse_checkout

And we need that the most.


--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:18:26 +0800
Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 07/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
  Am Sonntag, 7. März 2010 12:03:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
  2) svn-git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, ..
  will need to be adapted.
 
  The problem is that our current repo layout and workflow is not
  mappable to git. E.g. we use svn's feature to checkout specific
  dirs/files etc..
 
  But I guess if someone would come up with a superior solution using
  git we would be quite happy.
 
 Sparseness is a complicated matter in git:
 http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-read-tree.html#_sparse_checkout
 
 And we need that the most.
 
 
 --
 GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

hmm.. it doesn't look _that_ hard:
http://vmiklos.hu/blog/sparse-checkout-example-in-git-1-7

Btw, re: my con 1 (disk space needed for history), one could use git
clone --depth if one only wants recent history.
(though i don't think this will be an issue at all in practice)

Dieter


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:49:01 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:

 1) We want to be able to see which PKGBUILD matches the package in the
 repository. In SVN, we use copy - which is subversion's equivalent to
 branching: By copying, you create a reference and all history of the
 copied file is still there. In git, copying means that the copy has no
 history, it is entirely unrelated to the original. The only equivalent
 in git would be branching - but you cannot branch a single file or
 path, you can only branch the entire tree.

Note that with package in repository Thomas means the
package/repos/i686 and such directories in svn.

There are some approaches we could take:
* git diff has a -C flag to detect copies.
   --find-copies-harder
   For performance reasons, by default, -C option finds copies
only if the original file of the copy was modified in the same
changeset. This flag makes the command inspect unmodified files as
candidates for the source of copy. This is a very expensive operation
for large projects, so use it with caution. Giving more than one -C
option has the same effect.

so, we tell all packagers to do the add/update/test/add-to-repositories
in one commit. (or use the slow -C flag, I don't know how often you
want to do this)

* git branches. 3 branches or so for each package. that's a lot of
  branches, but maybe that's not really a problem, depends on how many
  times you want to merge branches i guess (i.e. how related packages
  are to each other)

* we could also get rid of these branch directories.  what's the
  point of them anyway? the tools who build the packages (tarballs)
  must know the latest version for the particular architecture? maybe
  we can put tags in the commit messages, or keep a textfile in the
  package directory to know which state of the directory is usuable
  to build packages for.

* just do normal copies and don't care about the histories.


I'm not really a packager so I don't know how feasible all approaches
are, but some of them seem pretty feasible.


 2) Partial checkouts and commits: We check out single directories and
 most importantly we commit to single directories without updating the
 rest of the repository. These operations come naturally to SVN, but
 they are against the very concept of git.

did you see http://vmiklos.hu/blog/sparse-checkout-example-in-git-1-7 ?
is this not enough? I mean, you can clone the (complete)
repository, checkout the git repo sparsely,
commit in your subdirs, add the clone as remote in your
original and pull in the changes. okay you do have the
complete 57MB repository locally, but at least a clean checkout.
I actually just tried this and it just works!

Dieter


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Stefan Husmann

Am 07.03.2010 12:03, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:

Couldn't find any discussion about this,
but what about we maintain our packages in git instead of svn?

pros:
1) git is awesome


That is a personal opinion, not an argument.


2) we don't need abs/rsync anymore. users can just read from git.

Users would have to learn git commands.

3) git network communication is more efficient then rsync (afaik)

Maybe, I do not know.

4) users can check out older versions of packages easily, with
limited storage overhead.

Do you want to store binary packages in the git repo? Maybe I misunderstand you.
Checking out older PKGBUILDs would  be doable in svn also, I guess.

5) makes it easier to maintain forks of packages (have your
own git repository with some changes, then merge in upstream changes to
keep them up to date. upstream == arch linux here)

cons:
1) using git for abs will use more disk space because you need the
checkout + the repo (a 60% or increase or so? my abs tree is now 57MB,
so even if this becomes 100MB that's still ok imho)
2) svn-git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, .. will
need to be adapted.

Dieter


We should not do that. git imho is by far to complicated for end users to use.
Lets keep it easy.

