Re: [arch-general] Libarchive 3.2

[Federico Di Pierro]

That was my first thought too...
But as far as i can tell this release should not break anything, as
changelog does not mention that (
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/libarchive-announce/qdeGf_DRvN4)

Well, i guess we only have to wait :)

Federico
Il 24 mag 2016 03:36, "Patrick Burroughs (Celti)"  ha
scritto:

> On Tue, 24 May 2016 00:42:32 +0200
> Federico Di Pierro  wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I see that libarchive is still at 3.1.2 which is 3 years old, while
> > latest version is now 3.2, released circa a month ago.
> > I already saw it is tagged as out of date, but still it has not been
> > updated.
> >
> > So...is there any issue blocking its update? Or is just packager away
> > for some time? :)
> >
> > Thanks everyone!
> > Federico
>
> AFAIK the maintainer is active (he's pushed packages as recently as the
> 14th) — but pacman depends on libarchive for most of what it does, thus
> I imagine everyone is being extra-careful about making sure it works
> before a new version hits [core].
>
> ~Celti
>

Re: [arch-general] Libarchive 3.2

[Patrick Burroughs (Celti)]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 00:42:32 +0200
Federico Di Pierro  wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I see that libarchive is still at 3.1.2 which is 3 years old, while
> latest version is now 3.2, released circa a month ago.
> I already saw it is tagged as out of date, but still it has not been
> updated.
> 
> So...is there any issue blocking its update? Or is just packager away
> for some time? :)
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> Federico

AFAIK the maintainer is active (he's pushed packages as recently as the
14th) — but pacman depends on libarchive for most of what it does, thus
I imagine everyone is being extra-careful about making sure it works
before a new version hits [core].

~Celti


pgpquqO54_lGk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature