Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice fresh not starting
Hi Ralph, *, Am 23.02.19 um 17:55 schrieb Ralph Corderoy: > Hi Friedrich, > If you look at /bin/libreoffice you'll see it's a shell script and > provides options like `--strace' and `--backtrace' that may give better > diagnostics that what you have so far. That's interesting indeed. > It looks like the problem happens in an area to do with user profiles. Bingo! ;o)) > Have you tried starting it as an entirely new user that has never run it > before? That one worked. Renamed the recent profile in .config/libreoffice/4 and voila Libreoffice went back to service. Had to reinstall all the extensions and copy .config/libreoffice/4/user/registrymodifications.xcu from the old profile to the newly created one, to restore recent documents and data bases. Asked for bug closure.. Thanks for Your help. -- Friedrich
Re: [arch-general] pambase update now requires explicit service files in /etc/pam.d/ - dovecot affected
On 2/8/19 2:20 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > With the latest change to pambase, e.g. > > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pambase=3552aba772e8bebbe754a4d01f2729e291dd2070 > > if you have services that rely on pam authentication, such as dovecot, etc.., > you will find that your applications an no longer authenticate using pam until > you install a specific pam service in /etc/pam.d for that application, e.g. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dovecot#PAM_Authentication > > I recall seeing something about this change coming earlier, but this was the > first update where something stopped working as a result. So add whatever > additional files you require to /etc/pam.d/ > > Thankfully the journal messages are good in pointing out the problem. I wish someone had submitted a bug about this in the first place as this should never have been relegated to thirdparty configuration performed only after reading the wiki. I did not realize there was no bug report for this... well, now there is one: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61852 -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] pambase in testing breaks email - *resolved*
On 1/5/19 3:46 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: > Requires adding files (if you haven't already got them) for both dovecot > and postfix and not relying on the old 'other' catchall pam file. > > This is described in more detail in the forum posts [1]. Hoever I'm as > yet not sure of the best postfix pam file. Perhaps others can comment. > > thank you. > > gene > > [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1824850 I wish someone had submitted bug reports about this in the first place, especially as in the case of dovecot this should never have been relegated to thirdparty configuration performed only after reading the wiki. I did not realize there was no bug report for this... well, now there is one: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61852 cyrus-sasl is covered by https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61712 -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
