Re: [arch-general] Mutt Compile-time Configuration
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:39:28AM +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote: > I think that the packager just didn’t see this addition and only bounced the > pkgver. There is an open ticket about this: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50445. This would be surprising, as the new compile-time option was explicitly given in the release announce mail. Does that mean the packager did not subscribe to the very low-traffic mutt announce list or did not read it before updating the package? However, the UPDATING file does not mention the new option. -- Thibaut signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:13:32PM +0200, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general wrote: > I mean, we don't even know all the people who contributed to the Linux > Kernel are (well,.. I suppose technically you can, but you know what I > mean). True, and take in account that Microsoft guys had contributed to the kernel mainly for virtualization. So maybe we should stop using Linux? -- Thibaut