Regards Stefan


Re: [arch-general] A good twitter client

2010-03-07 Thread Gaurish Sharma
On Sunday 07 Mar 2010 7:45:31 am Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
 Hi,
 Does anyone know a good twitter client for KDE apart from Firefox's
 echofon, Chromed Bird (I don't use GChrome), and KDE μblog ?
 Twitgin sucks if you have to many tweets from people you're following and
 that's my case.
Here is my list of twiiter clients:

* Adobe Air Based: tweetdesk,twhirl,Destroy Twitter.
*GTK/KDE apps: choqok,mitter,microblog-purple

I personally use twhirl which is available in AUR
-- 
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
www.gaurishsharma.com


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
 On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:51:30 +0100
 Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:

  4) users can check out older versions of packages easily, with
  limited storage overhead.
 Do you want to store binary packages in the git repo? Maybe I
 misunderstand you. Checking out older PKGBUILDs would  be doable in
 svn also, I guess.

 no, i was talking about the source packages (pkgbuilds, install files
 etc). now you can get all that stuff with ABS, but only the latest
 version.


uhm ?
Ray already showed you can obviously do that with svn as well, and you
even answered to him :)
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Getting_PKGBUILDS_From_SVN


[arch-general] New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?

2010-03-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
Hi,

Today's pacman -Syu installed new xorg-server package:

% pacman -Qs xorg-server
local/xorg-server 1.7.5.901-1 (xorg)
X.Org X servers

I have xorg.conf configured without hal support:

Section ServerFlags
Option  AutoAddDevicesFalse
Option  AllowEmptyInput   False
EndSection

I also have fluxbox installed:

% pacman -Qs fluxbox
local/fluxbox 1.1.1-1
A lightweight and highly-configurable window manager

And with the new xorg-server the behavior I'm seing is that if I try
to maximize/minimize a window, fluxbox freezes, but if I do top, I
don't see any process eating resources, neither memory, neither cpu...

Another weird behavior, is that fluxbox keys are dead.  I configured
for example:

# alt-left / alt-right
Mod1 Right :NextWorkspace
Mod1 Left :PrevWorkspace

And they don't work.  Well, if I try them like between the 1st 2
seconds, they actually work, after 2 seconds, they don't do a thing...

I don't think this is a video card issue, since I have the same issue
with a nvidia video card, and an ati video card:

Driver nvidia
VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
BoardName  Quadro FX 570M

...

Driver  radeon
VendorName  ATI Technologies Inc
BoardName   Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000]

Is this a bug?  I don't want to use hal, but perhaps it's inevitable
now as opposed as before, when we could still not depend upon it...
So I'm not sure if the only way to make Xorg work now is through hal,
or if this is just a temporal bug to be fixed...

Please let me know.

Thanks,


-- 
Javier.


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:14 PM,  f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:49:01PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:

 The only viable solution I could think of is using one git repository
 per package - and that is just crazy.

 I wonder, is it really that crazy ?

 I've been looking into git as a replacement for my own use.
 One repo per project seems the 'natural' way to use it.

 Downloading the complete abs would require a lot of
 'git clone' operations, but is that the typical use
 case ? I guess it is not. And if you really need
 everything you do it once, after that it's just updates.
 And most users probably don't need everything.

 Also, even if I find it hard to believe, it seems that
 git repos are typically much smaller than the equivalent
 in svn.


I have grepped the full abs tree many times for various reasons. It is
very practical.

And in 95% of the cases, I do not need any history, I just need the
last version to read/edit/rebuild.


Re: [arch-general] New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?

2010-03-07 Thread Javier Adrián Ortiz de la Tabla
 And with the new xorg-server the behavior I'm seing is that if I try
 to maximize/minimize a window, fluxbox freezes, but if I do top, I
 don't see any process eating resources, neither memory, neither cpu...

 Another weird behavior, is that fluxbox keys are dead.  I configured
 for example:

Yes, I've experienced the same problem, but I have hal enabled. After upgrading
with 'pacman -Syu', fluxbox started to freeze with no aparent reason.
I can't switch
between desktiops (Ctrl-Fx), can't click to activate a window, etc.


-- 
Javier Adrián Ortiz de la Tabla


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread fons
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote:

 I have grepped the full abs tree many times for various reasons. It is
 very practical.

No question about that, but it would still be possible to
download everything. When you do a netinstall pacman gets
a few hundred packages individually. Abs could do the same,
it would transparent to the user.
 
 And in 95% of the cases, I do not need any history, I just need the
 last version to read/edit/rebuild.

