Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.5.28-1

2010-01-12 Thread Evangelos Foutras

On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:

I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.


I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with Failed to execute 
/init like last time (http://i.imgur.com/h6xDu.png).


The mkinicpio revision I tried was 54fd032, along with latest 
mkinitcpio-busybox/trunk. The command used to generate the initramfs 
image was `./mkinitcpio -g /boot/kernel26.img' from within the cloned 
Git repository (switched to the kill-klibc branch).


Let me know if I can help with further testing.


Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.5.28-1

2010-01-12 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
 On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:
 I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
 a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
 keep you posted.
 
 I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with Failed to execute
 /init like last time (http://i.imgur.com/h6xDu.png).
 
 The mkinicpio revision I tried was 54fd032, along with latest
 mkinitcpio-busybox/trunk. The command used to generate the initramfs
 image was `./mkinitcpio -g /boot/kernel26.img' from within the cloned
 Git repository (switched to the kill-klibc branch).
 
 Let me know if I can help with further testing.
 

Okay, that is weird, I guess I will have to try myself this week, when I
get to it.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature