[arch-general] Netcfg status
Hi guys. Wanna know about netcfg package status. In latest git there is very important variable - HIDDEN, which allows to connect to hidden networks without PRE_UP="iwconfig " hack. How soon it'll be in repos?
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.6-2
On 05/13/2011 10:25 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi please signoff both arches, fixed libata regression in this rebuild- greetings tpowa Signoff (4 - i686, 3 - x86_64) - all good! ..flaky box gave grub error (1st time in a while - downgraded to 2.6.38.6-1) Will wait for whenever 2.6.38.6-3 comes out and try again on that box. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Re: [arch-general] AUR deletion request
2011/5/14 |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | : > Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four > packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your > list with links. > I'm not a TU, but the way I see, it is interesting (and important) for everyone that the person who requests the deletion or to orphan packages provide the links for them. If you know the package, then you have the link - you won't miss it. However, if you relay on the TU to find it, something could go wrong (ex: accidentaly deleting wrong package), not to mention you are making their work more difficult - yours too, btw, because this requested turned to be more than just "please delete this" and "deleted". -- Rafael
Re: [arch-general] AUR deletion request
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:54 AM, |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | wrote: > Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four > packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your > list with links. > > Evangelos, the reason for the deletion is that I'm refactoring my approach > and these packages are no longer needed. They really just psuedo-packages > anyway. > > Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own > packages? > deleted
Re: [arch-general] ArchLinux for mipsel (Loongson)
because that's not ours ;) El 14/05/11 11:53, Heiher dijo: > Hello, > > http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/dconf/repos/extra-mips64el/ > > Why is Null ? > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Nicolás Reynolds > wrote: > > El 13/05/11 11:01, javier dijo: > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nicolás Reynolds-2 [via ArchLinux] > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > El 04/05/11 02:59, javier dijo: > >> > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Jonathan Beatty[via ArchLinux] > >> > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > > > On 04/30/2011 04:52 PM, javier wrote: > >> > > >> Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into > >> > > >> packages > >> > > >> page, > >> > > >> and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it > >> > > >> out... > >> > > >> > >> > > >> I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all > >> > > >> for > >> > > >> x86, > >> > > >> so I didn't think it was going to support the lemote mini-pcs > >> > > >> neither > >> > > >> loongson in general. I do have mini-pcs, so it's great news to me, > >> > > >> :-)-- > >> > > >> View this message in context: > >> > > >> http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3486638.html > >> > > >> Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > Parabola GNU/Linux, an Arch derivative, already has a MIPS port. :) > >> > > > It's > >> > > > functional. > >> > > > >> > > Hi, do you know which flags are being used to compile the loongson2f > >> > > packets? I'm referring to: > >> > > > >> > > -march=loongson2f -mtune=loongson2f -mabi=64 -O3 > >> > > > >> > > This can be found by looking at: > >> > > > >> > > /etc/makepkg.conf > >> > > > >> > > If I remember correctly, :-) > >> > > > >> > > Perhaps using loongson2f is not such great idea, since ther will come > >> > > a3, and others... However, using the 64bits ABI might increase > >> > > performance for some applications (loongson2f is not the fastest CPU > >> > > ever, so any help on performance is good)... > >> > Hey, > >> > > >> > We're using -march=loongson2f -mabi=n32 for the Parabola port. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Salud! > >> > Nicolás Reynolds, > >> > >> Is there a way to find out which packages have already been ported? > >> Also, where to get information about how to install and go from there? > > > > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/?sort=&arch=mips64el&q=&maintainer=&last_update=&flagged=&limit=50 > > > > and http://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/mips:installation > > > >> > >> -- > >> Javier. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3521817.html > >> Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > -- > > Salud! > > Nicolás Reynolds, > > xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar > > omb:http://identi.ca/fauno > > blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ > > gnu/linux user #455044 > > > > OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2 > > > > http://parabolagnulinux.org > > http://endefensadelsl.org > > > > > > -- > Best regards! > Heiher > -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar omb:http://identi.ca/fauno blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044 OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2 http://parabolagnulinux.org http://endefensadelsl.org pgp8T3t2eiLja.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-general] AUR deletion request
2011/5/14 |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | : > Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own > packages? Because then nothing could stop you from adopting all orphans and mass deleting them. Corrado
Re: [arch-general] AUR deletion request
Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your list with links. Evangelos, the reason for the deletion is that I'm refactoring my approach and these packages are no longer needed. They really just psuedo-packages anyway. Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own packages?
