[arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Guillermo Leira
  WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
 
 
  Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
 
  Allan
 
  Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
 
 and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support

Hi,

How can I know if I still need HAL?

Best regards,

Guillermo Leira





Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Matthew Monaco

On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:

WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?



Not for X. You may still need it for other things...

Allan


Most notabaly KDE and Thunar


and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support


Hi,

How can I know if I still need HAL?

Best regards,

Guillermo Leira






After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Allan McRae

On 21/06/10 20:35, Guillermo Leira wrote:

WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?



Not for X. You may still need it for other things...

Allan


Most notabaly KDE and Thunar


and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support


Hi,

How can I know if I still need HAL?



run /etc/rc.d/hal stop and remove it from your DAEMONS array.  If 
stuff breaks, you needed it.


Allan


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Ananda Samaddar
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:

   WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
  
  
   Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
  
   Allan
  
   Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
  
  and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys
  support
 
 Hi,
 
 How can I know if I still need HAL?
 
 Best regards,
 
 Guillermo Leira
 
 
 

You still need it if you're using XFCE.

Ananda


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread PT M.
$ pacman -Qi hal
Name   : hal
Version: 0.5.14-4
.
Required By: gnome-vfs  vlc
.

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.ukwrote:

 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
 Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:

WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
   
   
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
   
Allan
   
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
  
   and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys
   support
 
  Hi,
 
  How can I know if I still need HAL?
 
  Best regards,
 
  Guillermo Leira
 
 
 

 You still need it if you're using XFCE.

 Ananda




-- 
Arch Linuxer, Pythoner, Geek
-- Blog: http://apt-blog.net


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:46:13AM -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
 How can I know if I still need HAL?
 [...]
 After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt

... which will, however, only work if hal hasn't been installed
explicitly and will also disregard optdeps.

If you're not sure whether to remove hal or net, it's best to check
packages for hal optdeps and disable hal for a while (remove it from the
DAEMONS line in your /etc/rc.conf). If everything still works as
expected you can most likely remove it.


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Gmail
Im not 100% sure if KDE will work whit out hall, but KDE doesent use hal 
directly instead it uses the Solid framework of KDE. Solid isint dependant of 
one spesific bacend, but its like phonon so you can have multiple differend 
back 
ends whit it. i do not have any Idea of the state of differend backebnd, mayby 
some one whit more knowelege could provide additional information.


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Guillermo Leira
  How can I know if I still need HAL?
 
 
 run /etc/rc.d/hal stop and remove it from your DAEMONS array.  If
 stuff breaks, you needed it.
 
 Allan

Thank you very much to all. :-)

I'll have to mix all the answers: I have systems with XFCE and GNOME, physical 
and virtual... I'll check dependencies and I'll also try to remove hal from 
daemons array.

Best Regards,

Guillermo Leira




Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.ukwrote:

 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
 Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:

WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
   
   
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
   
Allan
   
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
  
   and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys
   support
 
  Hi,
 
  How can I know if I still need HAL?
 
  Best regards,
 
  Guillermo Leira
 
 
 

 You still need it if you're using XFCE.

 Ananda



that's because Thunar and Exo still use hal


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Matthew Monaco wrote:
 On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
 Hi,

 How can I know if I still need HAL?

 Best regards,

 Guillermo Leira
 
 After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
 
According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server !??? Some packages
are missing a dep here, I think...

Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Do I need HAL?

2010-06-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:21:39PM +0200, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
  After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
  
   According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server !??? Some packages
 are missing a dep here, I think...

That's correct. Only few packages actually depend on xorg-server
(blackbox, enter, grass, hacburn, lwm, nvidia-utils, perl-x11-protocol,
windowlab and xkbsel). As a workaround you can either mark xorg-server
as installed explicitly by uninstalling/reinstalling the package or by
using `pacman -D --asexplicit` (the latter only works with
pacman=3.4.0) or create a meta package with xorg-server as dependency.