Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install. I second that. I have met someone who just can't easily install ArchLinux because his network card is supported only since the 2.6.33 kernel.
Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
On Sat, 08 May 2010 11:50:27 +0200 Mathieu Pasquet mathieu...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install. I second that. I have met someone who just can't easily install ArchLinux because his network card is supported only since the 2.6.33 kernel. you quoted the wrong part, that's not what i said. Dieter
Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:53:35PM -0400, Keith Hinton wrote: Hi all. I remember way back when Aaron G posted about how Arches goal would be to release every four months or so to keep up with regular kernel releases and frequent ISO images. However, I remember the last official Iso was in August of 2009. I am not saying that that is bad or anything. I am curious why there hasn't been a release since that time period? I never figured that out. I did send an email to our fine Arch Linux leader using a GMail address-and am curious if that address just isn't checked? I did send Aaron some other interesting emails of late as well. But I haven't received anything-though being a leader of a project such as Arch Linux must take up a lot of time. Take care! Regards, --Keith Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install.
Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:42:39 +0300 Nick Stepa hired...@gmail.com wrote: Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install. updated images are good for support of new hardware, filesystems, .. Dieter
[arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
Hi all. I remember way back when Aaron G posted about how Arches goal would be to release every four months or so to keep up with regular kernel releases and frequent ISO images. However, I remember the last official Iso was in August of 2009. I am not saying that that is bad or anything. I am curious why there hasn't been a release since that time period? I never figured that out. I did send an email to our fine Arch Linux leader using a GMail address-and am curious if that address just isn't checked? I did send Aaron some other interesting emails of late as well. But I haven't received anything-though being a leader of a project such as Arch Linux must take up a lot of time. Take care! Regards, --Keith
Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule
Am Freitag 07 Mai 2010 schrieb Keith Hinton: Hi all. I remember way back when Aaron G posted about how Arches goal would be to release every four months or so to keep up with regular kernel releases and frequent ISO images. However, I remember the last official Iso was in August of 2009. I am not saying that that is bad or anything. I am curious why there hasn't been a release since that time period? I never figured that out. I did send an email to our fine Arch Linux leader using a GMail address-and am curious if that address just isn't checked? I did send Aaron some other interesting emails of late as well. But I haven't received anything-though being a leader of a project such as Arch Linux must take up a lot of time. Take care! Regards, --Keith There are test images (release cycle approx. 2 weeks): http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95503 There is archboot (release cylce approx. a month - 6 weeks): http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=94687 and all work probably fine. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
