Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required
Thank you. It would be wonderful to be given reasons why. That would help me contribute in a more acceptable way moving forward, which is ultimately my personal goal. As such, time can be made to contribute, but time can't be given to explain why a moderative action was taken and how best to proceed in the future. So again, thank you. On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 8:28 PM Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em outubro 10, 2019 17:06 John Crist via arch-general escreveu: > > I've submitted `base-extras` to the AUR at > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/base-extras/ that contains the > > missing packages from `base` if someone REALLY wants it. > > > > > > > > And I have removed it. Following the same criteria, I've also removed > base-devel-meta. > > Regards, > Giancarlo Razzolini
[arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required
I've submitted `base-extras` to the AUR at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/base-extras/ that contains the missing packages from `base` if someone REALLY wants it.
Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required
Sounds good to me - do you have a suggested list of packages for base-extras or at least the list of what was pulled from the old base. Here's a diff of what was in the `base` group vs what is now in the `base` metapackage: $ comm -23 <(pacman -Sgq base | sort) <(expac -S "%D" base | tr -s " " "\n" | sort) cryptsetup device-mapper dhcpcd diffutils e2fsprogs inetutils jfsutils less linux linux-firmware logrotate lvm2 man-db man-pages mdadm nano netctl perl reiserfsprogs s-nail sysfsutils texinfo usbutils vi which xfsprogs
