Re: [arch-general] [Archboot] Custom created Archboot ISO won't boot on qemu OVMF EFI
I'll look at it soon. This happens if package depends change in core. greetings tpowa 2016-07-17 7:23 GMT+02:00 Alive 4ever <alive4e...@live.com>: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:16:50AM +, Alive 4ever wrote: > > After 'having fun' with archboot, I finally got it working on both UEFI > > and BIOS. Just make sure that x86_64 and i686 archboot systemd container > > have proper package cache. This can be achieved by bind mounting host > > package cache '/var/cache/pacman/pkg' to chroot package cache. Also make > > sure that /tmp in which archboot-allinone.sh -g performed is large > > enough to hold image creation, at least 4GB. > > > > However, a very serious problem occured. The resulting Archboot dual iso > > doesn't properly contain all packages needed for installation. The most > > notable is 'libnftl'. 'systemd' (core) depends on iptables (core). > > 'iptables' can't be installed because 'libnftl' is missing (extra). This > > is serious problem that prevented archboot development for about two > > months. > > > > I know that 'archboot' only contains 'core' repository. As temporary > > solution, 'libnftl' should be added as 'SUPPORT_ADDITION' in > > archboot-svn.sh, so that users will be able to get a working > > installation by using only the 'archboot' image. > > > > I strongly suggest to move 'libnftl' to core repository to prevent this > > problem i.e. 'base' can't be installed without access to extra > repository. > > I mean 'libnftnl' library, which is also depends on 'libmnl'. > > These two packages (libnftnl and libmnl) should be moved to core > repository. > -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Linux 4.6 enters [testing]
Am 16.05.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Tomasz Przybył: > > > --- Treść przekazanej wiadomości --- > Temat:Re: [arch-dev-public] Linux 4.6 enters [testing] > Data: Mon, 16 May 2016 21:07:38 +0200 > Nadawca: Tomasz Przybył <fadem...@gmail.com> > Adresat: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development > <arch-dev-pub...@archlinux.org> > > > > W dniu 16.05.2016 o 20:58, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public pisze: >> Hi folks, >> >> New kernel is in [testing], >> >> Binary modules which are not building: >> >> -nvidia series (all of them) >> >> -tp_smapi >> >> Maintainers please find patches to fix them. >> >> Thanks. >> >> greetings >> >> tpowa >> >> > Hi, > > Disable CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION config option against > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/3/437 and external modules will be build fine. > > NVIDIA need additional patch > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FadeMind/archpkgbuilds/master/AUR/linux-r500v46-external-modules/nvidia-r500v46/nvidia-4.6.patch > > Reference: > https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/926824/linux/364-1-2-5-won-t-compile-against-latest-kernel-git-tree-patches-for-4-6-0-rc3-included-/1 > > > Regards > > Tomasz > > > External modules build fine, the maintainer just need to add the correct patches for 4.6 STACK_VALIDATION is not a problem it's fixed in linux-headers to allow module building. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Why did kernel packaging become slow?
Am 07.05.2016 um 14:09 schrieb Andreas Radke: > Am Sat, 7 May 2016 09:15:13 + > schrieb Abderrahman Najjar <abderrahman.naj...@gmail.com>: > >> The kernel package (linux) is constantly out of date, both in >> Testing & Core. >> >> Whenever a version is pushed in kernel.org, the previous stable will >> be still in testing. And then the (old) stable version gets pushed to >> core, and the next one in testing will be already old (because it's >> the latest stable). Such as the case right now (Core=4.5.1, >> testing=4.5.2. Stable on kernel.org=4.5.3) >> >> Is there a reason for such delay? > Simply because our main kernel pkg maintainer is busy with real life > and so somewhat late with packaging the releases. > > -Andy Thanks Andy, yes this is correct. Sorry folks sometimes real life catches you and that's more important. I'm sure all understand this. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Kernel NULL pointer and crash - raid bug in 4.1.6 - and fix
Am 03.09.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Genes Lists: > I (and others) have enocuntered a pretty nasty raid bug that crashes > the machine running current 4.1.x stable. It seems a commit is > available but not yet in 4.1.6. > > (commit 49895bcc7e566ba455eb2996607d6fbd3447ce16) > > Seems like it is in 4.2 tho. > > Not sure it's worth patching 4.1.6 with this if 4.2 is imminent - but > it may be - it kills the machine and has caused some file lossage. > > Bugzilla: > >Upstream: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103711 >Arch: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/46188 > > Tobias - what do you suggest best way to proceed - skip as 4.2 is out > or patch 4.1.6? > > Thanks > > gene/ Uploading 4.2 to testing now, so no need to patch 4.1.x. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux 4.0 in [testing]
