Re: [arch-general] Kernel bug #60539
On Tuesday 30 July 2013 18:04:44 Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote: > The fix mentioned in bugzilla is in the 3.10.3 changelog[1]. Why don't > you give it a try? > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.3 > Commit f8ee0e2e9db4d11d3b6593d9e2fba464caa0ff0c Fix is in commit 94a335dba34ff47cad3d6d0c29b452d43a1be3c8, not f8ee0e2e9db4d11d3b6593d9e2fba464caa0ff0c. It's not made it into 3.10.3, and as far as I know, not into 3.10.4 either (judging by this: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.4). (In any case, I downgraded from 3.10.3, that's where I encountered the issue, so it's definitely not fixed there). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] Kernel bug #60539
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 22:49 +0300, Josh Liberty wrote: > Hi people, > > I've just had to downgrade my kernel back to 3.9.9 because of this bug: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60530 > Does anyone know when one may expect the fix to arrive at the stable kernel > builds? > > - Josh The fix mentioned in bugzilla is in the 3.10.3 changelog[1]. Why don't you give it a try? [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.3 Commit f8ee0e2e9db4d11d3b6593d9e2fba464caa0ff0c
[arch-general] Kernel bug #60539
Hi people, I've just had to downgrade my kernel back to 3.9.9 because of this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60530 Does anyone know when one may expect the fix to arrive at the stable kernel builds? - Josh signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
