Re: [arch-general] Gnome is Working But Missing Apps
I believe what you want is the eye of gnome application, a middleweight image viewer. sudo pacman -S eog Best regards Nicklas W Bjurman On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Leandro Inacio wrote: > Please, > > pacman -Sg gnome-extra > > after > > pacman -Si package_name | grep -i Description > > Lookup the package that you needs, some questions are answered with pacman > commands. > > And do what Ionut said. > > > -- > Leandro Inácio > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 13:21, Ray Kohler wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Carlos Williams >> wrote: >> > I have Gnome Desktop Environment up and running perfect on my Arch >> > x86_64 system but I elected to not install "gnome-extra" packages >> > because it installs too much junk I don't want and or need. My >> > question is I am missing two applications from Gnome and don't know >> > what they're called and or what to search for. >> > >> > 1st - I can't open any JPEG or PNG images because Gnome does not >> > appear to have the proper application to manage displaying those types >> > of files. Can someone tell me what the name of the package is Gnome >> > uses for default image viewing? I don't want Gimp for editing images, >> > just to plainly view them. >> >> I think this one is "eog". >> >
Re: [arch-general] Firefox 3.5.7 not support eh !??
If you go to wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox there is a link to the forum with the caption firebrand, go to the third page of the forum and copy the updated script and run it in sudo(when firefox is not running). This will rebrand your firefox completely to firefox. Best regards Nicklas W Bjurman On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Brendan Long wrote: > On 01/31/2010 10:25 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> On 02/01/2010 09:45 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >>> On 01/31/2010 10:31 PM, Alexander Lam wrote: [snip] >>> >> >> Eh. I cannot keep on switching the User Agent every time I start >> firefox. So about:config :D ;) >> > The about:config way will also make your Firefox-ing faster, since it > won't have to load the addon every time it starts. >
Re: [arch-general] Good press at distrowatch.com
I liked the Arch installer except I would liked to have a different partitioner as I find the current one's interface to be quite cumbersome in comparison to say the partitioner that is in the Debian installer. Otherwise the Archlinux installer is very simple in my opinion. Best regards Nicklas W Bjurman On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:17, Allan McRae wrote: >> Good thing you signed that message... it would be a shame if we did not >> know that "+1" was definitely from you. >> >> Allan >> > > +1 >