Hi, just released 4.0 kernel to [testing] repository. - nvidia-304xx - nvidia-340xx - r8169 modules do not build. Please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux 3.19 in [testing]
Hi, just released 3.19 kernel to [testing] repository. - nvidia-304xx - virtualbox modules do not build. Please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] NFS server broke after reboot - *urgent* need help
Am 31.01.2015 um 23:19 schrieb Genes Lists: On 01/31/2015 05:09 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote: First, in case it's relevant: DON'T PANIC! Ha ha good advice ... :) Secondly, I mentioned journalctl -u, not systemctl. There may be relevant stuff in there that isn't mentioned by systemctl status (due to cutoff). yes I did look thru the logs - and posted one relevant one (nfsd) in the bug report. The rest are already covered by the systemctl status one and are not additive. Thanks for suggestion. Could it be, that all you suffer from issues are using NFS3 and not NFS4.x My simple setup just works fine with NFS4 without any hiccups. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux 3.17 in [testing]
Hi, just released 3.17 kernel to [testing] repository. Only acpi_call binary module did not build. Please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux 3.16 in [testing]
Hi, just released 3.16 kernel to [testing] repository. Only r8168 binary module did not build. Please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] linux 3.15.1-1 and blank screen on boot
Am 23.06.2014 15:07, schrieb Martti Kühne: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Eduardo Machado eduardo.mach...@gmail.com wrote: After the last kernel update, when the mahine is booting, i see some info on scrren, but when the frame buffer starts it became blank. But the system finish to boot, the monitor is on, and i can blindly log in. Logs can be searched using journalctl and likely grep. What gfx driver do you have in place? I'd be interested in those messages too, they're likely in the logs. cheers! mar77i https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40899 -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]
Am 22.06.2014 09:57, schrieb Andreas Radke: Am Sun, 22 Jun 2014 09:49:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org: But this shouldn't be necessary because nfs-server.service has: grep rpcbind /usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service Requires= network.target proc-fs-nfsd.mount After= network.target proc-fs-nfsd.mount rpcbind.target nfs-mountd.service So I assume some race condition or bug here though. -Andy Replacing rpcbind.target with rpcbind.service does fix it here. Not sure if this is the proper solution. This should be decided upstream. -Andy Fixed in rpcbind-0.2.1-4, which uses socket activation. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] dmraid package - continued upstream or to move to mdraid?
Am 24.11.2013 02:02, schrieb David C. Rankin: All, tpowa, As of approximately 8-12 months ago, I was under the impression that upstream dmraid would not continue and that dmraid functionality would move into mdraid. (maybe that was just an arch plan?) Early in the discussion on this list it was noted that not all existing dmraid chipset support was included in the mdraid package. quote On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote: Is there planned support for existing nvidia based dmraid arrays in Arch, I can only speak for myself, but to the best of my knowledge no Arch devs use dmraid, and upstream appears to be dead. Based on that I'd say the best choice would be to move away from dmraid if you can. snip -t /quote I am at the point where I need to rebuild an arch server and must decide whether to continue with dmraid or move to mdraid. Looking at the current dmraid package 10/30/13 by tpowa (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/dmraid/) dmraid is still in core. The redhat list makes no reference to dmraid not continuing, so I'm a bit confused about the earlier discussion. At this point is there any information to suggest that dmraid will go away? Also, anyone have negative experience with dmraid and grub2 or dmraid and systemd? Hi, I quote from my archboot FAQ: dmraid: The reason is there are so many different hardware components out there. At the moment 1.0.0rc16 is included, with latest fedora patchset, development has been stopped. mdadm supports some isw and ddf fakeraid chipsets. You need to try yourself what works best for you. mdadm does only support ISW and DDF devices up to now. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] arch install issues with 2013.09 iso vfat device
Am 17.09.2013 15:15, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jakub Klinkovský kuba.klinkov...@gmail.com
wrote:
vfat has a lot of reserved characters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename#Comparison_of_filename_limitations
Note the colon (':') in vi-1:050325-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.part, don't know
why
it couldn't write /mnt/usr/bin/vgrename.
