[arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacherhollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter Thunderbird 3 is also good. Thunderbird by default bottom posts (it can be changed though). -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Adminstrator www.itech7.com
Re: [arch-general] claws-mail vs sup (WAS: Quoting of E-mails)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:01:09 +0530 Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote: On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 Philipp Überbacherhollun...@lavabit.com wrote: The only drawback right now is that sup is still very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I switched. Regards, Philipp i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on sender address or open mailbox. any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? Dieter Thunderbird 3 is also good. Thunderbird by default bottom posts (it can be changed though). thunderbird doesn't offer any of the things I'm looking for (see above), is bloat and makes a mess in its user's $HOME. Dieter