Re: [arch-general] ArchLinux for mipsel (Loongson)
Hello, http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/dconf/repos/extra-mips64el/ Why is Null ? On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Nicolás Reynolds wrote: > El 13/05/11 11:01, javier dijo: >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nicolás Reynolds-2 [via ArchLinux] >> wrote: >> > >> > El 04/05/11 02:59, javier dijo: >> > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Jonathan Beatty[via ArchLinux] >> > > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > On 04/30/2011 04:52 PM, javier wrote: >> > > >> Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into packages >> > > >> page, >> > > >> and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it >> > > >> out... >> > > >> >> > > >> I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all for >> > > >> x86, >> > > >> so I didn't think it was going to support the lemote mini-pcs neither >> > > >> loongson in general. I do have mini-pcs, so it's great news to me, >> > > >> :-)-- >> > > >> View this message in context: >> > > >> http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3486638.html >> > > >> Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Parabola GNU/Linux, an Arch derivative, already has a MIPS port. :) >> > > > It's >> > > > functional. >> > > >> > > Hi, do you know which flags are being used to compile the loongson2f >> > > packets? I'm referring to: >> > > >> > > -march=loongson2f -mtune=loongson2f -mabi=64 -O3 >> > > >> > > This can be found by looking at: >> > > >> > > /etc/makepkg.conf >> > > >> > > If I remember correctly, :-) >> > > >> > > Perhaps using loongson2f is not such great idea, since ther will come >> > > a3, and others... However, using the 64bits ABI might increase >> > > performance for some applications (loongson2f is not the fastest CPU >> > > ever, so any help on performance is good)... >> > Hey, >> > >> > We're using -march=loongson2f -mabi=n32 for the Parabola port. >> > >> > -- >> > Salud! >> > Nicolás Reynolds, >> >> Is there a way to find out which packages have already been ported? >> Also, where to get information about how to install and go from there? > > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/?sort=&arch=mips64el&q=&maintainer=&last_update=&flagged=&limit=50 > > and http://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/mips:installation > >> >> -- >> Javier. >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3521817.html >> Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Salud! > Nicolás Reynolds, > xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar > omb:http://identi.ca/fauno > blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ > gnu/linux user #455044 > > OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2 > > http://parabolagnulinux.org > http://endefensadelsl.org > -- Best regards! Heiher
Re: [arch-general] ArchLinux for mipsel (Loongson)
El 13/05/11 11:01, javier dijo: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nicolás Reynolds-2 [via ArchLinux] > wrote: > > > > El 04/05/11 02:59, javier dijo: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Jonathan Beatty[via ArchLinux] > > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > On 04/30/2011 04:52 PM, javier wrote: > > > >> Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into packages > > > >> page, > > > >> and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it > > > >> out... > > > >> > > > >> I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all for > > > >> x86, > > > >> so I didn't think it was going to support the lemote mini-pcs neither > > > >> loongson in general. I do have mini-pcs, so it's great news to me, > > > >> :-)-- > > > >> View this message in context: > > > >> http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3486638.html > > > >> Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Parabola GNU/Linux, an Arch derivative, already has a MIPS port. :) It's > > > > functional. > > > > > > Hi, do you know which flags are being used to compile the loongson2f > > > packets? I'm referring to: > > > > > > -march=loongson2f -mtune=loongson2f -mabi=64 -O3 > > > > > > This can be found by looking at: > > > > > > /etc/makepkg.conf > > > > > > If I remember correctly, :-) > > > > > > Perhaps using loongson2f is not such great idea, since ther will come > > > a3, and others... However, using the 64bits ABI might increase > > > performance for some applications (loongson2f is not the fastest CPU > > > ever, so any help on performance is good)... > > Hey, > > > > We're using -march=loongson2f -mabi=n32 for the Parabola port. > > > > -- > > Salud! > > Nicolás Reynolds, > > Is there a way to find out which packages have already been ported? > Also, where to get information about how to install and go from there? https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/?sort=&arch=mips64el&q=&maintainer=&last_update=&flagged=&limit=50 and http://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/mips:installation > > -- > Javier. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/ArchLinux-for-mipsel-Loongson-tp3418315p3521817.html > Sent from the arch general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar omb:http://identi.ca/fauno blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044 OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2 http://parabolagnulinux.org http://endefensadelsl.org pgpIPl5lQMtNJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