Regards,
Jakub Klinkovský (Lahwaacz)
I had the same issue with the vi package when installing on ext2.
As for vfat. I have no idea why I can't install Arch on this filesystem.
Do not install arch / on vfat it will not work. It's too limited.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.11-1 in [testing], broken community modules
Hi, I built the kernel, now there are issues with following - community binary modules: virtualbox-modules Please find patches and fix those. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] kernel 3.11 and virtualbox kernel module
Am 02.09.2013 23:31, schrieb Genes Lists: Heads up - noew that 3.11 is out, there is a patch in upstream virtualbox which is not in vbox 4.2.16 that is necessary otherwise the kernel modules wont compile for 3.11 kernel. The file needing fixing is /usr/src/vboxguest-4.2.16/vboxsf/dirops.c I am happy to send the required patch if its needed. Gene/ Please send a link to the patch. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.10.2-1 in [testing], still broken community modules
Hi, I built the kernel, now there are issues with following - community binary modules: cdfs ndiswrapper open-vm-tools-modules Please find patches and fix those, 3.10 will move to [core] when signoff procedure is done. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] syslinux-4.06-2
Hi, please signoff syslinux-4.06-2 for the /usr/bin move. It will go direct to [core] repository, due to 5.01 sits in testing. Please download from here: https://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/syslinux/ thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [linux] 3.8.12 is a binary module breaker, time to get 3.9.1 into [core]
Hi guys, The 3.8.12 is a binary module breaker and cannot move to [core] as it is. I'll build and upload it, but not merge into [core]: https://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux Time to get 3.9.1 into [core]. Please test and signoff 3.9.1 real soon. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.8.11-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.8.11 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.9.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] 3.8.6 kernel compile fails with gcc 4.8
Am 08.04.2013 17:07, schrieb Damjan: On пон, 08 апр 2013 16:35:12 CEST, Allan McRae wrote: On 09/04/13 00:25, Damjan wrote: For various reasons I'm compiling my own kernels, but just now I have got this error while trying to update and compile 3.8.6. gcc is 4.8.0-1 arch is i686 How do I get preprocessed source? ... Can you repeat it? Yes, happens every time the same exact spot. Here's another run (but I've already tried several times) $ make make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'. CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/generated/compile.h make[3]: `arch/x86/realmode/rm/realmode.bin' is up to date. CHK kernel/config_data.h CC [M] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.o drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c: In function ‘e1000_xmit_frame’: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:5159:1: internal compiler error: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (30) } ^ Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See https://bugs.archlinux.org/ for instructions. make[5]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e] Error 2 make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel] Error 2 make[2]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 -- дамјан The kernel in core is already compiled with gcc 4.8.0. I had no issues. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] samba 3.6.x - samba 4.0.x migration
Am 09.04.2013 00:37, schrieb Karol Babioch: Hi, Am 27.03.2013 16:55, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: I'll release samba 4.0.x to testing. anything holding this one back to hit the official repository? Do we need an announcement or an install news during upgrade? I guess it wouldn't hurt as this is quite a big change ;). Best regards, Karol Babioch Upgrade news has been added to package. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] More infos on failing archboot ISOs with Kernel Panic on start
Am 19.03.2013 23:24, schrieb fredbezies: Some more infos. Only 32 bits versions seems to be working. I grabbed archlinux-2013.03-2-archboot-x86_64.iso, verified its checksum (which matches), and always I get : Failed to execute /init followed Kernel Panic - not syncing : init not found. And I can see it with both qemu and VirtualBox. Need to make another round of dual and x86_64 archboot ISOs ? Pretty strange, I reupload another one something is really messed up with the upload. Sorry for the issues, will fix it soon. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] More infos on failing archboot ISOs with Kernel Panic on start
Am 20.03.2013 08:34, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am 19.03.2013 23:24, schrieb fredbezies: Some more infos. Only 32 bits versions seems to be working. I grabbed archlinux-2013.03-2-archboot-x86_64.iso, verified its checksum (which matches), and always I get : Failed to execute /init followed Kernel Panic - not syncing : init not found. And I can see it with both qemu and VirtualBox. Need to make another round of dual and x86_64 archboot ISOs ? Pretty strange, I reupload another one something is really messed up with the upload. Sorry for the issues, will fix it soon. greetings tpowa Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now the same as on my system. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] More infos on failing archboot ISOs with Kernel Panic on start
Am 20.03.2013 17:24, schrieb fredbezies: 2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com: [...] Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now the same as on my system. All is ok. I was not able to test UEFI boot. But the only last bug I saw is that there is no working network on installed system. I have to do dhcpcd name-of-interface to get online :( Besides this, all is ok ! This is normal, archboot doesn't run any network service during bootup. Not a bug, it's a feature. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is last archboot iso completely busted ?