Yes, with git you get the full history. I've still not
grokked why that is the only option... (except for
Linus' motto: if in doubt, do the opposite of svn :-)

Ciao,

-- 
FA

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !


Re: [arch-general] New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?

2010-03-07 Thread Thaddeus Nielsen
Javier Adrián Ortiz de la Tabla [adriandelata...@gmail.com] wrote:
  And with the new xorg-server the behavior I'm seing is that if I try
  to maximize/minimize a window, fluxbox freezes, but if I do top, I
  don't see any process eating resources, neither memory, neither cpu...
 
  Another weird behavior, is that fluxbox keys are dead.  I configured
  for example:
 
 Yes, I've experienced the same problem, but I have hal enabled. After 
 upgrading
 with 'pacman -Syu', fluxbox started to freeze with no aparent reason.
 I can't switch
 between desktiops (Ctrl-Fx), can't click to activate a window, etc.
 
 
 -- 
 Javier Adrián Ortiz de la Tabla

The last six entries of my /var/log/Xorg.0.log are:
config/hal: New Input Device Request failed (8).  There are six of
those.  Hal is running here also.  Ctrl-Alt-Fx works here.

T.



Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Nathan Wayde

On 07/03/10 21:34, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote:


[...]

And in 95% of the cases, I do not need any history, I just need the
last version to read/edit/rebuild.


Yes, with git you get the full history. I've still not
grokked why that is the only option... (except for
Linus' motto: if in doubt, do the opposite of svn :-)

Ciao,


Maybe you're looking for `git clone --depth 1`


Re: [arch-general] svn packaging, abs = git ?

2010-03-07 Thread Allan McRae
The only way for this to actually happen would be for someone to set up 
a git repo with a handful of packages and demonstrate that it works 
better with the usual packaging workflow.  That is what was done with 
SVN and why it was chosen when we switched from CVS.


Allan


Re: [arch-general] New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?

2010-03-07 Thread Thaddeus Nielsen
Javier Vasquez [j.e.vasque...@gmail.com] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Today's pacman -Syu installed new xorg-server package:
 
 % pacman -Qs xorg-server
 local/xorg-server 1.7.5.901-1 (xorg)
 X.Org X servers
 
 I have xorg.conf configured without hal support:
 
 Section ServerFlags
 Option  AutoAddDevicesFalse
 Option  AllowEmptyInput   False
 EndSection
 
 I also have fluxbox installed:
 
 % pacman -Qs fluxbox
 local/fluxbox 1.1.1-1
 A lightweight and highly-configurable window manager
 
 And with the new xorg-server the behavior I'm seing is that if I try
 to maximize/minimize a window, fluxbox freezes, but if I do top, I
 don't see any process eating resources, neither memory, neither cpu...
 
 Another weird behavior, is that fluxbox keys are dead.  I configured
 for example:
 
 # alt-left / alt-right
 Mod1 Right :NextWorkspace
 Mod1 Left :PrevWorkspace
 
 And they don't work.  Well, if I try them like between the 1st 2
 seconds, they actually work, after 2 seconds, they don't do a thing...
 
 I don't think this is a video card issue, since I have the same issue
 with a nvidia video card, and an ati video card:
 
 Driver nvidia
 VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
 BoardName  Quadro FX 570M
 
 ...
 
 Driver  radeon
 VendorName  ATI Technologies Inc
 BoardName   Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000]
 
 Is this a bug?  I don't want to use hal, but perhaps it's inevitable
 now as opposed as before, when we could still not depend upon it...
 So I'm not sure if the only way to make Xorg work now is through hal,
 or if this is just a temporal bug to be fixed...
 
 Please let me know.
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 -- 
 Javier.

I was able to downgrade back to xorg-server-1.7.5-1 and things seem
to be working OK for now.

T.



Re: [arch-general] New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?

2010-03-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
On 3/7/10, Thaddeus Nielsen thadde...@gmail.com wrote:
 Javier Vasquez [j.e.vasque...@gmail.com] wrote:
 Hi,

 Today's pacman -Syu installed new xorg-server package:

 % pacman -Qs xorg-server
 local/xorg-server 1.7.5.901-1 (xorg)
 X.Org X servers

 I have xorg.conf configured without hal support:

 Section ServerFlags
 Option  AutoAddDevicesFalse
 Option  AllowEmptyInput   False
 EndSection

 I also have fluxbox installed:

 % pacman -Qs fluxbox
 local/fluxbox 1.1.1-1
 A lightweight and highly-configurable window manager

 And with the new xorg-server the behavior I'm seing is that if I try
 to maximize/minimize a window, fluxbox freezes, but if I do top, I
 don't see any process eating resources, neither memory, neither cpu...

