Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On 17:34 Thu 30 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:28 +0400, Fess wrote: > > On 13:07 Thu 30 Sep , 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Fess wrote: > > > > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > > > >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > > > >> > frustrating though. > > > >> > > > >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > > > > > > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > > > > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > I do realize the best part you can do is join the test process, and > > > stop crying for that. > > > > Crying? Where? I just say that few last kernel updates were not the best. > > That's all. Calm down. > > Was there any need to mention diarrhea? Definitely. --
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:28 +0400, Fess wrote: > On 13:07 Thu 30 Sep , 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Fess wrote: > > > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > > >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > > >> > frustrating though. > > >> > > >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > > > > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > > > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > > > -- > > > > > > > > I do realize the best part you can do is join the test process, and > > stop crying for that. > > Crying? Where? I just say that few last kernel updates were not the best. > That's all. Calm down. Was there any need to mention diarrhea?
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On 13:07 Thu 30 Sep , 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Fess wrote: > > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > >> > frustrating though. > >> > >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > > -- > > > > > I do realize the best part you can do is join the test process, and > stop crying for that. Crying? Where? I just say that few last kernel updates were not the best. That's all. Calm down. --
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Fess wrote: > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very >> > frustrating though. >> >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > -- > > I do realize the best part you can do is join the test process, and stop crying for that.
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 14:04 -0600, Gary Wright wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Fess wrote: > > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > >> > frustrating though. > >> > >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > > -- > > Surely you mean the _kernel_ developers, right? Whichever he meant, such comments are a bit out of line. The devs (Arch or kernel) don't exist to make your life easier.
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Fess wrote: > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very >> > frustrating though. >> >> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. > > Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. > Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. > -- > > Surely you mean the _kernel_ developers, right?
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > > frustrating though. > > Kernel updates always go through [testing] first. Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain. Maybe developers had diarea. Or something like that. --
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote: > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very > frustrating though. Kernel updates always go through [testing] first.
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very frustrating though.
Re: [arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
On 09/29/2010 12:31 AM, John Holbrook wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing the issue as discussed here on the forums: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105637 This mentions a bug report at: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20972 The fix mentioned is to run kernel26-headers -2. I am currently running "core/kernel26-headers 2.6.35.6-1 [installed]" I asked how to get -2 on IRC and was told to wait until my mirror updates. I tried a closer mirror and even manually looked at some of the mirrors and none of them appear to have 2.6.35.6-2. How can I upgrade to -2 without waiting for a mirror update? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what they mean by '-2'? Thanks. http://mirrors1.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/x86_64/kernel26-2.6.35.6-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz http://mirrors1.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/x86_64/kernel26-headers-2.6.35.6-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz -- Ionuț
[arch-general] kernel26-headers breaks VMWare and VirtualBox
Hi, I'm experiencing the issue as discussed here on the forums: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105637 This mentions a bug report at: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20972 The fix mentioned is to run kernel26-headers -2. I am currently running "core/kernel26-headers 2.6.35.6-1 [installed]" I asked how to get -2 on IRC and was told to wait until my mirror updates. I tried a closer mirror and even manually looked at some of the mirrors and none of them appear to have 2.6.35.6-2. How can I upgrade to -2 without waiting for a mirror update? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what they mean by '-2'? Thanks.