Am 18.03.2013 22:59, schrieb fredbezies: 2013/3/18 G. Schlisio g.schli...@dukun.de: errot : target not found : netctl. netctl still in testing is. to wait you have (or take netcfg). By the way, when using GPT partitions = cannot modify configuration files. I can only configure files in MBR partitions. It is not possible to deselect netctl at the moment. Please use cdrom mode at the moment. I'll look at GPT haven't tested this mode. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is last archboot iso completely busted ?
I'll look at GPT haven't tested this mode. It was the first partition mode I tested. Post installation configuration gave me empty files for /etc/hostname, /etc/vconsole.conf and so on. When trying to save them, I was told they were not existing. Have you used autoprepare mode? It mounts the vfat as / and this way it cannot work at all. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is last archboot iso completely busted ?
It's pretty simple to fix all UEFI partition mounting. At the beginning of the setup script: replace -_UEFISYS_MOUNTPOINT=/boot/efi +UEFISYS_MOUNTPOINT=/boot/efi and all should work as it should. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is last archboot iso completely busted ?
New archboot files released the -2 files don't suffer from the mentioned problems anymore. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.7.10-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.7.10 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.8.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] nmbd fails to start
Am 31.01.2013 09:18, schrieb Guillermo Leira: -Mensaje original- De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Martín Cigorraga Enviado el: jueves, 31 de enero de 2013 4:07 Para: General Discussion about Arch Linux Asunto: Re: [arch-general] nmbd fails to start On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote: On 01/30/13 16:37, martin kalcher wrote: Here is the bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33596 Try to update. The most recent package is: samba-3.6.11-4 Thanks! Same here, thanks, I had no clue why it stopped to work out of the blue... I've read the bug report, and tried the modifications suggested, but I still don't have access to network shares from my PC (although my samba shares are accessible from other systems). I does not seem to be critical for me, I has not worked for five or six days and I have just noticed, but I use cifs shares for my backups... Is there a fix for this issue? Thanks, Guillermo It should work with latest 3.6.12-1, if not please report back. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] nmbd fails to start
Am 31.01.2013 12:16, schrieb Guillermo Leira: -Mensaje original- De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Tobias Powalowski Enviado el: jueves, 31 de enero de 2013 11:31 Para: arch-general@archlinux.org Asunto: Re: [arch-general] nmbd fails to start Am 31.01.2013 09:18, schrieb Guillermo Leira: -Mensaje original- De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Martín Cigorraga Enviado el: jueves, 31 de enero de 2013 4:07 Para: General Discussion about Arch Linux Asunto: Re: [arch-general] nmbd fails to start On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote: On 01/30/13 16:37, martin kalcher wrote: Here is the bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33596 Try to update. The most recent package is: samba-3.6.11-4 Thanks! Same here, thanks, I had no clue why it stopped to work out of the blue... I've read the bug report, and tried the modifications suggested, but I still don't have access to network shares from my PC (although my samba shares are accessible from other systems). I does not seem to be critical for me, I has not worked for five or six days and I have just noticed, but I use cifs shares for my backups... Is there a fix for this issue? Thanks, Guillermo It should work with latest 3.6.12-1, if not please report back. It does not work, at least for me. Is it necessary to change anything in the configuration? I'm using the x-systemd.automount option in fstab: //nas/publico /mnt/nas cifs noauto,x-systemd.automount,credentials=/root/creds.pow,uid=gleira,gid=users,iocharset=utf8 0 0 And I have hundreds of lines like these in dmesg: [ 1099.716137] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13 [ 1103.720104] Status code returned 0xc06d NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE [ 1103.720114] CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 [ 1103.720237] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13 [ 1107.709261] Status code returned 0xc06d NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Regards, Guillermo Leira To be clear your nmbd, smbd are starting fine? What are the errors if it's not startin ok? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.6.11-1
Am 18.12.2012 14:47, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.6.11 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.7.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa anyone interested in 3.6.11? please signoff. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.6.11-1
Am 19.12.2012 04:20, schrieb Jesus Alvarez: Hello, I am getting a bad signature check for linux-headers-3.6.11-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig. I have downloaded both files three times to make sure it wasn't a bad transfer, but still a no go. Thanks, Jesus Alvarez On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote: Hi, Am 18.12.2012 14:47, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.6.11 series for both arches. Signoff for x86_64. Best regards, Karol Babioch Please retry, fixed the signatures. -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.6.11-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.6.11 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.7.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] mythtv issues with HDTV and MPG ac3 audio
Hi, Since upgrading to 0.26 series, i have serious issues with HD TV and DVB-S mpg conversion. I'm using latest git version of 0.26 from 121209. - HDTV looses audio complete if using high profile for conversion. - DVB-S mpg's are not convertable anymore with cutlists. The mpg's are not working to convert until I remove the ac3 audio stream manually with ffmpeg. With HDTV I don't get a working cutted recording. Do others observe such issues too? Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.7.0-1 enters [testing]
Hi guys, Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges -ndiswrapper does not build, maintainers please look for a patch. Please report any issues that arise. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.6.10-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.6.10 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.7 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.6.2-1 ready for [core]?
Hi guys, Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Please report any issues that stops moving this series to [core]. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.5.6-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.5.6 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.6.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.5.5-1
Am 03.10.2012 07:51, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.5.5 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.6.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa Rebuilding all binary modules now. Please give me at least one signoff for i686 and x86_64, for the kernel package. Thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.5.5-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.5.5 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.6.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] linux-3.5.x status
Am 23.08.2012 16:10, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core], - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3 - watchdogs are completely broken I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please shout out if this is a real problem. If you have any other showstopper please let me know. greetings tpowa Ok everything reported fixed. Please signoff and 3.5.3 will move to core. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.5.x status
Hi guys, 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core], - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3 - watchdogs are completely broken I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please shout out if this is a real problem. If you have any other showstopper please let me know. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.4.9-1
Am 15.08.2012 20:44, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.4.9 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.5.2 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa anyone for i686? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.4.9-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.4.9 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.5.2 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.4.8-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.4.8 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.5.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] New dual install iso -- Where the heck is arch-setup??
Am 04.08.2012 08:17, schrieb David C. Rankin: Guys, What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you through. Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were assembled and partitioned. Now, unless I'm completely missing something, we a back to a total manual install with archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall. I've looked at the basic setup wiki and the install guide wiki and I don't see the friendly install tool referenced anywhere. So am I missing it, or are we just back to a manual install? (guessing where packages are /usr/bin, /usr/sbin or /sbin. On archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall, /usr/sbin is not in the default path, so typing dhcpcd as instructed in the wiki -- does nothing... I really liked the old arch installer. It was a fairly brain-dead install that nicely walked you though the install process with minimal keystrokes and choices required. Is that installer on the archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall image? If so where? (This is an arch client vbox install if that makes any difference...) Use archboot if you need hand holding. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Testing archboot-2012.08-1-archboot-x86_64
Am 03.08.2012 07:49, schrieb Jeremiah Dodds: To sum up: I consistently needed to manually choose the networking setup step in order for a netcfg profile to be generated, it was consistently skipped over as a selected choice after the keyboard/console font step. fixed in git tree, thanks Using systemd seems to work, and netcg started automatically using the profile created during setup. Without systemd support, netcfg did not start automatically. fixed in git tree, thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] linux-3.5.0-1 enters [testing]
Am 23.07.2012 14:57, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Please report any issues that arise. Thanks. greetings tpowa There seem to be no serious regression, any objections if 3.5.0-2 move to [core] ? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [archboot] looking for 2012.08 beta testers
Hi, please drop me an answer if you are interest in testing the next archboot release. Thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.4.7-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.4.7 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.5 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] How do I should install and configure arch linux
