Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:07:46 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general
>> wrote:  
>>> I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
>>> features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
>>> However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out
>>> preferable, since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on
>>> too many tabs.  
>>
>> The OP is a little bit lazy. I launched opera and have taken a look
>> for around 2 seconds at opera://settings/.
>>
>> opera://settings/ > Browser > Search
>>
>> Set which search engine is used when searching from the combined
>> search and address bar
>>  
>I'm not very sure, I tried this about a year ago ... I could replace
>the search engine in one place, I think, but not in the other (IIRC
>this has been for new tabs).

It depends on what you actually want. You could disable the "Search
box", but I don't know how to change it. As an example, you could add
e.g. StartPage with a keyword to the address bar search, you could as
well add the xquick (startpage) toolbar by an extension. But as
defaults you perhaps only could select between the given defaults,
Google, DuckDuckGo etc., but e.g. not StartPage. However, I only spend
1 minute with this, I'm not an expert, even not an user of nowadays
Opera.


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Peter Nabbefeld

Am 09.03.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote:

I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable,
since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on too many tabs.


The OP is a little bit lazy. I launched opera and have taken a look for
around 2 seconds at opera://settings/.

opera://settings/ > Browser > Search

Set which search engine is used when searching from the combined search
and address bar

I'm not very sure, I tried this about a year ago ... I could replace the 
search engine in one place, I think, but not in the other (IIRC this has 
been for new tabs).


Regards
P.


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:18:29 +0100, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote:
>I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
>features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
>However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable,
>since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on too many tabs.

The OP is a little bit lazy. I launched opera and have taken a look for
around 2 seconds at opera://settings/.

opera://settings/ > Browser > Search

Set which search engine is used when searching from the combined search
and address bar


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:19:48 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>> 
>> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while
>> Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".  
>
>Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would someone be happy
>with a blob.

The OP should consider to find a new browser, that fits most good to
his needs. There are a lot of browsers available and a lot are open
source.


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:23:06 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while 
>Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
>
>As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to 
>replace Google as a search engine in Opera - what about in Vivaldi?

I don't know, you need to find out yourself. Most likely it's possible
to replace search engines, but I've got a different workflow. I'm using
search engines by loading their websites.


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Guus Snijders via arch-general
2017-03-09 8:23 GMT+01:00 Peter Nabbefeld :

[...]


> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera
> is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".

That is how ArchLinux works:
The developers are volunteers who choose for themselves which packages
they maintain. Community is run by Trusted Users (also volunteers), Extra
is for "official" developers.
AUR is a sort-of public playground; anyone can publish PKGBUILDS there.

If $dev decides to adopt Vivaldi for example, it might show up in Extra.
If no dev decides to do this, then it won't show up in Extra either.


mvg,
Guus Snijders


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
I actually tried Vivaldi for a while. It's pretty cool for the
features it delivers out of the box, and it uses DDG by default.
However I found that Firefox' memory management turns out preferable,
since I had a few points where vivaldi would choke on too many tabs.

cheers!
mar77i


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 03/09/2017 02:23 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while 
> Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
> 
> As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to 
> replace Google as a search engine in Opera - what about in Vivaldi?

I really have no idea. Firefox makes me happy enough to not consider
considering any other browser.

-- 
Eli Schwartz



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-09 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> 
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera
> is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".

Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would someone be happy with a
blob.

-- 
Jelle van der Waa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

2017-03-08 Thread Peter Nabbefeld

Am 09.03.2017 um 04:49 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-general:

On 03/08/2017 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

Ok I understand, https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ is an insecure web
site, since the issue mentioned by the OP happens with this login.
However, for my taste it's not a problem to select the user name,
but this history problem is an issue for me, as well as the
safebrowsing that gets added, even if you removed it. Some of many
issues, that are reason for me to use other web browsers. Could you
explain what's actually insecure with
https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ ? It's a https page, not a http
page.


I cannot, in fact, explain what is insecure about
https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ but this is probably because it works
perfectly for me...

You are dreaming. Please wake up.


The history once upon a time worked as the history still works for
nearly any other browser. Fortunately there are other browsers we
could chose and a lot of people migrated to other browsers. It's not
an unrelated rant, since the OP dislikes two changes, I try to
explain that many users discontinued using Firefox. By the pulseaudio
thread I already mentioned other firefox based and firefox alike
projects. That web browser developers go different ways in general is
not only an issue for firefox, that's why there's vivaldi ;).


Yes, please let's answer the OP by telling him to find an alternative
browser. Thanks for clearing that up, I was *wondering* what your post
was getting at. :)


However, in regards to security firefox would be the last browser I
would use. Java script settings were removed


[...]


So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while 
Opera is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".


As far as I can see, Vivaldi is an Opera clone. I cannot see, how to 
replace Google as a search engine in Opera - what about in Vivaldi?


Kind regards
Peter