Re: [arch-general] Latest testing/vim lacks symlink
Allan, Ruby 1.9 can be supported by VIM with a patch which I sent to Tobias months ago. I submitted to vim-devel, but without response. If anyone want this patch (vim support to ruby 1.9) I will be happy to send. On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Caină wrote: It also lacks ruby/python support Ruby support is deliberate as we are switching to ruby-1.9 and vim currently does not support it. No idea about python. Allan -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org
Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux Turkish Community @ 8th Free Software and Linux Festival
Hi Alper! Here in Brazil we are planning some like that for the FISL (Internation Forum of Open Software - Fórum Internacional de Software Livre) at June 24-27. Me and Hugo Doria are planning a lecture for that, and a Arch Linux user group, which have a space for all interested in our distro. If anyone want come to the event, please, let us know. *Sorry for my english... On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Alper KANAT tu...@raptiye.org wrote: Hey There Guys, We'd love to tell you about the latest news. We were at our stand all day long on the very first day of 8th Free Software and Linux Festival. What we've done? * We've burnt 20 i686 and 10 x86_64 CD images and created paper CD cases and gave everyone for free. (unfortunetly we were only capable of doing 40 of them and 30 cases since especially the cases were so expensive as they were the best quality available) * Made some installations for people who needs help * Printed nearly 30 Turkish installation manual and gave them with the CD's.. * Created a Arch Linux on Tap concept and made it available over the network! :) They is very cool though since anyone can put the plug in and install Arch with our very new and fresh Arch mirror (that have i686 and x86_64 packages for core, testing, community, extra). We'll continue to do introduce Arch Linux to visitors of the festival and help them to discover the beauty! We also have some pictures for you! :) Comments are welcome! http://www.flickr.com/photos/tunix/sets/72157616848517025/ -- Alper KANAT alperka...@raptiye.org -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] Keyboad in KDE locks up
I had that once. Only works after a manual reboot. On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Leonid Grinberg lgrinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Every once in a while -- not too frequently to be unusable, but certainly enough to be annoying -- the keyboard in KDE will simply lock up. Mouse will still work fine, and keyboard inputs that don't go through KDE -- switching to virtual terminals, resetting X via ctrl-alt-backspace still work (and, indeed, resetting X and logging back in is the only thing that fixes it). I can't see any real pattern as to when this happens -- programs that I basically always have running, though, are Pidgin, Firefox and keytouchd, as well as, obviously, plasma, etc. I am running the vanilla KDE 4.2 packages. Thanks in advance. This is really starting to become annoying. -- Leonid Grinberg -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
[arch-general] Ruby 1.9 upgrade and some more
Hi all, I'm doing a recompile of ruby for version 1.9. The needed are, in that order: - recompile ruby to version 1.9 (no change) - recompile vi and vim [applying the new patch's until version 108, arch today only apply 65] and applying a patch for make compatible with ruby1.9, it's done already. - move rails to community - removing rake and rubygems dependency - drop rake and rubygems from community to /dev/null [ruby now provides both] - verify which packages needed ruby and check compatibility -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] Ruby 1.9 upgrade and some more
I forgot, need recompile gvim too, obvious. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro kessiapinhe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a recompile of ruby for version 1.9. The needed are, in that order: - recompile ruby to version 1.9 (no change) - recompile vi and vim [applying the new patch's until version 108, arch today only apply 65] and applying a patch for make compatible with ruby1.9, it's done already. - move rails to community - removing rake and rubygems dependency - drop rake and rubygems from community to /dev/null [ruby now provides both] - verify which packages needed ruby and check compatibility -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] Ruby 1.9 upgrade and some more
I sent a mail right now for him, i'was clean up the build tree. Thanks for remember me. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis grb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:29:28PM -0300, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a recompile of ruby for version 1.9. The needed are, in that order: - recompile ruby to version 1.9 (no change) - recompile vi and vim [applying the new patch's until version 108, arch today only apply 65] and applying a patch for make compatible with ruby1.9, it's done already. - move rails to community - removing rake and rubygems dependency - drop rake and rubygems from community to /dev/null [ruby now provides both] - verify which packages needed ruby and check compatibility Did you get in touch with Tobias? See http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-February/010259.html regarding the vim family. -- Greg -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby
Hi, Maintain both version only depends of the developer, he'll maintain both? And it can broke any actual package? On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Ondřej Kučera ondrej.kuc...@centrum.cz wrote: Hi, We can alway have a ruby package and a ruby18 package at a later date, much like what will happen when I make python3 to python. Currently, it seems that nothing in the repos builds against ruby-1.9 so I (or whoever takes ruby over) can wait for that transition and provide a ruby19 package. Well maintaining both versions (at least for some time) would be an ideal solution, only I didn't dare to suggest it because I can imagine it takes quite some work. :-) Ondřej -- Cheers, Ondřej Kučera -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby
I think the problem isn't the Rails, but the Gems. Until I know, Rails 2.2.2 are compatible with Ruby 1.9. But some developers don't upgrade their gems code to work with Ruby 1.9.X, so, sometimes apps will break with a upgrade. But, it depends only from developers of used gems. -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ondřej Kučera ondrej.kuc...@centrum.cz wrote: Hi, Johannes Held wrote: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: I think very little in [extra] depends on ruby (needed plugins mainly), but the is quite a bit in [community]. I thought BaSh used to maintain some of them so perhaps he wants to be the maintainer. Anyway, the transition to the 1.9 series in not minor (as in plug-ins need ported) so if no-one volunteers, I will just continue with the 1.8 series until such a time as something in our repos really needs 1.9. Allan I did an update via abs right know and ran into some smaller problems: - Ruby 1.9.1 now includes rubygems, so I had to remove that first. - /usr/bin/rake wasn't owned by any package. - vim (compiled with --enable-rubyinterp) won't work (and compile) However, ruby 1.9.1 is really faster than old 1.8.7. I'll test further for some shortcomings with the new ruby. Does anyone know what the current state of Ruby on Rails versus Ruby 1.9.x is? Because I remember there were compatibility issues and I'm pretty sure there are Archers who use Ruby on Rails (even if only for example for development). It would be unfortunate to break it for them, even if Ruby itself is better in the version 1.9.x. Ondřej -- Cheers, Ondřej Kučera -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby
Hi, On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Ondřej Kučera ondrej.kuc...@centrum.cz wrote: Hi, cut True. But at the end of the day it goes down to works/doesn't work as a whole and as long as the gems used by Rails are broken, Rails are effectively broken too. :-( Ondřej -- Cheers, Ondřej Kučera True, but, it depends of the user. If he don't use any gem, it wont broke. So, we need decide if we'll provide a new package with many new features, or wait some time (how much?) to provide this package because some (how much?) users use a specific gem to code/run a Rails app. Finally, I maintain the rubygems package at community, so, when we decide which choise will be applyed, we need remove the rubygems package from community too. Thanks, -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
Amanai, The question: do you use any packages from community repo? On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Amanai ama...@freenet.de wrote: Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but it's available for i586 and x86_64. See here: http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/ Daniel I am using Opera! Moonlight works really great with Opera too. I just missing it in the Archlinux stable repo's extra. Daniel you maintain Mono, maybe you like to maintain moonlight ;) -- Kessia Pinheiro Student at Computer Science - UFBa Trainee with ProCaTI founds - DiSup/CPD - UFBa Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter User #389695 - [http://counter.li.org] http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
Re: [arch-general] INFO, Java SE 6 Update 12 Build 02
Yeah! I don't know if its only a coincidence, but we made the jre from the sources a week ago, also posting in Sun's bugtracker. So, i'm think if it had some influense (crazy thoughts)... =) On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Geoffroy Carrier geoffroy.carr...@koon.fr wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:19, Amanai ama...@freenet.de wrote: The earlier (unstable) build from Sun Java SE Update 12 Build 02 have now full 64 bit broswer support. Finally Sun have make it. VERY nice event :) I have exams this week. I'll do my job right after. -- Geoffroy Carrier -- Kessia Pinheiro Student at Computer Science - UFBa Trainee with ProCaTI founds - DiSup/CPD - UFBa Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter User #389695 - [http://counter.li.org] http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
[arch-general] Problems with snort package
Hi everyone, I did a snort instalation using the package from extra, but i got some problems. The package does not works after a fresh install. The problems are: - There are some problematic links with /usr/src/lib/snort_* - The conf /etc/snort/snort.conf doesn't load the rules, because the rules arent there! - The start script /etc/rc.d/snort doesn't start because the $SNORT_ARGS is blank. That should be some SNORT_OPTIONS and they are in /etc/conf.d/snort, but are never read. - The /etc/conf.d/snort is never used, and the security or incremental arguments like user, group or interface aren't used. So the user can edit it, but will never have efect. So, after that (and some more problems that i do not remember, I made another package [1], fixed all the problems and made some changes. [1] http://even.archlinux-br.org/things/arch/snort.tar.gz Thats all! -- Kessia Pinheiro Bacharelanda em Ciência da Computação - UFBa Linux Counter User #389695 - [http://counter.li.org] Colaboradora do Projeto Arch Linux Brasil http://even.archlinux-br.org
Re: [arch-general] Problems with snort package
Sorry, i forgot add a issue [1] in bugtracker. . . Someone add this bug, but solves with a patch. I do a new package. =) [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10775?string=snortproject=0search_name=type[0]=sev[0]=pri[0]=due[0]=reported[0]=cat[0]=status[0]=openpercent[0]=opened=dev=closed=duedatefrom=duedateto=changedfrom=changedto=openedfrom=openedto=closedfrom=closedto= On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Angel Velásquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Hi Kessia! our beloved brazilian hacker girl. I did a snort instalation using the package from extra, but i got some problems. The package does not works after a fresh install. The problems are: - There are some problematic links with /usr/src/lib/snort_* - The conf /etc/snort/snort.conf doesn't load the rules, because the rules arent there! - The start script /etc/rc.d/snort doesn't start because the $SNORT_ARGS is blank. That should be some SNORT_OPTIONS and they are in /etc/conf.d/snort, but are never read. - The /etc/conf.d/snort is never used, and the security or incremental arguments like user, group or interface aren't used. So the user can edit it, but will never have efect. So, after that (and some more problems that i do not remember, I made another package [1], fixed all the problems and made some changes. [1] http://even.archlinux-br.org/things/arch/snort.tar.gz Thats all! Good work!, Imho you should send an e-mail to Andreas Radke (who is the maintainer) to report the issues, also open a bug in the bugtracker (http://bugs.archlinux.org) and post something on the forum http://bbs.archlinux.org then an answer should arrive. Cheers! -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909 Arch Linux Trusted User -- Kessia Pinheiro Bacharelanda em Ciência da Computação - UFBa Linux Counter User #389695 - [http://counter.li.org] Colaboradora do Projeto Arch Linux Brasil http://even.archlinux-br.org