Am 25.07.2012 21:22, schrieb brainwor...@lavabit.com: Hello, folks Due to recent changes in arch linux, I have some qustion about new process of installation and configuration of arch linux. I am really not computer geek, so I apologize if I express anything incorrectly. First. About absence of core images. When I just read about it, I thought why they did it. But then I realize that arch is rolling release system after all. This fact means periodical and quite frequent updates, which are impossible without Internet connection. So if you would like to install Linux on computer without Internet, choose OS with fixed release cycle - all the system packages (as well as applications) will be on that distribution. So I am glad that now there is one universal iso-image instead of six. Second. About absence of AIF. I really sorry about it. As I said I am not so geeky to install everything with closed eyes. AIF helped me a lot. It gives me tips what to do next and how to do it. Now, when burned CD finished loading, I just see prompt to enter commands and nothing else. But I just do not know what to do next. So if I do not have installation guide previously printed on paper, I just become consused what to do next. So, I really hope that to the moment when next iso snapshot will be released, AIF will be fixed and included in that release. But for the present I would like at least to have installation guide included in installation iso (with a note where this guide resides) in order to switch to it during installation. Third. About systemd. As I understand from installation guide on Wiki all the configuration now is made not in rc.conf but in several config files. I do not know yet whether it is good or bad. But in Wiki I can read the following: 1) instead of NETWORKING section I should specify hostname in /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts. Why should I duplicate information? The danger of need to duplicate information is that it have to be synchronized. 2) instead of LOCALIZATION section I should specify locale in /etc/locale.conf and /etc/locale.gen. Again why should I duplicate information? 3) instead of LOCALIZATION section I should specify timezone in /etc/timezone and /etc/localtime. And again the same question. Why? Besides, where should I specify my network connection settings? In what systemd-specific file? As I understand in ... rc.conf. And what about daemons? Where to specify them? Again in rc.conf? And now the main question. If new plan of reorganization of configuration files can not manage without rc.conf, why there is so need to split it? I hope you can make it clear, guys. There is archboot which still ships an up to date hand holding installer: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot New version will be released when changes on [core] will calm down. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.5.0-1 enters [testing]
Hi guys, Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Please report any issues that arise. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] claws-mail is it possible to see own posts to mailinglist?
Hi, I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own posts to mailinglists? I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown. Thunderbird does not have this issue. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail is it possible to see own posts to mailinglist?
Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own posts to mailinglists? I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown. Thunderbird does not have this issue. greetings tpowa You don't have a sent or all mail folder/tag ? Well yes I have a sent folder. EDIT: Maybe this is relevant http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php?title=Using_Claws_with_Gmail I used that guide and it does not work as it should with MLs. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail is it possible to see own posts to mailinglist?
When you send message to mailing list with gmail smtp, you don't receive a copy of your sent mail. It is the same as with webinterface. http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=6588 This is not true sending through webinterface works as tbird works. I skip inbox and put new label on MLs and this works just fine. So where is claws-mail doing something different? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail is it possible to see own posts to mailinglist?
Am 19.07.2012 16:40, schrieb Leonid Isaev: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:58:19 +0300 Vytautas Stankevičius brothe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own posts to mailinglists? I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown. Thunderbird does not have this issue. greetings tpowa You don't have a sent or all mail folder/tag ? Well yes I have a sent folder. EDIT: Maybe this is relevant http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php?title=Using_Claws_with_Gmail I used that guide and it does not work as it should with MLs. greetings tpowa When you send message to mailing list with gmail smtp, you don't receive a copy of your sent mail. It is the same as with webinterface. http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=6588 Ha... I can't even send a mail to myself with default GMail webinterface/settings. This works here without problems. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] About arch-install-scripts and new official iso.
Am Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:28:00 +0200 schrieb fredbezies fredbez...@gmail.com: Hello. I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very user-friendly. Any hope to see this embedded in a program, like good old arch/setup ? I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some users which are not ready for a so simplified installation tool. Archboot: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143541 It uses a working installer for quite everything. For complete systemd support next ISO would be better to use, I'm only waiting for core changes to calm down first. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-general] Time for new release?
