Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread Attila
On Dienstag, 28. Juli 2009 23:08 Thomas Bächler wrote:

> Given the popularity of kdemod, it is sad that they can't seem to keep
> up with Arch's development.

I think the problem is more kdemod3 because the packages were built with the
older gcc and if they really want to rebuilt them than this could be a very
hard work. So from my view using the libjpeg6 from aur would be the best
compromise.

See you, Attila



Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread David Rosenstrauch

Daenyth Blank wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:48, David Rosenstrauch wrote:

Better to install libjpeg6 from aur.  It's generally a bad idea to manually
install system files.  You should let pacman do that.

DR


And best to actually _fix_ the issue: recompile the software against libjpeg7


Certainly!  But until the maintainer gets around to doing that, this 
would be the appropriate band-aid.


DR


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:48, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Better to install libjpeg6 from aur.  It's generally a bad idea to manually
> install system files.  You should let pacman do that.
>
> DR

And best to actually _fix_ the issue: recompile the software against libjpeg7


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread David Rosenstrauch

José M. Prieto wrote:

2009/7/28 David C. Rankin :

Up until this past week kdemod3 and kde4-unstable had lived
side-by-side quite harmoniously. However, now kcontol in kdemod3
will not run until the following link is created:

ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62


I also use kdemod-legacy on one computer. As the symlink doesn't work
 I simply untarred ibjpeg.so.62 from the old libjpeg pakage.


Better to install libjpeg6 from aur.  It's generally a bad idea to 
manually install system files.  You should let pacman do that.


DR


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread David Rosenstrauch

Thomas Bächler wrote:

Eric Bélanger schrieb:
report that to Chakra. Looks like kdemod3 needs to be rebuilt against 
libjpeg 7.




Reports about libjpeg+kdemod breakage have been coming in for a while. 
The SONAME bump was announced on arch-dev-public, then packages went to 
testing a week later, then the packages stayed in testing for another 
two weeks - so they had 3 weeks to fix their stuff, thus it really can't 
be our fault.


Given the popularity of kdemod, it is sad that they can't seem to keep 
up with Arch's development.


They're generally pretty good about keeping up to date.  I think the 
package maintainer is just currently buried in some work/school insanity 
right now.


DR


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread David Rosenstrauch

David C. Rankin wrote:

Listmates,

Up until this past week kdemod3 and kde4-unstable had lived
side-by-side quite harmoniously. However, now kcontol in kdemod3 will
not run until the following link is created:

ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62


Don't do that.  Fix it by installing libjpe6 from AUR.

DR


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread Jan de Groot
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
> 
> After the link is made, kcontol will start, but any attempt to
> access the panel or taskbar settings (among others) results in a
> complete kcontrol crash. The backtraces are generally the same:

Why do you think the soname was bumped? Just to give us maintainers some
extra work, or would there be some other reason?

Never symlink libraries like that, unless you are 100% sure that the
soname bump was a mistake. In case it's an unused linked library, the
symlink will work, but in case it's a library that is in use, like
libjpeg, you will face problems.
It's better to temporary extract the old lib on your system until the
affected packages get updated, though that's also not a warranty for a
working binary, as two different versions of a library linked into one
program could conflict.



Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread José M . Prieto
2009/7/28 David C. Rankin :
>
>        Up until this past week kdemod3 and kde4-unstable had lived 
> side-by-side quite harmoniously. However, now kcontol in kdemod3 will not run 
> until the following link is created:
>
> ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62

I also use kdemod-legacy on one computer. As the symlink doesn't work
I simply untarred ibjpeg.so.62 from the old libjpeg pakage.


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread Thomas Bächler

Eric Bélanger schrieb:

report that to Chakra. Looks like kdemod3 needs to be rebuilt against libjpeg 7.



Reports about libjpeg+kdemod breakage have been coming in for a while. 
The SONAME bump was announced on arch-dev-public, then packages went to 
testing a week later, then the packages stayed in testing for another 
two weeks - so they had 3 weeks to fix their stuff, thus it really can't 
be our fault.


Given the popularity of kdemod, it is sad that they can't seem to keep 
up with Arch's development.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 02:48:14 pm Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:44 PM, David C.
> Rankin wrote:

> >Do I need to create another link or a different link to solve this 
> > problem. Also, where should this bug report go? Chakra or Arch?
> >
> 
> report that to Chakra. Looks like kdemod3 needs to be rebuilt against libjpeg 
> 7.
> 


I added to the existing one:

http://chakra-project.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=38

for anyone else interested.


