Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-05 Thread Thomas Bächler

James Rayner schrieb:

There's some vague support, though I have no idea how well/if it still
works. Nor is it documented well.

btw, I've been meaning to contact you to work out some way to make
autowifi and netcfg work well together.


Haha, I have a very good idea on how to do it, but not the time to 
implement it right now.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-04 Thread James Rayner
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:

 I collected it together from several (old) HOWTOs back in 2001 and there's a
 wiki page on Arch (originally written by your's truly) - sad that netcfg
 doesn't include support (or does it?).


There's some vague support, though I have no idea how well/if it still
works. Nor is it documented well.

btw, I've been meaning to contact you to work out some way to make
autowifi and netcfg work well together.

James


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler

Damjan Georgievski schrieb:

Now,
rp-pppoe's /etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so and ppp-2.4.4's
/usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4/rp-pppoe.so are doing the same thing, only the
rp-pppoe version should be a bit newer and better. I dont have a clear
overview of what the differences are (the ppp one is an older fork of
the rp-pppoe version), but I could make a diff and check for obvious
things if needed.


That's what I thought. My impression was that the ppp project is mostly 
dead, but its sources were imported into a git[1] last year and there 
was active development. Nothing was ever released though.


Anyway, putting a plugin into /etc/ is stupid regardless of why it is 
being done.


[1] http://git.ozlabs.org/?p=ppp.git;a=summary



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-02 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Thomas Bächler wrote:
 Allan McRae schrieb:
 For example:
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt

 Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.


 rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so

 That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in
 /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION and the ppp package already contains the
 rp-pppoe plugin. Why does rp-pppoe install it again? Why do we even
 need rp-pppoe?

There are an old open ticket for this:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13876  FS#13876 - [rp-pppoe] package: .so
file in /etc

-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Thomas Bächler

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi schrieb:

Pierre Schmitz wrote:

* Only extract files from /opt /lib /sbin /bin /usr/lib /usr/sbin /usr/bin
  

This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt


Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Allan McRae

Thomas Bächler wrote:

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi schrieb:

Pierre Schmitz wrote:
* Only extract files from /opt /lib /sbin /bin /usr/lib /usr/sbin 
/usr/bin
  

This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt


Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.



rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so






Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Thomas Bächler

Allan McRae schrieb:

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt


Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.



rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so


That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION 
and the ppp package already contains the rp-pppoe plugin. Why does 
rp-pppoe install it again? Why do we even need rp-pppoe?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 01 Jul 2009 14:32 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
 Allan McRae schrieb:
 For example:
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
 
 Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.
 
 
 rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so
 
 That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in
 /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION and the ppp package already contains the
 rp-pppoe plugin. Why does rp-pppoe install it again? Why do we even
 need rp-pppoe?

Hahha.
Maybe because of this:

http://www.samba.org/ppp/features.html
 Some features of ppp include

 * works sometimes

`man rp-pppoe`
 My design goals for this PPPoE client were as follows, in descending
 order of importance:

 o  It must work.

There's no documentation about pppoe in ppp either.
rp-pppoe helps me make my ADSL connection easily.



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 01 Jul 2009 09:48 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:
  Allan McRae schrieb:
 
  For example:
  http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
 
  Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.
 
 
  rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so
 
  That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION and
  the ppp package already contains the rp-pppoe plugin. Why does rp-pppoe
  install it again? Why do we even need rp-pppoe?
 
 Good question - does anyone actually use it?

http://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics
Eh. 72% of pkgstats users do.



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-01 Thread Allan McRae

Loui Chang wrote:

On Wed 01 Jul 2009 09:48 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
  

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:


Allan McRae schrieb:
  

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt


Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of.

  

rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so


That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION and
the ppp package already contains the rp-pppoe plugin. Why does rp-pppoe
install it again? Why do we even need rp-pppoe?
  

Good question - does anyone actually use it?



http://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics
Eh. 72% of pkgstats users do.
  


No, 28% know they don't want it even though it is in base.  Slightly 
different...


Allan





Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-06-28 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
 * Only extract files from /opt /lib /sbin /bin /usr/lib /usr/sbin /usr/bin
   
This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/extra.badfhs.txt
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/community.badfhs.txt


-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sunday 28 June 2009 19:25:08 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
 This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

 For example:
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/extra.badfhs.txt
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/community.badfhs.txt

Sure, but those packages are just broken. You cannot put binaries into 
/usr/share or even /etc.

Doesn't namcap catch those? If not it should be implemented.

-- 

Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-06-28 Thread Allan McRae

Pierre Schmitz wrote:

On Sunday 28 June 2009 19:25:08 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
  

This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

For example:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/extra.badfhs.txt
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/community.badfhs.txt



Sure, but those packages are just broken. You cannot put binaries into 
/usr/share or even /etc.


Doesn't namcap catch those? If not it should be implemented.
  


The current namcap definitely does not.  I haven't checked in git.  A 
feature request probably needs files.


Everything with a binary in /usr/share needs a bug report filed also.

Allan






Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-06-28 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Allan McRae wrote:
 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
 On Sunday 28 June 2009 19:25:08 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
  
 This will be omit some ELF files that are outside these directories:

 For example:
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/extra.badfhs.txt
 http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/community.badfhs.txt
 

 Sure, but those packages are just broken. You cannot put binaries
 into /usr/share or even /etc.
Absolutelly, yes.

 Doesn't namcap catch those? If not it should be implemented.
   

 The current namcap definitely does not.  I haven't checked in git.  A
 feature request probably needs files.
OK.

 Everything with a binary in /usr/share needs a bug report filed also.

 Allan

OK, so I will start opening one bug report for each pkg don't complaint
about this.


-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D



Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-06-24 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
 Hi,

 I just got an idea which might be worth to think about. Namcap is quite 
 useful 
 but due to its limitation of only seeing a certain pkg file at a time it 
 cannot answer all questions.

 The idea is to create a database (similar to the file list we already create) 
 which includes lists of files and to which they are linked. 
snip

Hi,

Some times ago I sended to the list this:

http://github.com/djgera/pkgdyn

For the database output and output usable data:
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn
http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.the-BIG-dependency-family.sortbynrdeps.txt

-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D