Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Bruno Paganiwrote: > No problem here, with HD4600 on one and 945GM on another one. ;) If you check Xorg's bugtracker you'll find at least three serious regressions for 945GM since 4.3. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92879
[arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
Hi everyone, I just saw that 4.3.3-2 hit stable. There are still open bugs, one of them critical, about the 4.3 series on the bug tracker. I heard of a lot of issues around this kernel on the dev-public mailing list. Does anyone have problems with this update? Also, does anyone have problems using Intel graphics? Thanks, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
> Does anyone have problems with this update? having no problems so far > Also, does anyone have problems using Intel graphics? no problems either. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
Hi, Le 4 janvier 2016 11:32:31 GMT+01:00, Bennett Piatera écrit : >Hi everyone, >I just saw that 4.3.3-2 hit stable. > >There are still open bugs, one of them critical, about the 4.3 series >on >the bug tracker. Where ? I couldn’t find any. The only critical bug I was aware of is about old Intel GFX, but it has been solved in 4.3.3-2. >I heard of a lot of issues around this kernel on the dev-public mailing >list. Does anyone have problems with this update? >Also, does anyone have problems using Intel graphics? No problem here, with HD4600 on one and 945GM on another one. ;) Bruno
Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
> Where ? I couldn’t find any. The only critical bug I was aware of is > about old Intel GFX, but it has been solved in 4.3.3-2. Simple, maybe naive search [0]. But you are right, I misread - there is no critical bug left. > No problem here, with HD4600 on one and 945GM on another one. ;) Thanks, and thanks for the other reply. I'll go ahead and upgrade then :) Merci beaucoup! Cheers, Bennett [0]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=4.3=1%5B%5D=%5B%5D=%5B%5D=%5B%5D=%5B%5D=%5B%5D=%5B%5D=open%5B%5D=index -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Bruno Paganiwrote: > Hi, > > Le 4 janvier 2016 11:32:31 GMT+01:00, Bennett Piater > a écrit : > >Hi everyone, > >I just saw that 4.3.3-2 hit stable. > > > >There are still open bugs, one of them critical, about the 4.3 series > >on > >the bug tracker. > > Where ? I couldn’t find any. The only critical bug I was aware of is about > old Intel GFX, but it has been solved in 4.3.3-2. > > >I heard of a lot of issues around this kernel on the dev-public mailing > >list. Does anyone have problems with this update? > >Also, does anyone have problems using Intel graphics? > > No problem here, with HD4600 on one and 945GM on another one. ;) > > Bruno > 4.3.3-2 just crashes with my NVIDIA GT620M. The good news is the problem is fixed in kernel.git. The bad news is that Arch's stock kernel does not include the patch. There are more details in https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47593. Yen Chi Hsuan
Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?
Nope, everything works flawlessly on T410 including Intel graphics. On 01/04/2016 11:32 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Hi everyone, > I just saw that 4.3.3-2 hit stable. > > There are still open bugs, one of them critical, about the 4.3 series on > the bug tracker. > > I heard of a lot of issues around this kernel on the dev-public mailing > list. Does anyone have problems with this update? > Also, does anyone have problems using Intel graphics? > > Thanks, > Bennett >