Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-26 Thread Alexander Duscheleit
On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:19:28 -0400
Gregory Eric Sanderson gzou2...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have a lenovo thinkpad T500 with optional intel 5100 AGN wireless
 card and HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-U20N dvd recorder, and overall i'm quite
 satisfied. But I did get a few quirks :
 
 - Graphics card is a switchable intel/ATI gpu, and I had to force the
 BIOS to only use either ATI or Intel. 

For what it's worth, GPU switching is currently being worked on. I'm
not sure if it's in .34, but .35 seems to look good for it.
You will still need to restart X, but rummaging around in the BIOS
might soon be a thing of the past.


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-25 Thread Brendan Long
On 05/22/2010 09:33 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
 [snip]
 What laptops should I have a look at?
 Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?

 /M

I have an HP dv6 that works perfectly in Arch. After my first laptop, I
realized (like some other people suggested) that you should go with
Intel parts if possible, so my current laptop is pretty much 100% Intel
(lspci is a big list of intel, with one broadcom at the bottom).

My previous laptop had an nvidia graphics card, which worked perfectly
but ran much hotter and has some minor things that annoy me (no KMS,
driver doesn't get built with the kernel). Nvidia is a good choice if
you plan to run games, but an Intel card can run compiz fine and might
be easier to work with.

The advantage of the Intel processor (Core2 Duo) is that it uses less
power, runs cooler and works better with laptop-mode-tools (look it up
in extra).

I have a broadcom wireless card (Broadcom BCM4322), which is annoying
during the initial install, but has worked perfectly since then
(including 802.n support).

Sound works perfectly with no work (intel's hda driver has worked fine
in ALSA for a couple years -- be careful of this if you use a slower
updating distro like Fedora/Debian).

Bluetooth worked out of the box (on Arch, out of the box means after
installing bluez), no idea what kind it is (not listed by lscpi or
lsusb). Might be part of the broadcom stuff.

Mine also came with a webcam, and it seems to work fine. I don't
remember doing anything special to set it up, but don't quote me on that.

The one I bought isn't available anymore, but here's the specs if you
want it: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834147934

-Brendan Long

PS: I haven't tried the card reader or lightscribe support.


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-25 Thread Gregory Eric Sanderson
I have a lenovo thinkpad T500 with optional intel 5100 AGN wireless card and
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-U20N dvd recorder, and overall i'm quite satisfied. But
I did get a few quirks :

- Graphics card is a switchable intel/ATI gpu, and I had to force the BIOS
to only use either ATI or Intel. The open-source drivers don't support the
ATI model yet, so I had to go with catalyst which has caused pains each time
that I want to upgrade xorg. I haven't tried out the intel card under linux,
but from what I read its well supported.
-ACPI volume buttons don't work out-of-the-box, had to configure a key event
listener and use amixer
-Sound when playing a DVD is awfully quiet compared with winDVD, even with
the volume at max

Otherwise the rest (webcam, wireless, suspend, SD card reader, etc) works
fine





-

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:30 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.netwrote:

 On 05/22/2010 11:33 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:

 What laptops should I have a look at?
 Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than
 others?


 My work laptop, a Dell Precision M4400, runs Arch fine.  Had to install a
 few extra kernel modules (e.g., broadcom-wl), but everything else got picked
 up automagically.

 HTH,

 DR




-- 
All musicians are drug addicts, no question about it. The ecstasy we get
during a concert is proof enough.
yet there is a slight difference between us, the musicians, and the typical
'street-junkie'...
Instead of consuming powder, we consume vibrations

Will
et/ou
Gregory Eric Sanderson Turcot Temlett MacDonnell Forbes
et/ou
Touffa!  :)


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-25 Thread PT M.
I have an Acer 4736ZG runs arch fine, nvidia graphic.

test the machine with a ubuntu cd is a good idea.

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Gregory Eric Sanderson gzou2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I have a lenovo thinkpad T500 with optional intel 5100 AGN wireless card
 and
 HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-U20N dvd recorder, and overall i'm quite satisfied. But
 I did get a few quirks :

 - Graphics card is a switchable intel/ATI gpu, and I had to force the BIOS
 to only use either ATI or Intel. The open-source drivers don't support the
 ATI model yet, so I had to go with catalyst which has caused pains each
 time
 that I want to upgrade xorg. I haven't tried out the intel card under
 linux,
 but from what I read its well supported.
 -ACPI volume buttons don't work out-of-the-box, had to configure a key
 event
 listener and use amixer
 -Sound when playing a DVD is awfully quiet compared with winDVD, even with
 the volume at max

 Otherwise the rest (webcam, wireless, suspend, SD card reader, etc) works
 fine





 -

 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:30 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net
 wrote:

  On 05/22/2010 11:33 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
 
  What laptops should I have a look at?
  Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than
  others?
 
 
  My work laptop, a Dell Precision M4400, runs Arch fine.  Had to install a
  few extra kernel modules (e.g., broadcom-wl), but everything else got
 picked
  up automagically.
 
  HTH,
 
  DR
 



 --
 All musicians are drug addicts, no question about it. The ecstasy we get
 during a concert is proof enough.
 yet there is a slight difference between us, the musicians, and the typical
 'street-junkie'...
 Instead of consuming powder, we consume vibrations

 Will
 et/ou
 Gregory Eric Sanderson Turcot Temlett MacDonnell Forbes
 et/ou
 Touffa!  :)




-- 
Arch Linuxer, Pythoner, Geek
-- Blog: http://apt-blog.net


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-24 Thread David Rosenstrauch

On 05/22/2010 11:33 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:

What laptops should I have a look at?
Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?


My work laptop, a Dell Precision M4400, runs Arch fine.  Had to install 
a few extra kernel modules (e.g., broadcom-wl), but everything else got 
picked up automagically.