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com


Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:44 PM, David C.
Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
>        Up until this past week kdemod3 and kde4-unstable had lived 
> side-by-side quite harmoniously. However, now kcontol in kdemod3 will not run 
> until the following link is created:
>
> ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
>
>        After the link is made, kcontol will start, but any attempt to access 
> the panel or taskbar settings (among others) results in a complete kcontrol 
> crash. The backtraces are generally the same:
>
> [KCrash handler]
> #5  0x in ?? ()
> #6  0x7f3a2e4f29b5 in jpeg_CreateDecompress () from /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
> #7  0x7f3a2d92de78 in ?? () from /opt/qt/plugins/imageformats/libqjpeg.so
> #8  0x7f3a337d32f9 in QImageIO::read () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #9  0x7f3a337d3696 in QImage::load () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #10 0x7f3a2a9e1b3d in KBackgroundRenderer::doWallpaper ()
>   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
> #11 0x7f3a2a9e270a in KBackgroundRenderer::render ()
>   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
> #12 0x7f3a2a9e2a28 in KBackgroundRenderer::qt_invoke ()
>   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
> #13 0x7f3a337fd3cf in QObject::activate_signal ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #14 0x7f3a337ff726 in QObject::activate_signal ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #15 0x7f3a3381d8a5 in QTimer::event () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #16 0x7f3a3379fc75 in QApplication::internalNotify ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #17 0x7f3a337a0dca in QApplication::notify ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #18 0x7f3a34f91ee2 in KApplication::notify ()
>   from /opt/kde/lib/libkdecore.so.4
> #19 0x7f3a33796353 in QEventLoop::activateTimers ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #20 0x7f3a337517b8 in QEventLoop::processEvents ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #21 0x7f3a337b6609 in QEventLoop::enterLoop ()
>   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #22 0x7f3a337b64c2 in QEventLoop::exec () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
> #23 0x7f3a2f0555fa in kdemain () from /opt/kde/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so
> #24 0x004076e8 in ?? ()
> #25 0x00407e85 in ?? ()
> #26 0x00408562 in ?? ()
> #27 0x00408ea4 in ?? ()
> #28 0x7f3a313d69ed in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #29 0x00404549 in ?? ()
> #30 0x7fff9c658818 in ?? ()
> #31 0x001c in ?? ()
> #32 0x0005 in ?? ()
> #33 0x7fff9c659ad5 in ?? ()
> #34 0x in ?? ()
>
>
>        Do I need to create another link or a different link to solve this 
> problem. Also, where should this bug report go? Chakra or Arch?
>

report that to Chakra. Looks like kdemod3 needs to be rebuilt against libjpeg 7.


[arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-28 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates,

Up until this past week kdemod3 and kde4-unstable had lived 
side-by-side quite harmoniously. However, now kcontol in kdemod3 will not run 
until the following link is created:

ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62

After the link is made, kcontol will start, but any attempt to access 
the panel or taskbar settings (among others) results in a complete kcontrol 
crash. The backtraces are generally the same:

[KCrash handler]
#5  0x in ?? ()
#6  0x7f3a2e4f29b5 in jpeg_CreateDecompress () from /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
#7  0x7f3a2d92de78 in ?? () from /opt/qt/plugins/imageformats/libqjpeg.so
#8  0x7f3a337d32f9 in QImageIO::read () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#9  0x7f3a337d3696 in QImage::load () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#10 0x7f3a2a9e1b3d in KBackgroundRenderer::doWallpaper ()
   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
#11 0x7f3a2a9e270a in KBackgroundRenderer::render ()
   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
#12 0x7f3a2a9e2a28 in KBackgroundRenderer::qt_invoke ()
   from /opt/kde/lib/kde3/kcm_kicker.so
#13 0x7f3a337fd3cf in QObject::activate_signal ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#14 0x7f3a337ff726 in QObject::activate_signal ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#15 0x7f3a3381d8a5 in QTimer::event () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#16 0x7f3a3379fc75 in QApplication::internalNotify ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#17 0x7f3a337a0dca in QApplication::notify ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#18 0x7f3a34f91ee2 in KApplication::notify ()
   from /opt/kde/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#19 0x7f3a33796353 in QEventLoop::activateTimers ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#20 0x7f3a337517b8 in QEventLoop::processEvents ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#21 0x7f3a337b6609 in QEventLoop::enterLoop ()
   from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#22 0x7f3a337b64c2 in QEventLoop::exec () from /opt/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#23 0x7f3a2f0555fa in kdemain () from /opt/kde/lib/libkdeinit_kcontrol.so
#24 0x004076e8 in ?? ()
#25 0x00407e85 in ?? ()
#26 0x00408562 in ?? ()
#27 0x00408ea4 in ?? ()
#28 0x7f3a313d69ed in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#29 0x00404549 in ?? ()
#30 0x7fff9c658818 in ?? ()
#31 0x001c in ?? ()
#32 0x0005 in ?? ()
#33 0x7fff9c659ad5 in ?? ()
#34 0x in ?? ()


Do I need to create another link or a different link to solve this 
problem. Also, where should this bug report go? Chakra or Arch?

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com