Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2-1
Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2012, 11:38:07 schrieb Dominik Cermak: > With 3.2 I get the following messages while booting: > > [7.875726] watchdog: INTCAMT: cannot register miscdev on minor=130 > (err=-16). > [7.875821] watchdog: error registering /dev/watchdog (err=-16). > [7.875877] mei: unable to register watchdog device. > > I don't understand them, so I don't know if they are critical (haven't > noticed any problems yet). Now with linux-3.2-2 the messages are different: [7.790647] iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.07 [7.790730] iTCO_wdt: Found a QM57 TCO device (Version=2, TCOBASE=0x0460) [7.790747] iTCO_wdt: cannot register miscdev on minor=130 (err=-16) [7.790833] iTCO_wdt: probe of iTCO_wdt failed with error -16 I also found a thread in the forums about that: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=133083 Greetings Dominik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2-1
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 15:19:03 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.2 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges With 3.2 I get the following messages while booting: [7.875726] watchdog: INTCAMT: cannot register miscdev on minor=130 (err=-16). [7.875821] watchdog: error registering /dev/watchdog (err=-16). [7.875877] mei: unable to register watchdog device. I don't understand them, so I don't know if they are critical (haven't noticed any problems yet). Greetings Dominik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1-2
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011, 11:11:19 schrieb Paul Gideon Dann: > > The SSC on PCH message may be a debug message that was accidentally left in. > See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/80 Thanks for the link, looks like it is nothing to worry about. Dominik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1-2
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2011, 20:48:34 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > > Hi guys, > > please signoff 3.1 series for both arches. > > > > Upstream > > changes: > > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > > > Archlinux Changes: > > - $(uname -r) reports now the full kernel version > > - all external modules should be installed in > > > > /lib/modules/extramodules-3.1-ARCH now > > > > - disabled the old IDE subsystem, > > > > marked as deprecated for quite some time > > All users of the old ide hook in mkinitcpio > > should make the transition to pata hook now! > > > > - disabled the old ACPI /proc files, > > > > marked as deprecated for quite some time, > > everything is available in /sys > > Another release, mostly identical, but I fixed the depmod on kernel > update in nvidia, lirc, fcpcmcia and fcpci. All external module package > maintainers in AUR/community should look at the PKGBUILD and install > files for those to see what needs changing. I get the following message displayed right before the initscripts output: [2.117965] [drm:ironlake_update_pch_refclk] *ERROR* enabling SSC on PCH So far I have no problems, but this message seems important. Greetings Dominik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] Amarok fails to start after upgrade
Am Montag, den 27.06.2011, 20:41 +0200 schrieb Dominik Cermak: > Hi list, > after upgrading amarok today I get following error after trying to start > it: > > Amarok could not find any collection plugins. It is possible that Amarok > is installed under the wrong prefix, please fix your installation using: > $ cd /path/to/amarok/source-code/ > $ su -c "make uninstall" > $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`kde4-config --prefix` && su -c "make > install" > $ kbuildsycoca4 --noincremental > $ amarok > More information can be found in the README file. For further assistance > join us at #amarok on irc.freenode.net. > > Can anyone confirm this? Is this one considered a packaging bug? > > Greetings Dominik > It's already reported, sorry for the noise. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24908 Greetings Dominik
[arch-general] Amarok fails to start after upgrade
Hi list, after upgrading amarok today I get following error after trying to start it: Amarok could not find any collection plugins. It is possible that Amarok is installed under the wrong prefix, please fix your installation using: $ cd /path/to/amarok/source-code/ $ su -c "make uninstall" $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`kde4-config --prefix` && su -c "make install" $ kbuildsycoca4 --noincremental $ amarok More information can be found in the README file. For further assistance join us at #amarok on irc.freenode.net. Can anyone confirm this? Is this one considered a packaging bug? Greetings Dominik
Re: [arch-general] File conflict between pyqt & python2-qt
Am Freitag, den 06.05.2011, 21:45 +0300 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis: > Dominik Cermak wrote: > > > > there seems to be a file conflict between the two packages pyqt and > > python2-qt > > > > python2-qt is flagged out of date, so will this be solved once the > > package is updated or is this a bug? > > Its a bug and has already been reported, probably numerous times. Sorry, didn't search the bug tracker. Dominik
[arch-general] File conflict between pyqt & python2-qt
Hi list, there seems to be a file conflict between the two packages pyqt and python2-qt python2-qt is flagged out of date, so will this be solved once the package is updated or is this a bug? Greetings Dominik