Am 17.06.2012 22:27, schrieb Ionut Biru: On 06/17/2012 10:25 PM, Geoffroy PLANQUART wrote: Hi everybody, I'm currently on a school project and I run a dozen of virtual machines, all running Arch. I noticed that every time I set up a new VM, I have to manually run the `pacman-key --init' and `pacman-key --populate archlinux'. Wouldn't it be time to set up a new installation release? Thus new users wouldn't have to bother about pacman recent changes, and moreover the basic install would be kept simple, ready to use. Geoffroy Hello, It is time to release a new iso but right now, AIF installer is not in a good shape. Soonish we will have a call for help published and yo will know the current situation. Try this if you need fresh packages: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.8-1
Am 06.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe: On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa Just installed and rebooted x86_64, all seem to be good. anyone for i686? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.8-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [EOL] Support for fcpci and fcpcmcia will end with kernel 3.4.x series!
For those who want to already switch their machines, here are updated misdn kernel modules for 3.4.x: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/misdn/ Have fun. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [EOL] Support for fcpci and fcpcmcia will end with kernel 3.4.x series!
Hi community, today I got the message from Karsten Keil that latest capi20 support for passive isdn cards will be merged into kernel 3.5 series. This means there is no need to manually patch an old binary blob anymore and those 2 packages will be removed from the repositories. If you need capi20 support you have to switch to kernel misdn driver + misdnuser package. Have fun, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.7-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.3.7 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] linux-3.4.0-1 enters [testing]
Hi guys, Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges The x86_32 switch is not yet enabled. Please report any issues that arise. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm
Am 08.05.2012 17:53, schrieb Seblu: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote: Any thoughts on that? I was interested by your suggestion as slim user since 2 years. Consolekit integration (and my ugly workaround) is my only issue with it. So i took the time to test this light login manager, and my conclusion is : It's not light. There are dependencies to gtk3 and qt without any greeter installed. gtk greater needs gnome-common, kde greater needs kdelibs, so if I have to use kde or gnome i would look to kdm or gdm instead of a not so light lightdm. I don't think we can compare slim and lightdm ! I tested xdm (with xdm-arch-theme), it's light and have consolekit integration. Tobias has just released slim with consolekit integration and it works great (except for the omission of removing pam ck connector). Cheers, And done removed it from the pam file. Everything should now work and i can only confirm lightdm is not light at all! greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.3 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Config cleanup: - disabled comedi staging modules - disabled not needed GPIO modules - disabled W1 support - disabled charger and battery modules - disabled snd_soc module - disabled regulator modules - disabled SPI support Fixed Bugs and feature requests: - New default 'ondemand' cpufreq govenor #28778 - added mtd header files #29076 - more I can't remember ;) greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.14-1
Am 04.04.2012 08:59, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.14 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa bump anyone? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.14-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.14 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.13-1
Am 24.03.2012 09:45, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.13 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa anyone i686? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.13-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.13 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.12-1
Am 19.03.2012 21:17, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.12 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa bump anyone? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2.12-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.2.12 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel config changes in testing
Keshav i'll sure not forget that. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] broken PKGDEST?
I'm not sure what you want to do... Are you trying to release to a architecture that isn't specified in the PKGBUILD's arch array? Or does commitpkg fail to upload an architecture you actually specified? Just to be sure, commitpkg currently behaves as follows: 1. Iterates over all architectures that you specified in your PKGBUILD (unless you use $commit_arch). 2. Searches for package files for each of these architectures (and it looks in $PKGDEST if that is used). If it cannot find a package file for one architecture, it displays something like Skipping $_pkgname-$fullver-$_arch: failed to locate package file and skips that architecture. 3. Searches for signature files, bails out if one of them cannot be found or is invalid. 4. archreleases to all remaining architectures. 5. Uploads package and signature files. If it doesn't behave like that for you, you should probably file a devtools bug. If it behaves like that and you need another feature, file a feature request :) All worked fine till last devtools update I think. Everything is in the directory so there is no reason for testingpkg to bail out that the arch is not there. I had to call each chroot to get everything done, before it was just working from one chroot for both arches. This is imho a bug somewhere. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] broken PKGDEST?
i don't quite understand your workflow. can you describe them in simple steps and point where is failing and how? - Build kernel for x86_86, - chroot into i686 build i686 kernel - leave chroot - testingpkg in trunk does only upload x86_64 and not both. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] broken PKGDEST?