 Another weird behavior, is that fluxbox keys are dead.  I configured
 for example:

 # alt-left / alt-right
 Mod1 Right :NextWorkspace
 Mod1 Left :PrevWorkspace

 And they don't work.  Well, if I try them like between the 1st 2
 seconds, they actually work, after 2 seconds, they don't do a thing...

 I don't think this is a video card issue, since I have the same issue
 with a nvidia video card, and an ati video card:

 Driver nvidia
 VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
 BoardName  Quadro FX 570M

 ...

 Driver  radeon
 VendorName  ATI Technologies Inc
 BoardName   Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000]

 Is this a bug?  I don't want to use hal, but perhaps it's inevitable
 now as opposed as before, when we could still not depend upon it...
 So I'm not sure if the only way to make Xorg work now is through hal,
 or if this is just a temporal bug to be fixed...

 Please let me know.

 Thanks,


 --
 Javier.

 I was able to downgrade back to xorg-server-1.7.5-1 and things seem
 to be working OK for now.

   T.

Downgrading actually works as suggested.  There's a forum already with
dicsussion about this:

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=92679

And a bug already filed as a result:

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18598

I'll have to keep an eye on it, to see how it progress, :-)

Thanks,


-- 
Javier.


Re: [arch-general] Something is seriously wrong with FlashPlugin; makes chrome firefox crash like crazy

2010-03-07 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Sunday 07 March 2010 20:54:24 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
 Hi,
 My CPU is Intel E5300.AKAIK, lahf only applies to AMD athlon 64 line of
 chips. Plus, flash earlier used to work but this crashing has started
 about 2-3weeks back.
 
 anyone else having similar issues

I am running a E7400 with flashplugin 10.0.45.2-1. No issues at all.
-- 
Regards 
 Shridhar


Re: [arch-general] Something is seriously wrong with FlashPlugin; makes chrome firefox crash like crazy

2010-03-07 Thread Robert Howard
Same problem here. Running dual E5410 Xeons; Firefox crashes and will not
restart.

On Mar 7, 2010 9:59 PM, Shridhar Daithankar ghodech...@ghodechhap.net
wrote:

On Sunday 07 March 2010 20:54:24 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
 Hi,
 My CPU is Intel E5300.AKAIK, lahf onl...
I am running a E7400 with flashplugin 10.0.45.2-1. No issues at all.
--
Regards
 Shridhar


[arch-general] Building netboot images

2010-03-07 Thread Piyush P Kurur
Hi,

I would like to create a (custom) netboot install image of 
archlinux to facilitate installation within our department. I have
few queries regarding the corresponding mkinitcpio.conf.

1. How do I use custom hooks together with standard hooks *without*
   installing them in /lib/initcpio/install. Or in other words can I
   configure mkinitcpio to look for hooks in other locations besides
   the standard locations.

   There are two options that I can think of both of which looks
   ugly to me.

   * install custom hooks in the standard location
 /lib/initcpio/install.  I would don't like this because I don't
 want to mess up the standard directory for testing these hooks.

   * copy all the hooks in the standard location to a new
 location. Install the custom hooks there as well and set the
 mkinitcpio to look at this new location. There does not seem to
 be an option for this, I might be stupid not to spot it, but
 appropriate fakeroot + chroot can make this work

2. I would like to have the minimal set of packages on the netboot image to
   reduce size. The actual installation will be from the local mirror of course
   but some packages are needed to start the process. What is the suggested 
   package set ? Is the whole of base okey or is it an overkill?

3. How does one provide standard packages on the rootdir. I would
   assume the initial ramdisk should act as the actual root during the
   entire installation process (I don't want the NFS mounting mess). 

   The algorithm seems like

   (1) install the appropriate packages via pacman --root /foo

   (2) get the entire subtree on to the initial ramdisk.

   For step 2, I would need to set BINARIES and FILES of
   mkinitcpio.conf appropriately. I would rather enjoy Vogon
   poetry. Is there a better way?


Regards,

ppk