Re: [arch-general] Espeak in official repositories needs an overhaul
Hi, I have been using espeak ng git rom the aur and it seems to work. I have not seen an update in a while. Matthew -Original Message- From: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Capella via arch-general Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2017 7:10 PM To: arch-general@archlinux.org Cc: Daniel Capella Subject: Re: [arch-general] Espeak in official repositories needs an overhaul I had previously looked into packaging espeak-ng (in the AUR), but it depends on the development version of pcaudiolib (espeak-ng maintains a fork that is "even" with upstream). Perhaps they can be persuaded to make a release. -- Best, polyzen
Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags
Given how derailed this thread became, I'm enabling moderation for all new messages on arch-general from now on. Bartłomiej
Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags
On 10/12/17 03:27, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > To be clear, the real issue people are having with you here isn't your > proposal. It's the fact that you submitted it to the bug tracker, the > maintainer saw it, thought about it, and rejected it, but you couldn't let it > go at that. You instead drew out a forum thread to the point it got closed, > then decided to continue here. That is not the behavior of someone who wants > discussion or to contribute, it's the behavior of someone trying to cause > trouble. It comes across as petty and whiny. Please remember this for future > interactions. > I think you're re-framing the timeline here, possibly showing that your view of events was influenced by your view of me "trying to cause trouble". I was told the forum is a separate entity which devs don't read, hence it was pointless discussing this there. I've already said why I sent to list after the bug report was closed. I don't think I have been disrespectful to anyone in this entire exchange, and have answered or responded to points raised during the discussion. I made one tangential post in response to what seems to be people's fears of posting. But, point taken: I shall remember these events for future interactions. J signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Enlightenment OOD
Hi On Wednesday 15 November 2017 3:56:31 PM CET you wrote: > Can a maintainer please update it if possible if there > are no outstanding bugs or problems. I bumped the pkgver and it compiled without issues. But the wayland session doesn't work for me and I can't figure out why since it crashing in efl. -- Kind regards Jagan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
