Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Martín Cigorraga
You can also try Bleachbit from AUR, a complete cleaner for your system.

2010/12/29, Nicolás Reynolds :
> El 29/12/10 08:23, Thomas Bahn dijo:
>> Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds:
>> > Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space
>> > /usr/share/locale
>> > was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en
>> > and
>> > es locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the
>> > second.
>> >
>> > Would it make sense to remove the extra ones? I mean, I don't think
>> > anyone
>> > will switch back and forth that many languages (220 on my system), but
>> > it
>> > would be just stupid to make extra i18n packages for everything... so,
>> > should pacman remove the unneeded languages on package installation?
>>
>> Hi Nicolás,
>>
>> you find localepurge in the AUR. It removes unneccessary locales from your
>>
>> system everytime you execute it. configuration is done in a config-file,
>> so you
>> easy can call localepurge without any options.
>>
>> Sure, purge the locales not automagically done by pacman, but it does its
>> job
>> as you requested. Mybe its suitable for you.
>
> :o thanks!
>
> --
> Salud!
> Nicolás Reynolds,
> xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar
> omb:http://identi.ca/fauno
> blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/
> gnu/linux user #455044
>
> http://parabolagnulinux.org
> http://endefensadelsl.org
>

-- 
Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil


Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Nicolás Reynolds
El 29/12/10 08:23, Thomas Bahn dijo:
> Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds:
> > Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale
> > was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and
> > es locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the
> > second.
> > 
> > Would it make sense to remove the extra ones? I mean, I don't think anyone
> > will switch back and forth that many languages (220 on my system), but it
> > would be just stupid to make extra i18n packages for everything... so,
> > should pacman remove the unneeded languages on package installation?
> 
> Hi Nicolás,
> 
> you find localepurge in the AUR. It removes unneccessary locales from your 
> system everytime you execute it. configuration is done in a config-file, so 
> you  
> easy can call localepurge without any options.
> 
> Sure, purge the locales not automagically done by pacman, but it does its job 
> as you requested. Mybe its suitable for you.

:o thanks!

-- 
Salud!
Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar
omb:http://identi.ca/fauno
blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/
gnu/linux user #455044

http://parabolagnulinux.org
http://endefensadelsl.org


pgpEP3NBVApDf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Thomas Bahn
Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds:
> Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale
> was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and
> es locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the
> second.
> 
> Would it make sense to remove the extra ones? I mean, I don't think anyone
> will switch back and forth that many languages (220 on my system), but it
> would be just stupid to make extra i18n packages for everything... so,
> should pacman remove the unneeded languages on package installation?

Hi Nicolás,

you find localepurge in the AUR. It removes unneccessary locales from your 
system everytime you execute it. configuration is done in a config-file, so you 
 
easy can call localepurge without any options.

Sure, purge the locales not automagically done by pacman, but it does its job 
as you requested. Mybe its suitable for you.


[arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Nicolás Reynolds
Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale was
using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and es
locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the second.

Would it make sense to remove the extra ones? I mean, I don't think anyone will
switch back and forth that many languages (220 on my system), but it would be
just stupid to make extra i18n packages for everything... so, should pacman
remove the unneeded languages on package installation?

-- 
Salud!
Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar
omb:http://identi.ca/fauno
blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/
gnu/linux user #455044

http://parabolagnulinux.org
http://endefensadelsl.org


pgpO8Pf0O6AV2.pgp
Description: PGP signature