Re: [arch-general] Libarchive 3.2

2016-05-23 Thread Patrick Burroughs (Celti) 
On Tue, 24 May 2016 00:42:32 +0200
Federico Di Pierro  wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I see that libarchive is still at 3.1.2 which is 3 years old, while
> latest version is now 3.2, released circa a month ago.
> I already saw it is tagged as out of date, but still it has not been
> updated.
> 
> So...is there any issue blocking its update? Or is just packager away
> for some time? :)
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> Federico

AFAIK the maintainer is active (he's pushed packages as recently as the
14th) — but pacman depends on libarchive for most of what it does, thus
I imagine everyone is being extra-careful about making sure it works
before a new version hits [core].

~Celti


pgpquqO54_lGk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] replace m$ for exclusive archlinux

2016-05-23 Thread Noah Schoem 
See the Arch wiki beginner's guide
for installation
instructions.  If you're looking to remove microsoft from your laptop, I
would recommend deleting all of the partitions on the hard drive.
Details on how to do that, and more information on the disk utility that
comes on the Arch iso, are available at the wiki's page on parted
.

Signed,
Noah Schoem

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:03 PM, message  wrote:

> Readers,
>
> Can someone please suggest a suitable wiki web page to help, for removal
> of m$ (e.g. lenovo ideapad 100s) and installation of archlinux?
>

Re: [arch-general] replace m$ for exclusive archlinux

2016-05-23 Thread Jonathan Villatoro 
El may 23, 2016 4:03 PM, "message"  escribió:
>
> Readers,
>
> Can someone please suggest a suitable wiki web page to help, for removal
of m$ (e.g. lenovo ideapad 100s) and installation of archlinux?

Assuming you've already backed up your data properly, the Beginners' Guide
[1] should definitely help you out.

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beginners%27_Guide

Re: [arch-general] Deletion of old account

2016-05-23 Thread Florian Pritz 
On Mon, 23 May 2016 20:43:42 +0200 Giovanni Santini
 wrote:
> Does this fix the issue with Yahoo?
> I don't suppose so, but I want to double check 

No idea. They don't respond to my attempts to contact them and the
error message doesn't tell what is actually going on. Given they accept
something like 1 mail per month from us right now I doubt they will
even notice our DKIM sigs.

PS: You might want to trim your signature a bit. It's kind of long.

Florian


pgpwVirnfCtIt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Deletion of old account

2016-05-23 Thread Giovanni Santini 
Does this fix the issue with Yahoo?
I don't suppose so, but I want to double check 

---
Giovanni Santini
My blog: http://giovannisantini.tk
My code: https://github.com/ItachiSan
My code, again: https://gitlab.com/u/ItachiSan
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/santini__gio
My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.santini
My Google+: https://plus.google.com/+GiovanniSantini/
My GPG: 2FADEBF5
Il 23 mag 2016 2:47 PM, "Florian Pritz"  ha scritto:

> On Sun, 22 May 2016 14:01:47 +0200 Florian Pritz 
> wrote:
> > As for DKIM, I just now noticed this too. It appears that our DNS
> > provider's UI mangled the entry I put in. I'm working on
> > fixing this problem.
>
> Our provider fixed some issues and now the key in the DNS seems to be
> fine. I managed to verify a test message, but it may take some time
> until all DNS servers are up to date.
>
> Florian
>

Re: [arch-general] Kick vtk6 to rebuild?

2016-05-23 Thread Elvis Stansvik 
2016-05-23 19:23 GMT+02:00 Elvis Stansvik :
> Hi folks,
>
> The vtk6 package in [community] (unmaintained) currently has Python
> extensions which link against libhdf5.so.10 (for example
> /opt/vtk6/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vtk/vtkIOAMRPython.so). The
> package should have had a dependency on hdf5.
>
> The hdf5 library has had a so version bump since vtk6 was built
> (libhdf5.so.10 -> libhdf5.so.100). Would it be possible to just give
> the vtk6 package a kick it to rebuild, so that the package in
> [community] can keep working for a little longer? It'll probably work
> fine if it's just re-built.
>
> I unfortunately don't have time to take over the maintainership of the
> aging vtk6. But if it's possible to just trigger a rebuild, that would
> be great.

Nevermind, I obviously didn't search the bug database enough:

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/49233

Sorry for the noise.

Elvis

>
> Thanks in advance,
> Elvis

[arch-general] Kick vtk6 to rebuild?

2016-05-23 Thread Elvis Stansvik 
Hi folks,

The vtk6 package in [community] (unmaintained) currently has Python
extensions which link against libhdf5.so.10 (for example
/opt/vtk6/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vtk/vtkIOAMRPython.so). The
package should have had a dependency on hdf5.

The hdf5 library has had a so version bump since vtk6 was built
(libhdf5.so.10 -> libhdf5.so.100). Would it be possible to just give
the vtk6 package a kick it to rebuild, so that the package in
[community] can keep working for a little longer? It'll probably work
fine if it's just re-built.

I unfortunately don't have time to take over the maintainership of the
aging vtk6. But if it's possible to just trigger a rebuild, that would
be great.

Thanks in advance,
Elvis

Re: [arch-general] Deletion of old account

2016-05-23 Thread Florian Pritz 
On Sun, 22 May 2016 14:01:47 +0200 Florian Pritz 
wrote:
> As for DKIM, I just now noticed this too. It appears that our DNS
> provider's UI mangled the entry I put in. I'm working on
> fixing this problem.

Our provider fixed some issues and now the key in the DNS seems to be
fine. I managed to verify a test message, but it may take some time
until all DNS servers are up to date.

Florian


pgpZG84jIE5kr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature