[arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all Btw, shouldn't his account be removed? greetings, -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On 02/15/2011 04:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all Btw, shouldn't his account be removed? greetings, i'm not going to deactivate his account until he disown all the packages. i'm not sure if archweb supports it, but it would be cool to automatically disown all the account packages when deactivating. I have to talk with Dan about this. -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . He own a lot of package. I hope too TUs will adopt them, and they will not fall in AUR. I applaud his work. Good road! -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . He own a lot of package. I hope too TUs will adopt them, and they will not fall in AUR. I applaud his work. Good road! -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net I will grab a bunch of these :) -Thomas S Hatch
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
Am 15.02.2011 15:59, schrieb Jelle van der Waa: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all Btw, shouldn't his account be removed? greetings, Hm, he is still listed as developer in the list http://www.archlinux.org/developers/ so he in theory is still allowed to maintain packages in [community]. Maybe he should drop a note here. Regards Stefan
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
2011/2/15 Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de: Am 15.02.2011 15:59, schrieb Jelle van der Waa: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all Btw, shouldn't his account be removed? greetings, Hm, he is still listed as developer in the list http://www.archlinux.org/developers/ so he in theory is still allowed to maintain packages in [community]. Maybe he should drop a note here. Regards Stefan Ok Stefan, Ghost resigned, 'cause he wasn't much free time, I think is kinda annoying disturb him asking for more explanations. I think the point in discussion is, the fact that archweb should drop the packages of a Dev/TU at the moment to move it to 'fellows' section right?, I will try to code a patch, if Dan doesn't make it first :P. Cheers -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On 2011/2/15 Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all I'd like to adopt scribus, but the Web interface seems to answer randomly at my clicks. -- Rémy.
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On 02/15/2011 10:35 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: On 2011/2/15 Jelle van der Waaje...@vdwaa.nl wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all I'd like to adopt scribus, but the Web interface seems to answer randomly at my clicks. caching... -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:23 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 02/15/2011 04:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to [unsupported] . Here is a link with all his packages, i already adopted some but he is also still listed as maintainer there. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=arch=repo=q=maintainer=dgriffithslast_update=flagged=limit=all Btw, shouldn't his account be removed? greetings, i'm not going to deactivate his account until he disown all the packages. i'm not sure if archweb supports it, but it would be cool to automatically disown all the account packages when deactivating. I have to talk with Dan about this. Ok np, Btw i want to make clear that I didn't start this thread to insult or make Ghost look bad. I wanted to let other TU's adopt some of his packages so they are kept up to date. -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