Am 14.02.2012 15:58, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: i don't quite understand your workflow. can you describe them in simple steps and point where is failing and how? ok I think we come a bit closer, Problem is that both chroots use different PKGDEST, the devtools before didn't use PKGDEST and just checked for the symlinks which are working. Can we change that back, do I need to change my config? Thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] broken PKGDEST?
Am 14.02.2012 16:07, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:58:31PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: i don't quite understand your workflow. can you describe them in simple steps and point where is failing and how? - Build kernel for x86_86, - chroot into i686 build i686 kernel - leave chroot - testingpkg in trunk does only upload x86_64 and not both. Are you sure, you put both package files into the right location (trunk or $PKGDEST, if used)? Does commitpkg display the Skipping [...]: failed to locate package file warning? There were two changes since the last devtools release that might have caused that [1], [2]. We probably need more details to figure out what's going wrong here, though. [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=b763788b [2] http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=06a681ca Definitly [1] causes this, because the symlinks would work but PKGDEST is for both chroots different. -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Don't Panic Fresh Install
Archboot needs 320 MB RAM to run. Imho most systems ourdays have this amount of memory. -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1.9-2
Hi guys, please signoff 3.1.9 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ - includes fix against correct libarchive This will move to [core] directly, because 3.2.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] LTS bumps to 3.0.x series
Hi guys, New LTS kernel is in testing: - changed package name to linux-lts - config synced with our last recent 3.0.x - dropped nouveau-drm-lts it's now in the kernel - kernel name changed: vmlinuz-linux-lts - initramfs names changed: initramfs-linux-lts.img All users should to adopt those changes to their bootloaders. Compat symlinks will be created to old names on upgrade. Please try it and give signoffs. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] LTS bumps to 3.0.x series
Hi guys, New LTS kernel is in testing: - changed package name to linux-lts - config synced with our last recent 3.0.x - dropped nouveau-drm-lts it's now in the kernel - kernel name changed: vmlinuz-linux-lts - initramfs names changed: initramfs-linux-lts.img All users should to adopt those changes to their bootloaders. Compat symlinks will be created to old names on upgrade. Please try it and give signoffs. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1.9-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.1.9 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.2.1 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1.8-1
Am 07.01.2012 10:08, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 3.1.8 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.2.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa anyone i686? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1.8-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.1.8 series for both arches. package is not in testing, please grab it from here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/ This will move to [core] directly, because 3.2.0 is in [testing]. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2-1
Am 06.01.2012 02:58, schrieb Jonathan Vasquez: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 3.2 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org You might want to hold off on that sign off. There is a Regression Bug affecting Intel users in the final source of 3.2 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTAzNzk We are not affected by this we don't enable iommu by default. You need to activate it with your posted link. intel_iommu=on So no issue for arch users. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.2-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.2 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] 2011.11-1 archboot 2k11-R7 ISO hybrid image released
Hi Arch community, Arch Linux (archboot creation tool) 2011.11-1, 2k11-R7 has been released. To avoid confusion, this is not an official arch linux iso release! Homepage and for more information on archboot: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot Forum: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130747 Summary: - Plain bugfix release. Hybrid image file and torrent is provided, which include i686 and x86_64 core repository. Please check md5sum before using it. Hybrid image file is a standard CD-burnable image and also a raw disk image. - Can be burned to CD(RW) media using most CD-burning utilities. - Can be raw-written to a drive using 'dd' or similar utilities. This method is intended for use with USB thumb drives. Please get it from your favorite arch linux mirror: - https://downloads.archlinux.de/iso/archboot/2011.11/ - yourmirror/iso/archboot/2011.11/ Have fun, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.48-1
Latest LTS kernel is in testing, Attention: - This version uses the /lib/modules/extramodules-2.6.32-lts for self compiled modules - uname -r now reports the real kernel version, like the 3.x series does please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.1.1-1
Hi guys, please signoff 3.1 series for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.47-1
Latest LTS kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
[arch-general] [signoff] gettext-0.18.1.1-4
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] cracklib-2.8.18-2
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] findutils-4.4.2-4
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] gawk-4.0.0-2
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] groff-1.21-2
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] hdparm-9.37-2
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] isdn4k-utils-3.2p1-7
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] iputils-20101006-2
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] [signoff] librpcsecgss-0.19-7
Hi, signed rebuild, please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