HTH,

DR


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-23 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 22 Mai 2010 schrieb Guilherme M. Nogueira:
 I have a Lenovo Y450 which runs arch x86_64 fine, except for a small
 problem with the lcd brightness control.
 Card reader, webcam, suspend and hdmi audio/video are ok.
As subnotebook, i can recommend the acer 1810t, everything works fine,
limitation is displaysize and missind dvd drive but the rest works all fine.

greetings
tpowa

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer  Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread Magnus Therning
It's that time for me again... my desktop is getting long in the tooth so I'm
starting to look around for a replacement.  This time I thought I'd also
include laptops in my search.  However, with laptops it's difficult to find
out just how well they work with Linux.  Are all the built-in devices,
webcams, fingerprint scanners etc, fully supported?  Is the power management
(ACPI) fully supported?  Etc, etc...

In the past I've heard good things about Linux on IBM's ThinkPads.  But I've
heard some VERY bad things about getting Linux working well on Lenovo's recent
models.

So, I resort to ask for advice on this mailing list.

What laptops should I have a look at?
Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org  Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread Evgeny Burmentyev
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 04:33:36PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
 It's that time for me again... my desktop is getting long in the tooth so I'm
 starting to look around for a replacement.  This time I thought I'd also
 include laptops in my search.  However, with laptops it's difficult to find
 out just how well they work with Linux.  Are all the built-in devices,
 webcams, fingerprint scanners etc, fully supported?  Is the power management
 (ACPI) fully supported?  Etc, etc...
 
 In the past I've heard good things about Linux on IBM's ThinkPads.  But I've
 heard some VERY bad things about getting Linux working well on Lenovo's recent
 models.
 
 So, I resort to ask for advice on this mailing list.
 
 What laptops should I have a look at?
 Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?
 
 /M
 
 -- 
 Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
 magnus@therning.org  Jabber: magnus@therning.org
 http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
 


I'd consider any Lenovo Thinkpad, except for SL series. There is a very
friendly article about their drivers -
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Drivers . The only thing, that SL series
has, and the other ones don't, is HDMI interface. So, if it's essential
for you, then Thinkpads won't suffice.


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread Lukas Grässlin
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 04:33:36PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
 It's that time for me again... my desktop is getting long in the tooth so I'm
 starting to look around for a replacement.  This time I thought I'd also
 include laptops in my search.  However, with laptops it's difficult to find
 out just how well they work with Linux.  Are all the built-in devices,
 webcams, fingerprint scanners etc, fully supported?  Is the power management
 (ACPI) fully supported?  Etc, etc...
 
 In the past I've heard good things about Linux on IBM's ThinkPads.  But I've
 heard some VERY bad things about getting Linux working well on Lenovo's recent
 models.
 
 So, I resort to ask for advice on this mailing list.
 
 What laptops should I have a look at?
 Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?
 
 /M
 
 -- 
 Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
 magnus@therning.org  Jabber: magnus@therning.org
 http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
 

I'm using a Lenoxo Thinkpad x200 and except for the fingerprint reader
_everything_ works completely fine.

-- 
Lukas Grässlin
GnuPG-Key: http://lg.ath.cx/lukasgraess...@gmx.de.asc


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread Gaurish Sharma
Hmm...Get something which has Intel Wireless + Intel/Nvidia Graphics
and Intel Chipset. These days almost all hardware is supported out of
the box. it depends on your budget.

While buying, take a Ubuntu Live CD with you and boot the laptop to
check comparability. you can also cross-check support by running lspci
and pasting output in Debian[1]. few more resources for your help.
Ubuntu Laptop testing[2] Dell with Ubuntu factory installed[3]

[1]http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/
[2]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Laptop/Reports
[3]http://is.gd/ckHzH

Hope it helps.
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
www.gaurishsharma.com



2010/5/22 Lukas Grässlin lukasgraess...@gmx.de:
 On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 04:33:36PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
 It's that time for me again... my desktop is getting long in the tooth so I'm
 starting to look around for a replacement.  This time I thought I'd also
 include laptops in my search.  However, with laptops it's difficult to find
 out just how well they work with Linux.  Are all the built-in devices,
 webcams, fingerprint scanners etc, fully supported?  Is the power management
 (ACPI) fully supported?  Etc, etc...

 In the past I've heard good things about Linux on IBM's ThinkPads.  But I've
 heard some VERY bad things about getting Linux working well on Lenovo's 
 recent
 models.

 So, I resort to ask for advice on this mailing list.

 What laptops should I have a look at?
 Is there some brand (Dell, HP, ...) that is more Linux friendly than others?

 /M

 --
 Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
 magnus@therning.org          Jabber: magnus@therning.org
 http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe


 I'm using a Lenoxo Thinkpad x200 and except for the fingerprint reader
 _everything_ works completely fine.

 --
 Lukas Grässlin
 GnuPG-Key: http://lg.ath.cx/lukasgraess...@gmx.de.asc



Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On May 22, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Lukas Grässlin lukasgraess...@gmx.de
wrote:
 I'm using a Lenoxo Thinkpad x200 and except for the fingerprint reader
 _everything_ works completely fine.

Is it a Thompson reader?  While I don't have it set up ATM, in the
past I've used thinkfinger to successfully login thru [xkg]dm, on
the terminal (sudo/su), and screensavers with my fingerprint... Pretty
neat.

C Anthony


Re: [arch-general] Off-topic: Good laptop to run Arch on?

2010-05-22 Thread Guilherme M. Nogueira
I have a Lenovo Y450 which runs arch x86_64 fine, except for a small problem
with the lcd brightness control.
Card reader, webcam, suspend and hdmi audio/video are ok.


-- 
Guilherme M. Nogueira
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke